When school days are fragmented and move at the pace of fast-food eateries rather than four-star restaurants, teachers have no time in which to build the provocative experiences that nurture richly layered learning - experiences that provide teachers with the continuing intellectual and creative challenges that allow them to be professional educators rather than short-order cooks. IT WAS 21 June 1999, the last day of the school year and my last day as a classroom teacher. After a decade of bulletin boards, lunch counts, and parent conferences and of teaching every grade from second through fifth, I had decided it was time to move on. What precipitated the voluntary end of my career as a classroom teacher? It wasn't burnout, and my salary was adequate. I had long ago adjusted to 50-hour weeks and Sunday afternoons communing with homework papers. I had moved beyond problems with student behavior, and my final years were manageable and even calm. I never stopped appreciating my personal interactions with students or the supportive involvement of their parents. So much seemed to be ideal, but the keystone that held it all together had finally come loose: I had lost my passion for teaching. I became a teacher not just to be with children but to teach them. In my last two years in the classroom, however, I no longer felt that I was teaching as well as I could. I had fallen into the trap of maintenance teaching, teaching effectively enough but not making the extra effort to teach better. The factors pushing teachers to such a low point are, of course, complex. Indeed, they have been a major focus of research for at least two decades. But an often overlooked factor, hiding in plain sight, is the problem of how instructional time is organized in the average day and week. A cursory glance through my planning book would show most days broken into shards of time, with running marginal notes stating when certain students would be coming and going for various pull-out classes and programs. Consequently, the curriculum often had to be chopped into segments and compressed. I felt powerless to change the situation and faced a difficult choice: learn to teach within the constraints or find something else to do. I chose the latter. New Expectations, Same Old Schedule Such fretting would have been out of place not too many years ago, when elementary teachers routinely divided the instructional day into separate subject areas, with each subject further divided into self- contained lessons. Instruction tended to be a continuous replay of structured activities: provide examples of adjectives, then distribute worksheets for practice; introduce the formula for finding the area of a triangle, then assign pages in the textbook; read about the early explorers, then answer the questions at the end of the chapter. Fortunately, much has changed. Expectations for student learning are higher and now require challenging problem-solving situations, in-depth discussions, and extended projects for small groups and individuals. As teachers have gradually adopted such new approaches as writing workshops, literature circles, integrated curricula, problem-solving math, and exploratory science, they have needed flexibility in the use of every minute of the school day. But classroom teachers are less and less in control of their students' time, and I haven't even mentioned special periods such as those assigned to art, physical education, library, music, or drug and HIV-AIDS education. It is difficult to believe that any school district could be unaware of how time undergirds effective instruction. Yet, ironically, in responding to the pressure of standards and high-stakes assessments, additional directives from the central office to schools and teachers are proliferating, often intruding on instructional time and undermining teaching and learning. Such hastily adopted additions to the curriculum can force teachers to make triage decisions about the use of time that lead to fragmented and erratic instruction. …
Read full abstract