Disease Control Rate Research Articles

Real-World Experience of First-Line Osimertinib in EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers from a Tertiary Cancer Center, India

Osimertinib is approved in the first line in patients with mutations in the sensitive gene epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. There is lack of real-world evidence to illustrate the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib that can reflect the current medical practice especially in resource-constrained setting. A total of 129 patients with histology-proven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation registered at Tata Memorial Hospital between from March 2018 and May 2023 were analyzed. The parameters studied included demographics, outcomes, safety analysis, and secondary mutations. Most common EGFR mutation was exon 19 deletion 58.9% followed by EGFR exon 21 L858R 39.5% and others 1.5%. The overall median progression-free survival was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.0–58.1) and median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI: 17.8–45). The median duration of response was 21.3 months (95% CI: 17.1–25.5). Of 129 patients, 77.5% had partial response (PR), 10.1% had stable disease (SD), and 6.2% patients had progressive disease (PD) as the first best response with overall disease control rate was 87.2%. In patients with baseline central nervous system disease, 8.9% had complete response, 75.5% had PR and 8.9% had SD, and 2.2% had PD as best response. The overall intracranial response rate was 84.4% and disease control was 93.3%. Skin toxicities (27.1%) and gastrointestinal toxicities (17%) were most frequently observed toxicities. Overall, 63 patients had progression of disease on osimertinib. Subsequently, 58.7% (n = 37) patients received second line of therapy and 27% (n = 17) patients received third line of therapy. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy was the most common subsequent treatment after progression on osimertinib. Repeat biopsy was done in 33 patients (52.3%) and next-generation sequencing was done in 30 patients (47.6%). The most common resistance alteration detected was TP53 in 30% cases followed by mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) amplification which was seen in 20% cases. Our study confirms similar efficacy and safety of osimertinib as first-line treatment of mutated non-small cell lung cancer in real-world setting irrespective of the type of common EGFR mutation and similar intracranial activity as well.

Real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab-tremelimumab as second-line systemic therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are known. We explored ICI rechallenges with direct switching from 1 ICI regimen to another. This retrospective study included 16 patients who received atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) as the first-line and second-line combination therapy, respectively, at Hiroshima University Hospital. The radiological response and adverse event were evaluated in all patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were male, and the median age at Atezo+Bev induction was 71 years. The reasons for medication changes were disease progression in 11 patients and adverse events in 5 patients. With Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre initiation, the Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer stage (A/B/C) progressed in 9/6/3 and 3/4/9 patients and the Child-Pugh classification (A/B/C) progressed in 12/4/0 and 9/6/3 patients, respectively. The disease control rate and overall response rate of Atezo+Bev were 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively, and of Dur+Tre were 62.5% and 0%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse event in both the Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre groups was colitis; 3 of the 5 patients with colitis on Atezo+Bev treatment had colitis with Dur+Tre, and 2 had exacerbations. Regarding liver function, ALBI score significantly decreased during Atezo+Bev, but not Dur+Tre, treatment. In patients with colitis following Atezo+Bev, subsequent Dur+Tre treatment may induce colitis recurrence or exacerbation. For immune-related adverse events other than colitis, Dur+Tre could provide relatively safe disease control while maintaining liver function.

Efficiency and Safety of Targeted Alpha Therapy in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Meta-analysis.

Despite the effectiveness of 177Lu-based peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), disease progression posttreatment remains a significant challenge. Targeted alpha therapy (TAT) has emerged as a promising option for patients experiencing such progression. This study aims to assess the therapeutic efficiency and toxicity of TAT in patients with metastatic NET through a meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL using relevant keywords. The analysis focused on the pooled proportions of objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to determine therapeutic efficiency. We also evaluated the incidence of serious hematologic and renal adverse events (grade 3 or 4) to assess toxicity. A subgroup analysis was performed to identify factors influencing therapeutic outcomes. Our meta-analysis included 7 studies comprising 162 patients. The results showed that TAT achieved ORR of 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.7%-57.4%) and DCR of 87.0% (95% CI: 72.1%-96.8%). The incidences of hematologic and renal toxicities were low, at 2.1% (95% CI: 0.5%-5.5%) and 3.4% (95% CI: 1.2%-7.3%), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated consistent therapeutic efficiency across different variables, including prior 177Lu-based peptide receptor radionuclide therapy treatment, 225Ac-based TAT, absence of radiosensitizer, and methods of response evaluation, with ORR ranging from 46.6% to 57.1% and DCR from 82.0% to 91.5%. TAT is an effective treatment for metastatic NET, demonstrating substantial disease control and response rates with minimal toxicity. These findings suggest that TAT is a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with metastatic NET.

