Redislocation Rate Research Articles

Shoulder Stabilization Versus Immobilization for First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level 1 Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Multiple studies have compared redislocation rates after stabilization and immobilization for patients experiencing a traumatic, first-time anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD). Purpose: To systematically review the literature to compare rates of recurrent instability and subsequent instability surgery in patients undergoing treatment for a first-time ASD with surgical stabilization versus shoulder immobilization. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify level 1 randomized studies that compared outcomes of surgical stabilization versus immobilization for treatment of primary ASD. The following search phrase was used: (glenohumeral OR anterior shoulder) AND (conservative OR nonoperative OR nonsurgical OR physiotherapy) AND (Bankart OR repair OR stabilization OR surgical OR surgery OR arthroscopic OR arthroscopy) AND (instability OR dislocation). Patients with soft tissue disruption alone as well as those with additional minor bony lesions (Hill-Sachs, Bankart) were included. Recurrent instability and subsequent instability surgery rates, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), and range of motion were evaluated. Results: A total of 5 studies met inclusion criteria, including 126 patients undergoing surgical stabilization (mean age, 23.6 years; range, 15.0-39.0 years) and 133 patients undergoing treatment with sling immobilization only (mean age, 23.1 years; range, 15.0-31.0 years). Mean follow-up was 59.7 months. Overall, 6.3% of operative patients experienced recurrent instability at latest follow-up compared with 46.6% of nonoperative patients (P < .00001). Similarly, 4.0% of operative patients underwent a subsequent instability surgery compared with 30.8% of nonoperative patients (P < .00001). These same trends were demonstrated when data were isolated to nonoperative patients immobilized in internal rotation. When comparing the operative and nonoperative groups at latest follow-up, 1 study found significantly improved WOSI scores among operative patients (P = .035) and 1 study found significantly improved abducted external rotation in nonoperative patients (P = .02). Conclusion: Patients, particularly active men in their 20s and 30s, undergoing treatment for a first-time ASD with a surgical stabilization procedure can be expected to experience significantly lower rates of recurrent instability and a significantly decreased need for a future stabilization procedure when compared with patients treated nonoperatively.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability in Patients With Epilepsy: A Case-Control Study

Background: Unacceptably high rates of redislocation, reoperation, osteoarthritis, and coracoid nonunion have been reported in patients with a seizure disorder after surgery for shoulder instabilitiy. Purpose: To evaluate the objective and subjective functional and radiologic results of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with epilepsy and compare them with the results of patients without epilepsy. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective and comparative case-control analysis of patients operated for shoulder instability with arthroscopic Latarjet was conducted. Nineteen patients (21 unstable shoulders) with a seizure disorder (epilepsy group) were matched with 21 patients without a history of seizure (control group). Demographics, surgical indications, and imaging data were collected. Clinical outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up (range, 2-9 years) postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome (CMSO) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The incidence of complications, recurrent instability, redislocation, revision surgery, repeated seizure(s), and presence of osteoarthritis, coracoid nonunion, and osteolysis were also examined. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, no significant differences in functional results were found between patients with and without epilepsy on the average Rowe (P = .917), WOSI (P = .621), CMSO (P = .600), and SANE (P = .859) scores. A total of 5 patients (7 shoulders) continued to have seizures postoperatively, but no seizure-related glenohumeral instability was documented. One dislocation and 1 subluxation were documented while participating in sports in each study group, comprising a recurrence rate of 9.5%, but no significant differences were found at comparison (P = .605). A bone defect did not influence the results, as no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Osteoarthritic changes of the glenohumeral joint were observed in 5 shoulders (23.8%) in the epilepsy group and in 3 (14.3%) in the control group (P = .451). No case of coracoid nonunion or osteolysis was recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative athletic activity (P = .660). However, patients with epilepsy had significantly lower pre- and postoperative sports participation (P < .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization can lead to improved functional and subjective outcomes and should be considered in patients with epilepsy with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. These results can be achieved regardless of the presence of bone defect and the postoperative control of seizures and are similar to those in patients without epilepsy.

Functional Rehabilitation and Return to Play After Arthroscopic Surgical Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability.

