The lithium-air (Li-O2) battery has the highest theoretical energy density (3500 Wh kg-1) of any rechargeable battery. Modelling has suggested more than 600 Wh kg-1 may be possible for the whole system, including air handling, making Li-O2 attractive for the electrification of aviation.(1) However, the development of the Li-O2 battery has faced many challenges since its inception, such as degradation and slow kinetics.(2) The discharge product at the cathode is Li2O2, which is electronically insulating and difficult to oxidise on re-charging.(3) To overcome the difficulties of direct electrochemical reactions involving an insulating solid, redox mediating molecules (RMs) were introduced such that the Li2O2 is formed and oxidised in the electrolyte solution in the pores of the cathode.(4) On charging the cell, the RM is oxidised at the surface of the cathode, and then diffuses to and oxidises Li2O2 within the cathode pores, releasing O2. It is desirable for the RM to operate at as low a voltage as possible, above the thermodynamic oxidation potential of Li2O2, to maximise energy efficiency during cycling.In our recent work, we have investigated the mechanism by which RMs oxidise Li2O2 particles.(5) The trend of oxidation rate with mediator potential follows Marcus theory with a maximum rate at +3.74 V. We show that following the initial outer-sphere one-electron oxidation of Li2O2, the dominant subsequent step is the disproportionation of LiO2 to 3O2, and not the one-electron oxidation of LiO2 to 1O2 or 3O2 (Fig. 1). We also show how RMs with different potentials affect the 1O2 yield and that this does not correlate well with degradation, casting doubt on whether 1O2 is the major source of degradation during charge. Our mechanism not only explains why the current generation of mediators cannot deliver high charging rates at sufficiently low potentials for good round-trip energy efficiency but also points the way to designing mediators that can deliver high rates at low charge voltages. W. J. Kwak, et al., Chem Rev, 2020, 120, 6626-6683. S. A. Freunberger, et al., Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2011, 50, 8609-8613. V. Viswanathan, et al., J Chem Phys, 2011, 135, 214704. Y. Chen, et al., Nat Chem, 2013, 5, 489-494. S. Ahn, et al., Nat Chem, 2023, 15, 1022-1029. Figure 1
Read full abstract