Radium application by interstitial para-metrial needles in combination with intracervical tandems has been used and advocated in recent years by several authors (3, 4, 5). The published clinical results are quite promising and they seem justified on theoretical consideration of this method. There are many possible variations in the number, strength, and position of the needles and in the size and strength of the tandem. It is the purpose of this study to calculate the distribution of radiation in several such schemes of radium implantation and to compare the results with those published for other methods of treating cervix carcinoma. Theoretically this method is proposed to yield a wider distribution of radiation in the pelvis because of the introduction of the radium sources directly into the parametria. Furthermore, the use of many weak sources rather than a few strong ones will tend to produce a more uniform field of radiation and eliminate the danger of extensive necrosis around individual sources. This use of many weak sources has no relationship to the opinion sometimes voiced, that protracted low-intensity radiation may have a more pronounced physiological effect than shorter and more intense treatment. Actually the radiation may be delivered as rapidly (or even more rapidly) by means of many weak sources as by a few strong ones. A uniform field of radiation and the avoidance of strong individual sources are important in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. It is quite necessary to avoid extensive necrosis and local over-irradiation, because of the morbidity and mortality associated with them. Tod (14) has shown that there is a definite relationship between over-irradiation of the so-called paracervical triangle and three-year survival rates. She emphasizes that there is an upper limit to the dosage that may be delivered to the region in the base of the broad ligament lateral to the cervix. Overdosage there brings a high percentage of “overdosage effects” and deaths. “... these deaths are not . . . solely due to necrosis. They are due to recurrence which may either be local or a result of residual disease in the pelvic lymph nodes growing down into the pelvis. These facts have been verified by a number of post-mortem examinations .... This peculiar combination of necrosis and recurrence has been called in this Clinic [Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute] ‘supralethal ef-fect.’” Others have mentioned this effect but, so far as is known, no adequate explanation has been offered. On the other hand, it has been brought out by several investigators (1, 9) that there is a definite relationship between lymph node involvement and the percentage of five-year survivals. No method of treatment, therefore, will increase the overall salvage unless it controls, not only the primary tumor, but also the field of lymphatic drainage. There are four groups of nodes along the course of lymphatic spread: the hypogastric nodes at the bifurcation of the common iliacs, the ureteric node at the crossing of the uterine arteries and the ureters, the obturator node at the entrance of the obturator canals, and the “ganglion principal” along the lateral pelvic wall halfway between the hypogastrics and obturators. It is generally considered that only 50 per cent of patients with carcinoma of the cervix are “operable” when they first apply for treatment, and in this group it has been found on serial sections that there is carcinomatous extension to the nodes in about 50 per cent. Thus, only about 25 per cent of patients with cervix cancer are treated before this lymphatic spread has occurred (9). (One must presuppose that there is already lymphatic involvement in the inoperable cases.)
Read full abstract