Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Research Articles

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a single institutional experience

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is a novel and evolving technique with limited reported outcomes in the literature. Compared to the laparoscopic approach, R-TAMIS provides enhanced optics, increased degrees of motion, superior ergonomics, and easier maneuverability in the confines of the rectum. We report a single institution experience at a large quaternary referral academic medical center with R-TAMIS using the da Vinci Xi® platform. This is a retrospective review of electronic medical records at the Mayo Clinic from September 2017 to April 2020. It includes all available clinical documentations for patients undergoing R-TAMIS at our institution. Patient demographics, intraoperative data (procedure time, tumor size and distance), complications, and pathology reports were reviewed. A total of 28 patients underwent R-TAMIS. Median follow-up was 23.65months. Sixteen patients underwent R-TAMIS for endoscopically unresectable rectal polyps, eight for rectal adenocarcinoma, two for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and two for rectal carcinoid tumor. The mean size of the lesions was 4.1cm (range 0.2-13.8cm). The mean location of lesions was 7.8cm (range 0-16cm) from the anal verge. The mean operative time was 132.5 ± 46.8min. There was one 30-day complication, and no deaths. Twenty-three (82%) patients were discharged the day of surgery. R-TAMIS is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for the surgical treatment of a variety of rectal pathology. A hybrid technique can be used for the resecting tumors extending into the anal canal.

Survival outcome of local vs. radical excision in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a SEER database analysis

BackgroundThe choice of surgical strategy for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains controversial. This study aims to address whether the surgical procedure [local excision (LE) vs. radical excision (RE)] influences the survival outcomes.MethodsThe information of the patients recruited in this study was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A survival curve was used to evaluate the differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsNo significant difference was detected in the CSS between the LE and RE groups. Also, no significant differences were observed in the CSS between the two groups with respect to different T classification, N classification, tumor differentiation, tumor size, regional LN surgery, age, gender, race, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The T classification and age were independent prognostic factors in rectal GIST patients.ConclusionsLE and RE have similar survival time after surgery, and LE could be considered as an effective surgical approach for rectal GIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: potential of minimally invasive surgical interventions

To analyze the issue of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and potential of minimally invasive surgical interventions. We analyzed postoperative outcomes in 97 patients with gastric and intestinal GISTs who underwent surgical treatment at the National Medical Research Centre for Oncology between 2015 and 2020. Twenty (24.7) patients with gastric GISTs underwent laparoscopic partial and distal gastric resections. Five (35.7%) patients with GISTs of the small intestine underwent minimally invasive segmental bowel resections. Only minimally invasive interventions were performed in patients with rectal GISTs. Analysis of laparoscopic and open surgeries for GISTs found no significant differences. Analysis of laparoscopic and open surgeries for gastric and small bowel GISTs revealed the obvious advantages of minimally invasive access regarding postoperative outcomes. Indeed, we found no need for nasogastric drainage in 50% of patients (p<0.001), earlier recovery of intestinal motility and oral feeding (p<0.001), lower postoperative morbidity (p=0.036), fast recovery of motor activity (p<0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital-stay (p<0.001). Despite small incidence, GISTs are a complex problem in modern oncology. Diagnosis and treatment require a multidisciplinary medical team (morphologists, geneticists, radiologists, surgeons, chemotherapists, gastroenterologists and other specialists) that is possible in a reference center. Minimally invasive interventions for GISTs of the stomach, small intestine and rectum improve postoperative course.

A Rare Case of Quadruple Negative GIST with an Unusual Presentation in a Young Female

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are an uncommon malignancy, with origin in the interstitial cells of Cajal located in the myenteric plexus. The incidence is 5000 new cases every year in the US. It is important to determine genetic alterations in GIST. Approximately 90% of GISTs have a gain of function mutation in either the c-KIT protooncogene (which encodes for the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT) accounting for 75%, or the platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) protooncogene which accounts for 15%. Only 5-10% constitute Wild Type (WT) GISTs with mutations observed in BRAF, NF1, &amp; SDH. While Imatinib, a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), is used as adjuvant therapy for most KIT-positive tumors, it cannot be used in TKI-resistant tumors that harbor alternative genetic mutations. We present a rare case of quadruple negative (negative for all aforementioned genes) GIST with a mutation identified as ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. This mutation was first described in a case of rectal quadruple negative WT GIST.

