Since 1936, when radioisotopes were introduced in clinical medicine with the therapeutic use of P32, many radiologists have been involved in the overall development of nuclear medicine. In this development internists, surgeons, general practitioners, and physicists have also participated, but from the beginning individual interest rather than any particular medical specialty has determined the use of the radioisotopes. The American Boards of Internal Medicine and of Pathology expect candidates to possess some knowledge of radioisotope procedures and of their interpretation. Furthermore, the Board of Pathology gives credit for up to six months of training in nuclear medicine as part of the clinical pathology program. The Board of Radiology is the only Board that requires specific training and gives separate examination and certification in nuclear medicine. At present the American Board of Radiology requires three months of training in nuclear medicine. The Board, however, does not appear to consider this training program in the same category as those for diagnostic roentgenology or the other portions of therapeutic radiology (1). The training in nuclear medicine need not be the responsibility of a radiologist, nor need it be given in an institution approved for residency in radiology. No quantitative figures have been established by the Board regarding the clinical experience expected in the diagnostic or therapeutic uses of radioisotopes. Radiology residents at the University of California Hospitals in San Francisco complete a laboratory course in basic principles, participate in an active clinical radioisotope section in the Department of Radiology, and receive instruction in radiation physics and radiobiology. Concern about deficiencies in this program and the desire to learn how other institutions are handling the problem prompted a recent survey of hospitals accredited for residency training in radiology. Questionnaires were mailed to all radio1ogy departments listed in the 1962 Directory of Approved Internships and Residencies published by the American Medical Association. The requested information concerned (a) basic training in instrumentation, physics, radiation safety, and related aspects; (b) clinical training in diagnostic uses of radioisotopes; (c) clinical training in their therapeutic uses. In all three sections, information was requested concerning the total number of hours of training as well as the portion of time given to “lecture” and “laboratory.” The informant was also asked if the training was given in the radiology department and what other departments participated. Additional comments were invited. Answers to part or all of the three major sections of the questionnaire were received from 92 per cent of the university departments and 71 per cent of the nonuniversity departments. The data relating to university programs have been compared with those of nonuniversity programs.
Read full abstract