qSOFA Score Research Articles

Epidemiology and Burden of Sepsis at Thailand's Largest University-Based National Tertiary Referral Center during 2019.

Data specific to the epidemiology and burden of sepsis in low- and middle-income countries are limited. This study aimed to determine the epidemiology and burden of adult patients with sepsis at Siriraj Hospital during 2019. Randomly selected adult patients who had blood cultures performed at our center during January–December 2019 were enrolled. A Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score was used to determine the presence of sepsis. Demographic data and clinical outcome data were collected, and the annual incidence of sepsis or septic shock and death was estimated. Of the 987 subjects who had blood cultures performed, 798 had infections, 341 had sepsis, and 104 had septic shock. The prevalence of sepsis or septic shock was 34.9% among blood cultured patients, and 42.7% among those with infections. The prevalence of septic shock was 30.5% among subjects with sepsis. Approximately 63% of sepsis subjects were hospital-acquired infections. The factors independently associated with 28-day mortality in sepsis were receiving an immunosuppressive agent (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–4.45; p = 0.007), septic shock (aOR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.71–4.87; p < 0.001), and proven infection (aOR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.55–5.36; p = 0.001). Receiving appropriate, definitive antibiotic therapy (ABT) was independently associated with lower mortality in sepsis (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27–0.93; p = 0.028) and septic shock subjects (aOR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06–0.72; p = 0.013). Achievement of mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg (aOR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01–0.77; p = 0.028) and urine output ≥ 0.5 mL/kg/h (aOR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.51; p = 0.006) were independently associated with lower mortality in septic shock patients. The incidence and mortality of sepsis remains high. Appropriate choice of definitive ABT and achievement of MAP and urine output goals may lower mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score & Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Surgical Patients With Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Purpose: Due to the mixed population enrolled in different studies i.e., medical and surgical cases, conflicting data exists about the accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the surgical emergency.Method: A prospective observational study was done in the department of surgery of a tertiary teaching hospital, India from June 2018 to July 2019. Consecutive patients who visited the surgical emergency department with suspected sepsis were included. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death.Results: Of the 410 patients screened, 287 were included in the analysis. The median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 41 to 61years) and 208 (72.8%) were men. Around 56.8% of patients had intra-abdominal pathology, and 43.2% had skin and soft -tissue infection. Sixty-nine (24%) patients died during their hospitalization, 98 (34.1%) patients had organ dysfunction, and 168 (58.5%) patients needed admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). A higher qSOFA score (≥2) was associated with organ dysfunction, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality. The specificity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of qSOFA for organ dysfunction (85.7%, 67.8%, 76.3%), ICU admission (92.4%, 89.3%, 64.5%), and in-hospital mortality (81.6%, 52.4%, 77.4%) was higher than SIRS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for qSOFA for these variables was also higher than for SIRS (0.826 vs. 0.524, 0.823 vs. 0.577, and 0.823 vs. 0.555, respectively).Conclusion: qSOFA is a better model for predicting adverse outcomes and mortality, organ dysfunction, and ICU admission in surgical patients. However, SIRS indicates intervention requirements in a surgical patient better than qSOFA.

The Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score Is Prognostic of Pancreatitis Severity in Patients With Alcohol-Induced Pancreatitis.

The aim of this study was to determine if the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score assessed at and 48 hours after admission is prognostic for alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis (AAP) severity. This is a retrospective cohort review study of 161 patients admitted to a single academic hospital in Houston, TX, with the diagnosis of AAP. Receiver operator characteristics analysis and logistic regression were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic ability of the qSOFA score. A qSOFA score of 2 or higher at and 48 hours after admission had a specificity of 94% or greater and sensitivity of 33% or higher for pancreatitis severity and need for intensive care admission, intubation, or vasopressors. The qSOFA score at and 48 hours after admission was prognostic of intensive care unit admission by an adjusted odds ratio of 48.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4-1013.3; P &lt; 0.001) and 18.8 (95% CI, 2.2-467.3; P &lt; 0.05), respectively. The qSOFA score at admission was prognostic of severe pancreatitis by an adjusted odds ratio of 35.3 (95% CI, 7.2-224.3; P &lt; 0.001). A qSOFA score of 2 or higher is highly specific and prognostic of multiple clinical outcomes both at and 48 hours after admission in patients with AAP.

Quick COVID-19 Severity Index, CURB-65 and Quick SOFA Scores Comparison in Predicting Mortality and Risk Factors of COVID-19 Patients.

