Abstract Introduction Pulse-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation technology associated with a favorable safety profile and short procedural times. Elderly patients, in whom AF ablation indications are expanding, may be particularly suitable to PFA. However, in a recent large multicenter trial, patients older than 75 years were not included, so that data on PFA safety and efficacy in this population are scarce. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent PFA of AF at a single academic center were prospectively included in a local registry. Written informed consent was obtained. Clinical, imaging and procedural data was collected and routine care follow-up was performed locally. Results From 2022, out of 345 consecutive patients who underwent PFA of, 42 (13%) were aged ≥75 years. As compared to <75 years-old patients (mean age 61±3 years), elderly patients (mean age 78±4 years) were more frequently females (21 [51%] vs 121 [40%], P=0.02), had more frequently non-paroxysmal AF (27 [65%] vs 164 [54%], P=0.01), significant cardiac comorbidities (9 [21%] vs 33 [11%], P=0.01), and larger indexed left atrial volumes (65 mL/m2 [interquartile range (IQR) 54-76] vs 61 [IQR 54-68], P=0.04). With regards to procedural parameters, the total procedural length was comparable, while elderly patients received more frequently PFA applications outside the pulmonary veins. The rate of major complications was comparable, but 3 cardiac tamponades occurred in patients aged over 75 years, while none occurred in younger patients. After a median follow-up time of 185 days (IQR 65 – 202), the cumulative freedom from sustained atrial arrhythmia recurrence was not statistically different between patients aged over 75 years (75%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [62-84%]) and under 75 years (75%, 95% CI [62-84%], P=0.11). Conclusions PFA appear as a safe and effective technique for AF ablation in elderly patients, although there was an excess of cardiac tamponades in this group