There exists limited objective functional return-to-play criteria after surgical stabilization for anterior shoulder instability in the competitive athlete. The proposed functional rehabilitation program and psychological evaluation after arthroscopic Bankart repair will help athletes return to sport with a decreased redislocation rate on return. Case series. Level 4. Participants were contact or overhead athletes at the high school or collegiate level. Each underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair after a single dislocation event, with less than 10% glenoid bone loss. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Athletes were only allowed to return to competition after completing the proposed functional and psychological rehabilitation protocol. A total of 62 participants were enrolled (52 male, 10 female; average age, 18.7 years (range 16-24 years); mean Instability Severity Index Score, 5.63 ± 0.55). All returned to sport for 1 full season and completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The average time to pass functional testing was 6.2 ± 0.7 months, psychological testing was 5.2 ± 0.5 months, and return to sport was 6.5 ± 0.7 months. SANE scores improved from 44.3 to 90.0, ASES from 45.5 to 89.3, and WOSI from 1578.0 to 178.9 (all P < 0.001). Redislocation rate was 6.5% (4 of 62). The proposed functional rehabilitation and psychological assessment protocol is safe and effective in returning athletes to sport after arthroscopic surgical intervention for anterior shoulder instability. This demonstrated a low redislocation rate after 2-year follow-up. Most return-to-play protocols after arthroscopic Bankart repair are centered on recovery time alone, with limited focus on functional rehabilitation, psychological assessment, and return-to-play testing parameters. To our knowledge, this is the first study to propose a dedicated rehabilitation program incorporating functional testing, psychological readiness, and return-to-play criteria for competitive athletes recovering from arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.

Video Technique on MedialOpen Reduction for DDH.

The most common approach for the open reduction of DDH is the anterolateral approach. After an initial report by Weinstein and Ponseti, the medial approach for DDH has garnered great interest. The medial approach for DDH allows easy access to the structures which block the reduction of the femoral head into the acetabulum; namely the psoas tendon, inferior capsule, and ligamentum teres. It uses a skin crease small incision in the groin with excellent cosmetic outcome and is very well hidden. The classical medial approach described by Ludloff uses interval between the adductor brevis and pectineus. The anteromedial approach to the hip uses the same incision but interval between the pectineus and femoral neurovascular bundle and allows better handling of medial circumflex vessels. A technical modification suggested by Late Ian Torode involves tenodesis of the ligamentum teres which improves the stability of the hip reduction. This video demonstrates the medial approach for the open reduction of DDH in a fourteen months old girl with medium-term follow-up results. The technique of the tenodesis of ligamentum teres is also shown. The medial approach is safe with a low rate of re-dislocation; it does not violate the hip abductors and iliac apophysis. The major disadvantage of the medial approach is the restricted operative field and a higher rate of AVN. Many authors have found the rate of AVN comparable to other approaches and the grade of AVN milder culminating in good long-term results. We have found this approach very useful in children with DDH, before they start walking (when the closed reduction is unstable) and arthrogrypotic children with hip dislocation. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00502-6.

Short-term outcomes of treatment in children presenting with DDH in walking age - An analysis of 84 hips

BackgroundDevelopmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH) presenting at walking age is not uncommon, particularly in developing countries. The available treatment modalities in this age group are closed reduction (CR), open reduction (OR), OR with additional femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy. This study was done in patients who presented between 12 and 36 months of age to assess the following: 1) Percentage of hips amenable for successful CR, 2) failure rate after CR and OR in walking age DDH and 3) the need for secondary procedures to address subluxation and residual dysplasia within first 2 years. Methodology: After IRB approval, the institutional database was searched for patients admitted with a diagnosis of DDH from January 2009 to January 2019. We identified 142 patients, of which 65 patients with 84 hips formed the study cohort after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic details, details of the interventions, brace wear, revision procedures and radiological data were collected from Hospital Information System. We divided the patients in three groups: Group I - CR, Group II –OR, and Group III - OR with an additional bony procedure in the form of femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy. ResultsThe mean age at presentation was 20.1 months. We had 10 (11.9%) hips in group I, 39 (46.4%) hips in group II and 35 (41.6%) hips in group III. The mean follow-up was 44.8 months (24–132 months). In Group I, 5 (50%) had re-dislocation and 2 (20%) needed revision intervention for residual dysplasia. In Group II, 4 (10%) had re-dislocation and 4 (10%) needed revision intervention. In Group III, 5 (14.2%) hips needed revision intervention for residual dysplasia. The mean final AI was 24.6°in Group I, 28.2° in Group II and 26.3°in Group III. There was no significant difference in the final AI between the groups (p > 0.05). ConclusionsAn attempted closed reduction has a 50% failure rate, and we recommend a low threshold for open reduction. There is a 10% rate of re-dislocation following open reduction with or without additional bony procedure. About 50% of the dysplastic hips treated without pelvic osteotomy at the time of index procedure fail to remodel and have residual acetabular dysplasia.

