Re-entrant auxetics offer the potential to address lightweight challenges while exhibiting superior impact resistance, energy absorption capacity, and a synclastic curvature deformation mechanism for a wide range of engineering applications. This paper presents a systematic numerical study on the compressive and flexural behaviour of re-entrant honeycomb and 3D re-entrant lattice using the finite element method implemented with ABAQUS/Explicit, in comparison with that of regular hexagonal honeycomb. The finite element model was validated with experimental data obtained from the literature, followed by a mesh size sensitivity analysis performed to determine the optimal element size. A series of simulations was then conducted to investigate the failure mechanisms and effects of different factors including strain rate, relative density, unit cell number, and material property on the dynamic response of re-entrant auxetics subjected to axial and flexural loading. The simulation results indicate that 3D re-entrant lattice is superior to hexagonal honeycomb and re-entrant honeycomb in energy dissipation, which is insensitive to unit cell number. Replacing re-entrant honeycomb with 3D re-entrant lattice leads to an 884% increase in plastic energy dissipation and a 694% rise in initial peak stress. Under flexural loading, the re-entrant honeycomb shows a small flexural modulus, but maintains the elastic deformation regime over a large range of strain. In all cases, the compressive and flexural dynamic response of re-entrant auxetics exhibits a strong dependence on strain rate, relative density, and material property. This study provides intuitive insight into the compressive and flexural performance of re-entrant auxetics, which can facilitate the optimal design of auxetic composites.
Read full abstract