Prostate-specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Activity of Platinum Chemotherapy in Men With Prostate Cancer With and Without DNA Damage Repair Mutations.

Alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes occur in 20%-30% of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) which may increase sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. Specifically, exceptional responses to platinum chemotherapy have been reported among patients with BRCA mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platinum chemotherapy in patients with mCRPC with and without HRR. In this retrospective, multi-institution series, we analyzed patients with mCRPC to assess response to platinum-containing chemotherapy based on HRR alteration status. Outcome measures were prostate specific antigen (PSA)50 response rate (percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% decline in PSA from baseline), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). From 1999 to 2020, 24 patients with mCRPC who received platinum chemotherapy were included with 7 patients analyzable for PSA outcomes. HRR alterations were found in 19 out of 24 patients (79.2%) with mutations recognized in 11 different HRR genes. Patients with a HRR alteration achieved a PSA50 response rate of 20% (1 out of 5) after platinum chemotherapy compared to 50% (1 out of 2) in patients without a HRR mutation. No difference in OS or PSA PFS was detected among patients with BRCA1/2 mutations compared to HRR alterations other than BRCA1/2 and patients without HRR alterations. In patients with mCRPC, we did not find a statistical difference in anti-tumor activity after receiving platinum chemotherapy among patients harboring a pathogenic HRR alterations compared to patients without a HRR alteration. Additionally, we were unable to detect an association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and response to platinum chemotherapy. Platinum chemotherapy, however, had clinically meaningful activity in a subset of patients regardless of HRR alteration status. Additional studies are warranted using genomic data to predict sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy.

Characterization of PSA dynamics and oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors.

This study investigated the characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics when androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), or vintage agent (bicalutamide) was used for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A total of 213 mHSPC patients from each of the ARSI and bicalutamide groups treated between 2015 and 2022 were selected from multiple institutions using propensity score-matched analysis to align backgrounds. PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. PSA level at 3months, PSA nadir level, and time to PSA nadir were examined to analyze of PSA kinetics. ARSI treatment significantly improved PSA PFS compared to bicalutamide (P = 0.0063), although no significant difference in OS was seen (P = 0.3134). No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in median PSA levels at 3months (1.47 vs 0.52ng/ml, P = 0.3042) or PSA nadir levels (0.263 vs 0.1345ng/ml, P = 0.1228). Bicalutamide treatment demonstrated longer time to nadir than ARSI in progression-free cases (median: 243 vs 213.5days, P = 0.0003). Survival tree analysis found that PSA nadir ≤ 1.5ng/ml and time to nadir ≥ 145days were the optimal cut-offs for best stratifying OS with bicalutamide, while PSA nadir ≤ 0.45ng/ml and time to nadir ≥ 70days were optimal with ARSI. No significant differences in PSA response was seen between groups; however, distinct optimal cut-offs were demonstrated for PSA nadir and time to nadir. The present findings will be useful for optimal PSA monitoring for mHSPC patients and for early identification of poor-prognosis populations.

SPECT/CT in Early Response Assessment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617.

177Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) is a newly established treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but survival outcomes vary widely, and predictors of treatment responses are needed. This study investigated the role of total tumor volumes (TTVs) and new lesions (NLs) determined by LuPSMA SPECT/CT in early cycles to predict subsequent outcomes in a real-world practice setting. Methods: Between June and December 2022, consecutive patients with mCRPC who received at least 2 administrations of LuPSMA with SPECT/CT 24 h after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated associations between TTVs and the appearance of NLs at cycles 2 and 3 with subsequent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) using multivariate Cox regression. All analyses were adjusted for changes in PSA level relative to baseline. Results: Sixty-six mCRPC patients (median age, 74 y) received a median of 4 (interquartile range, 3-5) cycles of LuPSMA. Median follow-up starting at cycle 2 was 42 wk (interquartile range, 33-48 wk), with 24 of 66 patients deceased at the time of the analysis. Changes in TTV measured at the start of cycles 2 and 3 relative to baseline correlated significantly with corresponding changes in PSA level (r = 0.55 and 0.56), but absolute TTVs did not correlate significantly (r = 0.00 and 0.18). Patients with a higher absolute TTV at the start of cycle 2 had worse PSA progression-free survival and OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4 [95% CI, 1.1-1.8] and 2.1 [95% CI, 1.5-2.9]), with consistent results at the start of cycle 3 (HR, 2 [95% CI, 1.4-2.9] and 2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.2]). NLs were identified in 13 of 66 and 11 of 51 patients at the start of cycles 2 and 3. NLs at the start of cycle 2 were associated with worse OS (HR, 5.8 [95% CI, 1.9-17.5]), with consistent results at the start of cycle 3 (HR, 4.9 [95% CI, 1.3-18.6]). In multivariate analysis, a higher TTV and the appearance of NLs at the start of cycles 2 and 3 were independently associated with poorer OS. Conclusion: Higher TTVs and NLs on LuPSMA SPECT/CT at the start of cycles 2 and 3 were independently associated with higher risk of death. These measures provided prognostic information independent of changes in PSA. Development of prognostic and predictive models including TTV, NLs, and PSA changes is warranted.

PET-Based TheraP Eligibility and Outcomes of VISION-Eligible Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Received 177Lu-PSMA-617: Importance of 18F-FDG-Avid Discordant Findings.

The VISION and TheraP trials introduced different PET-based criteria for patient selection for treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA). TheraP used a higher prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake threshold than VISION and required 18F-FDG PET to exclude patients with discordant findings. Although the screen-failed patients had shorter overall survival (OS) than those treated with LuPSMA, it remains unclear whether their outcomes might have been modified if they had been exposed to LuPSMA. In this study, we evaluated associations between the TheraP eligibility criteria and subgroups and the treatment outcomes of patients who were deemed suitable and treated on the basis of VISION criteria. Methods: Consecutive patients who were treated with LuPSMA and who underwent pretreatment PSMA and 18F-FDG PET were classified as TheraP-eligible (TheraP-E) and TheraP-ineligible (TheraP-I), the latter of which were subclassified as low PSMA or discordant. Odds ratios for an at least 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50) were computed using logistic regression, and hazard ratios (HRs) for PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and OS were computed using Cox regressions. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for baseline imaging and clinical parameters. Results: Of 75 patients, 31 (41%) were deemed TheraP-I; of those, 24 were subclassified as having discordant disease. TheraP-I patients had a lower PSA50 rate than that of TheraP-E patients (28% vs. 67%; odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.52; P = 0.002) and a higher risk of PSA progression (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P = 0.007). OS in the TheraP-I group was numerically shorter than in the TheraP-E group, but the comparison was only marginally significant (10.4 mo vs. not reached; HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.7; P = 0.054). TheraP-I patients with low PSMA had no significantly different risk of death (P = 0.9) from that of TheraP-E patients, but those with discordant findings had higher risk of death (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6; P = 0.02). Discordant disease remained prognostic for OS after adjusting for baseline imaging and clinical parameters (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.8; P = 0.01). Conclusion: In VISION-eligible patients who were treated with LuPSMA, TheraP-I patients with discordant findings had lower PSA50, PSA-PFS, and OS. Our study suggests that the shorter OS of TheraP-I patients is mainly driven by the presence of discordant disease.

Clinical Study of Lymph Node Dissection in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

We retrospectively analyzed the regions and perioperative outcomes associated with lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Of 543 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with or without lymph node dissection according to the modified D'Amico criteria, 333 (61.3%), 128 (23.6%), and 82 (15.1%) were classified into the non-dissection, limited dissection, and extended dissection groups, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was identified in eight patients : one in the limited dissection group and seven in the extended dissection group. Notably, all eight biopsies showed Gleason scores of 4＋4 or higher, and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was ≥10 ng/ml in seven of these patients. Lymph node metastasis was detected in areas other than the obturator lymph nodes in five patients (62.5%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of Clavien- Dindo grade ≥II complications among the three groups, six patients (7.3%) in the extended dissection group developed infectious lymphoceles. In the extended dissection group, the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with than in those without lymph node metastasis (p＜0.001). Because lymph node metastases were rare in the limited dissection group in our cohort of patients with a high risk of localized prostate cancer, achieving a diagnosis seems difficult with limited dissection. By contrast, in the extended dissection group, the PSA-PFS prognosis was significantly worse in lymph node-positive cases. Therefore, considering the high complication risk of lymphoceles, extended dissection should be performed in patients with a high likelihood of lymph node metastasis.

