Work in the heat increases physiological strain, especially when clothing limits heat dissipation. Using phase change cooling garments (CG) to mitigate core temperature rise may reduce physiological strain and prevent heat illness. PURPOSE: Evaluate the physiological and perceptual effects of using a phase change CG while conducting simulated industrial work in the heat. METHODS: Male participants (n=20, age 25 ± 4 y, ht 1.79 ± 0.08 m, body mass 75.0 ± 10.7 kg, body fat 13.6 ± 5.2%) wearing compression undergarments, coverall suit, gloves, and hard-hat to mimic industry clothing, completed two randomly assigned trials in an environmental chamber (34.2 ± 0.05°C, 54.7 ± 0.3%RH). Trials consisted of two 20 min work bouts (W1 and W2; separated by five min seated rest) and involved treadmill walking, lifting and moving boxes, tests of dexterity, and carrying dumbbells over steps. A final performance (PER) bout (maximum number of repetitions in 15 min of box moving, dexterity tests, and carrying dumbbells over steps) was followed by 10 min of recovery (REC). Phase change inserts (10°C) were added to the compression undergarment during the CG trial after baseline measures and replaced pre-PER, while the control (CON) trial included no inserts. Physiological and perceptual measures were recorded post W1, W2, and PER, and at three and 10 min of REC. Heat storage (HS) was also calculated. RESULTS: Rectal temperature was different at 3 min (CON 38.78 ± 0.38°C, CG 38.52 ± 0.39°C, P=0.003) and 10 min (CON 38.72 ± 0.37°C, CG 38.36 ± 0.40°C, P<0.001) of REC. Heart rate was lower in the CG trial (P<0.05) post-W2, pre-PER, and at 3 min and 10 min REC (CON 118 ± 13, CG 100 ± 12 bpm, P<0.001). Skin temperature was reduced with CG from post W1 (P<0.001) through 10 min REC (CON 36.9 ± 0.6°C, CG 32.9 ± 1.2°C, P<0.001). HS was reduced with CG (27.0 ± 7.6W·m-2) compared to CON (42.7 ± 9.9W·m-2, P<0.001). Rating of perceived exertion was decreased with CG from W2 (P=0.04) through 10 min REC (P=0.004). PER repetitions were not different between trials (CON 5.6 ± 1.1, CG 5.8 ± 1.1, P=0.10). CONCLUSION: The data indicated that the cooling intervention attenuated thermal, physiological, and perceptual strain during work in the heat. This CG could increase safety, facilitate performance, and reduce heat illness risk in occupational settings. Funded by PreventaMed, Inc.