Impact of Neuroendocrine Differentiation (NED) on Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Retrospective Analysis.

Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) represents a possible androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) resistance mechanism in metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). As mCRPC with NED has been excluded from clinical trials evaluating ARPI efficacy, this study investigates the prognostic impact of NED in mCRPC patients treated with ARPIs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 327 mCRPC patient data treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone in the first and second or successive lines of treatment. NED was assessed using prostate biopsy samples through immunohistochemical staining. Results: NED was confirmed in 32/327 (9.8%) mCRPC patients. In the overall population, mCRPC with NED showed worse PFS (4.38 vs. 11.48 months HR 2.505 [1.71-3.68] p < 0.05), disease control rate (DCR), and PSA response. In the first line setting, mCRPC with NED demonstrated worse PFS (8.5 vs. 14.9 months HR 2.13 [1.18-3.88], p < 0.05). Similarly, in the second or successive lines, mCRPC with NED showed worse PFS (4.0 vs. 7.5 months HR 2.43 [1.45-4.05] p < 0.05), DCR, PSA response and OS (12.53 vs. 18.03 months HR 1.86 [1.12-3.10] p < 0.05). The adverse impact of NED on PFS was consistence across all subgroups; we also noted a trend of worse PFS in patients with high vs. low NED. Conclusions: In our study, mCRPC with NED treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone showed worse clinical outcomes. NED assessment should be considered to optimize treatment decisions in the mCRPC setting.

Sleep disturbance as a poor prognostic predictor in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A prospective study

BackgroundSleep disturbances are highly prevalent in oncology and often exacerbate symptoms, leading to reduced quality of life, which in turn may further affect the tolerability and efficacy of oncological treatments. Sleep disturbance and cancer have an intimate and complicated relationship, and may be a negative predictor of cancer treatment. The present study aimed to characterize the relationship between sleep disturbance and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsData from 171 patients with advanced NSCLC, who underwent ICI treatment between December 2020 and October 2022, were analysed in our prospective study. Sleep disturbances were evaluated according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with a cut-off value of 5, to investigate the impact of sleep disturbance on the survival of patients with NSCLC and the efficacy of ICI treatment. ResultsThe median progression-free survival (PFS) was10.4 months (9 5% confidence interval [CI]:9.84–10.97). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that sleep disturbance and depressive symptom predicted worse prognosis with shortened PFS. Patients who experienced sleep disturbance exhibited a significant reduction in PFS (9.2 vs. 11.8 months; HR: 1.83 [9 5% CI 1.27–2.6 5]; p = 0.001), as did those with depressive states (HR 1.5 5 [9 5% CI 1.06–2.28]; p = 0.02 5). Additionally, patients with sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms exhibited significantly lower objective response rates and disease control rates. ConclusionSleep disturbance could be a factor for prognosis in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing first- or second-line treatment with ICIs, including shorter PFS and reduced efficacy.

Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential thoracic radiotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small–cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): a phase II trial

This phase II prospective trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adebrelimab (PD-L1 antibody) plus first-line chemotherapy followed by sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with adebrelimab in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Biomarkers associated with potential therapeutic effects were also explored. Patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Jinan, China). Patients received 4-6 cycles of adebrelimab (20mg/kg, D1, Q3W) combined with EP/EC (etoposide, 100mg/m2, D1-3, Q3W and cisplatin, 75mg/m2, D1, Q3W or carboplatin, AUC=5, D1, Q3W). Then patients with response sequentially underwent consolidative TRT (≥30Gy in 10 fractions or≥50Gy in 25 fractions, involved-field irradiation), and maintenance adebrelimab until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Genomic and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling were also analyzed with tumour tissues and peripheral blood. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04562337. From October 2020 to April 2023, 67 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. 45 patients received sequential TRT as planned. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.4 months (95% CI: 17.2-not reached months) and 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.9-15.5 months), respectively. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.6% (48/67, 95% CI: 59.3-82.0%) and disease control rate was 89.6% (60/67, 95% CI: 79.7-95.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hematological toxicities. The incidence of any grade and G3+ pneumonitis was 25% (17/67) and 6% (4/67), respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Patients without co-mutations of TP53/RB1 in both tissue and peripheral blood displayed longer PFS (tissue, P=0.071; ctDNA, P=0.060) and OS (tissue, P=0.032; ctDNA, P=0.031). Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential TRT as first-line therapy for ES-SCLC showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172865), Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.

Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for the therapy of cervical cancer with varying PD-L1 expression levels: a single-arm meta-analysis.

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced cervical cancer (CC), focusing on varying PD-L1 levels. A comprehensive exploration was carried out on EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library databases as well as Web of Science up to May 25, 2024, for studies involving advanced CC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), as well as median overall survival (OS). Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers using the JBI Case Series Critical Appraisal Checklist, followed by a meta-analysis via STATA/MP 16.0. Five eligible studies comprising 223 patients were chosen. ORR and DCR were 42% (95% CI: 17%-66%, P = 0.00) and 70% (95% CI: 22%-117%, P = 0.00), respectively, in the PD-L1 positive patients and were 36% (95% CI: 17%-54%, P = 0.00) and 47% (95% CI: 30%-63%, P = 0.00), respectively, in patients with PD-L1 negativity. For patients exhibiting PD-L1 positivity, median PFS and median OS were 3.98 months (95% CI: 0.80-7.16, P = 0.01) and 11.26 months (95% CI: 3.01-12.58, P = 0.00), respectively. With PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-L1 positive CC patients demonstrate superior ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS, underscoring PD-L1 as one biomarker for immunotherapy response.

Real-world efficacy, safety data and predictive clinical parameters for treatment outcomes in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy

BackgroundThe combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy has shown potential in the treatment of numerous malignant tumors, but limited evidence was available for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Therefore, the aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in conjunction with antiangiogenic therapy in patients diagnosed with advanced STS (aSTS).MethodsThe study enrolled patients with aSTS from January 2014 to October 2022. Eligible participants had previously received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, presented with an anthracycline-resistant sarcoma subtype, or were ineligible for anthracycline treatment due to medical conditions. Following enrollment, these patients received a combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events.ResultsFifty-one patients were included in this cohort study. The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months. The ORR and DCR were 17.6%, and 76.5%, respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.8–6.8) for all patients, and the median OS had not been reached as of the date cutoff. Multivariate analysis indicated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and ≤ second-line treatment were positive predictors for both PFS and OS. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma had longer mPFS (16.2 months, 95% CI: 7.8–25.6) when compared to those with other subtypes of STS (4.4 months, 95% CI: 1.4–7.5, P < 0.001). Among the observed adverse events, hypertension (23.5%), diarrhea (17.6%), and proteinuria (17.6%) were the most common, with no treatment-related deaths reported.ConclusionThe combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with aSTS, especially those with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer liver metastasis following failure of multiple-line therapy.

The prognosis of microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) following failure of multi-line therapy remains dismal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T treatment) for MSS-CRCLM which failed from multiple-line therapy. From February 2021 to June 2023, 45 patients with MSS-CRCLM after failure of multiple-line therapy who received HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T triple treatment) were enrolled. The combination therapy included HAIC regimens with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil on days 1-2, intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) before HAIC on day 1, and oral fruquintinb (3 mg/d) on day 3-21, every 4 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The follow-up ended on June 22, 2024, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months. The objective response rate was 42.2%, and the disease control rate was 82.2%. The median OS was 15.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:12.634-17.966), and the median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI:5.318-9.682). The independent risk factors related to worse OS were previous PD-1 immunotherapy (P = 0.021) and the number of HAIC-F-T triple treatment cycles of ≤ 2 (P = 0.007). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 20%, with the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs being abdominal pain (3/45, 6.7%). HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab may be an alternative salvage treatment for patients with MSS-CRCLM following failure of multiple-line therapy.

Predominance of hyperprogression in mucosal melanoma during anti-PD-1 monotherapy treatment.

