Pseudocereal Flours Research Articles

The betaine profile of cereal flours unveils new and uncommon betaines

We report the LC-ESI-MS/MS determination of betaines in commercial flours of cereals and pseudocereals most utilized in human nutrition. Results showed that glycine betaine, trigonelline, proline betaine, Nε-trimethyllysine were metabolites common to all examined flours, whereas an uncommon betaine, valine betaine, and glutamine betaine were present only in flours of barley, rye, oat, durum wheat, winter wheat, Triticum dicoccum and Triticum monococcum. Valine betaine and glutamine betaine, the latter never reported before in plants and animals, are not evenly distributed in the Poaceae family, but their presence or absence in flours depends on the subfamily to which the plant belongs.Interestingly, we also report for the first time the occurrence of pipecolic acid betaine (homostachydrine) and its precursor 1,2-N-methylpipecolic acid in rye flour. These two metabolites were not detected in any other cereal or pseudocereal flour, suggesting their potential role as markers of rye flour occurrence in cereal-based foods.

Significance of heat-moisture treatment conditions on the pasting and gelling behaviour of various starch-rich cereal and pseudocereal flours.

The impact of heat-moisture treatment processing conditions (15%, 25%, and 35% moisture content; 1, 3, and 5 h heating time at 120 ℃) on the viscosity pasting and gelling profiles of different grain flours matrices (barley, buckwheat, sorghum, high β-glucan barley, and wheat) was investigated by applying successive cooking and cooling cycles to rapid visco analyser canisters with highly hydrated samples (3.5:25, w:w). At a milder heat-moisture treatment conditions (15% moisture content, 1 h heating time), except for sorghum, heat-moisture treatment flours reached much higher viscosity values during earlier pasting and subsequent gelling than the corresponding native counterparts. Besides heat-moisture treatment wheat flour, the described behaviour found also for non-wheat-treated flours has not been previously reported in the literature. An increased hydrophobicity of prolamins and glutelins in low moisture-short heating time heat-moisture treatment of non-wheat flours with high protein content (12.92%-19.95%) could explain the enhanced viscosity profile observed.

Proteins of Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), Buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.), and Quinoa (Chenopodium spp.): A Food Science and Technology Perspective.

There is currently much interest in the use of pseudocereals for developing nutritious food products. Amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa are the 3 major pseudocereals in terms of world production. They contain high levels of starch, proteins, dietary fiber, minerals, vitamins, and other bioactives. Their proteins have well-balanced amino acid compositions, are more sustainable than those from animal sources, and can be consumed by patients suffering from celiac disease. While pseudocereal proteins mainly consist of albumins and globulins, the predominant cereal proteins are prolamins and glutelins. We here discuss the structural properties, denaturation and aggregation behaviors, and solubility, as well as the foaming, emulsifying, and gelling properties of amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa proteins. In addition, the technological impact of incorporating amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa in bread, pasta, noodles, and cookies and strategies to affect the functionality of pseudocereal flour proteins are discussed. Literature concerning pseudocereal proteins is often inconsistent and contradictory, particularly in the methods used to obtain globulins and glutelins. Also, most studies on protein denaturation and techno-functional properties have focused on isolates obtained by alkaline extraction and subsequent isoelectric precipitation at acidic pH, even if the outcome of such studies is not necessarily relevant for understanding the role of the native proteins in food processing. Finally, even though establishing in-depth structure-function relationships seems challenging, it would undoubtedly be of major help in the design of tailor-made pseudocereal foods.

Effect of pseudocereal flours on some chemical properties and phytic acid content of noodle

Quinoa flour (QF) was used in noodle formulation up to 30% level with and without buckwheat flour (BF). Some chemical properties (ash, protein, cellulose, fat and minerals), phytic acid (PA), colour values, cooking quality and sensory properties of noodles were determined. Ash, fat and PA content of noodle increased with QF or QF:BF blends addition, and the highest values were obtained with 30% QF. PA content increased from 142 mg/100 g to 578 mg/100 g with 30% QF usage. Significant (P<0.05) increases were obtained in copper, iron, potassium, magnesium, phosphorus and zinc (Cu, Fe, K, Mg, P and Zn) content of noodle in all addition levels of QF or QF:BF blends compared to control. Increment ratios in Cu, Fe, K, Mg, P and Zn content of noodle containing 30% QF:BF were found as 72.7, 36.9, 54.5, 158.1, 35.3 and 58.6%, respectively. Blends of QF:BF negatively affected L* values of noodles. The highest cooking loss values were obtained with QF:BF blends over 10% addition levels. The overall acceptability scor...

