Recently, Kauffmann (26) proposed a classification of the family Enterobacteriaceae in which the microorganisms known as Shigella alkalescens and Shigella dispar were removed from the genus Shigella and included in a special group termed the Alkalescens-Dispar group. The new group was placed in the tribe Eschericheae. Kauffmann's decision to make these changes was logical, and it was based upon the results of his investigations (cited below) on the relationships of S. alkalescens and S. dispar cultures to certain of the established 0 groups of Escherichia coli (15, 23, 26, 27, 32) and upon the biochemical behavior of S. alkalescens and S. dispar cultures. The work of other investigators on the relationships of these and other microorganisms to members of the genus Escherichia affords ancillary evidence for Kauffmann's conclusions (for example, see 16, 31). Frantzen (18), utilizing the methods recommended by Kauffmann (23, 24, 25), proposed an antigenic schema (table 1) for the AlkalescensDispar (A-D) group based upon an extensive study of the relationships of its members to each other and to E. coli 0 groups. Kauffmann (26) reported that certain types now included in the A-D group contain K antigens. Frantzen confirmed this fact and reported the presence of K antigens of the L and A types in certain A-D cultures. A detailed study of the K antigens of cultures of the A-D group is in progress (19). The results of agglutination tests which reveal the 0 antigen relationships of members of the A-D group to each other and to known E. coli 0 groups are given in tables 2, 3, and 4. The results of reciprocal absorption tests with 0 antiserums prepared with members of the A-D and' E. coli groups confirm the relationships between these groups that are described by Kauffmann and by Frantzen. The results of our tests indicate that A-D 08 and E. coli 081 are 0-identical. The Alkalescens-Dispar schema affords a practical means for the identification and reporting of its members. Since the members of the A-D group are related closely to, or are identical with, certain E. coli 0 groups, it would be feasible to classify these microorganisms as anaerogenic E. coli cultures of the several 0 groups. We are in accord with Kauffmann's view that such a change is not advisable at this time. However, if new types are found, they may be described as anaerogenic Escherichia cultures related to, or identical with, cer*Bacteriologists, Laboratory Services, Communicable Disease Center, Public Health Service, Atlanta, Ga.
Read full abstract