Chest Tube Removal Research Articles

The process and safety of removing chest tubes 4 to 12 hours after robotic pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy

ObjectiveChest tubes cause pain and morbidity. MethodsThis is a quality initiative study and review of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary resection by 1 surgeon (R.J.C.). The goal was to remove chest tubes within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Primary outcome was removal without the need for reinsertion, thoracentesis, or any morbidity due to early removal of the chest tube. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic pneumothorax, pleural effusion, chylothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and chest tube reinsertion or thoracentesis within 60 days of surgery. ResultsBetween January 2018 and December 2022, 590 patients underwent robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Chest tubes were removed within 4 to 12 hours postoperatively in 63.5% of patients (375/590). In 2022, this was achieved in 91% after lobectomy (119/128) and 94% after segmentectomy (75/80). There were significantly more chest tubes removed within 4 to 12 hours postoperatively from 2020 to 2022 than pre-2020 (P < .001). Forty patients (6.8%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 with a chest tube. Sixteen patients (2.7%) had post–chest tube removal increasing pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema; none required tube reinsertion. There was no 30-day or 90-day mortality. Twelve patients (2%) had an outpatient thoracentesis for effusion within 60 days. Twenty patients (3.3%) were readmitted, none seemingly related to effusions. Nonsmokers (P = .04) and segmentectomy (P = .001) were associated with chest tube removal within 4 to 12 hours of surgery. ConclusionsChest tubes can be safely removed within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Factors associated with successful early chest tube removal are nonsmoking, segmentectomy, and team members becoming comfortable with the process.

Association Between Chest Tube Removal, Risk of Pleural Effusion, and Opioid Usage

Purpose – There are no established guidelines regarding optimal timing of chest tube removal after cardiac surgery. This decision is often surgeon-specific, with commonly utilized criteria including drainage volume or time after surgery. We investigated the relationship between drainage volume, timing of chest tube removal, and risk of post-removal pleural effusion.&#x0D; Methods – Single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent non-emergent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy at our institution. Subjects were grouped by volume of chest tube output in the 24-hours (High [≥200 mL] vs. Low [&lt;200 mL]) and 12-hours (High [≥100 mL] vs Low [&lt;100 mL]) immediately prior to chest tube removal and by day of chest tube removal (Early [≤postoperative day 2] vs Late [&gt;postoperative day 2]). Primary and secondary outcomes analyzed were incidence of pleural effusion requiring intervention following chest tube removal and opioid analgesic usage after chest tube removal, respectively. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed.&#x0D; Results – A total of 351 patients were included. 15 patients developed post-removal pleural effusion. 24 and 12-hour chest tube output immediately preceding chest tube removal were not associated with post-removal pleural effusion formation (p=0.541 and p=0.326, respectively). Postoperative day of chest tube removal was also not associated with pleural effusion formation (p=0.461). Of the patients who developed post-removal pleural effusion, 67% (10/15) were female (p=0.010) and 47% (7/15) had a history of endocarditis (p=0.015). Early chest tube removal (on or before postoperative day 2) was associated with a significant decrease in opioid analgesic usage when compared to Late chest tube removal (113 morphine milligram equivalents vs 151 morphine milligram equivalents, p=0.007) in patients without a history of IV drug use.&#x0D; Conclusions - Chest tube output volume and removal day are not associated with an increased risk of post-removal pleural effusion. Chest tube removal is associated with a decrease in opioid use in some patients. Early removal of chest tubes following cardiac surgery might provide clinical benefit without associated increased risk of complications.

