Relapsing Forms Of Multiple Sclerosis Research Articles

Ozanimod: A Review in Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.

Ozanimod (Zeposia®), an orally administered sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator (S1PRM) that is selective for the S1P1 and S1P5 receptor subtypes, is approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). In pivotal phase III clinical trials in patients with RMS, ozanimod significantly reduced annualised relapse rates and the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and was associated with reduced brain volume loss, compared with interferon (IFN)-β1a. However, there were no significant differences in 3- and 6-month disability progression between the groups. Ozanimod was generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse reactions including upper respiratory tract infection and hepatic transaminase elevation. Efficacy and tolerability were sustained over more than 6 years with continued treatment. S1PRM-related adverse events seen with ozanimod are generally manageable with screening and/or monitoring. Notably, ozanimod does not require first-dose cardiac monitoring in the USA. In conclusion, ozanimod is a valuable once-daily oral disease-modifying therapy that extends the available treatment options for patients with RMS.

Profiling the impact of anti-human CD20 monoclonal antibodies on lymphocyte B cell subsets and their precursors in the bone marrow and in lymphoid tissues in an immunocompromised mouse engrafted with human cells

Ofatumumab (OFA) and ocrelizumab (OCRE) are two anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis due to their ability to deplete B lymphocytes. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of these anti-hCD20 antibodies on B lymphocyte subsets in the circulation and in primary and secondary lymphoid organs in an immune system humanized mouse model (immunocompromised Rag2−/−Il2rg−/−CD47−/−) engrafted with human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Three months after humanization, mice, which present adaptive immune cells only of human origin, were treated with OFA (0.3 mg/Kg; day 1, 3 and 5), or OCRE (10 mg/kg; day 1) or saline. Seven days after the last injection a robust (>90 %) decrease of circulating human CD20+ B lymphocytes was observed in both OFA- and OCRE-treated mice. A partial replenishment of B lymphocytes was detectable in blood 36 days from the last injection in OFA-treated mice, while no B lymphocytes could be detected in OCRE-treated mice up to 65 days post injection. Bone marrow profiling showed that during hCD20+ B cell depletion and replenishment, OCRE-treated mice preserved only preB-I cells in the bone marrow, while the bone marrow of OFA-treated mice presented both preB-I as well as preB-II cells, with the latter subset being the one closest to differentiate into immature B cells. These data together with changes in B cell distribution in other tissues suggest that ofatumumab preserve BM niches, critical for B lymphocyte replenishment, limiting potential side effects of the treatment associated with the increased risk of infection.

Clinicians' Preferences for Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Clinical Management Considerations: A Choice Experiment.

Four sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are currently available in the USA for treating relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). These S1PR modulators have similar efficacy. Clinicians may therefore consider other factors, such as clinical management considerations, when distinguishing among treatments. This study estimated which S1PR modulator clinicians would choose on the basis of a treatment's clinical management and quantified how individual aspects of clinical management might drive this choice. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was conducted on the basis of clinical management preferences elicited in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and real-world clinical management profiles of the S1PR modulators currently available to treat relapsing forms of MS (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, siponimod). The DCE was completed by neurologists in the USA experienced in treating MS and included eight clinical management attributes: first-dose observations, genotyping, liver function tests, eye exams, drug-drug interactions, interactions with antidepressants, interactions with foods high in tyramine, and immune system recovery time. Attribute levels were selected on the basis of S1PR modulator product labels. In the MCDA, partial MCDA scores were created for each attribute and summed to produce an overall MCDA score for each S1PR modulator. The DCE was completed by 200 neurologists. The overall MCDA score was highest for ponesimod (4.78 points), followed by siponimod (4.10 points), fingolimod (3.61 points), and ozanimod (2.38 points). Having fewer drug-drug interactions contributed most to the overall scores (up to 1.56 points), followed by having no first-dose observations (0.95 points), the shortest immune system recovery time (0.94 points), and not interacting with foods high in tyramine (0.86 points). When considering clinical management convenience, the average US-based neurologist treating MS is likely to choose ponesimod over siponimod, fingolimod, or ozanimod. The strongest driver of preferences was the number of drug-drug interactions. This information can help inform recommendations for the treatment of MS and facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Impact of oral melatonin supplementation on urine and serum melatonin concentrations and quality-of-life measures in persons with relapsing multiple sclerosis