Leg muscle strength outcomes in adults and children after surgical or non-surgical treatment for patellar dislocation: A systematic review

Purpose: Patellar dislocations mainly occur during sporting activities in young active adults and adolescents. Treatment is either surgical or non-surgical but uncertainty remains over the most effective treatment strategy. Current treatment outcomes are poor and include reduced activity levels, later surgery, and high rates of redislocation. Leg strengthening exercises are routinely used during rehabilitation but it is unclear if muscle strength is restored after this injury. This review aimed to determine what leg muscles undergo strength assessment after patellar dislocation and to compare leg strength outcomes between patients treated surgically with those treated non-surgically.

Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic 270° Labral Repair in Traumatic Shoulder Instability Involving Anterior, Inferior, and Posterior Labral Injury

Background: Current literature reports highly satisfactory short- and midterm clinical outcomes in patients with arthroscopic 270° labral tear repairs. However, data remain limited on long-term clinical outcomes and complication and redislocation rates in patients with traumatic shoulder instability involving anterior, inferior, and posterior labral injury. Purpose: To investigate, at a minimum follow-up of 10 years, the clinical outcomes, complications, and recurrent instability in patients with 270° labral tears involving the anterior, inferior, and posterior labrum treated with arthroscopic stabilization using suture anchors. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective outcomes study was completed for all patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up who underwent arthroscopic 270° labral tear repairs with suture anchors by a single surgeon. Outcome measures included pre- and postoperative Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale for pain, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores were collected postoperatively. Complication data were collected, including continued instability, subluxation or dislocation events, and revision surgery. Failure was defined as any cause of revision surgery. Results: In total, 21 patients (mean ± SD age, 27.1 ± 9.6 years) with 270° labral repairs were contacted at a minimum 10-year follow-up. All outcome measures showed statistically significant improvements as compared with those preoperatively: Rowe (53.9 ± 11.4 to 88.7 ± 8.9; P = .005), ASES (72.9 ± 18.4 to 91.8 ± 10.8; P = .004), Simple Shoulder Test (8.7 ± 2.4 to 11.2 ± 1.0; P = .013), visual analog scale (2.5 ± 2.6 to 0.5 ± 1.1; P = .037), and SANE (24.0 ± 15.2 to 91.5 ± 8.3; P = .043). The mean postoperative WOSI score at minimum follow-up was 256.3 ± 220.6. Three patients had postoperative complications, including a traumatic subluxation, continued instability, and a traumatic dislocation, 2 of which required revision surgery (14.2% failure rate). Conclusion: Arthroscopic repairs of 270° labral tears involving the anterior, inferior, and posterior labrum have highly satisfactory clinical outcomes at 10 years, with complication and redislocation rates similar to those reported at 2 years. This suggests that repairs of extensile labral tears are effective in restoring and maintaining mechanical stability of the glenohumeral joint in the long term.

Derotational Femoral Osteotomy for Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation in the Presence of Increased Femoral Anteversion: A Systematic Review.

Background:Studies on the clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy to treat recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion are limited.Purpose:To investigate the role of derotational femoral osteotomy in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) by searching the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases through February 10, 2021. Included were studies of skeletally mature patients presenting with recurrent patellar dislocation and exhibiting increased femoral anteversion who subsequently underwent derotational femoral osteotomy. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. The basic characteristics of each study were recorded and analyzed: characteristic information, radiological parameters, surgical techniques, patient-reported outcomes, and complications.Results:A total of 6 studies with 163 patients (170 knees) were included. Sample sizes ranged from 7 to 66 patients, and the patients were predominantly women (range, 79%-100%). The mean age and follow-up ranges were 18 to 28 years and 16 to 44 months, respectively. The mean femoral anteversion decreased significantly from 34° preoperatively to 12° postoperatively. In studies reporting pre- and postoperative outcomes, significant improvements were found in the Lysholm score (from 24.8 to 44.1), Kujala score (from 15.8 to 41.9), International Knee Documentation Committee score (from 11.0 to 28.0), and visual analog scale for pain (from 2.0 to 3.7). All studies reported postoperative complications, giving an overall reported complication rate of 4.7%, but no redislocations occurred during the follow-up period.Conclusion:For recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion, combination treatment with derotational femoral osteotomy led to favorable clinical outcomes with a low redislocation rate. However, there was no consensus among researchers on the indications for derotational femoral osteotomy in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation.