The value of chest radiography after chest tube removal in nonventilated trauma patients: A post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Chest tubes are commonly placed in trauma care to treat life-threatening intrathoracic injuries by evacuating blood or air from the pleural cavity. Currently, it is common practice to routinely obtain chest radiographs between 1 to 8 hours after chest tube removal, while the necessity of it has been questioned. This study describes the "ins-and-outs" of chest tubes and evaluates the value of routine postremoval chest radiography in nonventilated trauma patients. A post hoc analysis of a multicenter observational prospective cohort study was performed in blunt chest trauma patients admitted with multiple rib fractures to two level 1 trauma centers between January 2018 and March 2021 and treated with one or more chest tubes. Exclusion criteria were mechanical ventilation during chest tube removal, missing reports of postremoval chest radiography, transfer to another hospital, or mortality before chest tube removal. Descriptive analyses were performed to calculate the number of findings on postremoval chest radiographs and reinterventions. A total of 207 patients were included for analysis of whom 14 underwent bilateral chest tube placement, resulting in 221 chest tube removals investigated in this study. The mean ± SD age was 58 ± 17 years, 71% were male, 73% had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 1 or 2, and the median Injury Severity Score was 19 (interquartile range, 14-29). In 68 of 221 chest tube removals (31%), postremoval chest radiography showed increased or recurrent intrathoracic pathology (i.e., 13% pneumothorax, 18% pleural fluid, and 8% atelectasis). Only two (3%) of these patients underwent a same-day reintervention based on these findings, of whom one had signs or symptoms of recurrent pathology and one was asymptomatic. It seems safe to omit routine use of postremoval chest radiography in nonventilated blunt chest trauma patients and to selectively use imaging in those patients presenting with clinical signs or symptoms after chest tube removal. Diagnostic Tests/Criteria; Level IV.

TPVB and general anesthesia affects postoperative functional recovery in elderly patients with thoracoscopic pulmonary resections based on ERAS pathway.

Thoracic surgery is easy to cause various perioperative complications, especially in elderly patients, due to their physical weakness and physiological function degeneration. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a common complication in elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery. This study focuses on exploring the effects of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) combined with general anesthesia on postoperative functional recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. A total of 104 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer were randomized into the combination group (n = 52) and the control group (n = 52). Patients in the control group were given general anesthesia alone, while patients in the combination group were given TPVB combined with general anesthesia. All patients applied the ERAS model for the perioperative intervention. Hemodynamic indices (heart rate [HR] and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) before anesthesia (T0), 5 min after thoracoscopic trocar placement (T1), at extubation (T2), 30 min after extubation (T3), and 6 h after the surgery (T4), postoperative analgesia, preoperative and postoperative serum pain stress factors (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT], prostaglandin E2 [PGE2], cortisol [Cor], substance P [SP], and norepinephrine [NE]), tumor markers (CYFRA21-1, CEA, and CA50), inflammatory factors (IL-6, TNF-α, and c-reactive protein (CRP)), lung function indicators (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1]), 6 min walking distance (6MWD), clinical recovery indicators, hospitalization status, and postoperative complications in patients between both groups were compared. Compared with the control group, patients in the combination group had lower HR and MAP at T1-T4 time points, less intraoperative doses of remifentanil and propofol, less patient-controlled interscalene analgesia compression number 24 h after the surgery, lower visual analogue scale scores 24 h after the surgery, shorter hospitalization time, postoperative off-bed time, postoperative chest tube removal time, postoperative first feeding time and gastrointestinal function recovery time, reduced postoperative serum levels of 5-HT, PGE2, Cor, SP, NE, CYFRA21-1, CEA, CA50, IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP, decreased complications, and higher FVC, FEV1, and 6MWD. Based on the ERAS pathway, TPVB combined with general anesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer in elderly patients can effectively reduce the patients' hemodynamic fluctuations, alleviate postoperative pain, accelerate the recovery process, and reduce complications.

302. IMPACT OF ERAS BENCHMARK ACHIEVEMENTS AND HYBRID ROBOTIC ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY ON RECOVERY AND READMISSION IN AN ERAS CENTER OVER TIME

