Reduced Length Of Hospital Research Articles

Palliative Care in the Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Settings: A Narrative Review.

We aimed to conduct a narrative review of available literature to understand the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. The search included all studies published through January 9th, 2022. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist tools. Outcomes were summarized in tables and synthesized qualitatively. A total of 22 studies were included in this review. Key elements of successful palliative care include communication, shared decision-making, family involvement, pain control, establishing a patient's prognosis, and end-of-life management. Approaches to implementation based upon these key elements include best-case/worst-case scenarios, consultation trigger systems, and integrated institutional palliative care programs. Palliative care may reduce hospital length of stay, improve symptom management, and increase patient satisfaction, but the impact on mortality is unclear. The core elements of palliative care have been identified and palliative care has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma and surgical critical care. However, the approaches for implementation still require development. The underutilization of palliative care for trauma patients reveals the need for refining criteria for use of palliative care and improvement in the education of surgical critical care teams to provide primary palliative care services.

Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study

BackgroundEnhanced recovery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, as enhanced recovery pathways have become more complex and varied, compliance has reduced. The ‘DrEaMing’ bundle re-prioritises early postoperative delivery of drinking, eating, and mobilising. We investigated relationships between DrEaMing compliance, postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in a prospective multicentre major surgical cohort. MethodsWe interrogated the UK Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme dataset. Analyses were conducted in four stages. In an exploratory cohort, we identified independent predictors of DrEaMing. We quantified the association between delivery of DrEaMing (and its component variables) and prolonged LOS in a homogenous colorectal subgroup and assessed generalisability in multispecialty patients. Finally, LOS and complications were compared across hospitals, stratified by DrEaMing compliance. ResultsThe exploratory cohort comprised 22 218 records, the colorectal subgroup 7230, and the multispecialty subgroup 5713. DrEaMing compliance was 59% (13 112 patients), 60% (4341 patients), and 60% (3421), respectively, but varied substantially between hospitals. Delivery of DrEaMing predicted reduced odds of prolonged LOS in colorectal (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43–0.59], P<0.001) and multispecialty cohorts (odds ratio 0.47 [0.41–0.53], P<0.001). At the hospital level, complications were not the primary determinant of LOS after colorectal surgery, but consistent delivery of DrEaMing was associated with significantly shorter LOS. ConclusionsDelivery of bundled and unbundled DrEaMing was associated with substantial reductions in postoperative LOS, independent of the effects of confounder variables. Consistency of process delivery, and not complications, predicted shorter hospital-level length of stay. DrEaMing may be adopted by perioperative health systems as a quality metric to support improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital length of stay.

Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations.

Single position surgery has demonstrated to reduce hospital length of stay, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain, ileus, and complications. ALIF and LLIF surgeries offer advantages of placing large interbody devices under direct compression and can be performed by a minimally invasive approach in the lateral position. Furthermore, simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column is possible in the lateral position without the need for patient repositioning. The purpose of this study is to outline the anatomical and technical considerations for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position. Surgical technique and technical considerations for reconstruction of the anterior column in the lateral position by ALIF at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Topics outlined in this review include: Operating room layout and patient positioning; surgical anatomy and approach; vessel mobilization and retractor placement for L4-5 and L5-S1 lateral ALIF exposure, in addition to comparative technique of disc space preparation, trialing and implant placement compared to the supine ALIF procedure. Anterior exposure performed in the lateral decubitus position allows safe-, minimally invasive access and implant placement in ALIF. The approach requires less peritoneal and vessel retraction than in a supine position, in addition to allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns when performing 360° Anterior-Posterior fusion.

Enhanced Recovery Pathway Reduces Hospital Stay and Opioid Use in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Private Practice Experience.