This study aimed to investigate CURB-65, quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores in predicting mortality and risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1919 cases for whom the rRT-PCR assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was positive. For mortality risk factors, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed for CURB-65, qCSI and qSOFA scores. The patients' average age was 45.7 (21.6) years. Male patients accounted for 51.7% (n=992). In univariate analysis, some clinical variables including age over 65 years and comorbid diseases such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, lymphopenia, troponin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and fibrinogen elevation were associated with the mortality rate. In multivariate logistic regression analysis: Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) 3.3 and above (OR, 9.1; 95% CI, 1.9-42), C-reactive protein (CRP)30 mg/L and above (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-13.6), D-dimer 1000 ng/mL and above (OR, 4; 95% CI, 1.5-10.7) and age (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18-year increase) were identified as risk factors for mortality among COVID-19 patients. The CURB-65 and qCSI scores exhibited a high degree of discrimination in mortality prediction (AUC values were 0.928 and 0.865, respectively). Also, the qSOFA score had a moderate discriminant power (AUC value was 0.754). CURB-65 and qSCI scores had a high discriminatory power to predict mortality. Also, this study identified CURB-65, qCSI and qSOFA scores, NLR, CRP, D-dimer level, and annual age increase as important mortality risk factors.

Diagnostic accuracy of quick SOFA score and inflammatory biomarkers for predicting community-onset bacteremia

The potential use of quick SOFA (qSOFA) score and inflammatory biomarkers as bacteremia predictors is unelucidated. Herein the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the qSOFA score and biomarkers for predicting community-onset bacteremia. We enrolled adult outpatients with blood culture samples drawn between 2018 and 2020. Contamination, intensive care unit admission, and hemodialysis were excluded. We performed a case-control study, and analyzed 115 patients (58 with bacteremia and 57 without bacteremia). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) for bacteremia was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–9.05) for a qSOFA score ≥ 2, and 4.07 (95% CI 1.92–9.58) for tachypnea (≥ 22/min). The highest performing biomarkers were procalcitonin (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80; 95% CI 0.72–0.88), followed by presepsin (AUC 0.69; 95% CI 0.60–0.79), and C-reactive protein (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.49–0.70). The estimated optimal cut-off value of procalcitonin was 0.377 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 74.1%, a specificity of 73.7%, and a positive LR of 2.82. Presepsin was 407 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 60.3%, a specificity of 75.4%, and a positive LR of 2.46. Procalcitonin was found to be a modestly useful biomarker for predicting non-severe community-onset bacteremia. Tachypnea (≥ 22/min) itself, rather than the qSOFA score, can be a diagnostic predictor. These predictors may aid decision-making regarding the collection of blood culture samples in the emergency department and outpatient clinics.

Utility of National Early Warning Score 2 to risk-stratify coronavirus disease of 2019 patients in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study.

The application of a risk stratification pathway is necessary for the emergency department (ED) to assess the severity of the disease and the need for escalation of therapy. We aimed to implement the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) pathway at triage to differentiate patients who are stable or critically ill with no invasive investigations at the time of admission during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) era in comparison to other clinical risk scores. One hundred and four patients were collected from April 1, 2021, to June 1, 2021, during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic at an academic medical center in India. The NEWS2 scoring system and the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score were introduced as part of the initial assessment in the triage area of the ED. Data were assessed using the area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for NEWS2 and qSOFA scores, respectively. In the study, NEWS2 classification indicated that 25% of patients required continuous monitoring, of which 12.7% subsequently deteriorated within 24 h of admission and 7% died. Both, NEWS2 (threshold 0; 1, AUROC 0.883; 95%; confidence interval [CI] 0.8-0.966) and qSOFA (threshold 0; 1, AUROC 0.851; 95% CI 0.766-29 0.936) effectively identified COVID-19 patients in the ED at risk for clinical deterioration. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of qSOFA and NEWS2 (DeLong's test P = 0.312). Both NEWS2 and qSOFA effectively-identified COVID-19 patients in the ED at risk for clinical deterioration with no significant statistical difference. However, a triage level risk stratification score can be developed with the inclusion of blood parameters on admission to further validate the practice.

A quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-negative result at triage is associated with low compliance with sepsis bundles: a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective registry.

