PURPOSE: To validate the clinical use of a newly designed wristband micromanometer. Augmentation Index (AIx), AIx normalized at 75bpm ([email protected]), and round trip travel time of the reflective waveform (Dtp) were compared to measurements produced using the traditional pencil-type micromanometer (Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas). METHODS: Resting pulse wave analysis was measured non-invasively in triplicate using radial artery applanation tonometry in 32 apparently healthy subjects (males n = 21; females n = 11). Each subject was randomized to testing first with either the novel wristband micromanometer or pencil-type micromanometer. AIx, [email protected], and Dtp were calculated from aortic pressure waveforms which were synthesized using a generalized transfer function from high fidelity radial pressure waveforms calibrated from standard brachial artery sphygmomanometry. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon's signed rank test, for non-normally distributed variables, was performed between means and coefficients of variation; at a = 0.05. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to test for agreement between micromanometers.Table 1: Means, Coefficients of Variations, and Standard Deviations for all Variables MeasuredRESULTS: The Bland-Altman analyses show full agreement between micromanometers. The observed minor but statistically significant differences, for only 5 variables, in coefficients of variation and means will have no impact in a clinical or research interpretation model. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the novel wristband micromanometer is highly correlated with the traditionally accepted pencil-type micromanometer used to determine AIx, [email protected], and Dtp in males and females. These data suggest that the wristband micromanometer is a valid and reliable alternative to the pencil type micromanometer.