IntroductionMelatonin is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent that modulates the immune system by scavenging free radicals, reducing the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and reducing transendothelial cell migration. Therefore, melatonin may play a role in regulating multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity. However, little is known about how melatonin supplementation effects individuals with MS. ObjectiveDetermine if there was a dose-dependent elevation in urine and serum melatonin concentrations. Determine if melatonin supplementation had an impact on patient reported outcomes. MethodsThis was a randomized, dose-blinded exploratory study. Adults (age 18–65) with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) treated with a stable dose of oral disease modifying therapy for at least 6 months were randomized into melatonin 3 mg or 5 mg daily. Urinary and serum melatonin levels and modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS), multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29), and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), patient determined disease steps (PDDS) and performance scales (PS) were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Urinary and serum melatonin analyses was performed to estimate mean concentrations and their differences between treatment arms over time by a repeated measures linear mixed model. The model included treatment, assessment time, and treatment × time interaction. ResultsThirty patients, randomized 1:1, were analyzed in an intent to treat population. Twenty-three completed the study. The repeated measures linear mixed model analysis of all timepoints revealed higher melatonin concentrations in patients on 5 mg compared to 3 mg melatonin for both urinary 6-SMT (p = 0.03) and serum melatonin (p = 0.04). MFIS, MSIS-29, PSQI, and PDSS-PS scores did not significantly change from baseline to month 12. No significant differences in these measures were seen between the two doses. Five patients stopped melatonin (three on 5 mg and two on 3 mg) due to adverse events, including one patient who developed focal spongiotic dermatitis. One patient experienced three consecutive serious adverse events that were unrelated to melatonin supplementation. ConclusionsThe 5 mg melatonin supplementation group had higher concentrations of urinary 6-SMT and serum melatonin compared to the 3 mg group over 12 months of treatment. There was a correlation between 6-SMT and serum melatonin concentrations. This suggests that measuring serum melatonin is a reliable alternative to measuring urinary 6-SMT. However, no differences in clinical benefit between the two dosage groups were demonstrated in the patient reported outcomes. Trial Registration NumberNCT03498131

Making Information About Cladribine Tablets Accessible to People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Patient-Survey-Led Narrative Review for Healthcare Professionals.

Cladribine tablets have been granted marketing authorization in Europe and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, people with MS (PwMS) may be more familiar, and therefore more confident, with treatments requiring long-term and frequent dosing. Differences in such treatment strategies can lead to questions relating to how short-course non-continuous treatments, such as cladribine tablets, can work and how well they are tolerated. In response to this, we aimed to create an evidence-based report on patient-focused aspects of treatment with cladribine. To inform development, MS experts, including healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, proposed topics that PwMS and their families and caregivers would most like to discuss with HCPs during consultations to help them better understand cladribine treatment. The statements regarding each topic were then ranked by PwMS and used to inform the topics covered in this report. We explain here the use of cladribine tablets, which includes explanations of how cladribine tablets work, how to take cladribine tablets, and considerations required prior to and while taking cladribine tablets. We also describe how cladribine tablets affect relapse rate and quality of life and detail side effects, when they are likely to happen, and for how long. We also discuss how cladribine tablets affect family planning, fertility, and the use of vaccines. Alongside each section is a brief, plain language description of what is covered and an accompanying visual to aid conversations between HCPs and PwMS. Improved understanding by PwMS of treatments, such as cladribine, can empower them to play a bigger role in shared decision-making regarding their treatment. Additionally, the open dialogue we aim to promote with this type of report could lead to treatment choices being better tailored for individuals with chronic diseases on the basis of personal experiences, preferences, and circumstances.

Patients' Preferences for Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Clinical Management Considerations: A Choice Experiment.

