SYNOPSIS HFCs are the leading options for replacing R22 in air conditioning applications due to the Montreal Protocol. Among the HFCs, one of the more promising refrigerants is R407C, a zeotropic refrigerant mixture with a glide temperature difference of roughly 6°C. However, R407C could not be used as a drop-in substitute since HFCs are immiscible with conventional mineral oils and POE is used as a lubricant. But POE is highly hygroscopic in nature and will cause adverse effects in the system. Previous research reported that M20 (80% R407C and 20% HC blend by weight) could be a viable substitute without changing the mineral oil. But, in that study, the condenser tube length was increased by 19% to limit the discharge pressure within the acceptable limits of an existing R22 compressor. In the present study a test is conducted to assess the performance of M20 as a drop-in substitute for R22 in a window air conditioner, without increasing condenser length but with the capillary length alone changed. The indoor and outdoor air temperatures were varied in accordance with BIS 1391 (1992) standard and the test was carried out in a psychrometric test facility. Experimental results showed that M20 refrigerant had 4.18% to 7.47% lower cooling capacity compared to the R22 system. Hence M20 can be used as a drop-in substitute for R22 in a window air-conditioner but with marginal reduction in cooling capacity.
Read full abstract