Investigating High-risk Factors, Precise Diagnosis, and Treatment of Castration- Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC).

The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the actual world currently presents difficulties. In light of this, it is crucial to investigate high-risk factors for the progression of advanced prostate cancer and to identify methods for delaying the onset of CRPC. This study aimed to explore the high-risk factors that impact the progression of prostate cancer and emphasize the significance of precise diagnosis and treatment based on etiological classification in the clinical management of castration-resistant prostate cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 277 newly diagnosed cases of PCa treated with endocrine therapy. A follow-up was done on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and testosterone. Additionally, a prospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 60 patients with CRPC. Following the principle of "4W1H", 30 patients were included in the precision treatment group for a second biopsy and related tests, while another 30 patients were included in the conventional treatment group. The therapeutic effect and prognosis of the two groups were observed. Distant metastasis (HR = 1.879, 95% CI: 1.311 ~ 2.694, P = 0.001), PSA nadir > 0.2 ng/mL (HR = 1.843, 95% CI: 1.338 ~ 2.540, P = 0.001), testosterone nadir > 20 ng/dL (HR = 1.403, 95% CI: 1.035 ~ 1.904, P = 0.029), and time to testosterone nadir > 6 months (HR = 1.919, 95% CI: 1.364 ~ 2.701, P = 0.001) were risk factors for the progression to CRPC. Patients in the CRPC group were treated with precision therapy and conventional therapy based on their molecular subtyping. The precision treatment group showed a significantly prolonged median PSA progression-free survival compared to the conventional treatment group (16.0 months vs. 13.0 months, P=0.025). The median radiographic progression-free survival was also significantly extended in the precision treatment group compared to the conventional treatment group (21.0 months vs. 16.0 months, P=0.042). Patients with prostate cancer diagnosed with distant metastasis at initial presentation require early intervention. Close monitoring of PSA and serum testosterone changes is necessary during the process of endocrine therapy. After entering the CRPC stage, the etiological classification precision treatment can improve the therapeutic effect and improve the prognosis of patients.

Prognostic value of three clinical nutrition scoring system (NRI, PNI, and CONUT) in elderly patients with prostate cancer.

Most of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) are elderly and have a long course of disease. Preoperative assessment of the patient's clinical nutritional status facilitates early intervention and improves patient prognosis. We assessed the nutritional status of PCa patients utilizing the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scoring systems. Survival comparisons between groups were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and log-rank tests, while Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to identify independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, we implemented bootstrap-based optimism correction methods to validate the scoring systems and applied decision curve analysis to evaluate the non-inferiority of these three clinical nutrition scoring systems relative to the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. In this study, malnutrition was diagnosed in 31.51% of the patients using the NRI, 13.02% using the PNI, and 88.28% using the CONUT score. After adjusting for confounders, normal nutritional status as defined by NRI and PNI emerged as an independent prognostic factor for prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). However, nutritional status assessed by CONUT inaccurately predicted PSA-PFS. Normal nutritional status, as determined by all three scoring systems, was found to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Following adjustments for optimistic estimates, the C-index for NRI in predicting both PSA-PFS and PFS remained the highest among the three scoring systems. The results of the DCA indicated that the C-index of all three scoring systems was higher than that of AJCC stage. NRI, PNI, and CONUT are convenient and clinically applicable scoring systems. A clinical malnutrition intervention may improve the prognosis of prostate cancer patients.