A minority subset of immunotherapy patients manifests hyperprogressive disease (HPD), with the disparity in melanoma subtypes yet to be reported. This study aimed to delineate the proportion and prognosis of HPD in patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy and to identify patient with HPD clinical characteristics across melanoma subtypes to inform clinical decision making. Utilizing 4 established HPD definitions, the incidence of HPD in patients with advanced melanoma on anti-PD-1 monotherapy was determined. The incidence rates and prognostic abilities of various HPD definitions were compared to elect the most effective one. This facilitated a comparative analysis of subtypes and clinical features between patients with HPD and traditional progression. A total of 262 patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy from 5 prospectively registered clinical trials were included in the study. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 21% and 58%, respectively, with 42% showcasing progression disease. The HPD incidences by 4 definitions were 13.2%, 16.8%, 10.8%, and 28.2%. All definitions effectively segregated HPD patients, with significantly poorer outcome than other progressive patients. The Delta TGR > 100 definition was the most indicative of a reduced overall survival, corroborated by the highest hazard ratio and statistical significance. The number of metastatic organs over 2 is a risk factor for HPD (OR = 4.18, P = .0103). Mucosal melanoma was the HPD prevalent subtype (OR = 3.13, P = .0489) in multivariable analysis, which is also indicated by RECIST criteria (P = .005). A delta TGR exceeding 100 best identified HPD patients in the advanced melanoma population treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Hyperprogression was notably prevalent in mucosal melanoma patients with multiple metastatic organs. Caution against HPD is warranted when applying anti-PD-1 monotherapy in mucosal subtype.

Efficacy and Safety of Metronomic Capecitabine in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASystematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Metronomic capecitabine has been found to be useful in several types of cancers such as pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. This unique systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and safety of metronomic capecitabine as a treatment regimen for hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic search of major databases was performed. Eight studies that dealt with the use of metronomic capecitabine for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were selected, seven were non-randomized control trials (n-RCTs), and one was a randomized control trial (RCT). Meta-analysis of these studies was performed using Review Manager v5.3 and STATA 15.1 software. The pooled prevalence of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), grade 1-2 adverse events (grade 1-2 AEs), grade 3-4 adverse events (grade 3-4 AEs) was determined, including publication bias and sensitivity analysis. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, combining the pooled data of 476 patients from safety and efficacy studies. The pooled prevalence of disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) achieved with metronomic capecitabine was 36% (95% CI 32-41) and 7% (95% CI 5-9) respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 3.57months (95% CI 3.29-3.85) and 11.75months (95% CI 10.56-12.95) respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (grade 3-4 AEs) and grade 1-2 adverse events (grade 1-2 AEs) was 38% (95% CI 32-44) and 73% (95% CI 67-79) respectively. This meta-analysis highlights metronomic capecitabine as a potential treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the advanced stage. However, effective management of capecitabine's side effects is essential.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment-naive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial

This single-arm phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2100046715) examined previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received four cycles of paclitaxel with carboplatin every 3 weeks. Toripalimab was infused intravenously every 3 weeks for 12 months, or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Radiotherapy that encompassed the primary lesions and metastases commenced in the third cycle. The median progression-free survival time was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8–not estimable) in the intent-to-treat population, failing to meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included an objective response rate of 45.5%, a disease control rate of 57.6%, and a median duration of response of 11.5 months (interquartile range, 6.4–15.0). The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 41.9% (95% CI: 27.7–63.5) and 69.7% (95% CI: 55.7–87.3), respectively. Lymphopenia was the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse event (82%), and an esophageal fistula developed in three patients (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. In prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis, higher densities of CD8 + T cells, CD11c+ dendritic cells, and CD68+ macrophages correlated with improved tumor response and prognosis. Radiotherapy supplementation to first-line chemo-immunotherapy for treatment-naive advanced ESCC demonstrated some antitumor activity and manageable safety profiles, warranting further randomized controlled trials.

Prognostic value of type of prior TKI in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab.