ObjectiveWe investigated the effects of a quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)–negative result (qSOFA score <2 points) at triage on the compliance with sepsis bundles among patients with sepsis who presented to the emergency department (ED).MethodsProspective sepsis registry data from 11 urban tertiary hospital EDs between October 2015 and April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who met the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria were included. Primary exposure was defined as a qSOFA score ≥2 points at ED triage. The primary outcome was defined as 3-hour bundle compliance, including lactate measurement, blood culture, broad-spectrum antibiotics administration, and 30 mL/kg crystalloid administration. Multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict 3-hour bundle compliance was performed.ResultsAmong the 2,250 patients enrolled in the registry, 2,087 fulfilled the sepsis criteria. Only 31.4% (656/2,087) of the sepsis patients had qSOFA scores ≥2 points at triage. Patients with qSOFA scores <2 points had lower lactate levels, lower SOFA scores, and a lower 28-day mortality rate. Rates of compliance with lactate measurement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29–0.75), antibiotics administration (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52–0.78), and 30 mL/kg crystalloid administration (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49–0.77) within 3 hours from triage were significantly lower in patients with qSOFA scores <2 points. However, the rate of compliance with blood culture within 3 hours from triage (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.33–2.08) was higher in patients with qSOFA scores <2 points.ConclusionA qSOFA-negative result at ED triage is associated with low compliance with lactate measurement, broad-spectrum antibiotics administration, and 30 mL/kg crystalloid administration within 3 hours in sepsis patients.

Clinical features, microbiology, and vancomycin regimens in sepsis patients: A retrospective study conducted at a single infectious diseases center

Despite increasing antibiotic resistance, vancomycin remains the first choice to treat severe infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. This study aimed to summarise the clinical, microbiological, and vancomycin treatment outcomes in bacteremia patients. From July to December 2019, a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients with bacteremia treated with vancomycin at a tertiary hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam. Patients without vancomycin concentrations were excluded from the study. Patients had a median age of 54 years (IQR, 41.8 - 63.3), with a male/female ratio of 1.86. Renal complication was markedly different; Clcr &lt; 60, 60 - 130, and &gt; 130 mL/min was 29%, 60%, and 11%, respectively. The median Charlson score was 3.0 (2-4.3), the qSOFA score was 1 (1-2), and the NEWS score was 76%, with a median of 6 (5-8). Twenty-one cases had positive blood culture where85.7% were gram-positive. 93% of patients with sepsis were treated with vancomycin as the first antimicrobial, of which 72% used vancomycin in combination with other antibiotics. Renal complications occurred in 12% of all patients, with grades R, I, and F accounting for 4%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 12 days (IQR, 7-17), with a success rate of 82 % and a failure rate of 18%, respectively. Conclusions: In most patients with bacteremia, microbiological tests reveal no detectable bacteria. When sepsis is suspected, a vancomycin regimen should be initiated.

Cut-Off Value of Procalcitonin in Sepsis and Septic Shock patients at Dr. Soetomo Hospital

Sepsis is a state of life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulation of the body's response to infection. Organ dysfunction is marked by an increase in SOFA score ≥ 2 or qSOFA score ≥ 2. Septic shock is a subset of sepsis with fairly severe circulatory disorders that can significantly increase mortality. Although the current gold standard diagnosis method for sepsis is bacterial culture, some researchers believe PCT can help identify sepsis severity because bacterial culture requires a relatively long time. This study aims to determine the cut-off point of procalcitonin in patients with sepsis and septic shock. The data taken were secondary data from the medical records of sepsis and septic shock patients in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital from 2017 to 2019. Determination of cut-off PCT for sepsis and septic shock using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis curve. Most sepsis patients were young (18 - 65 years) (69%) (p = 0.331) and male (60%) (p = 0.156). The majority of the clinical sepsis patients have focal infections of the respiratory system (55.17%). Patients with respiratory tract infections who develop sepsis have an OR of 6.182, which means it is six times more likely to develop septic shock. There was a significant difference between septic and non-septic PCT levels (p = 0.000), and there was a positive correlation between PCT and sepsis. The cut-off of procalcitonin in sepsis was 0.6 ng/mL, and the cut-off of procalcitonin in septic shock was 10 ng/mL.

Predictive Value of SOFA and qSOFA for In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Study in Romania.