This study aimed to determine benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway implementation in free flap breast reconstruction related to postoperative narcotic use and health care resource utilization. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction from November of 2015 to April of 2018 was performed before and after implementation of the ERAS protocol. Four hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria. The pre-ERAS group comprised 205 patients, and 204 patients were managed through the ERAS pathway. Mean age, laterality, timing of reconstruction, and number of previous abdominal surgical procedures were similar ( p > 0.05) between groups. Mean operative time between both groups (450.1 ± 92.7 minutes versus 440.7 ± 93.5 minutes) and complications were similar ( p > 0.05). Mean intraoperative (58.9 ± 32.5 versus 31.7 ± 23.4) and postoperative (129.5 ± 80.1 versus 90 ± 93.9) morphine milligram equivalents used were significantly ( p < 0.001) higher in the pre-ERAS group. Mean length of stay was significantly ( p < 0.001) longer in the pre-ERAS group (4.5 ± 0.8 days versus 3.2 ± 0.6 days). Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that operative time was positively associated with total narcotic requirements ( p < 0.001) and length of stay ( p < 0.001). ERAS pathways in microsurgical breast reconstruction promote reduction in intraoperative and postoperative narcotic utilization with concomitant decrease in hospital length of stay. In this study, patients managed through ERAS pathways required 46 percent less intraoperative and 31 percent less postoperative narcotics and had a 29 percent reduction in hospital length of stay. Therapeutic, III.

Nutritional support in the perioperative period of treatment of cancer patients: Retrospective cohort study

Background. The most important component of multimodality treatment of cancer is nutritional support. The management of the correct full nutritional support in the perioperative period will help to maintain body weight and muscle function, to reduce the frequency of development of postoperative complication severity and to reduce hospital length of stay. To provide full nutritional support is necessary to cover all energy requirements in patients (30 kcal/kg body weight per day), protein requirements (1.5 g of protein/kg of body weight per day) and eicosapentaenoic acid requirements (2 g/day), applying clinical nutrition through the appropriate routes of administration (oral, enteral, parenteral or combined).&#x0D; Materials and methods. The trial studied the dynamics of the nutritional status of 400 oncological patients who underwent surgical treatment at the Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute the branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Centre from 2019 to 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the main (n=200) and the control (n=200). The patients of the main group received full nutritional support. The control group consisted of the patients, according to retrospective analysis of the patients, with the traditional approach to nutritional support. The study included patients with nutritional deficiency confirmed by clinical criteria, as well as patients with malignant neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract the gastrointestinal tract (esophagus and stomach), colon and rectum, as well as head and neck.&#x0D; Results. The application of nutritional therapy in the perioperative period can improve the nutritional status of the patients with head and neck and upper gastrointestinal tract cancer (the statistically significant increase in body weight by 1 kgs and 0.5 kgs, respectively). In patients with colorectal cancer, body weight during the treatment was stable with the tendency to increase by 0.4 kg. Perioperative nutritional support for patients with head and neck and upper gastrointestinal tract cancer showed statistically significant increase of the level of both complete protein by 2.8 and 4.1 g/l, respectively, as well as serum albumin by 5.2 and 3.3 g/l, respectively. The absolute lymphocyte count increased at the trend level. No statistically significant difference was obtained during treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. Nutritional support in cancer patients during the surgical treatment allowed to reduce the total number of surgical complications by 36%, including the incidence of anastomotic failure by 3 times (p=0.014), infectious complications by 1.5 times (p=0.074), to reduce the duration of stay in the intensive care unit, as well as inpatient stay in hospital to 0.3 and 1.08 bed days, respectively (p0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion. The application of nutritional support can help to reach more favorable perioperative course in cancer patients and also can lead to a decrease in the number of complications and early rehabilitation for patients, and on the other hand, will help to reduce the duration of stay in the intensive care unit as well as inpatient stay in hospital, reducing the cost of treating patients.

A Cohort Study of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Pancreatic Surgery at a Community Hospital.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve pancreatic surgery outcomes, though feasibility in a community hospital remain unclear. We hypothesized that an ERAS protocol would reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) without increased morbidity. An ERAS pathway was initiated for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery at a community cancer center and compared to a historical cohort. The primary outcome was hospital LOS. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, comprehensive complication index (CCI®), textbook outcomes (TO), and mortality. A total of 144 patients were included, with 63 patients in the ERAS group and 81 in the control group. The mean LOS decreased significantly in the ERAS group (6.85 [± 4.8]) vs 9.96 [±6.8] days, P = .001), without an increase in 30-day admission rates or CCI. Implementation of an ERAS protocol in a community setting reduced LOS without a corresponding increase in readmission rates or morbidity.