Abstract Background Early recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have provided an effective recovery approach for esophagectomy. Adherence to ERAS benchmarks leads to improvements in accelerated recovery over time. We evaluated differences in ERAS clinical benchmark achievements in patients undergoing hybrid robotic assisted esophagectomy (hRAMIE) and the impact on length of hospital stay (LOS). We also examined the overall performance of our ERAS program and impact of operative technique on recovery and readmissions over time. Methods A single-center prospective database of esophageal cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed between January 2020 and December 2022. All consecutive patients underwent hRAMIE within a standardized ERAS pathway. Impact of individual ERAS benchmark achievements on postoperative outcomes were evaluated according to LOS groups: accelerated (≤6 days, AR), targeted (7–8 days, TR), and delayed recovery (≥9 days, DR). Ability to achieve AR and readmission rates were compared with previous esophagectomy patient cohorts and institutional published data. Data were tested for normality with Shapiro–Wilk testing. Continuous variables were compared via ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis testing. Categorical variables were compared via Fisher testing. Results Sixty-four patients underwent hRAMIE with a median LOS 5.5 days. AR, TR, and DR was achieved by 75.0%, 18.8%, and 6.3% patients, respectively. AR outperformed the other groups in ICU stay (p = 0.0046), transition to PO medications (p &amp;lt; 0.0001), and chest tube removal (p = 0.0002). Complications (48.4%) were more frequent among the TR and DR groups (p = 0.0051). 30-day readmission rate of 9.4% did not differ among the recovery groups (AR 6.2%, TR 25.0%, DR 0%, p = 0.114). 90-day mortality was 4.7% and disproportionately impacted the DR group (p = 0.0203). AR increased overtime without impacting readmission rate compared to previous cohorts in our ERAS center (Figure 1). Conclusion Within a common ERAS pathway at a single center, adherence to recovery benchmarks in patients undergoing hRAMIE multiplies the impact of ERAS and evolving operative technique on accelerated recovery across time. Improvements in AR can be achieved without affecting readmission rates. Routine audit of achievements of ERAS benchmarks is necessary to maintain post-esophagectomy outcomes in a time of changing health care resources.

The effect of virtual reality glasses on reducing pain during chest tube removal

&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; The studies that generally investigate the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods in reducing chest tube removal related pain are remarkable. However, new studies need to expand the use of virtual reality glasses and evaluate its effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Aim&lt;/b&gt;: This study aims to determine the effect of distraction with virtual reality glasses on pain during chest tube removal in patients undergoing tube thoracostomy.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; This quasi-experimental study with a pre-test post-test control group design was performed with the participation of 40 patients. The patients in the intervention group (n=20) watched the video with virtual reality glasses throughout procedure. Pain measurements were evaluated before, during, and after chest tube removal. The patients in the control group (n=20) received standard care.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; In the intervention group, it was revealed that the pre-procedure pain score decreased compared to the pain score obtained during the procedure (p=0.002). After the chest tube removal procedure, a statistically significant decrease was observed in pain score in favor of the intervention group. In the intervention group, the pre-procedure pain score was found to decrease statistically significantly in the measurement at the 10th min of the procedure (p=0.000). The pain score of the intervention group 10 min after the chest tube removal procedure was lower than that of the control group (1.80 vs 2.95 and p=0.028).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; The virtual reality glasses assisted chest tube removal procedure can help reduce pain. Surgical nurses should benefit from the use of virtual reality glasses for pain control.

Endobronchial Valves for Management of Persistent Air Leaks in Patients With Chronic Lung Disease

BackgroundPersistent air leak (PAL) is a challenging problem in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax and chronic lung disease who are poor surgical candidates. Conventional management consists of long-term thoracostomy tube placement; however, in some cases, patients are unable to leave the hospital because of the need for continuous negative pressure. We investigated the application of endobronchial valves (EBVs) in the management of patients with air leak for whom surgical intervention was contraindicated. MethodsEBVs were placed in patients with PALs arising from nonoperative causes. Successful outcomes were defined as the ability to remove the thoracostomy tube from suction, resolution of air leak, and removal of chest tube. ResultsSeventeen patients with PAL requiring negative pressure suction were treated with EBVs. The overall complete successful outcome rate was 82.4%. There was a statistically significant reduction in length of stay after valve placement in the success group compared with the failure group (8.9 days vs 61.7 days; P = .0097). ConclusionsEBVs are a valid option for patients who are not surgical candidates and have failed to respond to conventional management of PAL. This experimental use of EBVs leads to high success rates and shorter length of stay when it is successful.