Two years after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the disease continues to claim victims worldwide. Assessing the disease’s severity on admission may be useful in reducing mortality among patients with COVID-19. The present study was designed to assess the prognostic value of SOFA and qSOFA scoring systems for in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19. The study included 133 patients with COVID-19 proven by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) admitted to the Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital of Timisoara, Romania between 1 October 2020 and 15 March 2021. Data on clinical features and laboratory findings on admission were collected from electronic medical records and used to compute SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA and qSOFA values were higher in the non-survivor group compared to survivors (3.5 vs. 1 for SOFA and 2 vs. 1 for qSOFA, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to determine the discrimination accuracy, both risk scores being excellent predictors of in-hospital mortality, with ROC–AUC values of 0.800 for SOFA and 0.794 for qSOFA. The regression analysis showed that for every one-point increase in SOFA score, mortality risk increased by 1.82 and for every one-point increase in qSOFA score, mortality risk increased by 5.23. In addition, patients with SOFA and qSOFA above the cut-off values have an increased risk of mortality with ORs of 7.46 and 11.3, respectively. In conclusion, SOFA and qSOFA are excellent predictors of in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients. These scores determined at admission could help physicians identify those patients at high risk of severe COVID-19.

Study of Significance of Serum Lactate Kinetics in Sepsis as Mortality Predictor.

IntroductionSepsis is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Serum lactate is being used in sepsis for diagnostic and prognostic purposes for years now. In this study, we shed light over a novel use of lactate in form of various clearance parameters to determine mortality in septic patients at the 28th day.Materials and methodsIn our study, 200 patients with sepsis were included using quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and their lactate levels were measured at the time of admission (0 hour) and 24 hours after admission. Lactate clearance parameters (absolute and relative lactate clearance, lactate clearance rate) were calculated. All patients were followed up for a period of 28 days to determine the outcome, and data analysis was done accordingly.Results and conclusionOur study showed that higher SOFA score, qSOFA score, and serum lactate levels were associated with increased 28th-day mortality. Low absolute, relative lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate were also associated with poor outcomes. The best cutoffs to predict poor outcomes were serum lactate level at 24 hours ≥4 mmol/L and relative lactate clearance ≤40.3% with good sensitivity and specificity.How to cite this articleChaudhari M, Agarwal N. Study of Significance of Serum Lactate Kinetics in Sepsis as Mortality Predictor. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):591–595.

Prevalence and outcome of sepsis in respiratory intensive care unit

BackgroundSepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection.ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence and outcome of sepsis in RICUPatients and methodsThe study was conducted upon 403 patients admitted at RICU of the Abbassia Chest Hospital, Cairo, Egypt; 100 of them had sepsis either on admission or acquired in the RICU during the period from May 2019 to November 2019. Severity of illness was assessed by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II score), which was recorded within 24 h from patient admission. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score was recorded in emergency room, and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was recorded on ICU admission and on the 3rd and 7th day of ICU stay. Type of infection (community or hospital acquired), infection site, and pathogenic organisms, all were recorded. Assessment was done also regarding mechanical ventilation, length of RICU stay, the presence of comorbidities, survived patients, and dead ones, as regards causes of death and risk factors.ResultsThe study included 100 cases with sepsis out of 403 admitted cases in the same duration with frequency 24%. Among sepsis patients, 72% were males and 28%were females, with mean age 51.62 ± 18.62 years. The main diagnosis was pneumonia (62%), and the main comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (23%). There was significant increase in age among non-survivors when compared with survivors. There was significant increase in number of mechanically ventilated patients and a highly significant incidence of complications and need for vasoactive drugs among non-survivors when compared with survivors. There was a highly significant higher APACHE II score on the 1st day of admission among non-survivor patients. The SOFA score was significantly higher on the 1st day of admission and significantly higher on the 3rd and 7th day of admission among non-survivor patients when compared to survived patients.ConclusionThe current study showed that sepsis affects nearly one quarter of cases admitted at RICU, and it is usually associated with higher mortality rate in those patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05240157. Registered February 15, 2022. Retrospectively registered.

Rickettsial Infections Are Neglected Causes of Acute Febrile Illness in Teluk Intan, Peninsular Malaysia.

