Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest Research Articles

Shear Wave Elastography of the Skin following Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery in Transgender Patients: Observational Study.

Background: Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) noninvasively measures the stiffness of tissue by producing and measuring tissue deformation. Scar formation, a crucial aspect of wound healing, can lead to functional and aesthetic complications when pathological. While SWE has shown promise in dermatological evaluations, its role in surgical scar assessment remains underestimated. Our study aims to investigate SWE in evaluating surgical scars at the donor site after forearm free flap surgery in transgender patients. Methods: After radial forearm free flap harvesting, the donor site was grafted with a split-thickness skin graft with or without interposition of Matriderm. Eleven patients were evaluated more than one year after surgery, using SWE alongside scar characteristics, sensory outcomes, and patient satisfaction surveys. Results: Our study revealed no significant difference in stiffness (p > 0.15), pigmentation (p = 0.32), or erythema (p = 0.06) between operated and non-operated sides. The interposition of Matriderm did not influence the stiffness. Patients significantly (p < 0.0001) reported a loss of discrimination. Patients' subjective scar evaluation appeared in line with our quantitative and objective results. Conclusions: This study contributes to the evolving understanding of SWE's role in scar assessment, highlighting its feasibility in evaluating surgical scars. However, continued research efforts are necessary to establish SWE as a reliable and objective method for surgical scar evaluation and management.

Robot-assisted radial forearm free flap harvesting: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

Although some surgeons prefer anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck area because it minimizes donor site complications, the radial forearm flap remains the workhorse for soft tissue reconstruction due to its reliability. To reduce donor site morbidity, the authors developed a novel technique for radial forearm flap harvesting using a robotic device. 42 radial forearm free flap reconstruction cases were studied, consisting of 31 conventional and 11 robot-assisted cases. 1:1 propensity score matching was done according to age, sex, previous and postoperative radiation therapy history and method used for vein anastomosis. There was no significant difference in flap outcome, which was 100% vitality in the robot-assisted group and 90.9% vitality in the conventional group. The robot-assisted group showed significantly longer mean harvesting time than did the conventional group, being 107.2min and 67.0min, respectively. Robot-assisted radial forearm flap harvesting can reduce donor site complications by minimizing incision. When more surgical experience is gained under appropriate case selection, we expect our robot-assisted method will yield a harvesting time similar to that of the conventional method and thus become more reliable and feasible.

Preoperative Examination Is Not Associated with Postoperative Function following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest.

There is debate on the utility of a preoperative Allen test or ultrasound before radial forearm free flap (RFFF) harvest. This study sought to evaluate correlations between preoperative testing and donor-site morbidity. A survey of plastic surgery and otolaryngology RFFF patients was conducted at a Midwestern academic center. The modified Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (modCISS) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) instruments were administered. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess perioperative factors. Of 212 RFFFs completed over 7 years, 144 patients were contacted, and 71 patients completed the survey (33% response rate). Preoperative Allen test was negative in 92% of patients (65 of 71). There was no statistical association between Allen test and duplex ultrasound findings ( P = 0.19). Cold intolerance screening was positive on 20% of donor arms (14 of 71), with an average positive modCISS score of 39.0 ± 14.7. Disability was reported on the QDASH by 76% of patients (54 of 71), with an average score of 21.0 ± 22.3. There was no statistical correlation between preoperative Allen test or ultrasound classification and modCISS or QDASH score. There was a borderline positive correlation between modCISS and QDASH scores that did not reach statistical significance ( r = 0.22, P = 0.067). Operative characteristics also did not predict modCISS or QDASH scores. Following RFFF harvest, donor extremity cold intolerance is reported in 20% of patients, and extremity-related disability is reported in the majority of patients. Preoperative ultrasound and physical examination findings are not predictive of morbidity.

84. The Superficial Ulnar Artery variant – A hazard during radial forearm free flap harvest

First described in the early 1980s, the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has become a popular choice among surgeons reconstructing the head and neck owing to its versatility, suitability for two-team operating, and reliable vascular anatomy. Following radial artery harvest, perfusion of the hand relies predominantly on the ulnar artery. We present a case of atypical anatomy of the ulnar artery while raising the RFFF and explore its relevance to reconstructive surgery.

