Prostate Cancer Detection Rate Research Articles

Use of prostate health index in diagnosing prostate cancer in Chinese men

Objective: To investigate the value of prostate health index (PHI) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) <20 μg/L. Methods: Totally 1 135 patients with tPSA<20 μg/L and prostate biopsy indications at Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from March 2013 to April 2016 were enrolled in this study. They were tested for serum tPSA, free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen isoform 2, from which PHI was calculated. Diagnostic efficacy of PHI and tPSA were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The detection rates of prostate cancer were calculated in different ranges of PHI. Subgroup analysis of 716 patients, who were aged 50 or above with tPSA in the range of 4 to 10 μg/L and digital rectal examination negative, was performed. Results: In the biopsied objects with tPSA<20 μg/L, PHI was significantly higher in prostate cancer patients than that in non-cancer patients (48.4(37.4) vs. 26.5(16.9), U=52 674.00, P=0.000), PHI was also significantly higher in high-grade prostate cancer patients than that of low-grade prostate cancer patients (44.5(30.8) vs. 56.4(42.5), U=23 314.00, P=0.000). The area under the curve (AUC) of PHI for diagnosing prostate cancer was significantly higher than that of tPSA (0.771 vs. 0.627, P=0.000). When PHI was in the range of <27, 27 to <36, 36 to <55 and ≥55, the probability of prostate cancer was 9.4% (95%CI: 7.0% to 12.2%), 16.3% (95%CI: 12.2% to 20.8%), 31.0% (95%CI: 25.9% to 37.3%) and 66.4% (95%CI: 58.9% to 74.2%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the AUC of PHI in diagnosing prostate cancer was significantly higher than that of tPSA (0.764 vs. 0.569, P=0.000). When PHI was in the range of <27, 27 to <36, 36 to <55 and ≥55, the probability of prostate cancer was 8.1% (95%CI: 5.4% to 11.3%), 14.0% (95%CI: 9.1% to 19.9%), 30.8% (95%CI: 23.6% to 38.7%) and 78.8% (95%CI: 66.7% to 88.9%), respectively. Conclusion: PHI is superior to tPSA in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Chinese men with tPSA<20 μg/L.

Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate

We systematically analyzed the records of patients with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3 lesions, which are called equivocal according to PI-RADS version 2, using prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies. Systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies served as the reference standard. A total of 120 consecutive patients were retrospectively included in the study. In these patients the overall PI-RADS score was 3 after 3 Tesla T2-weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as well as subsequent targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies plus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies. The study end points were the prostate cancer detection rate, the Gleason score distribution, the prostate cancer location and risk stratification by subgroup analyses. Prostate cancer was detected in 13 of 118 patients for a detection rate of 11%, including 5 patients (4.2%) with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 or greater. Three of the 212 lesions (1.4%) in the transition zone and 6 of the 64 (9.4%) in the peripheral zone were positive for prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging revealed patterns of peripheral prostatitis combined with diffuse stromal hyperplasia in 54% of the patients with prostate cancer. Prostate volume was significantly lower in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.015) but differences in prostate specific antigen levels were not statistically significant (p= 0.87). Prostate specific antigen density was higher in patients with prostate cancer (0.19 vs 0.12 ng/ml/ml). Low grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) can develop in patients with an overall PI-RADS score of 3. Prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 or greater can be detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with a high degree of certainty. Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 or greater prostate cancer is unlikely in PI-RADS 3 lesions. Therefore, these patients should primarily undergo followup multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. In patients with a combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging aspects of extensive prostatitis and diffuse stromal hyperplasia low prostate volume and/or high prostate specific antigen density biopsy might be considered.