Statin use and oncological outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort of nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients of the ARAMIS trial

IntroductionWhile observational studies suggest favorable associations between statin use and prostate cancer (CaP) outcomes, data from randomized-controlled trials remain inconclusive. Our study explores the relationship between statin use and survival outcomes in the context of the phase III ARAMIS study, a trial of darolutamide in the treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. MethodsWe reviewed all 1,509 patients in the ARAMIS trial. Statin use was identified at baseline. Statin users were matched 1:2 with nonusers using a propensity score matching model. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for MFS comparing statin users and nonusers across ARAMIS trial arms. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was fitted using the propensity-matched cohort and incorporating statin use and all covariates. ResultsOf the 1,509 patients in ARAMIS, 334 (22.1%) were statin users. We matched 297 statin users to 550 nonusers. Characteristics appeared well balanced. Among nonusers, 331 (60.3%) and 219 (39.7%) were in the ARAMIS darolutamide and placebo arms, respectively. Among statin users, 179 (60.3%) and 118 (39.7%) were in the ARAMIS darolutamide and placebo arms, respectively. Overall, we found no significant difference in MFS between statin users and nonusers (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.80–1.38 P = .72). However, we found significant interaction between statin use and ARAMIS trial arm. Specifically, statin use had a stronger association with MFS in the placebo arm (P = 0.024). However, this is likely coincidental and due to the statin-placebo patients having higher nodal positivity than the nonusers-placebo patients (14.3% vs. 5.5%). Statin use was similarly not associated with the secondary outcomes of PSA progression-free survival (P = 0.42), time-to-pain progression (P = 0.85), or overall survival (P = 0.15). ConclusionsIn our secondary analysis of the ARAMIS trial, statin users had similar MFS and secondary outcomes compared to nonusers. These results suggest pursuing further statin synergies with amide-based androgen receptor axis target agents may not be fruitful.

The Association of Statin Use With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Treated With Androgen Receptor Targeted Therapies (ART)

BackgroundStatins may provide a compounded effect on ART by decreasing cholesterol levels thus decreasing de novo androgen synthesis and tumor cell viability. We investigated the clinical efficacy of concurrent statin use on outcomes of patients with mCRPC taking ART. MethodsA single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with mCRPC receiving ART from 2010 to 2021 was performed. Our primary outcome was PSA progression free survival (PFS), and our secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS). Patient characteristics were collected in addition to ART treatment course, statin treatment, and survival outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PSA PFS and multivariable logistic regression to determine risk factors. Results153 patients with mCRPC treated with ART were included. A total of 67 patients (43.8%) received concurrent statins. Median PSA PFS was 20.4 months for patients that received statins versus 15.3 months for patients who did not receive statins. Median OS was 45.1 months for patients who received concurrent statins versus 29.7 months for patients who did not. On univariate and multivariate survival analyses, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for PSA PFS (HR 0.7; CI 0.44-1.1; P = .123) and OS (HR 0.67; CI 0.42-1.06; P = .089). ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that statins do not significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC. Ultimately, current understanding remains limited, and prospective studies are needed, but here we provide a cost-effective, timely, and selective preliminary analysis.

