Purpose: Visual short‐term memory (VSTM) for briefly presented visual stimuli has been estimated at 4–6 items for real‐world objects (Luck and Vogel, 1997). To measure the fundamental capacity of VSTM the use of real‐world objects is undesirable, since estimates are confounded by verbal descriptors and/or long‐term memory support (Olsson and Poom, 2005). The purpose of this study is to measure the accuracy and capacity of VSTM for unfamiliar, non‐categorical visual stimuli.Method: Stimuli were random grayscale noise patterns subtending 2°× 2, displayed at a distance of 57 cm. A series of reference stimuli were presented sequentially at the centre of a computer display for 500 ms each. Following this, a blank interval of 500 ms, and then a test stimulus were displayed. Signal present test stimuli originated from a random index in the study series. The probability of a signal present trial was 50%. Observers were instructed to indicate, via a numeric keypad, if the test stimulus was present in the study series (yes/no). Series length was increased from 1 to 5 across blocks of trials. The number of blocks completed for each series length, S, was 2S, where each block comprised 100 trials (i.e. 3000 trials per observer were completed). Four normal/corrected‐to‐normal observers participated in the study. The number of objects encoded in VSTM was calculated using Cowan's formula (Cowan, 2001).Results: Across series lengths 1–5, average performance rate (pooled across observers) decreased exponentially from 95% for series length 1, to 60% for series length 5. The number of stimuli encoded in VSTM, determined using Cowan's formula, was found to be 1.52, achieved for series length 3. Beyond series length 3, the number of items encoded was found to decrease, at 0.92, 1.30, 1.52, 1.35 and 1.40 for series lengths 1–5, respectively. For series lengths > 1, large recency effects were found by analysis of the reference indices of correctly identified signal present test stimuli.Conclusions: We find that the capacity of VSTM for serially presented non‐categorical visual stimuli is limited to 1.5 items, in line with VSTM capacity estimates of Olsson and Poom (2005), rather than the more commonly cited 4–6 items (Cowan, 2001; Luck and Vogel, 1997), and is seen to decrease exponentially with increases in series length or decreases in recency. A suite of related experiments are underway to construct a memory performance model under varying stimulus presentation scenarios, including parallel display and variable location.
Read full abstract