Several sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are available in the US for treating relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). Given that these S1PR modulators have similar efficacy and safety, patients may consider the clinical management characteristics of the S1PR modulators when deciding among treatments. However, none of the S1PR modulators is clearly superior in every aspect of clinical management, and for some treatments, clinical management varies based on a patient's comorbid health conditions (e.g., heart conditions [HC]). This study aimed to determine which S1PR modulator patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) would prefer based on clinical management considerations, and to estimate how different clinical management considerations might drive these preferences. Preferences were explored separately for patients with and without comorbid HC. A multicriteria decision analysis was conducted on S1PR modulators approved to treat RMS: fingolimod, ozanimod, siponimod, and ponesimod. Clinical management preferences of patients with RRMS were elicited in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which participants repeatedly chose between hypothetical S1PR modulator profiles based on their clinical management attributes. Attributes included first-dose observations, genotyping, liver function tests, eye examinations, drug-drug interactions, interactions with antidepressants, interactions with foods high in tyramine, and immune system recovery time. Preferences were estimated separately for patients with HC and without HC (noHC). Marginal utilities were calculated from the DCE data for each attribute and level using a mixed logit model. In the multicriteria decision analysis, partial value scores were created by applying the marginal utilities for each attribute and level to the real-world profiles of S1PR modulators. Partial value scores were summed to determine an overall clinical management value score for each S1PR modulator. Four hundred patients with RRMS completed the DCE. Ponesimod had the highest overall value score for patients both without (n=341) and with (n=59) HC (noHC: 5.1; HC: 4.0), followed by siponimod (noHC: 4.9; HC: 3.3), fingolimod (noHC: 3.4; HC: 2.8), and ozanimod (noHC: 0.9; HC: 0.8). Overall, immune system recovery time contributed the highest partial value scores (noHC: up to 1.9 points; HC: up to 1.2 points), followed by the number of drug-drug interactions (noHC: up to 1.2 points; HC: up to 1.7 points). When considering the clinical management of S1PR modulators, the average patient with RRMS is expected to choose a treatment with shorter immune system recovery time and fewer interactions with other drugs. Patients both with and without heart conditions are likely to prefer the clinical management profile of ponesimod over those of siponimod, fingolimod, and ozanimod. This information can help inform recommendations for treating RRMS and facilitate shared decision making between patients and their doctors.

Temporal Relationship Between Serum Neurofilament Light Chain and Radiologic Disease Activity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels correlate with multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity, but the dynamics of this correlation are unknown. We evaluated the relationship between sNfL levels and radiologic MS disease activity through monthly assessments during the 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption period in RESTORE (NCT01071083). In the RESTORE trial, participants with relapsing forms of MS who had received natalizumab for ≥12 months were randomized to either continue or stop natalizumab and followed with MRI and blood draws every 4 weeks to week 28 and again at week 52 The sNfL was measured, and its dynamics were correlated with the development of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Log-linear trend in sNfL levels were modeled longitudinally using generalized estimating equations with robust variance estimator from baseline to week 28. Of 175 patients enrolled in RESTORE, 166 had serum samples for analysis. Participants with Gd+ lesions were younger (37.7 vs 43.1, p = 0.001) and had lower Expanded Disability Status Scale scores at baseline (2.7 vs 3.4, p = 0.017) than participants without Gd+ lesions. sNfL levels increased in participants with Gd+ lesions (n = 65) compared with those without (n = 101, mean change from baseline to maximum sNfL value, 12.1 vs 3.2 pg/mL, respectively; p = 0.003). As the number of Gd+ lesions increased, peak median sNfL change also increased by 1.4, 3.0, 4.3, and 19.6 pg/mL in the Gd+ lesion groups of 1 (n = 12), 2-3 (n = 18), 4-9 (n = 21), and ≥10 (n = 14) lesions, respectively. However, 46 of 65 (71%) participants with Gd+ lesions did not increase above the 95th percentile threshold of the group without Gd+ lesions. The initial increase of sNfL typically trailed the first observation of Gd+ lesions, and the peak increase in sNfL was a median [interquartile range] of 8 [0, 12] weeks after the first appearance of the Gd+ lesion. Although sNfL correlated with the presence of Gd+ lesions, most participants with Gd+ lesions did not have elevations in sNfL levels. These observations have implications for the use and interpretation of sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS disease activity in controlled trials and clinical practice.

Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus non-specific immunosuppressants: Real-world evidence from MSBase.