Neuropathic Donor-Site Pain following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest: A Multicenter Study on Incidence, Prognostic Factors, and Quality of Life.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is widely used and is considered one of the workhorse flaps in oncologic head and neck reconstructions. However, the potential for significant donor-site morbidity remains a major drawback. Although various donor-site problems have been reported, the incidence of neuropathic pain and possible predicting factors remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the incidence, prognostic factors, and impact on quality of life of neuropathic pain following RFFF harvest. In this multicenter, cross-sectional study, 167 patients who underwent an RFFF reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics were collected by medical charts. All patients received questionnaires to measure patient's pain (Doleur Neuropathique 4 and visual analog scale, pain), hand function (Patient-Reported Wrist and Hand Evaluation), and quality of life (EuroQol 5D). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify prognostic factors associated with outcomes. A total of 114 patients (68%) completed the questionnaire. Neuropathic pain was present in 18% of all patients. Donor-site wound problems, mostly tendon exposure, occurred in 32% and was significantly correlated with neuropathic pain (p = 0.003). Neuropathic pain was significantly associated with poorer quality of life (p < 0.001) and poorer hand function (p < 0.001). Almost one-fifth of all patients deal with neuropathic pain following RFFF harvest. Neuropathic pain is significantly correlated with poorer hand function and a poorer quality of life. Therefore, future research should focus on analyzing surgical factors such as the management of wound problems and primary denervation to improve hand function and quality of life of these patients.

The radial forearm snake flap: An underutilized technique for fasciocutaneous and osteocutaneous forearm flaps with primary closure

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is associated with troublesome donor site morbidity related to split thickness skin grafting (STSG). The radial forearm snake flap with primary closure of the donor site may reduce donor site complications. Single institution, retrospective cohort study comparing rates of delayed donor site wound healing and tendon exposure in 52 patients undergoing radial forearm snake flap and 95 patients undergoing conventional RFFF with STSG closure of the donor site. Tendon exposure occurred in zero (0%) patients undergoing snake flap and four (4.2%) patients undergoing conventional RFFF (0/52 vs. 4/95; p=0.297). Delayed wound healing occurred in zero (0%) patients undergoing snake flap and 19 (20.0%) patients undergoing conventional RFFF (0/52 vs. 19/95; p < 0.001). The radial forearm snake flap provides an alternative to conventional RFFF harvest, which enables primary donor site closure with reduced rates of delayed donor site healing.

Closure of radial forearm free flap donor-site defect with proportional local full-thickness skin graft: case series study of a new design.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to describe a simple, convenient, and reliable new technique using local full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) for skin coverage of a donor-site defect of the radial forearm free flap (RFFF).Patients and Methods Between April 2016 and April 2021, five patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent mass resection combined with RFFF reconstruction. After RFFF harvesting, donor-site defects were restored by proportional local FTSG.ResultsThe donor-site defects ranged in size from 24 to 41.25 cm2, with a mean of 33.05 cm2. Good or acceptable esthetic outcomes were obtained in all five patients. There was no dehiscence, skin necrosis, wound infection, or severe scarring at the graft site through the end of the postoperative follow-up period, and no patient had any specific functional complaint.ConclusionThe proportional local FTSG showed promising results for skin coverage of the donor-site defect of the RFFF. This technique could decrease the need for skin grafts from other sites.

Is Hyperspectral Imaging Suitable for Assessing Collateral Circulation Prior Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvesting? Comparison of Hyperspectral Imaging and Conventional Allen's Test.