Safety and feasibility of preferential manual bronchoplasty in 2-3 cm single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

This retrospective study aimed to compare preferential manual bronchoplasty (PMB) and mechanical stapler closure (MSC) of the bronchial stump after 2-3 cm single-port (SP) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) stage lung cancer. Between January 2019 and March 2022, patients with pulmonary neoplasms who underwent 2-3 cm SP VATS lobectomy were retrospectively screened. After propensity-matched analysis, we compared perioperative outcomes and analyzed the safety and feasibility of PMB and MSC of the bronchial stump while performing VATS lobectomy. In this study, 280 and 832 patients were enrolled in the PMB and MSC groups, respectively. Propensity score matching produced 280 pairs. The operation time was shorter in the PMB group, whereas the average number of lymph nodes dissected was higher in the PMB group. The conversion rate was significantly lower in the PMB group. The following were similar between the PMB and MSC groups, respectively: average blood loss volume, postoperative hospital stay, and chest tube removal time. Postoperatively, the incidence of atelectasis was significantly higher in the MSC group. As per subgroup analyses, PMB was associated with a shorter operation time in left and right upper lobectomies. Particularly in left upper lobectomy, PMB had more lymph node dissections and less conversion to open and postoperative atelectasis. In comparison with MSC of the bronchial stump, PMB showed better safety and feasibility in 2-3 cm SP VATS left and right superior lobectomies in patients with pT1 stage lung cancer.

Çocuklarda Plevral Ampiyemde Video Yardımlı Torakoskopik Dekortikasyonun Sonuçları

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine efficacy, safety, and feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in childhood empyema with two port technique. Materials and Methods: 34 patients under 17 years of age were included to the study. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Results: 34 patients under 17 years of age were included in the study. The first time the complaints started was 12 days. VATS was performed on mean 12 (2-46) days after the complaints of the patients started. The empyemas were in right hemithorax in 21 children and left in 11. Two patients underwent bilateral decortication Mean of chest tube removal time was 9.70 (2-26) days. While the postoperative stay was 23.50 (4-120) days, the total hospital stay was 32.50 (7-142) days. Emphysema developed in 7 patients in the following period. Chest tube revision was performed in a patient. Emphysema spontaneously regressed at follow-up in 6 patients. Two children had died due to 1- arrest and 2 – after liver transplant. Conclusion: VATS is a feasible method with good results pleural empyema in children. The results are satisfactory in the early or late period of disease.

The effect of cold application on pain during the chest tube removal: A meta-analysis.

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the effect of cold application on chest tube removal-related pain compared to conventional analgesic care. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted (PROSPERO, 2021: CRD42020179867). We searched studies in PubMed, Ovid-LWW, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, Science Direct, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Medline Complete, Cochrane Library and ULAKBIM databases and grey literature for this study. We included the articles published from January 2009 to December 2019. We limited the language to Turkish and English and the design to randomized-controlled trials. All studies were reviewed by two independent researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.3 software. Heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression. A total of 2,462 records were identified, of which 16 studies were included in a random model meta-analysis. The cold application was used in combination with a pharmacological agent in six studies and alone in 13 studies. All patients were older than 16 years and they had at least one chest tube. Cold application was found to be effective in relieving pain during chest tube removal (d=-1.265). The use of a non-pharmacological method such as cold application is helpful to reduce pain or reduce painkiller doses during chest tube removal. Its use is recommended, as it is effective, easy to use, and cost-effective without any side effects.

The determination of pleurodesis using sonography after surgical pleurectomy for pneumothorax: a pilot study.

The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility of monitoring the process of pleurodesis after surgical pleurectomy with thoracic ultrasound. Repetitive measurements with thoracic ultrasound after surgical pleurectomy could provide information on the extent and development speed of pleurodesis. We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study. Adult patients who required surgical pleurectomy after pneumothorax were eligible. Participants had daily thoracic ultrasound examination until discharge to determine lung sliding [present (0 point), questionable (1 point), or absent (2 points)], and pleural thickening [normal (0 point), questionable (1 point), or present (2 points)]. Thoracic ultrasound was performed in six regions, the sum of all scores was divided by the number of regions. Fourteen patients were enrolled. Thoracic ultrasound on day 1-4 was 0.25±0.26, 0.39±0.48, 0.84±0.49, 1.12±0.56 for mean lung sliding, and 1.0±0.56, 1.17±0.48, 1.44±0.44, 1.54±0.34 for mean pleural thickening. Lung sliding and pleural thickening increased significantly between day 1 and day 4 (P=0.002 and P=0.023, respectively). One (7%) and 3 (21%) patients reached the maximum achievable grade for lung sliding and pleural thickening, respectively. Thoracic ultrasound grades tended to be lower in three patients with recurrent pneumothorax, although this was not statistically significant. This study shows a significant increase in thoracic ultrasound grading for pleurodesis lung sliding and pleural thickening during the first postoperative days after surgical pleurectomy, probably attributable to progressing pleurodesis. Only a minority of patients reached complete pleurodesis before discharge despite complete surgical pleurodesis (SP). The results of this study may guide future research regarding optimal timing of chest tube removal.

