This article provides an overview of the links between environment and national security in the US. The links vary with geography and institutional affiliation. Developed countries tend to associate global environmental changes with the potential to create instability and conflict and tend to focus on the human security implications of local and regional environmental problems. Understanding of these issues is obscured by vagueness of terminology and postures. Current research and statistics have increased the prominence of environmental issues on national and international agendas and led to creating thinking among a diverse population of experts. An environmental and security framework has implications for the aesthetics of nature, human responsibility for global stewardship, and humanitarian concerns. Policymakers should frame international environmental priorities in terms of broad interests; to refrain from limiting interests to security concerns; and to examine environmental problems in ways other than as crises or threats. Long-term strategies are needed to address underlying problems, as well as pragmatic, multidisciplinary approaches to problem solving, conceptual clarity, and improved willingness and ability to explain complexity of environmental change to the public. US Secretary of State Warren Christopher put environmental issues near the top of the foreign policy agenda in April 1996. This article provides an overview of the major scholarly arguments and US government actions on environmental and security issues, new and traditional definitions of security, and how security issues affect the environment.
Read full abstract