Midterm Results After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction as First-Line Surgical Treatment in Skeletally Immature Patients Irrespective of Patellar Height and Trochlear Dysplasia

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients who experience lateral patellar dislocation has been reported to yield good results. Whether bony abnormalities such as patellar height and trochlear dysplasia should be addressed additionally is a topic of discussion. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes and redislocation rates after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as first-line surgical treatment for lateral patellar dislocation in skeletally immature patients. Further, to analyze epidemiological, intraoperative, and radiographical factors influencing redislocation and clinical outcome. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analyzed for adolescent patients younger than 16 years who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction between 2014 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with gracilis tendon and availability of accurate pre- and postoperative radiographs with the presence of open physes. The patients were questioned regarding further surgery, redislocation, and clinical outcomes using the Tegner Activity Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, Lysholm score, and Kujala score. The influence of diverse epidemiological, intraoperative, and radiographical parameters on the redislocation rates and clinical outcome was analyzed. Results: A total of 54 medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions (49 patients) met the inclusion criteria. After 4.3 ± 1.7 years (range, 2.0-7.3 years), 45 reconstructions (83.3%) in 41 patients were available for follow-up. The distribution of trochlear dysplasia was as follows: type A and B, 19 cases (42.2%) each; type C, 6 cases (13.3%); and type D, 1 case (2.2%). Patellar redislocation occurred in 3 patients (6.7%). The mean Tegner, subjective IKDC, Lysholm, and Kujala scores at follow-up were 6.3 ± 1.6 (range, 3-9), 93.6 ± 8.8, 95.9 ± 7.4, and 97.9 ± 7.1, respectively. Patellar height and trochlear dysplasia had no influence on redislocation or clinical scores. The Lysholm score was lower in knees with intraoperative retropatellar chondral lesion grade ≥III versus grade <III (89.0 ± 19.2 vs 96.9 ± 3.6, respectively; P = .023); likewise, the Kujala score was lower in knees that were grade ≥III versus grade <III (90.0 ± 19.7 vs 98.1 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .015). Conclusion: Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as first-line surgical treatment in skeletally immature patients yields excellent midterm results, irrespective of patellar height and trochlear dysplasia. Redislocation still occurs in a certain number of patients, and a higher degree of retropatellar chondral lesion is a predictor for a worse clinical outcome.

Complications Related to Latarjet Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review

Background: In cases of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect, Latarjet procedures are widely used for stabilization. Although complications with this procedure have been reported, few studies have comprehensively analyzed issues related to the Latarjet procedure. Purpose: To identify the overall complication rate of the Latarjet procedure used for anterior shoulder instability and to compare the rate of complications between arthroscopic and open approaches. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed by using the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Data on complications were extracted and classified as intraoperative, postoperative, or instability-related for further analysis. Quality assessments were performed with criteria from the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). A quantitative synthesis of data was conducted to compare the complication rates between arthroscopic and open approaches. Results: A total of 35 articles were included in this analysis. The MINORS score was 11.89. A total 2560 Latarjet procedures (2532 patients) were included. The overall complication rate was 16.1% (n = 412). The intraoperative complication rate was 3.4% (n = 87) and included a 1.9% (n = 48) incidence of nerve injuries and a 1.0% (n = 25) incidence of iatrogenic fractures. Screw problems, vascular injuries, and conversion arthroscopic to open surgery each occurred at a rate of <1%. The postoperative complication rate was 6.5% (n = 166), and the most common complication was nonunion (1.3%; n = 33). The instability-related complication rate was 6.2% (n = 159) and included a 1.5% (n = 38) rate of redislocation, a 2.9% (n = 75) rate of positive apprehension test, and a 1.0% (n = 26) rate of instability. Overall, 2.6% (n = 66) of patients required an unplanned secondary operation after the initial surgery. The arthroscopic approach was associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications compared with the open approach (5.0% vs 2.9%; P =.020) and a lower rate of instability-related complications (3.1% vs 7.2%; P < .001). Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability results in an overall complication rate of 16.1% and a reoperation rate of 2.6%. However, serious complications at short-term follow-up appear rare. When the arthroscopic approach was used, the rate of intraoperative complications was higher, although instability-related complications were lower when compared with the open approach.