Effect of Cryotherapy on Pain Associated with Chest Tube Removal after Thoracotomy

Context: Chest tube removal (CTR) is described as one of the worst feelings for critically ill patients after thoracotomy. Unrelieved pain causes undesired consequences that have adverse effects on patient quality of care. Analgesics usually manages CTR pain, but patients respond differently to drugs and might not provide complete relaxation. Cryotherapy is commonly applied as a non-pharmacological intervention for relieving CTR pain.&#x0D; Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of cryotherapy on pain associated with chest tube removal after thoracotomy.&#x0D; Methods: This study was conducted in the cardio-thoracic critical care units at Cardiovascular and Thoracic Academy, affiliated to Ain Sham University Hospital. A purposive sample of 140 patients undergoing thoracotomy was included in this study. They were divided into control and study group (70 patients in each group). Data were obtained using the Chamber-Price Modified Pain Rating Scale (CPPRS), Standardized Linear Scale for Pain Assessment, and Modified McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF).&#x0D; Results: The results reveal that 50%, 67.1% of the control and study group patients were in the age group 51-≥60 years. 62.9, 81.4% of the control and study group were males. Besides, there were highly statistically significant differences regarding peripheral pulse, apical pulse, and respiratory rate throughout CTR pain assessment times and a highly statistically significant difference regarding blood pressure immediately after CTR between the study and control groups. Also, statistically significant differences regarding physiological and behavioral parameters, pain intensity, and quality (sensory and affective descriptors) were found between the study and control groups immediately and 30 minutes after cryotherapy was applied after chest tube removal.&#x0D; Conclusion: Cryotherapy effectively improved hemodynamic, physiological, and behavioral parameters, relieving pain intensity and improving pain quality after chest tube removal for patients with thoracotomy. The current study recommends conducting periodic in-service educational programs for critical care nurses regarding the benefits, methods, contraindications, and side effects of cryotherapy for relieving pain associated with CTR after thoracotomy. Motivate nurses in critical care units to use cryotherapy as a non-pharmacological therapy for relieving pain associated with chest tube removal.

Thoracodorsal Artery Injury After Tube Thoracostomy: A Case Report

BackgroundTube thoracostomy is rarely associated with serious bleeding complications. Although intercostal artery injury is a well-known bleeding complication, other vascular injuries in the chest wall have only rarely been reported. Case ReportA 58-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis presented to the emergency department with dyspnea. He was diagnosed by chest computed tomography with spontaneous hemopneumothorax, for which he underwent tube thoracostomy. However, bleeding in the chest wall continued, which required chest tube removal and blood transfusion. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and angiography revealed contrast extravasation from the thoracodorsal artery, which confirmed a diagnosis of thoracodorsal artery injury. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This?Because the thoracodorsal artery gives branches to the serratus anterior muscles that are located in the “triangle of safety,” chest tube placement in this area is not always safe; it can still cause major bleeding complications from vessels such as the thoracodorsal artery. Hence, close monitoring for bleeding is needed after tube thoracostomy.