The use of non-specific immunosuppressants (NSIS) to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) remains prevalent in certain geographies despite safety concerns, likely due to resource limitations. To use MSBase registry data to compare real-world outcomes in adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) or NSIS (azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mitoxantrone or mycophenolate mofetil) between January 1, 2014 and April 1, 2022. Treatment outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) Cox regression. Outcomes were annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time to discontinuation, time to first relapse (TTFR) and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) or 24-week confirmed disability improvement (CDI; in patients with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≥2). After IPTW, ARR was similar for DMF (0.13) and NSIS (0.16; p = 0.29). There was no difference in TTFR between cohorts (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; p = 0.84). The DMF cohort experienced longer times to discontinuation (HR: 0.75; p = 0.001) and CDP (HR: 0.53; p = 0.001), and shorter time to CDI (HR: 1.99; p < 0.008), versus the NSIS cohort. This analysis supports the use of DMF to treat patients with relapsing forms of MS, and may have implications for MS practices in countries where NSIS are commonly used to treat RRMS.

Reversible oxidation/reduction steps in the metabolic degradation of the glycerol side chain of the S1P1 modulator ponesimod

1. Ponesimod is a selective modulator of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) approved for the treatment of active relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. The chemical structure of ponesimod contains a glycerol side chain which is the major target of drug metabolism in humans. 2. The two major metabolic pathways give the acids M12 (-OCH2CH(OH)COOH) and M13 (-OCH2COOH). While the former results from oxidation of the terminal alcohol, the mechanism yielding the chain-shortened acid M13 is less obvious. A detailed mechanistic study with human liver microsomes and hepatocytes using ponesimod, M12 and some of the suspected intermediates revealed an unexpectedly complex pattern of enzyme-mediated and chemical reactions. 3. Metabolic pathways for both acids were not independent and several of the transformations were reversible, depending on reaction conditions. Formation of M13 occurred either via initial oxidation of the secondary alcohol, or as a downstream process starting from M12. 4. The phenol metabolite M32 was produced as part of several pathways. Control experiments at various pH values and in the absence of metabolizing enzymes support the conclusion that its formation resulted from chemical degradation rather than from metabolic processes.

Meaningful Change Thresholds and Fatigue Severity Points on Patient-Reported Outcomes by the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

ObjectivesThe Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) is a new content-valid, concise, and reliable 20-item patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the symptoms and impacts of fatigue in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Analyses were performed to derive meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) on patient-reported outcomes as measured by FSIQ-RMS and generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine fatigue severity cut points at baseline and change in severity at post-baseline and supplement the anchor-based MCT results. MethodsAnalyses were based on data from the OPTIMUM trial (NCT02425644). An anchor-based approach using uncollapsed changes on the Patient Global Impression of Severity at week 108 were used to determine the MCT for only the FSIQ-RMS Symptoms domain; distribution-based MCT estimations were conducted using baseline FSIQ-RMS Impacts scores. ROC curves with calculation of area under the curve were used to identify the best cut point. ResultsBased on the evidence provided by the anchor-based analyses using the Patient Global Impression of Severity as an anchor for the FSIQ-RMS Symptoms domain, meaningful score changes for improvement and deterioration were −6.3 and 6.3, respectively. Meaningful score changes for the FSIQ-RMS Physical, Cognitive/Emotional, and Coping Impacts domains using distribution-based methods were 10.8, 8.4, and 9.8, respectively. These results are supported by the ROC analyses. ConclusionsThresholds to support interpretation of the FSIQ-RMS, such as MCTs, can be used to determine and categorize patients who have experienced a meaningful change in their MS-related fatigue (eg, responder analyses) in future clinical research studies.