Clinicopathological features, clinical efficacy on 101 cases of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and the significance of neoadjuvant therapy

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinicopathological features and clinical efficacy among 101 cases of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to investigate the significance of imatinib mesylate (IM) neoadjuvant therapy.MethodsThe clinicopathological features, treatment methods, perioperative data, and prognosis of the patients were summarized and analysed in 101 patients with rectal GISTs who received treatment in the Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from August 2002 to November 2020 in China.ResultsA total of 101 patients, including 64 males and 37 females, were aged from 22 to 79 years (55.4 ± 12.2 years). Among the 70 patients who underwent direct surgery, 8 were very low risk cases, 10 were low risk cases, 7 were intermediate risk cases, and 45 were high risk cases. Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative IM adjuvant treatment improved the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 52 intermediate and high risk patients. Among the 31 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83.9% (26/31), and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 96.8% (30/31). Subgroup analysis was also conducted based on the tumour diameter. (1) Among the 36 patients with a diameter ≤ 5 cm, two patients received IM neoadjuvant therapy, while 34 patients received direct surgery. Neither univariate nor Cox regression analysis found that neoadjuvant therapy affected DFS and OS. (2) Among the 65 patients with a diameter > 5 cm, 29 received IM neoadjuvant therapy, and 36 received direct surgery. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had less blood loss (P = 0.022), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001), increased anal retention rate (93.1% vs. 72.2%, P = 0.031), and decreased enterostomy rate (10.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.037) than those who underwent direct surgery. Cox regression analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative IM adjuvant therapy improved DFS.ConclusionRectal GISTs are relatively rare and highly malignant tumors. Postoperative oral IM therapy can improve the DFS and OS of intermediate and high risk patients. In patients with rectal GISTs with diameters > 5 cm, IM neoadjuvant therapy can improve anal retention rate, preserve the structure and function of the organs, reduce enterostomy rate, and improve prognosis.

Current scenario and future perspectives of minimally invasive approaches in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Current scenario and future perspectives of minimally invasive approaches in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Application of a hybrid robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision approach to resect a bulky low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Application of a hybrid robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision approach to resect a bulky low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour

The effect of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on outcome and survival in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multiinstitutional study.

This study aimed to characterize the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and the prognostic characteristics of patients after surgery. Patients with rectal GISTs who received neoadjuvant imatinib between 2000 and 2019 were selected from 11 large-scale tertiary hospitals in China. The best response to neoadjuvant imatinib was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 100 patients, 75, 18, and 7 had a partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median tumor size decreased from 5 cm before treatment to 4 cm after treatment (p < 0.001). A total of 31 patients underwent genetic testing after surgery; 23 of patients with exon 11 mutation had PR and 2 had SD. One of the patients with exon 9 mutation had PR, 2 had SD, and 1 had PD. Two patients with the wild type GIST had PD. A total of 86 patients underwent surgery of which 85 underwent complete resection; 72 underwent anal preservation and 40 underwent local excision (LE). After PSM, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had higher rates of LE (p = 0.001) and anal preservation (p = 0.033) than those of patients without neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Nine patients experienced recurrence and one patient died. The 3-year RFS and OS rates were 95.0% and 100%, respectively. After PSM, we found that there was no significant difference in RFS between patients who received or did not receive neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.623). Univariate analysis showed postneoadjuvant tumor size (p = 0.469) and mitotic count (p = 0.294) were not associated with the RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant imatinib. Neoadjuvant imatinib can shrink rectal GIST size, increasing the possibility of complete resection and anal preservation. Further studies are warranted to understand the long-term outcomes of rectal GISTs in patients receiving neoadjuvant imatinib.

Transanal approach after preoperative imatinib treatment of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with external anal sphincter invasion: A case report.

