ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of using “distal acupoints only” vs. “local acupoints mainly combined with distal acupoints” in cases of acute low back pain (ALBP). MethodsA total of 102 eligible patients aged 18–65 years with ALBP lasting less than 6 weeks will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the distal acupoints only group (DPOG) and the local acupoints mainly combined with the distal acupoints group (LPMG). During a 4-week treatment period, patients in the DPOG will receive acupuncture at distal acupoints only (Houxi [SI 3] and Yaotongxue [EX-UE 7]) twice a week, while those in the LPMG group will receive acupuncture at local acupoints (mainly Shenshu [BL 23] and Dachangshu [BL 25]) combined with distal points (Weizhong [BL 40]). The patients in both groups will be evaluated at every session of treatment, and the follow-up will be performed for 3 months. The primary outcome measure will be the change in ALBP intensity, assessed using visual analogue scale scores before and after treatment. The secondary outcome measure will be the evaluation of functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index. DiscussionThis study compares the DPOG and LPMG to explore the feasibility of the DPOG in the treatment of ALBP.