Simple dislocation fault models of the San Fernando, California, earthquake of 1971 as deduced from leveling data have been presented with emphasis on an abrupt change in dip angle of fault plane at a shallow depth, and geologic and geomorphic implications of the models have been discussed.Model-1 is a basic fault model ignoring the effects of sporadically distributed surface breaks. This model consists of two rectangular fault segments: the deeper (F1) and the shallower (F2). The geometry of F1 was fixed with the constraints that it should fit the focal mechanism and that the hypocenter should lie on F1. The geometry of F2 and the offsets on F1 and F2 were determined by trial and error. In Model-2, a subsidiary fault segment (F3) that represents the surface breaks was added in order to make displacement pattern near the surface breaks better fit.The results obtained are as follows:(1) The dip angle of F1 and F2 are 52° and 13° respectively. The dip of F2 is very low angle, so that the fault plane bends abruptly at a depth of about 2.5km.(2) The offsets on F1 and F2 are 1.5m and 5.5m respectively. The offset on F1 is notably smaller, so that no noticeable uplift appears in the San Gabriel Mountains which has been uplifted due to thrust faulting during late Cenozoic time as suggested by geological evidence. If we assume uniform offset on entire depths of fault plane, it becomes easier to avoid this contradiction. Therefore it seems likely that the deeper part of the fault had slipped seismically or possibly aseismically prior to the earthquake of 1971.(3) The geometry of fault models, together with some geological evidence, permits us to describe a probable history of structural evolution in the San Fernando Valley-San Gabriel Mountains border region: The Santa Susana fault, which is the projection of F1, had been active and thick basin deposit had been deposited on the down-thrown side of the fault until early Pleistocene time. In middle Pleistocene time, F2 was formed in, or on the base of, the basin deposit, and the Santa Susana fault became inactive. Consequently the location of surface faulting shifted several km south of the Santa Susana fault, and the up-thrown side of F2 has been uplifted and intensely deformed scince middle Pleistocene time.(4) Although the mechanism is unknown, the bending of fault plane can be explained in terms of an effect of “accretion” by the analogy of that in subduction zones. Such a bending model of fault plane may be applicable to some thrust fault systems in Japan which have very similar geologic and geomorphic settings to the San Fernando Valley-San Gabriel Mountains border region.
Read full abstract