Introduction and importanceRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and preserving anorectal function can be challenging. We report the case of a patient with rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion, treated via the laparoscopic and transanal approaches.Case presentationA 61-year-old man with locally advanced GIST in the right anterolateral wall of the lower rectum was examined. Lower endoscopy revealed a 50-mm submucosal tumor located 4 cm from the anal verge. On immunohistochemistry, the biopsy specimen tested positive for CD34 and C-KIT, and the patient was diagnosed with GIST. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed external anal sphincter infiltration. Because of the large tumor size and proximity to the anal verge, preserving the anus was challenging, and colorectal resection was avoided. Instead, neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib was administered to facilitate local resection of the tumor. Post-treatment MRI showed a reduction in tumor size (30 × 20 × 30 mm), and surgery was performed. We identified an appropriate resection line for diplomatic sphincter resection of the infiltrated area by laparoscopy alone. Thus, we performed a hybrid surgery using the laparoscopic and transanal approaches. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 23.Clinical discussionNo study has reported cases of rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion wherein anal function was preserved. Here, imatinib was administered preoperatively, and hybrid surgery was performed using the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.ConclusionPreoperative treatment and surgery preserved anorectal function in a patient with a massive rectal GIST.

Endoscopic resection of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor using the submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) technique.

The optimal treatment for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum is controversial owing to its extremely low incidence [1]. The submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) technique is a so-called “nonexposed” full-thickness endoscopic resection technique developed to remove upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) arising from the muscularis propria [2] [3]. This technique allows a very interesting exposure of a GIST, as the axis of the knife is more tangential than when using an “exposed ESD technique”, which features a perpendicular axis that carries a risk of R1 resection. We believe that it could also be interesting for the resection of rectal SMTs. We report here the first successful use of this technique, with an accompanying video ([Video 1]), for the removal of a 15-mm rectal GIST.

The Combination of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgical Resection: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

BackgroundRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare digestive tumors. The treatment methods of rectal GISTs are diverse, while no standardized treatment was recommended. The aim of this study was to report the treatment mode of rectal GISTs in our center.MethodsPatients with pathologically confirmed rectal GISTs who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection were retrospectively collected. Perioperative complications and long-term prognosis were evaluated.ResultsFrom January 2010 to December 2019, 36 patients were pathologically diagnosed with primary rectal GISTs. After excluding patients who were treated with surgery or imatinib alone, 21 patients received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was enrolled. During neoadjuvant treatment, tumors shrank significantly (6.53cm to 4.68cm, p<0.001) without toxicities over grade 2. The total postoperative complication rate was 42.9% (all grade). R0 resection was achieved in 76.2% patients. Transanal resection had advantages on anus preservation and postoperative recovery. No patients died during the follow-up period, 4 patients relapsed and the relapse-free survival was 81.0%.ConclusionThe combination of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection was a safe and effective treatment for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study

Background and Study Aims: To investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical and imatinib management and long-term follow-up outcomes of the rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with rectal GISTs admitted to our center (from January 2013 to June 2018) were chosen. Their history information was viewed, and the follow-up results were obtained by phone or medical records. Results: Forty-nine patients (32 males and 17 females) were identified, with a median age of 59 years, and 36 patients received surgery. Most (46 patients, 93.9%) of the tumor were located within 6 cm from the anal verge, 18 patients (36.7%) had very low or low risk, and 31 patients (63.3%) had intermediate or high risk. Four kinds of surgery approach were applied in our center: trans-abdominal (8 patients, 22.2%), trans-anal/trans-perineal (15 patients, 41.7%), trans-sacral (12 patients, 33.3%) and abdominoperineal (1 patient, 2.8%). The complication is low and the mortality related to surgery is 0%. After a median follow-up of 705 days (ranged from 48 days to 1677 days), 3 patients (8.33%) were found to have a recurrence. Conclusion: Trans-anal/trans-perineal and trans-sacral surgery were more commonly used in our study, and for now, the recurrence rate had no difference, but a longer time for follow-up is needed.