Financial Incentives for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Ontario, Canada: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis, which has become standard of care. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum cost‐effective investment in TAVI care that should be made at a health system level to meet quality indicator goals.Methods and ResultsWe performed a cost‐utility analysis using probabilistic patient‐level simulation of TAVI care from the Ontario, Canada, Ministry of Health perspective. Costs and health utilities were accrued over a 2‐year time horizon. We created 4 hypothetical strategies that represented TAVI care meeting ≥1 quality indicator targets, (1) reduced wait times, (2) reduced hospital length of stay, (3) reduced pacemaker use, and (4) combined strategy, and compared these with current TAVI care. Per‐person costs, quality‐adjusted life years, and clinical outcomes were estimated by the model. Using these, incremental net monetary benefits were calculated for each strategy at different cost‐effectiveness thresholds between $0 and $100 000 per quality‐adjusted life year. Clinical improvements over the current practice were estimated with all comparator strategies. In Ontario, achieving quality indicator benchmarks could avoid ≈26 wait‐list deaths and 200 wait‐list hospitalizations annually. Compared with current TAVI care, the incremental net monetary benefit for this strategy varied from $10 765 (±$8721) and $17 221 (±$8977). This would translate to an annual investment of between ≈$14 to ≈$22 million by the Ontario Ministry of Health to incentivize these performance measures being cost‐effective.ConclusionsThis study has quantified the modest annual investment required and substantial clinical benefit of meeting improvement goals in TAVI care.

Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures.

Background:As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost and safety associated with inpatient versus outpatient ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).Methods:All patients who underwent ORIF of isolated closed ankle fractures at 2 affiliated hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities and injuryspecific variables, were collected. We grouped patients based on whether they underwent ankle ORIF as an inpatient or outpatient. We determined case costing for all patients and analyzed it using multivariate regression analysis.Results:A total of 196 patients (125 inpatient, 71 outpatient) were included for analysis. Inpatients had a significantly longer mean length of stay than outpatients (54.3 h [standard deviation (SD) 36.3 h] v. 7.5 h [SD 1.7 h], p < 0.001). The average cost was significantly higher for the inpatient cohort than the outpatient cohort ($4137 [SD $2285] v. $1834 [SD $421], p < 0.001). There were more unimalleolar ankle fractures in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (42 [59.2%] v. 41 [32.8%], p < 0.001). Outpatients waited longer for surgery than inpatients (9.6 d [SD 5.6 d] v. 2.0 d [SD 3.3 d], p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (11.2%) in the inpatient group presented to the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, compared to 5 (7.0%) in the outpatient group (p = 0.3).Conclusion:In the treatment of isolated closed ankle fractures, outpatient surgery was associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and overall case cost compared to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in readmission or reoperation rates. In medically appropriate patients, isolated ankle ORIF can be performed safely in an ambulatory setting and is associated with significant cost savings.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology: A Multicenter Study with Three Years of Surgical Outcomes

Background: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols were instituted to optimize perioperative outcomes and have been successfully implemented in adult and pediatric surgical specialties with reduction in length of hospital stay, narcotic use, and improvement in patient satisfaction. In 2020, our institution was the first to publish one year of pilot intra-abdominal gynecologic cases supporting similar successful implementation of ERAS and outcomes in pediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG).

The Use of Intermittent Non-Invasive Ventilation as an Alveolar Recruitment Method for Patient with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia

Background: The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID 19 pneumonia has been controversial. NIV is an aerosol generating procedure which may increase the risk of viral transmission amongst patients and staff. Because of fear of aerosolizing the virus and transmitting the disease, initial expert recommendation was to avoid NIV and proceed with early intubation. With further experience of the virus, this recommendation has been challenged and NIV has been used widely with some retrospective studies quoting between 11 to 56 percent of COVID 19 related respiratory failures being treated with NIV. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of using non-invasive mechanical ventilation as an alveolar recruitment method for patients with severe COVID 19 pneumonia. This method was used by our respiratory team on selected patients during the early phase of the COVID 19 pandemic. Methods: We reviewed the charts of patients that were admitted to the American Hospital Dubai intensive care unit, or our medical step-down unit who had diffuse bilateral infiltrates requiring oxygen supplementation between March and October 2020. We identified patients who were on intermittent BiPAP in addition to standard care. We also monitored the rate of infection among staff taking care of these patients. Results: Average length of stay after starting BIPAP therapy was 6.8 days, while the average total length of stay was 13.6 days. Only one patient was transferred to the ICU after being on the BIPAP protocol and did not need intubation. All patients were discharged home either without oxygen or with their chronic baseline home oxygen requirement. Radiological improvement in aeration was seen in 100% of patients at follow-up x-ray post-intervention. There were no reported pulmonary complications from barotrauma, such as pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. There were no reported cases of staff infection to the health care workers that were taking care of these patients Conclusion: Our first of its kind observational study showed clearly that using BIPAP therapy for one hour three times daily during nebulization therapy in addition to standard care resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay and hastened the clinical and radiological improvement of patients with severe COVID 19 pneumonia.

Predictors allowing early discharge after interventional treatment of acute coronary syndrome patients.

Many scoring systems for predicting the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been proposed. In some populations, a significant reduction in length of hospital stay may be achieved without compromising patient prognoses. However, the use of such scoring systems in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to propose a universal list of predictors that can identify low-risk ACS patients who may be eligible for an earlier hospital discharge without increased short-term risk for major adverse cardiac events. A cohort of 1420 patients diagnosed with ACS were enrolled into a single-centre registry between October 2018 and December 2020. Clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and angiographic measurements were taken for each patient and entered into the study database. Using retrospective univariant analyses of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 932), we compared each predictor to 30-day mortality rate using the Czech national registry of dead people. Eleven predictors correlate significantly with 30-day survival: age <80 years, ejection fraction >50%, no cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no mechanical ventilation needed, Killip class I at admission, haemoglobin levels >110 g/L while hospitalized, successful PCI procedure(s), no residual stenosis over 90%, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow after PCI, no left main stem disease, and no triple-vessel coronary artery disease. In all, presence of all predictors applies to 328 patients (35.2% of the cohort), who maintained a 100% survival rate at 30 days. A combination of clinical, echocardiographic, and angiographic findings provides valuable information for predicting the outcomes of patients with all types of ACS. We created a simple, useful tool for selecting low-risk patients eligible for early discharge.

Utilization of Emergent Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Utilizing an emergent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pathway for emergency department patients with acute onset of stroke-like symptoms allows for optimization of acute ischemic stroke treatment. Emergent MRI increases the percentage of patients administered intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and minimizes stroke-related long-term disabilities. MRI also reduces the overall cost of stroke-related care by (1) preventing unnecessary IV tPA administration and its associated hospital costs and (2) facilitating faster stroke etiology work-up and treatment plan initiation to reduce hospital length of stay. The primary purpose of this article is to summarize two hospitals’ experience utilizing an evidence-based emergent MRI pathway for patients presenting to the emergency department with stroke-like symptoms who may be IV tPA eligible. Secondary purposes are to describe (1) emergent MRI pathway challenges with implemented mitigation strategies and (2) case examples (wake-up stroke; mild stroke-like symptoms with acute ischemic stroke confirmed by MRI).

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by acute care surgeons saves time and money compared to ERCP

BackgroundA typical pathway for treatment of choledocholithiasis (CD) in emergency general surgery patients involves same admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with either preoperative or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The goal of this study was to describe our initial experience at a safety net hospital with acute care surgeon-performed laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) when CD is confirmed at the time of LC. We hypothesized that this strategy would result in reduced length of stay, and lower charges compared to ERCP. MethodsThis was a retrospective case control study over a 2 year period matching LCBDE to ERCP (1:3) among a cohort of patients with CD confirmed at first procedure. Data is reported as median (interquartile range). Statistical analysis used the Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared tests with 95% confidence interval. ResultsDemographics, preoperative WBC, and bilirubin were similar between the LCBDE (n = 14) and ERCP (n = 37) groups. Success rate for LCBDE was 11/14 (79%), and the remaining three subjects successfully underwent post-operative ERCP. Overall complication rate for the LCBDE group was 1/14 (7%) and the readmission rate was 0/14 (0%). Length of stay for LCBDE vs ERCP was 2.5 (1–3) vs 5 (3–5) days (p < 0.01). Charges during initial hospitalization was $35858 ($26587-$49570) vs $48662 ($36018-$57106) (p = 0.05). ConclusionsLCBDE by acute care surgeons at the time of LC was associated with lower charges, reduced hospital length of stay, low rates of post-operative complications, and no readmissions.

