Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy in management of post traumatic retained hemothorax: a randomized study

Abstract

BackgroundRetained hemothorax is a serious problem that can lead to empyema or fibro-thorax. Evacuation of the retained hemothorax is commonly performed via open thoracotomy. This randomized study was conducted to represent our center's expertise with this issue, we compared the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) against open thoracotomy in managing post-traumatic retained clotted hemothorax.MethodsThis prospective randomized research was conducted on sixty cases with posttraumatic remaining clots of at least 500 ml or at least one-third of haemothorax that cannot be evacuated by a chest tube after 72 h of first intervention, as detected by computed tomography imaging who underwent open thoracotomy or VATS in the management of posttraumatic retained clotted hemothorax. Cases were allocated to equal groups; group A: cases who underwent VATS and group B: cases who underwent open thoracotomy.ResultsPreoperative intercostal chest tube (ICT) placement period was insignificantly different between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lesser post-operative amount of ICT drainage, and ICT was removed after significantly fewer days than in group B (P value < 0.001). Post-operatively, the numerical rating scale (NRS) was significantly higher at post-extubation and 6 h after extubation in group B than group A (P value < 0.05) and was insignificantly different between both groups the next morning, after chest tube removal and before discharge. group A had statistically better NRS versus group B (P value < 0.001). Wound infection incidence was significantly less in group A compared to group B (P value = 0.025); the incidence of air leak was insignificantly different between both groups. Group A has significantly shorter hospitalization than group B (P value < 0.001). Wound infection and empyema in outcases were insignificantly different between both groups (P value = 0.492). Cases in group A returned to normal activity earlier than group B (P value < 0.001).ConclusionsVATS in managing posttraumatic retained hemothorax was a more effective, well-tolerated, and reliable intervention that can be easily utilized for managing posttraumatic retained hemothorax in comparison to open thoracotomy.