Successful treatment of multiple sclerosis with refractory rheumatoid arthritis using ofatumumab: A case report

AbstractBackgroundOfatumumab is an anti‐CD20 human monoclonal antibody that is approved in several countries worldwide for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent studies have shown promising results of ofatumumab therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report a case with both MS and refractory RA that was successfully treated with ofatumumab.Case PresentationA 44‐year‐old woman with a history of RA since the age of 40, and prior treatment with methotrexate, prednisolone, and several disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including salazosulfapyridine, iguratimod, tacrolimus, presented with a recent onset of visual acuity loss in the left eye. Ophthalmic examination revealed a decreased central flicker frequency (CFF) and central scotoma. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed periventricular multiple lesions and contrast enhancement of the left optic nerve. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed mild lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevation of protein, and oligoclonal bands. Serum anti‐aquaporin‐4 (AQP4) antibodies, anti‐myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, and other serological tests for optic neuritis were unremarkable. She was diagnosed with relapsing and remitting MS at 10 months after development of optic neuritis when she experienced a relapse, accompanied by new asymptomatic lesions detected on brain MRI. After ofatumumab administration, we discontinued all DMARDs and maintained remission over a 12‐month period.ConclusionThere is growing evidence of significant involvement of B‐cells in the pathogenesis of RA and the effectiveness of B‐cell depletion therapy in managing RA. Ofatumumab is an effective treatment for patients with MS and refractory RA.

P687 Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy for Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: results from the induction period of a Phase 2/3 study (J-True North)

Abstract Background Ozanimod is an oral, small molecule sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that selectively targets the S1P1 and S1P5 receptor subtypes. Ozanimod is approved in multiple countries outside Japan for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and/or relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. We herein report the efficacy and safety results during the induction period of J-True North, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical Phase 2/3 study consisting of a 12-week induction period, followed by a 40-week maintenance period and an open-label extension period in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. Methods Japanese male and female UC patients aged 18 to 75 years with moderately to severely active UC (defined as Mayo score of 6 to 12, with endoscopic subscore ≥2, rectal bleeding score (RBS) ≥1, and stool frequency score ≥1) were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 0.46 mg or 0.92 mg ozanimod, or placebo capsules orally once daily. All patients had received prior treatment with aminosalicylates or corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 12 (defined as a reduction from baseline in the complete Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, and a reduction from baseline in the RBS of ≥ 1 point or an absolute RBS of ≤ 1 point), and key secondary endpoints were clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, mucosal healing and safety at Week 12 and 52. Results Patients were randomised to the ozanimod 0.46 mg group (n=68), 0.92 mg group (n=65), and the placebo group (n=65). At baseline, 36.4% of patients were female, mean age was 42.6 y and mean complete Mayo score was 8.4. The clinical response rate at Week 12 was 52.9%, 61.5%, and 32.3% in the ozanimod 0.46 mg, 0.92 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement of ozanimod vs placebo (Figure 1). Similarly, higher improvement rates were observed in all key secondary clinical and endoscopic endpoints in the ozanimod groups compared with the placebo group at Week 12. Frequent adverse events (AEs) observed in the induction period were nasopharyngitis, headache, et.al. (Table 1). AEs observed in the study were similar to those in the global phase 3 True North study with 0.92 mg ozanimod, and there were no new safety signals with ozanimod in the J-True North study. Conclusion Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy was effective as induction therapy for Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC, and the safety profile was consistent with the results of previous studies. Figure 1 Table 1

Comparison of injective related reactions following ofatumumab and ocrelizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis: data from the European spontaneous reporting system.

In 2021 ofatumumab, a recombinant human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) already authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, received the marketing approval for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differently from ocrelizumab, that is administered intravenously, ofatumumab if the first anti-CD20 mAb to be administered subcutaneously without a premedication. In this study we aimed to describe and compare the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) describing the occurrence of Injective Related Reactions (IRRs) following the treatment with ocrelizumab and ofatumumab reported in the Eudravigilance (EV) database during years 2021-2023. A total of 860 ICSRs with either ofatumumab and ocrelizumab as suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 51% associated with ofatumumab and 49% with ocrelizumab. The majority of patients who experienced IRRs following ocrelizumab belonged to the age group of 18-64 years (73%), while the age-group was mostly not specified (55%) in ICSRs reporting ofatumumab as suspected. The distribution of gender was almost similar in the two groups, with the majority of ICSRs related to female patients. "Pyrexia" was the Preferred Term (PT) most reported for ofatumumab, while "Infusion related reaction" were more frequently reported with ocrelizumab. Premedication drugs were reported in 148 ICSRs. Out of 89 ICSRs for which the Time to Event (TTE) was calculated, 74 reported IRRs that occurred the same day of the drug administration. Based on the results of this study, although a risk of ofatumumab-induced IRRs cannot be excluded, it should be considered as manageable considering that the drug seems to be mostly associated with the occurrence of fever. Thus, it is important to continue to closely monitor the use of these in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety.