Clinical Value of Dual Tracer PET Imaging With 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the imaging characteristics of dual-tracer 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. We analyzed the uptake modes of the dual tracers, explored clinical pathological parameters affecting the 18F-FDG uptake in the lesions, and evaluated their prognostic implications for prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). A total of 41 mPCa patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) scans between September 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. One patient had negative uptake of both PSMA and FDG. According to the uptake patterns of the 2 tracers, the other patients, 40 in total, were categorized in 2 groups, including group A consisting of 33 cases who showed PSMA and FDG dual and those who showed FDG only avidity, and group B consisting of 7 cases who showed PSMA avidity only. Comparative analyses of clinical pathological characteristics between group A and group B were conducted. The relationship between various parameters and PSA-PFS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 26 patients (63.4%) were diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and 38 cases (92.7%) had a Gleason score of 8-9. Bone metastasis, the predominant type of distant metastasis, occurred in 36 cases (87.8%). The skeletal and distant lymph node metastases mostly showed a dual positive uptake pattern for both PSMA and FDG (85.7% [24/28] and 81.8% [9/11]). 37.5% (3/8) of the metastases to organs showed FDG only positive uptake pattern. The serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P=0.013). A total of 13 patients of special pathological classification (intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation) were all found to be in group A. Among the 41 cases, 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 25 patients who completed follow-up, 9 patients, with a median PSA value of 104 ng/mL, experienced PSA progression, while the 16 other patients, with a median PSA of 0.34 ng/mL, did not incur any PSA progression. There was significant difference in the median PSA between patients showing PSA progression and those who did not show PSA progression (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the median PSA-PFS of patients of specific pathological classifications was 7 months, which was shorter than the 16 months of the patients with typical prostate cancer, with the difference between the two groups being statistically meaningful (P=0.043). The median PSA-PFS for group A was 30 months. With more than half of the patients in the group not experiencing any PSA progression, group B did not reach the median PSA-PFS (P=0.645). Dual-tracer PET/CT imaging with 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG commonly exhibits avidity for both tracers in mPCa. Serum PSA level is a reliable biomarker for predicting FDG-positive lesions. mPCa presented with intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation tends to exhibit FDG avidity and is more susceptible to PSA progression.

Initial Experience with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 After Regulatory Approval for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcome Prediction.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Since the time of regulatory approval, however, real-world data have been lacking. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and outcome predictors of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at a major U.S. academic center. Methods: Patients with mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital outside clinical trials were screened for inclusion. Patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and had available outcome data were included in this study. Outcome data included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% decline), PSA progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Toxicity data were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.03. The study tested the association of baseline circulating tumor DNA mutational status in homologous recombination repair, PI3K alteration pathway, and aggressive-variant prostate cancer-associated genes with treatment outcome. Baseline PSMA PET/CT images were analyzed using SelectPSMA, an artificial intelligence algorithm, to predict treatment outcome. Associations with the observed treatment outcome were evaluated. Results: All 76 patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 met the inclusion criteria. A PSA response was achieved in 30 of 74 (41%) patients. The median PSA PFS was 4.1 mo (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 mo), and the median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI, 11.3-16.1 mo). Anemia of grade 3 or greater, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were observed in 9 (12%), 3 (4%), and 1 (1%), respectively, of 76 patients. Transient xerostomia was observed in 23 (28%) patients. The presence of aggressive-variant prostate cancer-associated genes was associated with a shorter PSA PFS (median, 1.3 vs. 6.3 mo; P = 0.040). No other associations were observed between circulating tumor DNA mutational status and treatment outcomes. Eighteen of 71 (25%) patients classified by SelectPSMA as nonresponders had significantly lower rates of PSA response than patients classified as likely responders (6% vs. 51%; P < 0.001), a shorter PSA PFS (median, 1.3 vs. 6.3 mo; P < 0.001), and a shorter OS (median, 6.3 vs. 14.5 mo; P = 0.046). Conclusion: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 offered in a real-world setting after regulatory approval in the United States demonstrated antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile. Artificial-intelligence-based analysis of baseline PSMA PET/CT images may improve patient selection. Validation of these findings on larger cohorts is warranted.

Phase II trial of multi-kinase inhibitor ESK981 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

ESK981 is a potent tyrosine kinase and PIKfyve lipid kinase inhibitor. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of ESK981 as a single agent in patients with androgen receptor-positive (AR +) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eligible patients had mCRPC with progression on AR-targeted agents and without prior chemotherapy treatment. Each patient received 160mg ESK981 once daily for 5days per week for 4weeks per cycle (except for an adverse event (AE) occurrence). The primary endpoints were a 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50), and safety. Secondary endpoints included the time and the duration of PSA response, PSA progression rates, PSA progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory investigations included whole exome sequencing in patients before treatment, and morphological evaluation of biopsy samples pre- and post-treatment. PSA was evaluated in 13 patients. Only one patient (7.7% two-sided 95% Wilson CI (0.4%, 33.3%)) experienced a reduction in their PSA levels by 50% or more. The most common grade 3 treatment-related AEs were cardiac disorders, diarrhea, hypertension, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase elevations. No grade 4-5 events occurred. Median PFS was 1.8months, and median OS was 12.1months. Peripheral immune cells showed increased T cell activation and cytokine production in two patients who received 12-weeks of ESK981. Although relatively well tolerated, ESK981 alone showed no anti-tumor activity in patients with AR + mCRPC and its further evaluation as a single agent in AR + mCRPC is not warranted. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03456804. Registration date: March 7, 2018).