Rickettsial infections are among the leading etiologies of acute febrile illness in Southeast Asia. However, recent data from Malaysia are limited. This prospective study was conducted in Teluk Intan, Peninsular Malaysia, during January to December 2016. We recruited 309 hospitalized adult patients with acute febrile illness. Clinical and biochemistry data were obtained, and patients were stratified into mild and severe infections based on the sepsis-related organ failure (qSOFA) scoring system. Diagnostic assays including blood cultures, real-time PCR, and serology (IFA and MAT) were performed. In this study, pathogens were identified in 214 (69%) patients, of which 199 (93%) patients had a single etiology, and 15 (5%) patients had >1 etiologies. The top three causes of febrile illness requiring hospitalization in this Malaysian study were leptospirosis (68 (32%)), dengue (58 (27%)), and rickettsioses (42 (19%)). Fifty-five (18%) patients presented with severe disease with a qSOFA score of ≥2. Mortality was documented in 38 (12%) patients, with the highest seen in leptospirosis (16 (42%)) followed by rickettsiosis (4 (11%)). While the significance of leptospirosis and dengue are recognized, the impact of rickettsial infections in Peninsular Malaysia remains under appreciated. Management guidelines for in-patient care with acute febrile illness in Peninsular Malaysia are needed.

Evaluation of qSOFA score, and conjugated bilirubin and creatinine levels for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

Sepsis is a dangerous disease that develops rapidly and has a high mortality rate. A timely and accurate assessment of the patient's condition is beneficial in improving prognosis and reducing mortality. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the potential association between quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores and biochemical indicators, such as conjugated bilirubin (CB) and creatinine levels, with the 28-day prognosis of patients with sepsis in a retrospective observational study. All cases were divided into survival and non-survival groups on the 28th day after diagnosis. The qSOFA scores, and CB and creatinine levels were significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group (both P<0.01). Cox regression models identified CB [hazard ratio (HR), 1.006; P=0.002] and creatinine levels (HR, 1.002; P=0.024) as independent factors affecting 28-day mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) for CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score was 0.792 (95% confidence interval, 0.745-0.834), which was larger than the values for CB level, creatinine level and qSOFA score alone (all P<0.01) in the prognosis of 28-day mortality. The cut-off value of CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score for the 28-day mortality was 0.275 (-2.466 + 0.012 x CB + 0.002 x creatinine + 1.289 x qSOFA). Patients with lower combined predictor values had a better prognosis as demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves (log-rank test, 10.060; P=0.002). In both the septic shock and sepsis groups, the combined predictor value was higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group (P<0.001). Therefore, an increase in the combined predictor value of CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score may be an important predictor of disease progression and prognosis in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

EVALUATION OF SERUM VITAMIN D LEVELS IN SEPSIS, CORRELATION WITH QSOFA SCORE AND CLINICAL OUTCOME.

Aims - To study Vitamin D levels in sepsis, correlation of qSOFA score for assessing the severity of sepsis and predicting outcomes in patients of sepsis. Material And Methods - A cross sectional observational study was conducted at MLN Medical College, Prayagraj. A total of 140 patients were enrolled in the study after following inclusion and exclusion criteria's. Result – In the study, it was found that, higher values of qSOFA scores were found in the non-survivors patients (34.7% vs. 2.9%). Also higher value was associated with longer hospital stay and multiorgan dysfunction and ICU admission. In this study, it was also seen that higher values of serum Vitamin D was seen in survivors (27.9 ± 9.7 ng/dL v/s 9.7 ± 4.7 ng/dL; P &lt; 0.0001).Also lower values were associated with longer hospital stay and multiorgan dysfunction and ICU admission. Conclusion – In this study, it was seen that higher values of qSOFA predicted poor clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis. Likewise, low S. Vitamin D levels were also associated with dismal clinical outcomes in sepsis.

Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and New Early Warning Signs Scores Estimate Mortality of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit.

