DUE to its rapid progress, roentgen therapy has heretofore failed to show that degree of standardization which is so much admired in surgery. It evidently has not yet left the stage of experimentation. Nevertheless, though we are not at present able to explain the most fundamental biological reactions, recent communications are indicating that we have reached a point where we can decide as to the best method of treatment available. This statement holds true in cancer of the cervix, and also, to a lesser degree, in cancer of the breast. A considerable amount of material concerning results has been obtained from all parts of the world, but these statistics vary so much in their basic principles that they cannot be compared to best advantage. Lynham has ably pointed out that, if a few surgeons and radiologists of each country would get together and gather their material with the same basic understanding as to registration of cases and different methods of treatment, it would be easy to obtain enough data within a few years, clearly to establish the value of each particular method of treatment. In Europe, the Steinthal registration has been adopted. Its Group I and Group II are identical with those of the American College of Surgeons; as Group III, Steinthal registers all inoperable cases, including those with supraclavicular glands, and inoperable recurrences, whereas Group III of the American classification comprises operable local recurrences, and Group IV, inoperable local recurrences. The statistics of the last ten years have clearly established the fact that roentgen therapy, following the operation for cancer of the breast, has raised the percentage of five-year cures considerably. In inoperable and recurrent cases, it is indispensable. As a pre-operative procedure, it appears to be gaining increasing favor. Recent reports seem to indicate that further improvement in results may be expected by combination with interstitial radium application, according to Keynes' method. Occasional good individual results have already been obtained, in the early stages, and with a primitive equipment. With growing experience and the advancement of x-ray science, the figures have become consistently better, especially within the last decade. In the course of this development, many methods of treatment have been presented and later abandoned. Every radiotherapist has done his share of pioneering, and has tried to improve upon the different methods. This may be the reason why the number of methods in use is considerable, especially in the treatment of cancer of the breast. A part of this diversity is due to the fact that comparatively few authors have described their method so that it can be followed according to their specifications. In this country, the lack of a text-book on the different methods, unifying technic, written by a competent author, is felt keenly.
Read full abstract