Prognostic Significance of Baseline Clinical and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET Derived Parameters on Biochemical Response, Overall Survival, and PSA Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy.

In this study, we sought to identify the clinical baseline characteristics and pre-therapy 68Ga-PSMA PET derived parameters that can have impact on PSA (biochemical) response, OS and PSA PFS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who undergo RLT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Various pre-treatment clinical and PSMA PET derived parameters were gathered and computed. We used PSA response as the criteria for more than a 50% decrease in PSA level, and OS and PSA PFS as endpoints. We assessed the collected parameters in relation to PSA response. Additionally, we employed univariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank to evaluate the influence of the parameters on OS and PFS. A total of 125 mCRPC patients were included in this study. The median age was 68 years (range: 49-89). Among the cases, 77 patients (62%) showed PSARS, while 48 patients (38%) did not show PSA response. The median OS was 14 months (range: 1-60), and the median PSA-PFS was 10 months (range: 1-56). Age, prior history of chemotherapy, and SUVmax had a significant impact on PSA response (p<0.05). PSA response, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), number of metastases, wbPSMA-TV, and wbTL-PSMA significantly affected OS. GS, platelet count, NLR, and number of metastases were found to have a significant impact on PSA PFS. We have identified several baseline clinical and PSMA PET derived parameters that can serve as prognostic factors for predicting PSA response, OS, and PSA PFS after RLT. Based on the findings, we believe that these clinical baseline characteristics can assist nuclear medicine specialists in identifying RLT responders who have long-term survival and PFS.

Low-dose abiraterone plus Olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations: a multicenter retrospective pilot study

Although overall survival data are still premature, the PROpel study found radiological progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of abiraterone and olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, for patients who have not been genetically tested or lack BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), this combination therapy has been questioned as a first-line conventional treatment for mCRPC, mainly due to significant health economics and side effects. In our retrospective study, we found that treatment with low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC could lead to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and symptom PFS in selective cases even without BRCAm. The median PSA–PFS was 8 months (IQR: 6.5–11.5), with a median follow-up duration of 39.0 months (IQR: 27.5–64.5). Gene tests were conducted in all patients, identifying non-BRCA mutations through ctDNA testing (24%), tumor tissue testing (12%), or both (64%). Adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, with 16% experiencing Grade ≥ 3 events. Common adverse events included anemia (64%), decreased appetite (48%), and fatigue (25%). Our findings support low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a potential option for mCRPC patients without BRCAm, offering manageable safety and efficacy profiles.

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomarker in Metastatic Castrate-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Abiraterone Acetate

Given its known prognostic role, we aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving ADT, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with abiraterone acetate (AA) and prednisone. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the LATITUDE study of men with high-risk mCSPC. Patients were assigned to receive either AA, prednisone, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or placebo plus ADT. Using a previously established NLR threshold of 2.5, we evaluated if this could predict clinical response to abiraterone. At baseline, there were no significant differences in NLR values between the treatment groups. Of the known baseline prognostic factors, NLR was associated with albumin levels and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores. Moreover, the number of bone metastases was higher in patients with NLR ≥ 2.5. On multivariable analysis, baseline NLR ≥ 2.5 did not predict overall survival, PSA progression-free, or metastasis-free survival. However, changes in PSA and NLR at six months indicated distinct survival patterns between the placebo and AA groups, suggesting the potential for their combined assessment as a prognostic tool. Baseline NLR was not an independent predictor factor for response to AA in the LATITUDE study, though NLR changes at 6 months may predict better survival beyond PSA values alone. Further research is required to better understand in which patients with advanced prostate cancer NLR changes may be a useful prognostic tool.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors Therapy.