Surgical Outcomes of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in the Era of Imatinib

Surgical Outcomes of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in the Era of Imatinib

Radical resection versus local excision for low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundThe surgical approaches and resection extent for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are controversial due to the low incidence of this disease. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the postoperative and oncologic outcomes of local excision (LE) and radical resection (RR) in patients with low rectal GIST. Patients and methodsThe medical records of rectal GIST patients from 11 large-scale medical centers in China (January 2000-December 2019) were reviewed. All patients were divided into either the LE group or the RR group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. ResultsA total of 280 patients with low rectal GIST were enrolled. After PSM, 144 patients were included (72 in each group). The LE group showed a higher anal preservation rate (100.0% vs. 76.4%, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (77.1 ± 68.4 min vs. 159.1 ± 83.6 min, P < 0.001), fewer complications (8.3% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.021) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.9 ± 4.1 d vs. 10.7 ± 8.1 d, P < 0.001) than the RR group. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the RR and LE groups among patients with tumors ≤2 cm (P = 0.220), and the RR group had a superior RFS than the LE group in patients with tumors >2 cm (P = 0.046). ConclusionsLE resulted in improved postoperative outcomes and comparable oncological safety with a low rectal GIST of ≤2 cm. However, for patients with a low rectal GIST of >2 cm, RR might be a more appropriate option with better RFS.

Neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a provision for enhanced oncological and functional outcomes

BackgroundThe role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the neoadjuvant setting and the optimal duration of therapy remains poorly defined. As such, we aim to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant TKI on oncological and functional outcomes in our cohort of patients with rectal GISTs.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 36 consecutive patients who underwent treatment for rectal GIST at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from February 1996 to October 2017 was analysed. Surgical, recurrence and survival outcomes between the groups who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and those who underwent upfront surgery were compared.ResultsPatients who received neoadjuvant treatment had significantly larger tumours (median size 7.1 vs. 6.0 cm, p = 0.04) and lower mitotic count (> 10 per 50 HPF, 14 vs. 70%, p = 0.03) when compared with the non-neoadjuvant group. With TKI pre-treatment (median duration 8.8 months), majority of patients (82%) achieved at least partial response to the therapy coupled with a significant downsizing effect of up to 39% (median size of 7.1–3.6 cm), resulting in similar rates of sphincter-sparing surgery (75 vs. 76%, p = 0.94) when compared with the non-neoadjuvant group. In general, neoadjuvant group had lower rates of local recurrence (0 vs. 69%, p = 0.04) and higher overall survival (7.4 vs. 5.7 years, p = 0.03) as compared to the non-neoadjuvant group.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant TKI has the benefit of downsizing unresectable rectal GIST to benefit from sphincter-sparing procedure and also confers protection against local recurrence and improves overall survival.

Different Medical Features and Strategies of Large Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multi-Central Pooling Analysis.

PurposeThe rectum is a rare site for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Tumors in this critical anatomical site are prone to develop local recurrence, and this occurs at a high level even in low-risk tumors. Previous studies found that high-risk was the most common category in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (RGISTs), and size was the most important factor affecting the long-term prognosis. We aimed to find out the most influential factor on clinical outcomes, and describe demographics, oncological differences, and surgical procedures in patients with poor prognosis.Patients and MethodsData on consecutive patients with RGIST, who were diagnosed at Peking University People’s Hospital, Shandong Province Hospital, and The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from 2010 to 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. Further, a literature search was conducted by retrieving data from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception up to March 20, 2020.ResultsIn all, 50 patients were diagnosed with RGIST at three medical centers, and 86 published records were finally included in the literature review. Combined analysis of the whole individual patient data showed that 5.5 cm was deemed an appropriate cut-off value for L-RGIST, and that patients usually showed a male predominance (67.59%), younger age at onset (56.61 years), higher operative difficulty, and poorer prognosis.ConclusionSeparation of patients with large RGIST from general patients may contribute to the recognition of the oncological characteristics and clinical management of this rare type of tumor.

Transsacrococcygeal approach in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour resection: 10-year experience at a single centre.

