It has been known for many years that interspecific hybridization within the genus occurs more or less freely in nature. Woodworth (1929) states that at least 15 recognized hybrids occur in the genus, including pumila x lenta, populifolia x papyrifera, verrucosa x papyrifera, and others. Rosendahl (1916) also reported and analyzed hybridization within the genus, including a cross involving papyrifera and pumila var. glandulifera. In addition, is known to be a polyploid genus (Woodworth, 1929). This paper' deals with the first instance in which hybridization has been reported involving papyrifera and occidentalis. Wherever two species likely to hybridize grow together, and conditions are more favorable to one than to the other, introgressive hybridization may occur. Anderson (1949) has described this phenomenon as a contamination of the germplasm of one species by the germplasm of the other. The species less favored by present conditions may gradually be absorbed by the other, and the external characteristics of the hybrid derivatives will be more and more those of the best preadapted species. In the fall of 1906, Mr. Darwin M. Andrews, a nurseryman, discovered a small grove of paper-barked birches on the northwest slope of Green Mountain, a high foothill immediately southwest of Boulder, Colorado. Dr. Aven Nelson, to whom Andrews had sent specimens of the birch for identification, published a note (Nelson, 1907) drawing attention to the Andrews collection. The somewhat nvunicrl character' of the nrecimpno, and the geographic isolation of this birch community led Nelson to believe that these plants might constitute a new species, distinct from pap yrifera Marsh, the commori paper-barked tree of northern and eastern North America. However, because of the incompleteness of the specimens before him, and because of his inexperience with 'the population in the field, Nelson only tentatively named this birch Betula andrewsii, which name was, of course, a nomen provisiorum and therefore not valid until its subsequent publication in Coulter and Nelson, New Manual of Botany of the Central Rocky Mountains (1909). Bertram T. Butler (1909), in his taxonomic revision of the paper birches, did not think there were sufficient grounds for separating andrewsii from papyrifera. Dr. Francis Potter Daniels (1911), in his Flora of Boulder, Colorado, and Vicinity, formally reduced andrewsii to a trinomial, papyrifera andrewsii (A. Nels.) Daniels. Daniels' reduction of andrewsii to subspecific rank may have been a factor in a subsequent neglect of the problem. At least, recent authors of tree' manuals have not attempted to determine further the possible relationships of andrewsii. The status of andrewsii has remained unsettled to the present time. The herbarium material of this taxon consisted, until recently, of the type collection (a branch with yellowed leaves and fragmented aments, plus a strip of bark) collected in the fall of 1906, and a branch collected early the following year. This collection is in the Rocky Mountain Herbarium'of the University of Wyoming at Laramie. A photograph of the tree
Read full abstract