Clinical Comparison of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transfer for Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background: No clear guidelines or widespread consensus has defined a threshold value of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance for choosing the appropriate surgical procedures when additional tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO) should be added to augment medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between MPFL reconstruction and MPFL reconstruction with TTO for patients who have patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent surgical treatment using either MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction with TTO for recurrent patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm; the mean follow-up was 25.2 months (range, 12.0-53.0 months). The patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated MPFL reconstruction (iMPFL group; n = 36) performed by 2 surgeons and MPFL reconstruction with TTO (TTO group; n = 45) performed by another 2 surgeons. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kujala score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner activity score. Radiological parameters, including patellar height, TT-TG distance, patellar tilt, and congruence angle were compared between the 2 groups. Functional failure based on clinical apprehension sign, repeat subluxation or dislocation, and subjective instability and complications was assessed at the final follow-up. We also compared clinical outcomes based on subgroups of preoperative TT-TG distance (15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm vs 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm). Results: All of the clinical outcome parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up (P < .001), with no significant differences between groups. The radiological parameters also showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The incidence of functional failure was similar between the 2 groups (3 failures in the TTO group and 2 failures in the iMPFL group; P = .42). In the TTO group, 1 patient experienced a repeat dislocation postoperatively and 2 patients had subjective instability; in the iMPFL group, 2 patients had subjective instability. The prevalence of complications did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .410). In the subgroup analysis based on TT-TG distance, we did not note any differences in clinical outcomes between iMPFL and TTO groups in subgroups of 15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm and 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm. Conclusion: MPFL reconstruction with and without TTO provided similar, satisfactory clinical outcomes and low redislocation rates for patients who had patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without statistical difference. Thus, our findings suggest that iMPFL reconstruction is a safe and reliable treatment for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without the disadvantages derived from TTO.

Comparing Nonoperative Treatment, MPFL Repair, and MPFL Reconstruction for Patients With Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Background:Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, and nonoperative treatment are important treatments for patients with patellar dislocation. However, it is unclear which treatment leads to better outcomes.Purpose:To determine the efficacy and safety of the 3 treatments in the treatment of patellar dislocation and compare the effect of MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to December 2020. Included were clinical studies that described the efficacy and safety of 2 of the 3 treatments, studies directly comparing the clinical effects of the 2 operative techniques, or studies comparing the effects of reconstruction or repair with nonoperative treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. The outcomes evaluated were postoperative redislocation rate, revision rate, complications, and Kujala score. We used traditional direct pairwise meta-analysis as well as network meta-analysis for comprehensive efficacy of all 3 treatment measures.Results:Twelve studies were included: 5 compared MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, 2 compared MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and 5 compared MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment. The risk of bias was serious in 4, moderate in 4 and low in 4 articles. MPFL reconstruction led to significantly reduced redislocation and improved Kujala scores compared with MPFL repair and nonoperative treatment. MPFL repair led to reduced redislocation rates compared with nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocations. There was no significant difference among the 3 treatments in terms of revision rate and incidence of complications, although we found that treatment-related complications were least likely to occur in nonoperative treatment.Conclusion:The results of this review indicate that MPFL reconstruction decreases recurrent dislocation compared with MPFL repair or nonoperative treatment, but it has a higher possibility of complications. MPFL repair resulted in less postoperative redislocation than nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocation.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for First-Time Dislocators in Athletes.