(1) Background: This cross-sectional study aims to compare a new and non-invasive approach using hyperspectral imaging (HSI) with the conventional modified Allen’s test (MAT) for the assessment of collateral perfusion prior to radial forearm free flap harvest in healthy adults. (2) HSI of the right hand of 114 patients was recorded. Here, three recordings were carried out: (I) basic status (perfusion), (II) after occlusion of ulnar and radial artery (occlusion) and (III) after releasing the ulnar artery (reperfusion). At all recordings, tissue oxygenation/superficial perfusion (StO2 (0–100%); 0–1 mm depth), tissue hemoglobin index (THI (0–100)) and near infrared perfusion index/deep perfusion (NIR (0–100); 0–4 mm depth) were assessed. A modified Allen’s test (control) was conducted and compared with the HSI-results. (3) Results: Statistically significant differences between perfusion (I) and artery occlusion (II) and between artery occlusion (II) and reperfusion (III) could be observed within the population with a non-pathological MAT (each <0.001). Significant correlations were observed for the difference between perfusion and reperfusion in THI and the height of the MAT (p < 0.05). Within the population with a MAT >8 s, an impairment in reperfusion was shown (each p < 0.05) and the difference between perfusion and reperfusion exhibited a strong correlation to the height of the MAT (each p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: The results indicate a reliable differentiation between perfusion and occlusion by HSI. Therefore, HSI could be a useful tool for verification of the correct performance of the MAT as well as to confirm the final diagnosis, as it provides an objective, reproducible method whose results strongly correlate with those obtained by MAT. What is more, it can be easily applied by non-medical personnel.

A Vascular Variation in Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvesting: Distal Branching of the Radial Artery—A Case Report

Study Design: Case report. Objective: By reporting such a rare vascular variation of the radial artery, we aim to make other surgeons aware of comparable vascular variations in radial forearm free flap harvesting. Methods: In this case report, we present an 84-year-old male patient, with a rare distal branching of the radial artery into the deep palmar branch, approximately 7 cm from the wrist. In order to visualize the vascular variation, intraoperative photo documentation took place. Results: The radial free flap harvesting was successful and no postoperative complications were noted. Conclusions: Distal branching of the radial artery into the deep palmar branch may occur in radial forearm free flap harvesting. Since no restrictions in flap perfusion and/or hand perfusion were observed in our case, we recommend radial forearm free flap raising in the traditional way. No changes concerning the design and the positioning of the skin paddle need to be made.

The Use of Dermal Substitutes for Donor Site Closure After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvesting.

The aim of our study was to analyze the aesthetic and functional outcome in the radial forearm free flap donor site using a simple split thickness skin grafting (STSG) closure compared with the use of dermal scaffold supporting the STSG closure. The study analyzed 18 patients, divided in 2 groups based on the donor site closure modality. In STSG group, a simple STSG was used to cover the defect. In the DS + STSG group, the defect was covered by the use of dermal substitute (MatriDerm) supporting the STSG. Groups were compared on the following outcome variable: scar status; hand function; circumferences at most proximal and most distal point of the graft. All patients were followed up 1, 6, and 12 months post-operative. Nine patients from STSG group showed a difference in circumference between the operated and contralateral limbs respectively of 2.9 mm proximal and 1.2 mm distal; in the 9 patients of DS + STGS group the difference was respectively of 1.2 mm proximal and 1.3 mm distal. Welch unequal variances t-test demonstrated statistical significance of the values with P < 0.004 (P < 0.5). The average VSS was 1.82 ± 0.2 for STSG group and 1.75 ± 0.2 for DS + STGS group. The DASH score was 21.8% in STSG group and 19.4% in DS + STGS group. Our study shows that patients treated with Matriderm + STSG obtained a better result both in esthetic and functional outcomes.

A lightweight cast to support the upper limb following osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap harvest: a technical modification

Introduction The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap remains a valuable option in head and neck reconstructive surgery. It remains a back-up option for composite mandibular defects in cases where the composite fibular free flap is not suitable.

Dealing with vascular anomalies during radial forearm free flap harvest: report of two cases and review of the literature

Radial forearm free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer is very common, and it is widely considered a workhorse flap. Although this flap has a relatively reliable anatomy, surgeons need to be aware of possible anatomical variations and how to deal with them. This paper presents the cases of two patients who underwent oral reconstruction, in whom anomalies of the radial artery were identified while raising a radial forearm free flap. Case 1 demonstrates the dominant branch of the radial artery joining the common interosseous artery approximately 9 cm from the first wrist crease. Case 2 demonstrates abnormal distal branching of the radial artery approximately 4 cm from the first wrist crease. Reconstruction with the flap was successful in both cases. A literature review of reported anomalies of the radial artery is presented, and how to deal with such vascular anomalies is discussed.