Aim: To define the prognostic significance of first-line TKI in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.Materials and methods: A total of 571mRCC patients who received ≥second line nivolumab were included in this subanalysis. The correlation between prior TKI (sunitinib vs. pazopanib) and overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were investigated. Additionally, the impact of TKI choice according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score was examined.Results: There was no significant difference between sunitinib and pazopanib groups in terms of mPFS, mOS, overall response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, no difference between sunitinib and pazopanib was found according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score.Conclusion: There is no conclusive evidence favoring pazopanib or sunitinib treatment before initiating nivolumab therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) Cellular Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Carcinoma (NSCLC): A Meta-Analysis.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of autologous Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for non-small-cell carcinoma (NSCLC). The literature related to the efficacy and safety of autologous CIK cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in NSCLC were collected. The Chinese literature databases were collected from CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu, and the English literature were retrieved from Cochrane Library and PubMed. All literature were retrieved until the year of 2022, and evaluated by its method quality and analyzed by RevMan5.3 software. A Meta-analysis on the 11 included literature showed that the treatment efficacy and disease control rate (DCR) of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and significantly increased the levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ indexes than the control group (P < 0.05), and the incidence of bone marrow suppression, liver injury and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with single chemotherapy, CIK combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with NSCLC can improve the efficacy of treatment and DCR, significantly improve their immune function, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and is beneficial to the recovery of prognosis.

Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma with Enteric Differentiation without TTF-1 Expression Is a Very Rare Subtype with Limited Treatment Options and Poor Prognosis

Plain Language SummaryPulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation (PAED) without expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is an extremely rare and hard-to-treat variant of lung cancer. We collected clinicopathological data of 121 Caucasian patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma without TTF-1 expression, their systemic therapy options, and the efficacy of their systemic treatment including 79 cases without a PAED and 42 cases with a PAED, compared these subgroups, and investigated patients’ response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy as first-line treatment. A comparison of clinicopathological data of TTF-1-negative PAED and non-PAED patients revealed a significantly lower frequency of high programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in PAED resulting in the lack of single-agent immunotherapy (p = 0.032) in this subgroup. Frequencies of an activating Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene mutation were high in both groups (46.7% and 50.0%), but a G12C gene mutation was seldomly noted (in 6.7% and 18.5% of patients with evaluable data). Median overall survival (OS) was poor in both groups (10 and 12 months). The majority of PAED patients received platinum-based and taxane-containing chemotherapy or chemo-/immunotherapy with an objective response rate of 31.6% and a disease control rate of 57.9%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of PAED patients with systemic therapy were very poor (3.9 months and 5.9 months). Caucasian patients with a TTF-1-negative PAED have a poor prognosis with reduced response rates to standard first-line systemic therapy and short survival times (PFS and OS).

Prognostic factors of second-line nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study for 184 cases.

The real-world efficacy, prognostic factors, and adverse events of second-line nivolumab monotherapy and subsequent third-line therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer have not been fully evaluated. This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 184 consecutive patients treated with second-line nivolumab monotherapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, adverse events, long-term survival, and prognostic factors. Among 128 patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 23% and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 45%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 14%, but no treatment-related deaths presented. Median progression-free survival was 5.1months and overall survival was 14months, respectively. C-reactive protein level and performance status were identified as significant prognostic factors of overall survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis. The group with two favorable prognostic factors showed better overall survival than the groups with either one or zero prognostic factors (median overall survival: 22, 15, and 4.4months, respectively). Among 69 patients who received third-line taxane anticancer agents, the progression-free survival was 6.7months. Our study demonstrated that the real-world outcomes of second-line nivolumab monotherapy were comparable to those of previous randomized clinical trials in terms of tumor response, safety, and long-term survival. Furthermore, a good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may identify patients who are likely to benefit from therapy. Third-line chemotherapy after nivolumab treatment may have an enhanced effect; however, further prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

Lazertinib in EGFR-Variant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With CNS Failure to Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