IntroductionVarious mortality predictive score models for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have been deliberated. We studied how sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and new early warning signs (NEWS-2) scores estimate mortality in COVID-19 patients.Materials and methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of 53 patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. We calculated qSOFA, SOFA, APACHE II, and NEWS-2 on initial admission and re-evaluated on day 5. We performed logistic regression analysis to differentiate the predictors of qSOFA, SOFA, APACHE II, and NEWS-2 scores on mortality.ResultqSOFA, SOFA, APACHE II, and NEWS-2 scores on day 5 exhibited a difference between survivors and nonsurvivors (p <0.05), also between ICU and non-ICU admission (p <0.05). The initial NEWS-2 revealed a higher AUC value than the qSOFA, APACHE II, and SOFA score in estimating mortality (0.867; 0.83; 0.822; 0.794). In ICU, APACHE II score revealed a higher AUC value than the SOFA, NEWS-2, and qSOFA score (0.853; 0.832; 0.813; 0.809). Concurrently, evaluation on day 5 showed that qSOFA AUC had higher scores than the NEWS-2, APACHE II, and SOFA (0.979; 0.965; 0.939; 0.933) in predicting mortality, while SOFA and APACHE II AUC were higher in ICU admission than NEWS-2 and qSOFA (0.968; 0.964; 0.939; 0.934). According to the cutoff score, APACHE II on day 5 revealed the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the mortality (sensitivity 95.7%, specificity 86.7%).ConclusionAll scores signify good predictive values on COVID-19 patients mortality following the evaluation on the day 5. Nonetheless, APACHE-II appears to be the best at predicting mortality and ICU admission rate.How to cite this articleAsmarawati TP, Suryantoro SD, Rosyid AN, Marfiani E, Windradi C, Mahdi BA, et al. Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and New Early Warning Signs Scores Estimate Mortality of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):464–471.

Accuracy of ESI triage, qSOFA Score And Their Combinations As Predictor of Sepsis Prognosis

This study is to identify the combination of ESI, qSOFA and their combination as a predictor of sepsis prognosis. The research method was a retrospective study design. Out of a total of 2394 MRs of patients during that period, there were only 112 MRs met the inclusion criteria and then included in this study, consisting of 42 survival and 70 un-survival outcomes respectively. Among the un-survival group, there were 41 (58,6%) have ESI 1-2, and 29 (41.4%) ESI 3-5; also 21 (30%) qSOFA more than 2, and 49 (70%) qSOFA less than 2. The sensitivity of ESI to predict the unsurvive outcome was 71.4% and its specificity was 28.6%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of qSOFA to predict the unsurvive outcome was 30% and its specificity was 85.7%. The use of a combination of both to predict the prognosis was not significantly increased (p more than 0.05). The sensitivity of the combination of ESI and qSOFA to predict the unsurvive outcome was 61.9% and its specificity was 52.9%. So, a low ESI-score seemed to be more relevant to predicting the risk of unsurvival outcome than a high qSOFA, but a low qSOFA is more relevant to predicting the risk of survival outcome than a high ESI-score. The combination of both does not significantly increase the accuracy of the prognosis-predictor. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kombinasi ESI, qSOFA dan kombinasinya sebagai prediktor prognosis sepsis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain penelitian retrospektif untuk membandingkan akurasi ESI dengan qSOFA. Data yang digunakan adalah seluruh rekam medis pasien di RS Sumberglagah Mojokerto, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Kriteria inklusi adalah rekam medis pasien berusia lebih dari 18 tahun, data lengkap meliputi tekanan darah, HR, RR, SaO2 dan kadar ESI pasien. Dari total 2394 MR pasien selama periode tersebut, hanya 112 MR yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan kemudian dimasukkan dalam penelitian ini, terdiri dari 42 hasil survival dan 70 unsurvival. Diantara kelompok unsurvival, ada 41 (58,6%) memiliki ESI 1-2, dan 29 (41,4%) ESI 3-5; juga 21 (30%) qSOFA 2, dan 49 (70%) qSOFA kurang dari 2. Sensitivitas ESI adalah 71,4% dan spesifisitasnya adalah 28,6% untuk memprediksi unsurvive outcome, sedangkan sensitivitas qSOFA adalah 30% dan spesifisitasnya 85,7%. Kombinasi keduanya untuk memprediksi prognosis tidak meningkat secara signifikan (p lebih dari 0,05). Sensitivitas kombinasi ESI dan qSOFA adalah 61,9% dan spesifisitasnya adalah 52,9%. Skor ESI rendah tampaknya lebih relevan untuk memprediksi risiko hasil yang tidak bertahan hidup daripada skor qSOFA tinggi, tetapi skor qSOFA rendah lebih relevan untuk memprediksi risiko hasil kelangsungan hidup daripada skor ESI tinggi. Kombinasi keduanya tidak secara signifikan meningkatkan akurasi prediktor prognosis.

COVID-19 and C. auris: A Case-Control Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon.