Subjective morbidity following radial free flap reconstruction in head and neck tumour patients.

Evaluation of post-operative donor site disability remains unaddressed in radial forearm free flap cases. This study aimed to assess donor site dysfunction following radial forearm free flap harvest using validated general, disease-specific and site-specific disability questionnaires. In this retrospective case series of 24 patients at a tertiary academic medical centre, patients were assessed using the Short Form 36 Health Survey, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. One-sample z-tests were performed, comparing means of the cohort to controls. Compared to population controls, the cohort had higher mean scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (18.22 vs 10.1, p &lt; 0.01), and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire bothersome index (21.44 vs 13.77, p = 0.04), and a lower mean score for the Short Form 36 Health Survey physical component (38.88 vs 50, p &lt; 0.01), indicating a greater disability for the cohort compared to controls. Radial forearm free flap harvest causes significant long-term donor site disability in head and neck tumour patients. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire is a concise tool for measuring this dysfunction.

Endoscopic-Assisted Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest: A Novel Technique to Reduce Donor Site Morbidity.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) remains a workhorse flap but can have significant donor site morbidity. The authors developed a novel technique for endoscopic-assisted RFFF (ERFFF) harvest and hypothesized improved donor site morbidity. A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating patients who underwent ERFFF or RFFF by a single surgeon for head and neck reconstruction between November 2011 and July 2016; outcomes and complications were compared. A telephone survey was conducted to assess patient satisfaction with donor site appearance and function. Twenty-seven ERFFF and 13 RFFF harvests were performed. The cephalic vein was less commonly incorporated in ERFFF patients compared with RFFF patients (3.70 and 38.46%, respectively, p = 0.0095). ERFFF patients had lower rates of wound healing complications (0% vs. 15.38%, p = 0.10) and perfusion-related complications than RFFF patients (3.70% vs. 23.08%, p = 0.092). Fewer ERFFF patients reported a desire for a more normal appearance (42.86% vs. 71.43%, p = 0.361). The ERFFF group had a higher functional score (64.29% vs. 44.44%, p = 0.101), reporting lower rates of associated discomfort (35.71% vs. 85.71%, p = 0.063). None of the differences in rates of complications or patient-reported outcomes between the groups reached statistical significance. ERFFF is safe and effective alternative to RFFF, with similar operative time, similar pedicle safety, and elimination of the lengthy forearm incision. Unnecessary cephalic vein dissection can be avoided with endoscopic visualization of the venae comitantes. Further research with a larger sample size and better standardization is needed to assess effects on donor-site morbidity.

Functional and cosmetic donor site morbidity of the radial forearm-free flap: comparison of two different coverage techniques.

The use of the radial forearm-free flap is a well-established and reliable reconstruction method in head and neck surgery. Usually, the defect of the donor site is covered with full or split-thickness skin grafts. Since 09/2013, a direct closure of the radial forearm donor site has been performed at the ENT University Hospital Leipzig to avoid secondary donor site morbidity. However, few data are available in the literature on long-term cosmetic and functional results compared to the established indirect donor site defect coverage. This study investigated patients with radial forearm-free flap harvest from 01/2012 until 03/2015. A total of n = 39 patients were included, with n = 18 being operated by indirect (group 1) and n = 21 by direct closure technique (group 2). For the validation of surgical revisions and wound healing disorders, we carried out clinical investigations as well as interviews. The "POSAS Observer and Patient Scale" was used for assessing the cosmetic outcome and the "Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)" for functional criteria. Group 2 showed an increased rate of wound healing problems, however it was not statistically different compared to group 1. Revision surgery was necessary in both groups only each in one case. Using the POSAS, there were no significant differences between both groups in the observer scale for the items vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and even for pain, scar itching, color, stiffness, thickness and relief in the patient scale. The functional results (MHOQ) also showed no significantly inferior results for group 2. The direct closure procedure is quick, simple and can be performed without secondary donor site morbidity. For wound healing, cosmetic and function of the forearm and hand, no inferior results can be measured for the direct procedure compared to the indirect coverage technique.