Background:In athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the open Latarjet procedure (OL) are the most commonly utilized surgical procedures to restore stability and allow them to return to play (RTP).Purpose:To compare the outcomes of ABR and OL in athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of patients with first-time shoulder dislocation who underwent primary ABR and OL and had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Indications for OL over ABR in this population were those considered at high risk for recurrence, including patients with glenohumeral bone loss. Patients who underwent ABR were pair-matched in a 2:1 ratio with patients who underwent OL by age, sex, sport, and level of preoperative play. The rate, level, and timing of RTP, as well as the Shoulder Instability–Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score were evaluated. Additionally, we compared recurrence, visual analog scale pain score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe score, satisfaction, and whether patients would undergo the surgery again.Results:Overall, 80 athletes who underwent ABR and 40 who underwent OL were included, with a mean follow-up of 50.3 months. There was no significant difference between ABR and OL in rate of RTP, return to preinjury level, time to return, or recurrent dislocation rate. There were also no differences between ABR and OL in patient-reported outcome scores or patient satisfaction. When collision athletes were compared between ABR and OL, there were no differences in RTP, SIRSI score, or redislocation rate.Conclusion:ABR and OL resulted in excellent clinical outcomes, with high rates of RTP and low recurrence rates. Additionally, there were no differences between the procedures in athletes participating in collision sports.

Anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy for objective patellar instability

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). Correlations between patient's age, gender, pre-injury physical activity and the achieved results were investigated as secondary endpoints.MethodsAn observational retrospective study with prospective collected data was performed. Inclusion criteria were: treatment with anatomic MPFL reconstruction with gracilis tendon according to Schӧttle’s technique performed between 2011 and 2017; associated TTO as unique accessory procedure; skeletal joint maturity; a minimum follow-up of 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner scores.ResultsForty patients (42 knees) were included, 64% of them underwent TTO. The Kujala score significantly improved from 47.4 ± 17.6 preoperatively to 89.4 ± 13.6 postoperatively (p < 0.01). The average Lysholm score was 45.6 ± 20.5 preoperatively: it showed a significant increase to 89.8 ± 12.8 postoperatively (p < 0.01). Pre-injury mean Tegner was 5.9 ± 1.8, while it dropped to 3.0 ± 1.6 after injury. After surgery, Tegner resulted 4.9 ± 1.6. Forty-three percent of patients regained the pre-injury sport activity level. Redislocation rate was 2.4%.ConclusionAnatomic MPFL reconstruction allows excellent patellar stability recovery, knee functionality improvement, return to Activities of Daily Living and a low redislocation rate. Better results were achieved in younger (under 30 years old) and higher sports activity-level subjects. The TTO association provided clinical results comparable to isolated MPFL reconstructions, suggesting that the two procedures can be safely accomplished together without affecting the positive outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization in Professional Handball Players

Background:Although numerous studies have reported on the redislocation rate and functional results of arthroscopic treatment for anterior shoulder instability in athletes, they have not disclosed outcomes in the high-risk group of elite handball players.Purpose:To investigate the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for anterior shoulder instability as well as the return-to-sport (RTS) rate in professional handball players.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Involved in this study were 44 competitive handball players (47 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. After surgery, patients completed a questionnaire that collected Rowe and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and RTS data, and we compared these results with their preoperative scores. We also compared results according to the following subgroups: true dislocations versus recurrent subluxations, younger (<20 years) versus older (≥20 years) age, male versus female sex, and shorter versus longer duration of instability. Statistical analysis included the paired-samples t test and nonparametric Fisher exact test.Results:The mean follow-up period was 52.2 ± 21.4 months. There were 4 shoulders (9%) with recurrent instability. There were significant preoperative to postoperative improvements in the mean Rowe score (from 45.2 to 91.8) and mean ASES score (from 70.6 to 95.7) (P < .001 for both). Overall, the RTS rate was 83%, and 64% (30/47 shoulders) were able to return to their preinjury level. The RTS rate was significantly lower in the younger players than in the older players (46% vs 86%, respectively; P = .005).Conclusion:The study results indicated that handball players with anterior shoulder instability can be treated using arthroscopic labral reconstruction successfully and 83% of the athletes were able to RTS activity. The handball players aged ≥20 years returned to their preinjury level of sport at a higher rate than did those aged <20 years.

MPFL Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population: Does Skeletal Maturity Matter?

