Abstract Background Routine echocardiographic follow-up of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) is common practice recommended by clinical practice guidelines. However, there is limited contemporary data on the natural course of primary mitral regurgitation, particularly in those without severe regurgitation at presentation. Purpose To evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing repeated echocardiograms due to mild, moderate and severe primary mitral regurgitation. Methods We identified all patients at a tertiary referral center who were in follow-up due to MR between the years 2004-2019. Patients with a history of heart failure or secondary MR were excluded. Additional age and sex matched individuals without history of cardiac disease and in whom echocardiography showed no valvular heart disease were included as a control group. Data on echocardiographic severity of mitral regurgitation, all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and mitral valve interventions were collected from electronic medical records. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and survival free from intervention. Results The study cohort consisted of 614 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 6.1 ± 3.8 years. At baseline, 275 (45%) had mild (age 65 years, 58% men), 221 (36%) moderate (age 68 years, 66% men) and 118 (19%) severe (age 65 years, 85% men) MR. The control group consisted of 647 individuals (age 66 years, 66% men). Compared to patients with moderate MR at baseline, significantly fewer patients with mild MR at baseline progressed to severe MR during follow-up (27% vs. 4%, p<0.001). Out of patients with mild MR at baseline, 9 (3.3%) underwent mitral valve intervention (surgical mitral valve repair in 7 and implantation of mitral valve prosthesis in 2) during follow-up. Out of these, referral for intervention was based on development of symptoms in 7 (acute heart failure in 2 and atrial fibrillation in 1), endocarditis in 1, whereas 1 patient was operated due to asymptomatic severe MR. All 9 patients had an uncomplicated course of intervention and post-operative left ventricular ejection fraction was >50%. Out of patients with moderate and severe MR at baseline, 47 (21%) and 77 (64%) underwent intervention during follow-up, respectively. Based on a Kaplan-Meier analysis adjusted for stroke, myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus, survival of patients with mild MR did not differ from control patients without valvular heart disease (Figure). Conclusions Our findings indicate that only few patients with mild MR progress to severe MR during 6 years of follow-up and out of these only one asymptomatic patient had surgery. The likelihood of left ventricular function remaining normal in those who have had mitral valve intervention triggered by MR related symptoms seems high. Survival by time in follow-up (years)
Read full abstract