Many healthcare centers around the world have reported the surge of Candida auris (C. auris) outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This is a retrospective study conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between 1 October 2020 and 15 June 2021, to identify risk factors for acquiring C. auris in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the impact of C. auris on mortality in patients admitted to the ICU during that period. Twenty-four non-COVID-19 (COV−) patients were admitted to ICUs at AUBMC during that period and acquired C. auris (C. auris+/COV−). Thirty-two patients admitted with severe COVID-19 (COV+) acquired C. auris (C. auris+/COV+), and 130 patients had severe COVID-19 without C. auris (C. auris−/COV+). Bivariable analysis between the groups of (C. auris+/COV+) and (C. auris−/COV+) showed that higher quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score (p < 0.001), prolonged length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.02), and the presence of a urinary catheter (p = 0.015) or of a central venous catheter (CVC) (p = 0.01) were associated with positive culture for C. auris in patients with severe COVID-19. The multivariable analysis showed that prolonged LOS (p = 0.008) and a high qSOFA score (p < 0.001) were the only risk factors independently associated with positive culture for C. auris. Increased LOS (p = 0.02), high “Candida score” (p = 0.01), and septic shock (p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality within 30 days of positive culture for C. auris. Antifungal therapy for at least 7 days (p = 0.03) appeared to decrease mortality within 30 days of positive culture for C. auris. Only septic shock was associated with increased mortality in patients with C. auris (p = 0.006) in the multivariable analysis. C. auris is an emerging pathogen that constitutes a threat to the healthcare sector.

Predictors of Mortality and Amputation in Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections of the Upper Extremity

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) of the upper extremity is characterized by rapid progression, local tissue necrosis, systemic toxicity, and a high mortality rate. The negative consequences of debridement are balanced against preservation of life and limb. The primary objective of this study was to identify predictors of mortality in upper extremity NSTI. Secondary objectives were to identify predictors of amputation, final defect size, length of stay, and readmission within 30 days. An institutional registry for patients with NSTI was retrospectively queried from a single tertiary center covering a large referral population. Data on confirmed upper extremity NSTI were used to determine patient characteristics, infection data, and operative factors. Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores were calculated from primary data to provide a measure of clinical severity. Bivariate screening identifying possible predictors of mortality and multivariable regression was performed to control for confounding. Similar analyses were performed for amputation, final defect size, and readmission within 30 days. A total of 99 patients met the study criteria. In-hospital mortality occurred in 12 patients, and amputation was performed in 7 patients. Etiology, causative organism, and clinical severity scores were variable. Logistic regression showed mortality to be independently predicted by vasopressor dependency outside of operative anesthesia. The relatively low number of case events, limited sample size, and multiple comparisons limited the evaluation of lesser predictor variables. The LRINEC score did not strongly predict amputation or death in this series. Necrotizing soft tissue infection of the upper extremity carries risk of mortality and amputation, and effective treatment requires prompt recognition, early goal-directed resuscitation, and early debridement. The strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality was vasopressor dependence outside operative anesthesia. The LRINEC score did not strongly predict death or amputation in upper extremity NSTI. Prognostic IV.

Reappraisal of sepsis-3 and CLIF-SOFA as predictors of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and infection presenting to the emergency department: A multicenter study.

Background/AimsSepsis-3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) have been advocated to be used in defining sepsis in the general population. We aimed to compare the Sepsis-3 criteria and Chronic Liver Failure-SOFA (CLIF-SOFA) scores as predictors of in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) for infections.MethodsA total of 1,622 cirrhosis patients admitted at the ED for infections were assessed retrospectively. We analyzed their demographic, laboratory, and microbiological data upon diagnosis of the infection. The primary endpoint was inhospital mortality rate. The predictive performances of baseline CLIF-SOFA, Sepsis-3, and qSOFA scores for in-hospital mortality were evaluated.ResultsThe CLIF-SOFA score proved to be significantly better in predicting in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–0.82) than the Sepsis-3 (AUROC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72–0.77, P<0.001) and qSOFA (AUROC, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64–0.70; P<0.001) score. The CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C-AD scores, Sepsis-3 criteria, septic shock, and qSOFA positivity were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19–1.28; aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09–1.17; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15–1.24; aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42–2.48; aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.55–2.72; respectively; all P<0.001). For CLIF-SOFA scores ≥6, in-hospital mortality was >10%; this is the cutoff point for the definition of sepsis.ConclusionsAmong cirrhosis patients presenting with infections at the ED, CLIF-SOFA scores showed a better predictive performance for mortality than both Sepsis-3 criteria and qSOFA scores, and can be a useful tool of risk stratification in cirrhotic patients requiring timely intervention for infection.