Abstract
Abstract Background Proactive esophageal cooling is increasingly being utilized, and is now FDA cleared, to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). One-year follow-up from the largest randomized controlled study, the IMPACT trial, showed a trend towards improvement in long-term efficacy versus luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. With larger data sets now available for analysis, we sought to determine 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia associated with the use of proactive esophageal cooling. Methods Data from 2 trials comparing freedom from atrial arrhythmia after RF ablation using proactive esophageal cooling to LET monitoring were combined. Data were analyzed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model to compare arrhythmia recurrence rates, with R statistical analysis software. Results Data from 631 patients across two studies comparing arrhythmia outcomes for proactive oesophageal cooling versus LET monitoring were analysed. Mean patient age was 66.4±9.8 years, and 37.4% were female. Arrhythmias were 56.3% paroxysmal AF and 43.7% persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year was 77.2% for patients receiving proactive oesophageal cooling and 64.4% for patients receiving LET monitoring (Figure 1), with a hazard ratio for cooling of 0.65 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.99, P = 0.044). Conclusions Proactive oesophageal cooling was associated with significantly greater freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year when compared to LET monitoring during RF ablation.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call