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Between 2012 and 2023, a total of 127 consecutive patients with nmCRPC received ARSI treatment. Overall survival (OS), metastatic-free survival (MFS), and prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) from ARSI initiation were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical factors associated with OS in nmCRPC were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among the patients, 72, 26, 12, and 17 received enzalutamide (ENZ), abiraterone (ABI), apalutamide (APA), and darolutamide (DARO) as first-line therapy. The median OS and MFS for all patients were 79.0 and 42.0 months, respectively. Median PSA-PFS was 27.0, 20.0, 10.0, and 14.0 months for patients treated with ENZ, ABI, APA, and DARO, respectively (p = 0.33). Multivariate analysis revealed that a baseline PSA level ≥ 3.67 ng/mL at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS (p = 0.002). ARSI demonstrated favorable efficacy in nmCRPC patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among different types of ARSI therapy for nmCRP. Elevated baseline PSA at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS.

Abiraterone Acetate Versus Enzalutamide Against Chemo-Naïve Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Full-Dose Induction.

Purpose We recently released the multi-institutional real-world analysis about the difference in survival outcomes between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide against chemo-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in a first-line setting. Although reduced dose induction cases were included in that analysis, induction dose reduction might correlate with reduced efficacy. In this study, we analyzed full-dose induction subgroups from our overall cohort and investigated the true difference in efficacy between these agents. Methods A total of 220 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC cases treated with full-dose induction of first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) were analyzed. Outcome measures were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), treatment failure-free survival (TFF), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results Abiraterone acetateand enzalutamide were administered to 58 and 162 patients, respectively. The median PSA response rate (-65.4% (A) and -81.5% (E), p = 0.0252), PSA decline ≥ 90% (22.4% (A) and 37.0% (E), p = 0.0478), PSA-PFS (median four months (A) and seven months (E), p = 0.00833), TFF (median six months (A) and 15 months (E), p<0.0001), CSS (median 45 months (A) and not reached (E), p < 0.0001), and OS (median 34 months (A) and 80 months (E), p<0.001) were significantly better in the E group. Conclusion This study showed that PSA response, PSA-PFS, TTF, CSS, and OS were better with first-line enzalutamide administration. Direct inhibition of androgen receptor signaling by enzalutamide is associated with better clinical outcomes in the full-dose induction cohort.

Analysis of the immune-inflammatory indices for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundInflammation plays a pivotal role in the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Several immune-inflammatory indices, including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII), have demonstrated their prognostic values in several solid malignancies. However, Comparisons of superiority with these seven indices’ predictive efficacy within metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) remain uncertain.MethodsWe retrospectively included 407 patients diagnosed with mHSPC and 158 patients with mCRPC at West China Hospital from 2005 to 2022. The seven immune-inflammatory indices were computed based on hematological data of mHSPC at initial diagnosis and mCRPC at progression to CRPC. Prognostic value for castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression models, and chi-square tests. The predictive performance of each immune-inflammatory index was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) in time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and C-index calculation.ResultsAll seven immune-inflammatory indices were significantly associated with CFS and OS in the mHSPC cohort, as well as with PSA response, PSA-PFS, and OS in the mCRPC cohort. In the mHSPC cohort, LIPI consistently exhibited higher AUC values compared to NLR, dNLR, LMR, PLR, SII, and SIRI for predicting CFS and OS. This indicates that LIPI had a superior discriminative ability compared to the other indices (C-index of LIPI: 0.643 and 0.686 for CFS and OS, respectively). Notably, the predictive advantage of LIPI over other indices in the mHSPC stage diminished in the mCRPC stage.ConclusionsThis study firstly confirmed the prognostic value of SII, SIRI and LIPI in mHSPC and mCRPC, and revealed that LIPI had a higher predictive power than NLR, dNLR, LMR, PLR, SII and SIRI in mHSPC. These non-invasive indices can enable clinicians to quickly assess the prognosis of patients.

