The aim of this paper is to provide a plausible explanation of aggregate portfolio behavior, in a framework where economic agents have behavioral (narrow framing) preferences. Basically, we develop our analysis assuming the existence of boundedly rational economic agents. In that sense, we explicitly recall some Keynesian propositions. In fact, under different aspects, the analysis of Keynes’ work reveals that his approach was quite consistent with and actually anticipated both Simon's conception of bounded rationality and recent work on cognitive psychology. The idea is that representative agent derives utility not only from consumption (as in “standard” models) but also from financial (stock) wealth fluctuations (Barberis, Huang and Santos, 2001). Moreover, the investor frames the stock market risk narrowly and has loss averse preferences. With these premises, we numerically solve a simple model of international portfolio choice, providing a possible explanation for the equity home bias puzzle. Only economic agents able to process correctly information deriving from stock markets exploit the diversification opportunities provided by international financial markets. The mechanism in action is based on the individual’s limited capabilities of processing information: foreign asset is perceived as less attractive than it would be if the investor had the optimal information skills and hence would be able to evaluate the two risky assets in conjunction. What follows is a low foreign equity share. For the Italian case, this outcome is also confirmed by empirical evidence available at the household level. At the best of our knowledge, the present paper is the first one to obtain the outcome described above under narrow framing preferences.
Read full abstract