AbstractThe Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) currently consists of more than thirty high‐frequency (HF, 3–30 MHz) radars covering mid‐latitude to polar regions in both hemispheres. Their major task is to map ionospheric plasma circulation which provides information about the interactions between the solar wind and the near‐Earth's space plasma environment. One of the major factors defining radar data quality is the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), which requires an accurate characterization of the HF noise. The standard SuperDARN data analysis software uses the SNR as part of a set of empirical procedures designed to remove low‐quality data from further analysis. In this study we found that the currently used empirical algorithm systematically underestimates the noise level by up to 40%. Based on comparison of theoretical and observational noise statistics, we resolve this issue by designing and validating a procedure for accurate background noise level estimation. We then propose a simple SNR threshold to replace the existing criteria for excluding low‐quality data. In addition, we show that several aspects of the radar operational regime design, as well as short‐lived anthropogenic radio interference, can adversely affect the quality of the noise estimates at selected radar sites, and we propose ways to mitigate these problems.
Read full abstract