Severity of Pain and Anxiety before Chest Tube Removal among Cardiac Surgeries Patients

Severity of Pain and Anxiety before Chest Tube Removal among Cardiac Surgeries Patients

The effects of cold compress and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the pain associated with chest tube removal among patients with coronary bypass grafting

Background and aimChest tube removal (CTR) can cause severe acute pain which is usually described by patients as a painful experience. This study compared the effects of cold compress, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and combined cold compress-TENS on CTR-associated pain among patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2018–2019 using a double-blind four-group design. Participants were 120 patients with CABG selected from Shafa hospital, Kerman, Iran, and randomly allocated to a cold compress, a TENS, a combined cold compress-TENS, and a placebo group (compress with room temperature) and TENS with an off TENS device. Each participant received the intervention for 15 min immediately before CTR. CTR-associated pain was assessed before, during, immediately after, and 15 min after CTR. Data were analyzed using the SPSS program (v. 22.0) at a significance level of less than 0.05.ResultsThe data of 29 participants in the placebo group, 26 in the TENS group, 30 in the cold compress group, and 26 in the combined cold compress-TENS group was gathered. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and pain intensity scores of participants had no statistically significant differences among all four groups (P > 0.05). The mean score of pain intensity in all groups was at its highest level during CTR and gradually decreased afterwards, but this pain intensity reduction in the compress-TENS group was significantly greater than other groups (P < 0.001).ConclusionCombined cold compress-TENS is more effective than separate cold compress and TENS in reducing CTR-associated pain among patients with CABG. Therefore, non-pharmacological methods such as combined cold compress-TENS are recommended for managing CTR-associated pain.

Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy in management of post traumatic retained hemothorax: a randomized study

BackgroundRetained hemothorax is a serious problem that can lead to empyema or fibro-thorax. Evacuation of the retained hemothorax is commonly performed via open thoracotomy. This randomized study was conducted to represent our center's expertise with this issue, we compared the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) against open thoracotomy in managing post-traumatic retained clotted hemothorax.MethodsThis prospective randomized research was conducted on sixty cases with posttraumatic remaining clots of at least 500 ml or at least one-third of haemothorax that cannot be evacuated by a chest tube after 72 h of first intervention, as detected by computed tomography imaging who underwent open thoracotomy or VATS in the management of posttraumatic retained clotted hemothorax. Cases were allocated to equal groups; group A: cases who underwent VATS and group B: cases who underwent open thoracotomy.ResultsPreoperative intercostal chest tube (ICT) placement period was insignificantly different between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lesser post-operative amount of ICT drainage, and ICT was removed after significantly fewer days than in group B (P value < 0.001). Post-operatively, the numerical rating scale (NRS) was significantly higher at post-extubation and 6 h after extubation in group B than group A (P value < 0.05) and was insignificantly different between both groups the next morning, after chest tube removal and before discharge. group A had statistically better NRS versus group B (P value < 0.001). Wound infection incidence was significantly less in group A compared to group B (P value = 0.025); the incidence of air leak was insignificantly different between both groups. Group A has significantly shorter hospitalization than group B (P value < 0.001). Wound infection and empyema in outcases were insignificantly different between both groups (P value = 0.492). Cases in group A returned to normal activity earlier than group B (P value < 0.001).ConclusionsVATS in managing posttraumatic retained hemothorax was a more effective, well-tolerated, and reliable intervention that can be easily utilized for managing posttraumatic retained hemothorax in comparison to open thoracotomy.

Routine chest radiography after thoracostomy tube removal and during postoperative follow-up is not necessary after lung resection

ObjectivesThe need for routine chest radiography following chest tube removal after elective pulmonary resection may be unnecessary in most patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of eliminating routine chest radiography in these patients. MethodsPatients who underwent elective pulmonary resection, excluding pneumonectomy, for benign or malignant indications between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. Patients with in-hospital mortality or without routine follow-up were excluded. During this interval, our practice transitioned from ordering routine chest radiography after chest tube removal and at the first postoperative clinic visit to obtaining imaging based on symptomatology. The primary outcome was changes in management from results of chest radiography obtained routinely versus for symptoms. Characteristics and outcomes were compared using the Student t test and chi-square analyses. ResultsA total of 322 patients met inclusion criteria. Ninety-three patients underwent a routine same-day post-pull chest radiography, and 229 patients did not. Thirty-three patients (14.4%) in the nonroutine chest radiography cohort received imaging for symptoms, in whom 8 (24.2%) resulted in management changes. Only 3.2% of routine post-pull chest radiography resulted in management changes versus 3.5% of unplanned chest radiography with no adverse outcomes (P = .905). At outpatient postoperative follow-up, 146 patients received routine chest radiography; none resulted in a change in management. Of the 176 patients who did not have planned chest radiography at follow-up, 12 (6.8%) underwent chest radiography for symptoms. Two of these patients required readmission and chest tube reinsertion. ConclusionsReserving imaging for patients with symptoms after chest tube removal and follow-up after elective lung resections resulted in a higher percentage of meaningful changes in clinical management.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis.