MatriDerm Decreases Donor Site Morbidity After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest in Transgender Surgery

BackgroundPhalloplasty with the radial forearm free flap is associated with a large donor site defect. AimTo compare two methods of donor site closure for functional and cosmetic long-term results: full-thickness skin grafting vs split-thickness skin grafting with MatriDerm. MethodsThirty-seven transgender patients had a neophallus created from a radial forearm free flap, and all were operated on by the same senior surgeon. Eight patients had their donor site defect closed by total skin grafting and 29 patients, operated on after 2009, received a split-thickness skin graft with MatriDerm closure. All 37 patients were evaluated by questionnaire and by careful clinical examination. Pressure perception was assessed with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. Sensory recovery, skin quality, and cosmetic result also were compared. The contralateral arm was used as the control. OutcomesPressure perception values showed better sensory return in the MatriDerm group. Split-thickness skin grafting with MatriDerm achieved superior results in skin sensibility, superficial radial nerve recovery, and cosmetic aspect. ResultsOur findings support the hypothesis that MatriDerm can be used to preserve sensory function and decrease morbidity of the donor site. Clinical ImplicationsThe use of a dermal substitute decreases the morbidity of the forearm free flap donor site. Strengths and LimitationsThe strength of this study is its retrospective nature conducted of a prospectively maintained database of 37 consecutive radial forearm free flaps with superimposable dimensions and location performed by the same surgeon, thus limiting biases. A limitation is its small sample (particularly for the control group). ConclusionOur experience showed that the combination of a split-thickness skin graft with MatriDerm substantially decreases postoperative complications at the donor site defect on the forearm of transgender patients.Watfa W, di Summa PG, Meuli J, et al. MatriDerm Decreases Donor Site Morbidity After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest in Transgender Surgery. J Sex Med 2017;14:1277–1284.

Clinical audit and national survey on the assessment of collateral circulation before radial forearm free flap harvest.

Controversy exists regarding the use of Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) in addition to the Modified Allen's Test (MAT) for the assessment of collateral circulation prior to elevation of the Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF). A survey amongst members of BAOMS Head & Neck Oncology Subspecialty Interest Group and a completed local audit was undertaken to assess the need for DUS. Data for the initial audit was collected retrospectively between 2010 and 2013. Both MAT and DUS was performed routinely during this period. The results of the survey and initial audit led to a change in practice and DUS was no longer requested. The re-audit was performed prospectively between 2013 and 2015. The results of the survey showed that all respondents performed MAT. DUS was performed 'always' by 40%, 'sometimes' by 13.3% and 'never' by 46.7%. A total of 41 patients were included in the initial audit, 6 had an abnormal DUS but only 1 had an abnormal MAT. Five cases had an abnormal DUS but normal MAT and went on to have their ipsilateral RFFF raised without ischaemic complications. The patient with an abnormal MAT had their contralateral RFFF raised. No patients suffered ischaemic complications during the initial audit. A total of 48 patients were included in the re-audit 2 of which had an abnormal MAT and their contralateral RFFF raised. No patients suffered ischaemic complications during the re-audit. In conclusion, routine use of DUS did not provide any additional information above the MAT in identifying patients at risk of ischaemic complications.

Donor Site Outcomes with Osteocutaneous versus Fasciocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest: Level 3 Evidence