Do Indian men have similar oncological outcomes with abiraterone plus androgen deprivation therapy in the setting of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer? A prospective observational study.

Combination of abiraterone with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has better survival outcomes than ADT alone in metastatic Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in the Western population. In this prospective (Clinical Trials Registry-India [CTRI] registered) observational study, we present the comparative oncological outcomes of ADT alone and ADT + abiraterone in Indian patients, which is not available currently. This study (CTRI-number-CTRI/2020/07/026545) included newly diagnosed mHSPC patients from January 2020 to June 2023 in a tertiary care hospital, urology department. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were advised ADT with abiraterone (A + ADT), and those not affording received ADT monotherapy (ADT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline >90%, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and PSA progression-free survival (pPFS). Out of 278 patients with mHSPC, 163 patients were excluded and 115 were analyzed (ADT = 40 vs. A + ADT = 75). After a median follow-up of 20.3 months, 11 of 40 (27.5%) in ADT-only arm and 15 of 75 (20%) in ADT + abiraterone arm had died (Hazard-ratio of death 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.88; P < 0.001). A PSA decline of >90% was seen in 85% in the ADT alone group and 93.3% in the ADT + abiraterone group. Significantly better outcomes of the ADT + abiraterone were seen in the secondary endpoints of rPFS (P < 0.001) and pPFS (P < 0.001). The OS benefit was 28% reduction in risk of death in our study versus 37% and 38% in STAMPEDE and LATITUDE, respectively. pPFS and rPFS were also poorer in Indian subsets. Abiraterone with ADT improves OS, PSA response, rPFS, and pPFS in the Indian population akin to the Western data but with poorer OS, rPFS, and PSA progression-free survival on comparison.

Real‑world retrospective study of early‑stage prostate cancer at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Centre: The PEarlC study.

Despite the high prevalence of localised prostate cancer (LPC) and locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC), evidence on the characteristics of patients, treatments and clinical outcomes stratified by disease risk is limited. The PEarlC study was conducted to characterise a cohort of patients with early-stage prostate cancer that included real-world clinical outcomes. Retrospective data from a cohort of patients diagnosed with LPC/LAPC between 2015 and 2017 and followed up until December 2020 at a Portuguese comprehensive cancer centre (IPO Porto) was analysed. Patients were classified as LPC (high- or non-high-risk) or LAPC according to European Association of Urology guidelines, were eligible if diagnosed at stage I-III and followed up in Urology, Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology outpatient clinics of IPO Porto. Data was collected from the medical/administrative records database. Clinical outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), PSA response (palliative) and no evidence of residual tumour (prostatectomy). Time-to-event outcomes were compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A total of 790 patients were included (54.8% non-high-risk LPC, 30.9% high-risk LPC, 14.3% LAPC) and the median follow-up was 46.7 months. Patients had a median age of 68.0 years. The majority of patients were stage II (52.9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 (99.9%) and received treatment with curative intent (85.4%). The median was only achieved in progression-free survival (29.9 months; 95% CI, 26.5-41.0 months), as evaluated in palliative patients. At year 5, 82.9% were free of PSA progression (curative), 87.5% were metastasis-free, 83.7% were disease-free, all patients in palliative treatment progressed and the 5-year OS rate was 92.9% (CI 95%, 90.2-95.7%). Among patients with LPC, OS was worse in high-risk vs. non-high-risk patients (5-year OS rate, 88.8% vs. 96.8%; hazard ratio=3.34, CI 95%, 1.64-7.05; P=0.001). PSA response rate was 81.4% in the palliative setting. There was no evidence of residual tumour in 61.6% of patients who underwent prostatectomy. Although most patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated at IPO Porto showed positive 5-year real-world outcomes, patients with high-risk LPC showed worse OS compared with patients with non-high-risk LPC and therefore a poorer prognosis. The present large-sample real-world study is an important contribution to reducing the evidence gap on prostate cancer.