Objectives:Patellar instability requiring medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL) in the pediatric population poses a challenge in that the isometric point of femoral fixation (Schottle’s point) is in close proximity to the distal physis. As a result, various alternative fixation techniques have been described to avoid physeal damage, however the consequences of this are unclear. Continued growth and altered graft mechanics in the growing child are areas of concern. The objective of the current study was to evaluate short to midterm outcomes, including redislocation rates, following MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature versus mature pediatric patients.Methods:Patients under age 18 with recurrent patellar instability that underwent primary MPFL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2019 were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patients who were a minimum of 1 year from surgery were contacted to complete questionnaires. Questions pertained to knee pain and function, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, as well as further injury or surgery. Further data included chart and imaging review. Based on radiographic appearance of the distal physis, patients were placed into either the skeletally mature or immature cohort for comparison. Statistical analysis included chi-square, fisher’s exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Significance was determined by p-value <0.05.Results:There were 103 primary MPFL reconstructions in 94 patients: 70 skeletally mature and 24 immature. As expected, the skeletally mature group was older (15.5 vs. 13.1 years). Skeletally immature patients had a higher incidence of trochlear dysplasia (88 vs. 63%, p=0.04). No other baseline differences were identified. Average follow-up was similar at 4.1 years for the mature group and 3.5 years in the immature. Skeletally immature patients were more likely to sustain a subsequent dislocation or any ipsilateral knee injury (15 vs. 3%, p=0.03; 35 vs. 16%, p=0.04 respectively). Skeletally immature patients underwent more revision instability procedures, which trended towards but did not reach significance (23 vs. 9%, p=0.06). No significant difference was observed in IKDC score (80 each), perceived percent of normal for that knee (85% each), frequency of instability events, current sport participation (42 vs. 31%), sport avoidance (46 vs. 35%), or subjective stiffness (38 vs. 41%). Visual analog scale pain scores for skeletally immature compared to mature patients were not different at rest, with activities of daily living, or with sport (0.9 vs. 0.8, 1.5 vs. 1.7, 2.5 vs. 3 respectively). Significantly fewer patients in the skeletally immature group were satisfied (79 vs. 97%, p<0.05) and would undergo the surgery again (68 vs. 100%, p<0.05).Conclusions:In pediatric patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction, both skeletally immature and mature patients have good and comparable outcomes. However, those that are skeletally immature are more likely to have a subsequent ipsilateral injury or dislocation. These patients are also less likely to be satisfied with their results. Of note, there was a higher incidence of trochlear dysplasia in skeletally immature patients which may predispose them to subsequent injury.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring graft for recurrent patellar dislocation: a clinical and functional outcome evaluation

&lt;p&gt;Patellofemoral instability is a painful and often recurring disorder with many negative long-term consequences. Surgical treatment for patellar dislocation has evolved from the initial medial reefing to the present-day anatomical reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) which is thought to be the most appropriate treatment. MPFL reconstruction successfully addresses patellofemoral instability by restoring the deficient most important static primary soft tissue restraint. This prospective case series was conducted at a Tertiary care Govt. Hospital in Kolkata between January 2019 to August 2020 on 15 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. All patients were followed up at an interval of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Kujala score was used to assess the functional outcomes of the patients. Out of 15 patients, 13 (86.7%) showed good to excellent results whereas 2 (13.3%) had Fair outcome and none of the patients demonstrated Poor surgical result. The mean Kujala score improved from 49.6 pre-operatively to 92.7 post-operatively. By the end of 6 months follow-up, 13 (86.7%) patients achieved almost full range of motion. Majority (80%) of patients did not have any complications. Only 2 patients had a post-operative recurrence (13.3%). Reconstruction of MPFL using autologous hamstring graft showed excellent results over the short term with a low re-dislocation rate and acceptable complication rates. It greatly helps in preventing further episodes of patellar subluxations or dislocations and in improving quality of life.&lt;/p&gt;

Arthroscopic bankart repair for the management of anterior shoulder instability: Mid- and long-term results

