AbstractTo simplify the analysis, three‐dimensional soil–structure interaction problems are often modelled by considering a two‐dimensional slice without changing the material properties of the soil. This procedure, although convenient, is of questionable validity because two‐dimensional modelling inherently overestimates the radiation damping for translational and rocking motions. To make matters worse, two‐dimensional modelling always entails an underestimation of the dynamic‐spring coefficient for the translational motions. The damping ratio of the two‐dimensional case, which is proportional to the ratio of the damping coefficient to the spring coefficient, will thus be even larger. Thus, reliance upon a two‐dimensional analysis based on an equivalent slice of a strip foundation may result in a dangerously non‐conservative design.Valuable insights into the essence of radiation damping and the difference between two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional models may be obtained via approximate strength‐of‐materials solutions based on cone–wedge models and travel‐time considerations. By examining the decay of the waves along the axes of the cone–wedge models, the essence of radiation damping can be grasped. The heuristic concept of more spreading of waves in three dimensions than in two is misleading. Indeed, just the opposite is true: The less the amplitude spreads and diminishes with distance, the greater is the radiation damping.Because the damping ratio is grossly overestimated, two‐dimensional modelling of a three‐dimensional case cannot be recommended for actual engineering applications. It is more feasible to take the opposite approach and idealize slender soil–structure interaction problems with a radially symmetric model.As an alternative, when defining the equivalent slice of the two‐dimensional strip foundation, the impedance of the soil can be changed to achieve a much better agreement of the high‐frequency limits of the damping coefficients. In the low‐frequency range this modified two‐dimensional model also overestimates radiation damping, although to a lesser extent.As a by‐product, the dimensions of the equivalent slice of a two‐dimensional strip foundation are discussed; and equations for the aspect ratios determining the opening angles of the corresponding wedges are derived. Also addressed is the quite separate but related topic of the transition from square to slender rectangular foundations.
Read full abstract