The existing literature on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy is inconclusive. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of VATS and RATS lobectomy procedures for patients with non-small cell lung cancer to compare the short-term perioperative outcomes by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A total of 418 patients were enrolled in this study. After PSM, 71 patients each received VATS and RATS lobectomy for further analysis. RATS lobectomy was associated with a lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy (0% vs. 5.63%, p = 0.006), a lower rate of postoperative prolonged air leak (1.14% vs. 19.72%, p = 0.001) and a shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (3 days interquartile range [IQR: 3, 4] vs. 4 days IQR [3-5], p = 0.027). Subgroup analysis indicated that after acquiring proficiency in the RATS procedure, its disadvantages diminished while its advantages were enhanced. In terms of rate of conversion to thoracotomy, length of hospital stays, and duration of postoperative chest tube drainage, RATS was comparable to uniportal VATS and superior to triportal VATS. RATS has advantages over VATS in terms of early chest tube removal, early discharge, lower thoracotomy rate, less postoperative air leak, and a potential trend of more lymph node dissection numbers. These advantages are more pronounced after acquiring proficiency in RATS.

Randomized Trial of Modified Chest Tube Placement vs Routine Placement After Lung Resection

BackgroundChest tube placement after pulmonary resection is usually considered a mandatory procedure. However, peritubular leakage of pleural fluid and intrathoracic air is frequent after surgery. Therefore, we separated the chest tube from the intercostal space as a modified placement strategy. MethodsPatients undergoing robotic and video-assisted lung resection were enrolled in this study at our medical center between February 2021 and August 2021. All patients were randomly divided into either the modified group (n = 98) or the routine group (n = 101). The incidence of peritubular leakage of pleural fluid and peritubular air leaking or entering after surgery were the primary end points of the study. ResultsA total of 199 patients were randomized. Patients in the modified group had lower incidence of peritubular leakage of pleural fluid (after surgery, 39.6% vs 18.4% [P = .001]; after chest tube removal, 26.7% vs 11.2% [P = .005]), lower incidence of peritubular air leaking or entering (14.9% vs 5.1% [P = .022]), and fewer dressing changes (5.02 ± 2.30 vs 3.48 ± 0.94 [P < .001]). In patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, the type of chest tube placement was associated with the severity of peritubular pleural fluid leakage (P < .05). ConclusionsThe modified chest tube placement was safe and had better clinical efficacy than the routine type. The reduction of postoperative peritubular leakage of pleural fluid resulted in better wound recovery. This modified strategy should be popularized, especially in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy.

Early ambulation and postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer under thoracoscopic surgery—an observational study

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery guidelines in China recommend early ambulation within 24 h after surgery. The aims of this audit were to investigate the early ambulation of patients with lung cancer under thoracoscopic surgery, and to explore the influence of different ambulation time on postoperative rehabilitation of patients.MethodsUsing observational study method, observe and record of 226 cases under the thoracoscope surgery early ambulation of patients with lung cancer. Data collected included postoperative bowel movements, chest tube extubation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and the incidence of postoperative complications.ResultsThe time of first ambulation was (34.18 ± 17.18) h, the duration was (8.26 ± 4.62) min, and the distance was (54.94 ± 46.06) m. The time of first postoperative defecation, the time of chest tube extubation and the length of hospital stay were significantly shortened in patients who ambulate within 24 h, and the pain score on the third day after surgery was decreased, and the incidence of postoperative complications was reduced, with statistical significance (P < 0.05).ConclusionEarly ambulation within 24 h after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer patients can promote the recovery of intestinal function, early removal of chest tube, shorten the length of hospital stay, relieve pain, reduce the incidence of complications, and facilitate the rapid recovery of patients.