Comparing sugar components of cereal and pseudocereal flour by GC–MS analysis

Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry was used for carrying out a qualitative analysis of the ethanol soluble flour extract of different types of cereals bread wheat and spelt and pseudocereals (amaranth and buckwheat). TMSI (trimethylsilylimidazole) was used as a reagent for the derivatisation of carbohydrates into trimethylsilyl ethers. All samples were first defatted with hexane. (In our earlier investigations, hexane extracts were used for the analysis of fatty acid of lipid components.)Many components of pentoses, hexoses and disaccharides were identified using 73 and 217Da mass and the Wiley Online Library search. The aim of this paper is not to identify and find new components, but to compare sugar components of tested samples of flour of cereals bread wheat and spelt and pseudocereals (amarnath and buckwheat). Results were analysed using descriptive statistics (dendrograms and PCA). The results show that this method can be used for making a distinction among different types of flour.

Dehydrotriferulic and Dehydrodiferulic Acid Profiles of Cereal and Pseudocereal Flours

ABSTRACTDehydrooligomers of ferulic acid cross‐link polysaccharides such as arabinoxylans and pectic polysaccharides in cereal and certain pseudocereal grains, affecting physiological effects of these fiber components and their physicochemical properties during food processing. An HPLC‐MS method for the analysis of eight diferulic acids and five triferulic acids in low‐lignin samples such as cereal grains and pseudocereals was developed and validated. This method was applied to the analysis of ester‐linked diferulates and triferulates in maize, popcorn, wheat, rye, oats, barley, buckwheat, and amaranth, giving a complete profile of this set of diferulates and triferulates in cereals and pseudocereals. Triferulic acid contents of the cereal flours are roughly 1/10 of the diferulic acid contents, ranging between 23 (oats) and 161 (popcorn) μg/g of flour, with lower amounts for the pseudocereal flours (1–3 μg/g of flour). Dominating trimers are either the 5‐5/8‐O‐4‐ and/or the 8‐O‐4/8‐O‐4‐regioisomers with lower proportions of 8‐8cyclic/8‐O‐4‐, 8‐5noncyclic/8‐O‐4‐, and 8‐5noncyclic/5‐5‐triferulic acids. A unique diferulate pattern was found for buckwheat, with more than 90% of the dimers being 8‐5‐coupled. Amaranth contains an unusually high proportion of 8‐8cyclic‐diferulate, with 27% of the total dimers, whereas oats and barley show comparably high proportions (23%) of the 8‐8tetrahydrofuran diferulate.

Total phenolic and total flavonoid content, antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of pseudocereal breads

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of adding (in two different doses 15% and 30%) pseudocereal (buckwheat, amaranth and quinoa) flour on the antioxidant properties and sensory value of breads. Buckwheat flour had the highest phenolic content (7.25 ± 0.23 mg/g dw). The content of total flavonoids in flours was about 2–4 fold higher when compared to breads. The addition of buckwheat flour to wheat bread, particularly in higher dose, was more effective in enhancing antioxidant activity, as evaluated by means of FRAP and DPPH, which increased by 2.36 fold, and 3.64 fold respectively, in comparison with other pseudocereal flours (amaranth, quinoa), which caused, in higher doses, the changes of above parameters within the ranges 1.20–1.79 fold, and 0.60–1.71 fold. Analysis of sensory results of breads showed that addition of buckwheat flour to the dough might improve subjective properties of bread and increase acceptable quality attributes such as taste, colour or odour. All these observations suggest that addition of buckwheat flour into bread can improve antioxidant as well as sensory properties of bread. Bread fortified with pseudocereal flours, and especially with buckwheat flour, may be placed on the market as a functional food.

Quality characteristics of dried pasta enriched with buckwheat flour

Summary The addition of pseudocereal flours to semolina is becoming more and more popular to improve the nutritional quality of the resultant pasta. The aim of this study was the evaluation of several properties of commercial pasta made from a mixture of buckwheat flour and durum wheat semolina. The characterisation of products, belonging to different producers, focused on the evaluation of chemical and physical properties, such as water uptake and mechanical properties before and after cooking and surface characteristics. A sensory analysis was also performed in order to evaluate firmness, resistance to breaking and overall acceptability. The results highlighted high heterogeneity of the mechanical properties, solid loss and water absorption among the samples. The great variability could be explained by the different processing conditions adopted by each producer, particularly by the procedure used to form and shape the dough into the final product.

Baking properties and microstructure of pseudocereal flours in gluten-free bread formulations

In the present study, the baking properties of the pseudocereals amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat as potential healthy and high-quality ingredients in gluten-free breads were investigated. Scanning electron micrographs were taken of each of the flours. The pasting properties of these flours were assessed using a rapid visco analyser. Standard baking tests and texture profile analysis were performed on the gluten-free control and pseudocereal-containing gluten-free breads. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images were also obtained from the baked breads and digital image analysis was conducted on the bread slices. Bread volumes were found to significantly increase for the buckwheat and quinoa breads in comparison with the control. In addition, the pseudocereal-containing breads were characterised by a significantly softer crumb texture effect that was attributed to the presence of natural emulsifiers in the pseudocereal flours and confirmed by the confocal images. No significant differences were obtained in the acceptability of the pseudocereal-containing gluten-free breads in comparison with the control.