This paper examines power relations which affect and are affected by public criticism about New Zealand sport policy. Two questions guide the analysis. First, to what extent might public criticism influence future sport and recreation policy? Second, what effect does public criticism have on the critics themselves? Foucault's conception of parrhesia (or speaking truth to power) is used as a theoretical framework to address these concerns. Methodologically, instances of public criticism were critically examined, and interviews were held with critics and senior members of New Zealand's state sport agency, Sport and Recreation New Zealand (Sparc). The research found that while critics often consider their efforts are ineffectual, there were effects on public policy. Suggestions are offered to both policy writers and citizens for positively constructing and critiquing policy.
Read full abstract