EGFR-variant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a high rate of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, even with treatment with first-generation or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To investigate CNS activity with lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI. This multicenter single-arm, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted in South Korea and included patients with EGFR-variant NSCLC who had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic brain metastases after unsuccessful treatment with first-generation or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Data were collected from June 2021 to April 2022, with a data cutoff date of December 15, 2022. Lazertinib, 240 mg, once daily. The primary end point was intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in the evaluable population according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 assessed by the investigators. Secondary end points included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and iORR in patients with T790M-negative disease and isolated CNS progression as well as overall ORR, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, cerebrospinal fluid penetration of lazertinib, and safety. Among 40 included patients, 25 (63%) were women, and the median (range) age was 63 (29-85) years. A total of 38 patients were evaluable for tumor response, including 12 patients with leptomeningeal metastases. At data cutoff, the median (range) follow-up was 13.6 (2.9-17.7) months. The iORR for the evaluable population was 55% (21 of 38; 95% CI, 38.3-71.4); for patients with T790M-positive disease, 80% (4 of 5; 95% CI, 28.4-99.5); for patients with T790M-negative disease, 43% (9 of 21; 95% CI, 21.8-66.0); and for patients with T790M-unknown disease, 67% (8 of 12; 95% CI, 34.9-90.1). The median iPFS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 15.2-not reached) for the evaluable population, 15.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-not reached) for the T790M-positive subgroup, 15.4 months (95% CI, 7.9-not reached) for the T790M-negative subgroup, and 18.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) for the T790M-unknown subgroup. The cerebrospinal fluid penetration rate of lazertinib was 46.2% (95% CI, 10.0-49.6), providing further support for its mechanism of intracranial response. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. In this study, lazertinib had substantial CNS activity, regardless of T790M status, against the progression of intracranial metastases with or without leptomeningeal metastases after unsuccessful treatment with first-generation or second-generation EGFR TKIs in patients with metastatic EGFR-variant NSCLC. These results suggest that using lazertinib instead of brain local treatment could be a potential strategy in patients with EGFR-variant NSCLC whose CNS metastases progressed after prior EGFR TKI treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05326425.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC. METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability. RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone. CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Exploratory Study Identifies Matrix Metalloproteinase-14 and -9 as Potential Biomarkers of Regorafenib Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

In identifying biomarkers for anticancer drugs, the lack of objectivity in selecting candidate factors makes interpretation difficult. We performed preclinical analysis and a translational validation study to identify candidate biomarkers for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using in silico COMPARE analysis with a human cancer cell line panel, JFCR39, we selected candidate biomarkers whose expression correlates with regorafenib sensitivity. We validated predictive values in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib (discovery, n = 53) and FTD/TPI (control, n = 16). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), before the second cycle (2nd), and at progressive disease (PD), and biomarker levels were measured using ELISA. Our analysis showed that high matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 expression was associated with a high sensitivity to regorafenib. In the discovery cohort, high MMP-14 levels at BL and PD were correlated with tumor shrinkage and longer progression-free survival (PFS). A subsequent analysis of other related factors further indicated that the patients with decreased MMP-9 levels at the 2nd had higher disease control rates, tumor shrinkage, longer PFS, and overall survival than those with increased changes. These findings were not observed in the control cohort. Our study suggests MMP-14 and MMP-9 may serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib and provide insights into novel combination therapies with anti-MMP-9 agents or FTD/TPI.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Advanced Refractory Meningiomas: Efficacy and Toxicity in a Long Follow-up.

Recurrence of meningiomas after surgery and radiotherapy deserves specific attention because of the lack of active third-line therapies. Somatostatin receptors are usually overexpressed on the cell membrane of meningiomas, and this has led the way to a radionuclide theranostic approach. Diagnoses with 68Ga-DOTA-octreotide and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 90Y/177Lu-DOTA-octreotide are currently possible options within experimental protocols or as compassionate use in small patient groups. Methods: From October 2009 to October 2021, 42 meningioma patients with radiologic recurrence after standard therapies were treated with 90Y-DOTATOC (dosage of 1.1 or 5.5 GBq) or with 177Lu-DOTATATE (dosage of 3.7 or 5.5 GBq) in a mean of 4 cycles. All patients showed intense uptake at diagnostic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT or in an 111In-octreotide scan. Results: Of 42 patients treated, 5 patients received 90Y-DOTATOC with a cumulative activity of 11.1 GBq and 37 patients received 177Lu-DOTATATE with a cumulative activity of 22 GBq. The disease control rate was 57%. With a median follow-up of 63 mo, median progression-free survival was 16 mo, and median overall survival was 36 mo. Retreatment 177Lu-PRRT was performed in 6 patients with an administered median activity of 13 GBq in a mean of 5 cycles. With a 75.8-mo follow-up, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.5 and 17 mo, respectively. Only 1 patient discontinued the treatment because of grade 3 platelet toxicity. A rapidly transient grade 2 neutropenia was recorded in 1 retreated patient. Conclusion: PRRT in patients with advanced meningiomas overexpressing somatostatin receptor 2 was active and well tolerated, showing a 57% disease control rate. Furthermore, PRRT could represent a potential retreatment option. Further studies, also in combination with other treatments, are warranted.