BackgroundThe transsacrococcygeal (TSC) approach in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resection is clinically challenging and controversial, and we evaluated its value in the present study.MethodsWe enrolled patients who underwent rectal GIST resection by the TSC approach during 2008–2018. The clinicopathological index, surgical outcome, and prognosis were analysed. Prognostic information was obtained from medical records and follow-up data. Anal function was evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score.ResultsAmong 88 rectal GIST patients over the 10-year study period, 17 who underwent the TSC approach were analysed. The median age was 55 (range, 26–73) years. In total, 15 patients received preoperative imatinib neoadjuvant therapy for 232 (30–690) days. The tumours were exogenous in 14 patients and intramural in 3 patients. The mean initial tumour size and preoperative tumour size were 6.4±2.2 and 4.2±1.7 cm, respectively. The operative time and blood loss were 130.2±47.4 min and 44.6±36.0 mL, respectively. Of the 17 patients 7 had postoperative complications (within 30 days postoperatively), and the complications of 5 patients were cured by conservative treatment. Only 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and the others had a good oncological prognosis at recent follow-up evaluations. All patients had LARS scores ≤9 points at 1 year after the operation.ConclusionsThe TSC approach can result in a good oncological prognosis, usually does not affect anal function, and is particularly suitable for exogenous middle and low rectal GISTs. However, it might cause some controlled complications. Hence, careful patient selection is necessary for this operation.

Primary prostatic GIST vs Rectal GIST: A case report of a 62 years old male with a pelvic mass

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Extraintestinal GIST is a tumor with identical morphology and immunohistochemical profile that occurs outside the GIT. Primary prostatic GIST is a rare entity, and the diagnosis of such a case is usually confused with rectal GIST due to the anatomical proximity of these two organs. Here, we present a case of a 62 years old male patient who presented with a pelvic mass that was diagnosed as GIST after histological examination.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with alternative neoadjuvant imatinib for localized rectalgastrointestinal stromal tumor: a single center experience with long-term surveillance.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is widely used in the treatment of local rectal lesions and helps avoid radical surgery. This study evaluated the management and outcome in a long-term followed cohort of patients with localized rectal GIST underwent TEM with alternative neodajuvant imatinib (nIM). A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of patients identified from a case database at Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) over a continuous period, from January 2006 to December 2017. Over 12years, 42 patients presented with a primary rectal GIST in PUMCH. Median age was 49 (range 27-77) years. Neoadjuvant imatinib (nIM) therapy was used in 16 patients, significantly reducing mean tumor size from 4.41 to 2.46cm (p < 0.001) and mitotic index (p = 0.041). All of these patients underwent TEM with no tumor rupture, nIM therapy enabled sphincter-preserving surgery to be undertaken in 16 (16/42) patients who would otherwise have required abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exenteration for tumor clearance and all patients (42/42) achieve R0 resection and negative margin. Imatinib was also used as postoperative adjuvant treatment in 15 patients with high-risk GIST. Median follow-up was 77 (range 14-144) and overall survival is 100%. In 42 patients, Local recurrence (LR) occurred in 3 of 42 patients and 1 of 42 patients developed distant metastasis (DM) in 112months after TEM. In the univariate analysis, mitotic index (p = 0.028), NIH risk categories (p = 0.047) were predictive feature of local relapse. The application of nIM significantly decreased tumor size in large localized rectal GIST, which permitted TEM to preserve sphincter. The TEM procedure with alternative neoadjuvant imatinib therapy is a practicable treatment for patients with rectal GIST to preserve anus and have satisfied anal function.

Is nonanatomic rectal resection a valid therapeutic option for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors? A proposed decision algorithm.

The best surgical approach to rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still debated, and both nonanatomic rectal resection (NARR) and anatomic rectal resection (ARR) are applied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of NARR and ARR for rectal GISTs (R-GISTs). Through a large French multicentre retrospective study, 35 patients were treated for R-GIST between 2001 and 2013. Patients who underwent NARR and ARR were compared. There were 23 (65.7%) patients in group ARR and 12 (34.3%) in group NARR. Significantly more patients in the group with ARR had a neoadjuvant treatment (86%) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (imatinib) compared to those with NARR (25%) (p < .01). The median preoperative tumor size was significantly different between the groups without and with neoadjuvant TKI: 30 ± 23 mm versus 64 ± 44.4 mm, respectively (p < .001). Overall postoperative morbidity was 20% (n = 7) (26% for ARR vs. 8% for NARR; p = .4). After a median follow-up of 60.2 (3.2-164.3) months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 79.5% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 54-100) for the NARR group and 68% (CI 95%: 46.4-89.7) for the ARR group (p = .697), respectively. The use of NARR for small R-GIST's does not seem to impair the oncological prognosis.