There is no financial information to disclose. The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (ORFFF) has become an increasingly utilized reconstructive tool, particularly when the morbidity of other donor sites - such as the iliac crest or fibula - are less desirable. While initially associated with high donor site morbidity - especially radius fractures - increased experience and prophylactic plating have decreased these risks. This study hypothesized that the rates of donor site complications in patients undergoing ORFFF harvest with prophylactic plating with a diaphyseal-metaphyseal plate would be similar to those seen with fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap harvest (FRFFF harvest). A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent osteocutaneous or fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap harvest with a single otolaryngology surgeon over a 3-year period. Patients requiring an osteocutaneous flap underwent harvest of half of the diaphyseal diameter of the radius with prophylactic plating performed by an orthopaedic upper extremity surgeon. A 3.5/2.4mm diaphyseal-metaphyseal, volar distal radius, locking compression plate was used (Synthes. Paoli, PA, USA). Donor site outcomes including infection, skin graft loss, tendon exposure, neuropathy, fracture, hardware complications and donor site re-operation were compared between the groups. Two-tailed, Fischer’s exact test was used for data analysis. Twenty-five patients underwent ORFFF harvest and 53 patients underwent FRFFF harvest. An average of 7.5cm of radius was harvested in the ORFFF group with only 1 radius fracture, occurring in association with a hardware infection which required hardware removal and re-plating of the radius. No fractures were reported in the FRFFF group. No other major donor site complications requiring re-operation were seen in either group. Similar rates of minor complications were seen with skin graft take less than 50% in 4% (n = 1) and 7% (n = 4) with ORFFF and FRFFF, respectively, and tendon exposure in 8% (n = 2) and 15% (n = 8) with ORFFF and FRFFF, respectively. No soft tissue infections or superficial radial sensory neuropathies were seen. Mean follow-up was 14.2 months for the ORFFF group and 11.7 months for the FRFFF group. •The risk of fracture following osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (ORFFF) harvest with this prophylactic plating technique is small, making it a safe donor site when an osteocutenous flap is needed for reconstruction.•Donor site complications including skin graft loss, tendon exposure, soft tissue infection and superficial radial sensory neuropathy occurred at similar rates among patients undergoing osteocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flap harvest.

Closure of the Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site Using the Combined Local Triangular Full-Thickness Skin Graft

Traditional donor-site closure has been associated with serious esthetic and functional morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess morbidity in esthetics and function and measure the postoperative complications of the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site after using combined local triangular full-thickness skin grafting. This prospective study of patients who underwent reconstruction of head and neck defects using an RFFF was conducted from July 2008 through December 2014. The donor site was repaired with a combined local triangular full-thickness skin graft. Quality of the scar, color match, tendon exposure, presence of necrosis, dehiscence of the suture, and presence of dysesthesia were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software. One hundred consecutive patients (71 male and 29 female) underwent RFFF harvesting. RFFF donor-site defects ranged from 15 to 70 cm2; partial skin graft loss occurred in 7% of patients. Five patients (5%) had small dehiscences of the forearm skin graft, and 2 cases (2%) presented tendon exposure. In all cases, these sites healed secondarily by conservative management, with no final impairment of function. Esthetic results were considered excellent in 87%, good in 11%, and suboptimal in 2% of the cases. The combined local triangular full-thickness skin graft is a reliable method for closing RFFF donor-site defects because it obviates a second surgical site, it provides excellent color match and pliability, and it can be used for covering large defects of the donor site.

Long-term biomechanical analysis of donor site morbidity after radial forearm free flap.

Although the radial forearm free flap (RFF) is a commonly used microvascular graft for head and neck reconstruction, long-term biomechanical results regarding donor site morbidity are rare. In a prospective panel study, 32 patients were included. Biomechanical assessment was performed preoperatively, three months postoperatively and two years postoperatively. The primary endpoint of the study was grip strength. In addition, the Mayo wrist score, DASH score (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score), fine motor skill strengths (tip pinch, key pinch, palmar pinch) and the range of motion were analysed. Primary defects were closed with local full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) from the donor site forearm avoiding a secondary defect site. In the long-term analysis, grip strength was reduced in both arms. A significant improvement over time was found only for the donor arm. A persistent deficit of tip pinch strength and dorsal extension was recorded. Persistent sensory limitations occurred in four cases. Patient contentment after two years of follow-up was high and daily life routine was not restricted. Gross and fine motor skill limitations are reversible short-term effects after RFF harvesting and do not restrict daily routine in the long term. These findings substantiate the value of the RFF as a workhorse in reconstructive surgery.