Keywords: blood pressure, cardiac output, muscle pump, orthostatic hypotension, syncope, venous return.IntroductionStanding upright challenges the cardiovascularsystem as the pull of gravity displaces about 70%of the circulating blood volume to below heart level,much of it to the compliant veins of the dependentlimbs and the pelvic organs. In patients withautonomic failure due to neurodegenerative dis-eases, the normal cardiovascular adjustments tothis challenge are impaired, and symptomaticorthostatic hypotension becomes a common riskon standing or even sitting quietly. These patientslearn to sway and shift, so that the pumping actionof the muscles can be utilized to counter gravita-tional displacement of blood by squeezing venousblood from the legs upward. Augmentation ofvenous return in the upright posture can also beachieved by deliberate tensing of lower limb andabdominal muscles [1, 2], as depicted in Fig. 1.These clinical observations were the basis forphysical countermeasures, which are taught topatients with autonomic failure to combat symp-tomatic orthostatic hypotension [3–5]. Physicalcounterpressure manoeuvres specifically generatea counterpressure to oppose gravitational venouspooling (e.g. a single bout of lower-body musclecontraction to translocate blood centrally andsustained tensing of the same muscles to preventsubsequent peripheral pooling in the legs andabdomen). More recently, it has been shown thatphysical counterpressure manoeuvres are alsoeffective interventions in otherwise healthy sub-jects with episodic orthostatic syncope due toneurally mediated (i.e. vasovagal reactions) [6, 7]or postexercise syncope [8].In this narrative review, we will primarily considerthese physical counterpressure manoeuvres. Sec-ondarily, we will describe the broader category ofphysical countermeasures that include breathingmanoeuvres and other physical methods, tooppose orthostasis. Existing external devices,which operate through some of the same physio-logical principles as these manoeuvres, will only bediscussed for proof of principle.The defining characteristic of the manoeuvresdescribed in this review is the fact that they canbe employed by patients when a faint is imminent.This is in contrast to devices such as bandages andabdominal belts, which require ongoing use to beeffective. We will discuss both early studies inpatient with primary autonomic failure due toneurodegenerative diseases, as well as more recentexperience obtained in patients with neurally med-iated syncope. The physiology and pathophysiologyof orthostatic blood pressure control and perfusionof the brain are key factors in understanding howphysical countermeasures work. These topics havebeen reviewed extensively [2, 9–12] and will only bediscussed here briefly.Physical counterpressure manoeuvresMuscle tensingIt has been reported that intramuscular pressure isrelated to orthostatic tolerance [2]. Hendersonet al. demonstrated that intramuscular pressuremeasured in the relaxed biceps muscle wasdecreased after prolonged bed rest (38%), followingsurgery (35%), during voluntary hyperventilation(28%) and in the absence of air movement over theskin (31%) [13, 14]. These conditions are stronglyassociated with decreased orthostatic toleranceand a tendency to faint [2, 15]. In addition,intramuscular calf pressure has been shown tobe 15–24 and 6–9 mmHg, respectively, in thosewithout and with a tendency to faint during thehead-up tilt test using a tilt table with a saddle andsuspended legs (Fig. 1) [16].Although these interesting results from studiesperformed in the 1930s and early 1940s have