Practical Clinical Guidelines for Natalizumab Treatment in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) was the first high-efficacy monoclonal antibody disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS. Because natalizumab is administered by intravenous infusion, infusion nurses play a key role in the care of natalizumab-treated patients. In the 16 years since approval, substantial data have been gathered on the long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety of natalizumab. This article provides a synopsis of this data, as well as practical information for optimizing patient care. This includes information on strategies to mitigate the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients, natalizumab use during pregnancy, and use with vaccines. It also includes guidance on the preparation and administration of natalizumab and monitoring of natalizumab-treated patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Teriflunomide in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Improvements in Quality of Life: Results from the Real-World TERICARE Study.

Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; depending on the local label), based on extensive evidence from clinical trials and a real-world setting on efficacy, tolerability and patient-reported benefits. The TERICARE study assessed the impact of teriflunomide treatment over 2years on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and some of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS, such as fatigue and depression. This prospective observational study in Spain included RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide for ≤ 4weeks. The following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and every 6months for 2years: the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale version 2 (MSIS-29), the 21-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-21), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Short Form (SF)-Qualiveen and theTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication v1.4 (TSQM). Annualised relapse rate (ARR), disability progression according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) were also assessed. A total of 325 patients were analysed. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 43.2years (10.4), a mean baseline EDSS score of 1.75 (1.5), a mean number of relapses in the past 2years of 1.5 (0.7), and 64% had received prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Patients showed significant improvements in the psychological domain of MSIS-29 from 35.9 (26.6) at baseline to 29.4 (25.5) at 18months (p = 0.004) and 29.0 (24.6) at 24months (p = 0.002). Levels of fatigue and depression were also reduced. After 2years of treatment with teriflunomide, ARR was reduced to 0.17 (95% CI 0.14-0.21) from the baseline of 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-0.48), representing a 60.1% reduction. Mean EDSS scores remained stable during the study, and 79.9% of patients showed no disability progression. 54.7% of patients achieved NEDA-3 in the first 12months, which increased to 61.4% during months 12-24. Patients reported increased satisfaction with treatment over the course of the study, regardless of whether they were DMT naive or not. Teriflunomide improves psychological aspects of HRQoL and maintains low levels of fatigue and depression. Treatment with teriflunomide over 2years is effective in reducing ARR and disability progression.

Relapse recovery in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An analysis of the CombiRx dataset.

Clinical relapses are the defining feature of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), but relatively little is known about the time course of relapse recovery. The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of and patient factors associated with the speed and success of relapse recovery in people with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Using data from CombiRx, a large RRMS trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00211887), we measured the time to recovery from the first on-trial relapse. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models to investigate the association of patient factors with the time to unconfirmed and confirmed relapse recovery. CombiRx included 1008 participants. We investigated 240 relapses. Median time to relapse recovery was 111 days. Most recovery events took place within 1 year of relapse onset: 202 of 240 (84%) individuals recovered during follow-up, 161 of 202 (80%) by 180 days, and 189 of 202 (94%) by 365 days. Relapse severity was the only factor associated with relapse recovery. Recovery from relapses takes place up to approximately 1 year after the event. Relapse severity, but no other patient factors, was associated with the speed of relapse recovery. Our findings inform clinical practice and trial design in RRMS.

Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States

BackgroundReal-world evidence on the use of cladribine tablets (CladT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States is emerging. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of CladT in RMS. MethodsAdults with RMS initiating CladT were selected from the Symphony Integrated Dataverse. Baseline and follow-up periods were the 12 months before and 24 months after CladT initiation (index date). Switching to another disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and number of CladT courses were described during follow-up. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), MS disease severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale-Derived Disability Indicators (EDSS-DDI), corticosteroid use, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) were described during Years 1 and 2 of follow-up and compared with baseline. ResultsA total of 539 CladT-treated patients were included (mean age: 49.9 years; 77.6 % female). Over the 2-year follow-up, 91 % and 59 % of patients had one and two CladT courses, respectively, and 7 % of patients had evidence of switching to another DMT. ARR, MS disease severity score, and corticosteroid use decreased significantly during follow-up compared with baseline, while EDSS-DDI remained stable. All-cause and MS-related HRU decreased during follow-up. ConclusionCladT-treated patients with RMS had low switch rates, reduced ARR, disease severity, corticosteroid use, and HRU.

Meta‐analysis of the use of Ofatumumab in the treatment of relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

AbstractBackgroundOfatumumab is the first monoclonal antibody developed specifically for treating relapsed multiple sclerosis (RMS). This disease (Multiple Sclerosis) includes relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a chronic autoimmune illness that affects the central nervous system (CNS), including the brain and spinal cord. The purpose of this study is to determine whether Ofatumumab is efficacious and safe in the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis.MethodsAn analysis of studies comparing Ofatumumab with placebo in people with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis was done in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We looked up information in MEDLINE, SciSearch, BIOSIS Previews, Derwent Drug File, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. In patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, randomized double‐blind and non‐randomized trials contrasting Ofatumumab with placebo were found by two independent investigators. Utilizing Review Manager 5.4.1, data were examined. The main results were total gadolinium‐enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions, annualized relapse rate, and new or expanding total T2 lesions. Secondary outcomes concentrated on general adverse events and adverse events related to infections.ResultsThree studies were included involving 334 patients, and the meta‐analysis indicated that Ofatumumab showed good efficacy and safety in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. The annual rate of relapse was significantly reduced by Ofatumumab (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.98; P = 0.04). Ofatumumab reduced the number of gadolinium‐enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions per scan (Mean difference −0.59; 95% CI −0.63, −0.55; P &lt; 0.05). Ofatumumab treatment decreased new or enlarging total T2 lesions significantly (Mean difference −1.03; 95% CI −1.29, −0.76; P &lt; 0.05). Infection‐related adverse effects were seen more frequently with Ofatumumab shown by the odd ratio 0.48; 95% CI 0.22, 1.04; P = 0.06. Infection is, thus, a major limitation to its use.ConclusionThe meta‐analysis indicated that Ofatumumab is efficacious and safe for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

FTY720 in immuno-regenerative and wound healing technologies for muscle, epithelial and bone regeneration.

In 2010, the FDA approved the administration of FTY720, S1P lipid mediator, as a therapy to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. FTY720 was found to sequester pro-inflammatory lymphocytes within the lymph node, preventing them from causing injury to the central nervous system due to inflammation. Studies harnessing the anti-inflammatory properties of FTY720 as a pro-regenerative strategy in wound healing of muscle, bone and mucosal injuries are currently being performed. This in-depth review discusses the current regenerative impact of FTY720 due to its anti-inflammatory effect stratified into an assessment of wound regeneration in the muscular, skeletal, and epithelial systems. The regenerative effect of FTY720 in vivo was characterized in three animal models, with differing delivery mechanisms emerging in the last 20years. In these studies, local delivery of FTY720 was found to increase pro-regenerative immune cell phenotypes (neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes), vascularization, cell proliferation and collagen deposition. Delivery of FTY720 to a localized wound environment demonstrated increased bone, muscle, and mucosal regeneration through changes in gene and cytokine production primarily by controlling the local immune cell phenotypes. These changes in gene and cytokine production reduced the inflammatory component of wound healing and increased the migration of pro-regenerative cells (neutrophils and macrophages) to the wound site. The application of FTY720 delivery using a biomaterial has demonstrated the ability of local delivery of FTY720 to promote local wound healing leveraging an immunomodulatory mechanism.

Results of a Phase III, Multinational, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Subjects with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of GA Depot, a Long-Acting IM Injection of Glatiramer Acetate, Administered Once Every Four Weeks (P6-3.014)

Results of a Phase III, Multinational, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Subjects with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of GA Depot, a Long-Acting IM Injection of Glatiramer Acetate, Administered Once Every Four Weeks (P6-3.014)