Reaction Centers Of Rhodobacter Sphaeroides R26 Research Articles

Does different orientation of the methoxy groups of ubiquinone-10 in the reaction centre of Rhodobacter sphaeroides cause different binding at QA and QB?

The different roles of ubiquinone-10 (UQ10) at the primary and secondary quinone (QA and QB) binding sites of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres are governed by the protein microenvironment. The 4C=O carbonyl group of QA is unusually strongly hydrogen-bonded, in contrast to QB. This asymmetric binding seems to determine their different functions. The asymmetric hydrogen-bonding at QA can be caused intrinsically by distortion of the methoxy groups or extrinsically by binding to specific amino-acid side groups. Different X-ray-based structural models show contradictory orientations of the methoxy groups and do not provide a clear picture. To elucidate if distortion of the methoxy groups induces this hydrogen-bonding, their (ring-)C-O vibrations were assigned by use of site-specifically labelled [5-13C]UQ10 and [6-13C]UQ10 reconstituted at either the QA or the QB binding site. Two infrared bands at 1288 cm(-1) and 1264 cm(-1) were assigned to the methoxy vibrations. They did not shift in frequency at either the QA or QB binding sites, as compared with unbound UQ10. As the frequencies of these vibrations and their coupling are sensitive to the conformations of the methoxy groups, different conformations of the C(5) and C(6) methoxy groups at the QA and QB binding sites can now be excluded. Both methoxy groups are oriented out of plane at QA and QB. Therefore, hydrogen-bonding to His M219 combined with electrostatic interactions with the Fe2+ ion seems to determine the strong asymmetric binding of QA.

A D-band (130 GHz) EPR study of the primary electron donor triplet state in photosynthetic reaction centers ofRhodobacter sphaeroides R26

A high-field (D-band, 130 GHz) electron spin echo-detected spectrum of the primary electron donor triplet state,3P, in quinone-depleted photosynthetic reaction centers from the bacteriumRhodobacter sphaeroides R26 is obtained. It shows a significantg-anisotropy, which is larger than that of the primary donor oxidized state, P+⋅. Simulation gives the tripletg-tensor principal values of 2.0037, 2.0028, and 2.0022 (precision ±0.0001), assuming that theg-tensor is coaxial to a zerofield splitting tensor. The3P spectral lineshape reveals an orientational anisotropy of the triplet quantum yield. We explain this anisotropy as arising from the difference in the main values and relative orientations between theg-tensors of P+⋅ and I A −⋅ in the primary radical pair (the triplet state’s precursor).

Light-induced structural changes in photosynthetic reaction centres studied by ESEEM of spin-correlated D+QA− radical pairs

Zn-substituted Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres (RCs) frozen in the dark and under illumination exhibit quite different recombination kinetics of the D + Q A − radical pairs [Kleinfeld et al., Biochemistry, 23 (1984) 5780]. We have applied electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) of the spin-correlated D + Q A − radical pairs to assess a possible light-induced change in the distance between the D and Q A cofactors. The recombination kinetics and the field-swept spin-polarized EPR signal for the two preparations have been monitored by time-resolved EPR spectroscopy. For the samples frozen under illumination, a slight increase in the distance, 0.4±0.2 Å, has been detected.

FTIR spectroscopy shows weak symmetric hydrogen bonding of the Q B carbonyl groups in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres

The absorption frequencies of the C  O and C  C (neutral state) and of the CO (semiquinone state) stretching vibrations of Q B have been assigned by FTIR spectroscopy, using native and site-specifically 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- 13C-labelled ubiquinone-10 (UQ 10) reconstituted at the Q B binding site of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres. Besides the main C  O band at 1641 cm −1, two smaller bands are observed at 1664 and 1651 cm −1. The smaller bands at 1664 and 1651 cm −1 agree in frequencies with the 1- and 4-C  O vibrations of unbound UQ 10, showing that a minor fraction is loosely and symmetrically bound to the protein. The larger band at 1641 cm −1 indicates symmetric H-bonding of the 1- and 4-C  O groups for the layer fraction of UQ 10 but much weaker interaction as for the 4-C  O group of Q A The FTIR experiments show that different C  O protein interactions contribute to the factors determining the different functions of UQ 10 at the Q A and the Q B binding sites.

Asymmetric binding of the 1- and 4-C=O groups of QA in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres monitored by Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy using site-specific isotopically labelled ubiquinone-10.

Using 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-13C site-specifically labelled ubiquinone-10, reconstituted at the QA site of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres, the infra-red bands dominated by the 1- and 4-C = O vibration of QA are assigned in the QA(-)-QA difference spectra. The mode dominated by the 4-C = O vibration is drastically downshifted in the reaction centres as compared with its absorption frequency in free ubiquinone-10. In contrast, the mode dominated by the 1-C = O vibration absorbs at similar frequencies in the free and the bound forms. The frequency shift of the 4-C = O vibration is due to a large decrease in bond order and indicates a strong interaction with the protein microenvironment in the ground state. In the charge-separated state the mode dominated by the semiquinone 4-C = O vibration is characteristic of strong hydrogen bonding to the microenvironment, whereas the mode dominated by the 1-C = O vibration indicates a weaker interaction. The asymmetric binding of the 1- and 4-C = O groups to the protein might contribute to the factors governing different redox reactions of ubiquinone-10 at the QA site as compared with its reactions at the QB site.

QA binding in reaction centers of the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 investigated with electron spin polarization spectroscopy.

The relation between quinone (QA) binding and electron transport in reaction centers (RCs) of photosynthetic purple bacteria is investigated, using electron spin polarization (ESP) X-band (9 GHz) EPR as a tool to probe for structural changes resulting from charge separation and stabilization and from replacing the native QA molecule with other quinones. We present a study of possible changes in QA-binding that might be responsible for the remarkably prolonged lifetime of the charge-separated state at cryogenic temperatures for RCs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 cooled under illumination [Kleinfeld, D., et al. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 5780-5786]. It is shown that this effect is not caused by a major reorientation of the chromophores. Furthermore, we studied the effects of structurally different quinones functioning as primary electron acceptor in different purple bacteria. With simulations of ESP X-band spectra of the spin-polarized secondary radical pair P.+QA.+- in menaquinone-reconstituted, Zn(2+)-substituted RCs of Rb. sphaeroides R26, we show that quinone reconstitution is highly selective for site and orientation. Furthermore, we find that a very small exchange interaction between P.+ and QA.+- (magnitude of JPQ approximately 1 microT) is needed to account accurately for the observed relative line intensities at X-band, without affecting the accuracy of the simulations of reported ESP K-band spectra [Füchsle, G., et al. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1142, 23-35; Van der Est, A., et al. (1993) Chem. Phys. Lett. 212, 561-568]. This pronounced influence of small values for JPQ on the X-band ESP line shape results from cancellation effects of absorptive and emissive contributions to the spectrum, such that small shifts can be observed. The exchange interaction has opposite sign for the native, ubiquinone-containing RC [viz. JP.UQ = (-0.8 +/- 0.2) microT] and the menaquinone-substituted RC [JP.MK = (+0.3 +/- 0.2) microT]. The implications of these observations for electron-transport theory are discussed.