P687 Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy for Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: results from the induction period of a Phase 2/3 study (J-True North)

Abstract

Abstract Background Ozanimod is an oral, small molecule sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that selectively targets the S1P1 and S1P5 receptor subtypes. Ozanimod is approved in multiple countries outside Japan for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and/or relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. We herein report the efficacy and safety results during the induction period of J-True North, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical Phase 2/3 study consisting of a 12-week induction period, followed by a 40-week maintenance period and an open-label extension period in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. Methods Japanese male and female UC patients aged 18 to 75 years with moderately to severely active UC (defined as Mayo score of 6 to 12, with endoscopic subscore ≥2, rectal bleeding score (RBS) ≥1, and stool frequency score ≥1) were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 0.46 mg or 0.92 mg ozanimod, or placebo capsules orally once daily. All patients had received prior treatment with aminosalicylates or corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 12 (defined as a reduction from baseline in the complete Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, and a reduction from baseline in the RBS of ≥ 1 point or an absolute RBS of ≤ 1 point), and key secondary endpoints were clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, mucosal healing and safety at Week 12 and 52. Results Patients were randomised to the ozanimod 0.46 mg group (n=68), 0.92 mg group (n=65), and the placebo group (n=65). At baseline, 36.4% of patients were female, mean age was 42.6 y and mean complete Mayo score was 8.4. The clinical response rate at Week 12 was 52.9%, 61.5%, and 32.3% in the ozanimod 0.46 mg, 0.92 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement of ozanimod vs placebo (Figure 1). Similarly, higher improvement rates were observed in all key secondary clinical and endoscopic endpoints in the ozanimod groups compared with the placebo group at Week 12. Frequent adverse events (AEs) observed in the induction period were nasopharyngitis, headache, et.al. (Table 1). AEs observed in the study were similar to those in the global phase 3 True North study with 0.92 mg ozanimod, and there were no new safety signals with ozanimod in the J-True North study. Conclusion Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy was effective as induction therapy for Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC, and the safety profile was consistent with the results of previous studies. Figure 1 Table 1