IntroductionArthroscopic stabilisation is a well-recognised surgical technique with a variable rate of failure reported between 0–35%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of this technique and our second aim was to identify risk factors that could be associated to recurrence rate. Material and methods41 patients that underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for glenohumeral instability between 2001–2015 were included. Different items such as epidemiologic, recurrence, age at first dislocation, preoperative sport practice, and number of fixation devices used were collected. The results were evaluated using functional scales (WOSI, Rowe y Walch-Duplay) and radiological study was assessed using the Samilson-Prieto score. Data from the medical history were recognised in order to assess possible risk factors. ResultsThe overall redislocation rate was 9.4%. The average follow-up was 83 months. The 54.3% of the patients achieved excellent/good results in the functional assessment scales. The range of motion was complete in 90% of the cases. On the radiographs, only 4.88% of the patients present advanced osteoarthritis. It was not possible to identify risk factors related to a worse outcome after surgery. ConclusionThe arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors is considered the gold standard for treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability. The long-term follow-up shows a favourable outcome, with a redislocation rate of 9% and low complication rate.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Open Bristow Procedure in the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Osseous Glenoid Lesions in Collision Athletes.

Background:Traumatic anterior shoulder instability in collision sports athletes often involves osseous glenoid lesions, which make surgical treatment challenging. High redislocation rates have been seen in collision sports athletes treated using arthroscopic Bankart repair.Purpose:To investigate the effectiveness of a combined arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Bristow procedure for the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability in collision sports athletes, with a focus on osseous glenoid lesions.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:We reviewed 149 shoulders in 141 competitive collision sports athletes (mean ± standard deviation age, 20.1 ± 4.1 years; 8 bilateral cases) who underwent a combined arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Bristow procedure with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Osseous Bankart lesions were arthroscopically reduced and fixed using a coracoid graft.Results:Clinical outcomes as indicated by mean Rowe score improved significantly from 50.0 preoperatively to 98.9 postoperatively (P < .001) at a median follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 2.5-7 years). There were 2 recurrent dislocations (1.3%), both of which had nonunion of the transferred coracoid. Osseous Bankart lesions were observed in 85 shoulders, and osseous glenoid lesions ≥10% of the diameter of the nonoperative side were found in 58 shoulders, including 24 off-track cases. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between patients with a glenoid defect ≥10% and <10%. Nonunion of the transferred coracoid was observed in 16 shoulders (10.7%), which had inferior Rowe scores; however, we could not define any risk factors for nonunion, including patient characteristics or bone morphology. Postoperative computed tomography performed in 29 patients >1 year after surgery showed successful repair of the osseous glenoid lesions, with a restored glenoid articular surface in all cases. Significant pre- to postoperative increases were seen in glenoid diameter (mean, 13.1% [95% CI, 9.9%-16.3%]; P < .001) and area (mean, 10.6% [95% CI, 8.5%-12.7%]; P < .001).Conclusion:A combined arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Bristow procedure improved bone morphology and was a reliable surgical method for treating collision sports athletes with traumatic anterior shoulder instability involving osseous glenoid lesions.

Evaluation of the \u2018Spaarne soft tissue procedure\u2019 as a treatment for recurrent patellar dislocations: a four-in-one technique

PurposeThe ‘Spaarne soft tissue procedure’, is a 4-in-1 soft tissue procedure that treats recurrent patellar dislocations in the young and active population. The procedure has not yet described elsewhere. The purpose of this study is to analyse the redislocation rate and to evaluate the postoperative knee function and patient satisfaction.MethodsTwenty-seven patients (34 knees) underwent the four-in-one SST-procedure. The 4-step technique required a minor change in 2010, including the use of a smaller strip of the patellar tendon for transposition. After a median follow-up of 10.4 years, the redislocation rate was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome (IKDC, Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner activity scale) and Numeric Rating Scales for satisfaction and pain.ResultsRedislocation occurred in 8 cases (23.5%) and subluxation occurred in 13 cases (38.2%) post-surgery. A significant higher number of redislocations and subluxations were seen before 2010 (p = 0.04, p = 0.03). The median postoperative IKDC, Lysholm and Kujala scores for the total group were 54, 76 and 81 respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner activity scale were both level 3. Median NRS scores during rest, walking and sports were 1, 3 and 5 respectively. Satisfaction with the procedure was reported as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ by 79% of the patients.ConclusionDespite the high overall redislocation rate and increased pain scores, the SST-procedure shows to be a safe procedure in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations based on the cases after 2010. Mid- and long-term results show moderate to good functional outcomes and satisfaction.Level of evidenceTherapeutic retrospective cohort study, LEVEL III