Poison center consultation reduces hospital length of stay

Context Prior studies have observed shorter lengths of stay when practitioners consult a US poison control center (PCC) regarding hospitalized toxicology patients, but the most recent study used data from 2010. Since then, the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, a trend toward shorter hospitalizations and substantial adjustments in hospital charges have occurred. Methods This is a retrospective study of administrative hospital data and poison center data obtained from the Wisconsin Hospital Association and Wisconsin Poison Center for patients treated from 2010 to 2017. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the potential effects of PCC consultation on hospitalization. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was used to characterize which factors were associated with an increased rate of PCC consultation. Discussion 127,224 hospitalized cases were found, of which 44,628 were entered into a stratified hospital charge and length of stay analysis. PCC consultation was associated with an 11.6 h (95% CI 10.4–13.0 h) shorter mean length of stay overall, with children aged 0–6 having a larger reduction of 1.18 days. While total charges were higher by $600 in PCC consultation cases in the overall analysis (95% CI $390–$777), mean charges in patients aged 0–6 were $6695 lower when the PCC was consulted. PCC consultation was more likely to occur in cases involving children and adolescents, intentional overdoses (versus accidental or unknown intent), and women. Conclusions Our findings suggest that PCC consultation should be encouraged to potentially shorten hospitalizations of poisoned patients, and for pediatric patients in particular. Intentionality and demographic factors affect the rate of PCC consultation for overdose, but the nature of these relationships is unclear.

Prehabilitation-plus for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation may reduce acute hospital and total hospital length of stay: a retrospective, matched, case-controlled pilot service evaluation

Background/Aims ‘Prehabilitation’ refers to interventions that seek to enhance a person's functional capacity to help withstand a forthcoming stressor, such as major surgery. There is little research evaluating prehabilitation before major lower limb amputation. This study evaluated if a comprehensive multidisciplinary pre-admission programme, which included prehabilitation plus other interventions (eg education, home assessment and modifications), hereinafter called ‘prehabilitation-plus’, might shorten hospital length of stay by allowing earlier discharge home from hospital after major lower limb amputation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation-plus on hospital length of stay and discharge destination for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. Methods Seven patients receiving prehabilitation-plus were retrospectively matched with seven control patients in this case-controlled pilot service evaluation. Prehabilitation-plus was provided by a multidisciplinary team. Hospital length of stay was compared using Mann–Whitney U tests and discharge destination using Fisher's exact test. Results Acute hospital and total hospital length of stay were significantly lower in the prehabilitation-plus group than the control group (P=0.038 and 0.011 respectively). No significant difference was seen for rehabilitation hospital length of stay (P=0.400). More prehabilitation-plus patients were discharged directly home after their acute hospital stay, but this was not significant (P=0.286). Conclusions Patients who received prehabilitation-plus had reduced acute hospital and total hospital length of stay compared to matched control patients. While these preliminary results are promising for the ability of programmes such as prehabilitation-plus to reduce hospital length of stay, further studies with more robust designs are required to confirm and extend this finding.

Outcomes of an Institutional Rapid Recovery Protocol for Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Safety Net Hospital.

Introduction:Rapid recovery protocols (RRPs) for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) can reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) and improve patient care in select cohorts; however, there is limited literature regarding their utility in marginalized patient populations. This report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an institutional RRP for TJA at a safety net hospital.Methods:A retrospective review of 573 primary TJA patients was done, comparing the standard recovery protocol (n = 294) and RRP cohorts (n = 279). Measured outcomes included LOS, 90-day complications, revision surgeries, readmissions, and emergency department visits.Results:The mean LOS reduced from 3.0 ± 3.1 days in the standard recovery protocol cohort to 1.6 ± 0.9 days in the RRP cohort (P < 0.001). The RRP cohort had significantly fewer 90-day complications (11.1% versus 21.4%, P = 0.005), readmissions (1.4% versus 5.8%, P = 0.007), and revision surgeries (1.4% versus 4.4%, P = 0.047).Conclusion:A RRP for primary TJA can be successfully implemented at a safety net hospital with a shorter LOS and fewer acute adverse events. Such protocols require a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort with strict adherence to evidence-based practices to provide high-quality, value-based surgical health care to an underserved cohort.

Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) compared with next-day discharge (NDD). Reducing hospital length of stay is an important goal for patients and hospitals. Cleveland Clinic implemented a post-TAVR SDD pathway beginning in March2020. The study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent "minimalist" outpatient TF-TAVR in 2019 to 2020. SDD was applied to patients who met the predefined criteria. Outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day events and were compared between SDD and NDD (during and prior to availability of the SDD pathway). In 2020, SDD and NDD accounted for 22.1% (n=114 of 516) and 63.8% (n=329 of 516) of outpatient TF-TAVR, respectively. SDD patients in 2020, compared with NDD patients in 2019 (n=481), were younger, were more often male, and had a lower surgical risk. There were no significant differences in in-hospital events and 30-day readmissions (cardiovascular readmission: 3.5% vs 6.2%; P = 0.37; noncardiovascular readmission: 2.6% vs 4.0%; P=0.78), and there were no deaths after SDD. These outcomes remained consistent after propensity score matching. Only 1 (0.9%) patient required pacemaker implantation after SDD (post-TAVR day 25). As expected based on SDD criteria, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified procedure end-time as the strongest predictor of SDD (adjusted OR: 7.74; 95%CI: 4.39-13.63), while male sex and baseline hemoglobin level were also associated with SDD. SDD after TF-TAVR was feasible in this early experience without impairing post-discharge safety. Our SDD pathway may serve as a useful strategy to improve bed utilization and reduce hospital stay for TAVR recipients.

The 12 steps to a thoracoscopic anterior segment segmentectomy: Oncologically safe and sound.

The 12 steps to a thoracoscopic anterior segment segmentectomy: Oncologically safe and sound.

A Preoperative Spinal Education intervention for spinal fusion surgery designed using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System is safe and could reduce hospital length of stay, normalize expectations, and reduce anxiety : a prospective cohort study.

AimsPsychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS.MethodsPOSE was offered to 150 prospective patients over ten months (December 2018 to November 2019) Some chose to attend (Attend-POSE) and some did not attend (DNA-POSE). A third independent retrospective group of 150 patients (mean age 57.9 years (SD 14.8), 50.6% female) received surgery prior to POSE (pre-POSE). POSE consisted of an in-person 60-minute education with accompanying literature, specified using the RTSS as psychoeducative treatment components designed to optimize cognitive/affective representations of thoughts/feelings, and normalize anxieties about surgery and its aftermath. Across-group age, sex, median LOS, perioperative complications, and readmission rates were assessed using appropriate statistical tests.ResultsIn all, 65 (43%) patients (mean age 57.4 years (SD 18.2), 58.8% female) comprised the Attend-POSE, and 85 (57%) DNA-POSE (mean age 54.9 years (SD 15.8), 65.8% female). There were no significant between-group differences in age, sex, surgery type, complications, or readmission rates. Median LOS was statistically different across Pre-POSE (5 days ((interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 7)), Attend-POSE (3 (2 to 5)), and DNA-POSE (4 (3 to 7)), (p = 0.014). Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between Pre-POSE and Attend-POSE LOS (p = 0.011), but not between any other group comparison. In the Attend-POSE group, there was significant change toward greater surgical preparation, procedural familiarity, and less anxiety.ConclusionPOSE was associated with a significant reduction in LOS for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Patients reported being better prepared for, more familiar, and less anxious about their surgery. POSE did not affect complication or readmission rates, meaning its inclusion was safe. However, uptake (43%) was disappointing and future work should explore potential barriers and challenges to attending POSE.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):135–144.

A service evaluation to explore whether the implementation of thoracic enhanced recovery reduced hospital length of stay following thoracic surgery

A service evaluation to explore whether the implementation of thoracic enhanced recovery reduced hospital length of stay following thoracic surgery