Characteristics of serum PSA in HGPIN patients and the effect of the number of the first time biopsy HGPIN positive needles on the detection rate of second biopsy PCa

Objective To investigate characteristics of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in HGPIN patients and the effect of the number of the first time biopsy high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) positive needles on the detection rate of secondary biopsy prostate cancer (PCa). Methods A total of 320 patients who underwent prostate biopsy in our hospital from February 2013 to December 2015 were selected. Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy was performed in all patients, and the differences of serum PSA was analyzed, non PCa patients after 6 months of treatment underwent the secondary biopsy. Results All patients for the first time biopsy results showed: 80 patients with HGPIN ( 51 cases of solitary type and 29 cases of multifocal type ), 45 cases of low grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (LGPIN), 128 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 67 cases of PCa. Serum PSA of patients with PCa was significantly higher than that of BPH, LGPIN, solitary and multifocal HGPIN patients (P 0.05). PCa proportion of secondary biopsy in multifocal HGPIN patients was 38.46%, significantly higher than BPH, LGPIN and solitary HGPIN patients (P 0.05). Conclusions Serum PSA level of multifocal HGPIN patients is higher than solitary HGPIN, BPH and LGPIN, but still lower than PCa. Detection rates of secondary biopsy PCa in multifocal HGPIN patients are significantly higher than other patients. Key words: Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Biopsy, Needle

Incidence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation, High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, or Benign Tissue

To assess the incidence of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer after an initial biopsy that revealed either atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), or benign tissue. We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with ASAP, HGPIN, or benign tissue who had a repeat prostate biopsy within 1 year of diagnosis during 1987-2015. We compared the incidence of any prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (based on Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), number of positive cores, and core volume) for each diagnostic group. A total of 17,016 biopsies were performed in 12,817 patients during 1987-2015. Among the 615 patients who had a repeat biopsy within 1 year of their first, 261 (42.4%), 208 (33.8%), and 146 (23.8%) had ASAP, HGPIN, or benign tissue on the initial biopsy, respectively. The second biopsy demonstrated significant differences in prostate cancer detection rates between these 3 groups (34.1%, 20.2%, and 15.8%, respectively; P <.001), with cancer detected significantly more often in the ASAP group relative to other groups (P <.001 vs benign and P = .001 vs HGPIN). The rates of clinically significant prostate cancer did not differ between groups (8.0%, 6.7%, and 4.1%, respectively, P = .31). On repeat biopsy, rates of clinically significant prostate cancer did not differ between patients initially diagnosed with ASAP, HGPIN, or benign tissue. Elevated rates of prostate cancer after a diagnosis of ASAP appear to be largely due to differences in the rate of clinically insignificant disease.

Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer

PurposeTo compare clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FGB) and direct in-bore MRI-guided biopsy (MRGB).MethodsWe performed a comparison of csPCa detection rates between FGB and MRGB. Included patients had (1) at least one prior negative TRUS biopsy; (2) a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesion and (3) a lesion size of ≥8 mm measured in at least one direction. We considered a Gleason score ≥7 being csPCa. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to determine any differences.ResultsWe included 51 patients with FGB (59 PI-RADS 4 and 41% PI-RADS 5) and 227 patients with MRGB (34 PI-RADS 4 and 66% PI-RADS 5). Included patients had a median age of 69 years (IQR, 65–72) and a median PSA level of 11.0 ng/ml (IQR, 7.4–15.1) and a median age of 67 years (IQR, 61–70), the median PSA 12.8 ng/ml (IQR, 9.1–19.0) within the FGB and the MRGB group, respectively. Detection rates of csPCA did not differ significantly between FGB and MRGB, 49 vs. 61%, respectively.ConclusionWe did not detect significant differences between FGB and MRGB in the detection of csPCa. The differences in detection ratios between both biopsy techniques are narrow with an increasing lesion size. This study warrants further studies to optimize selection of best biopsy modality.

Detection rate of prostate cancer following biopsy among the northern Han Chinese population: a single-center retrospective study of 1022 cases

BackgroundProstate cancer is known to have ethnic and regional differences. The study aimed to clinically evaluate the detection rate of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and analyze its characteristics among the northern Han Chinese population at a single center.MethodsBetween October 2009 and September 2016, a total of 1027 Chinese men, who had undergone TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at Qingdao Municipal Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate biopsies were performed in the case of an abnormally elevated serum PSA level, and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, and/or suspicious prostatic imaging findings.ResultsOf the 1022 men enrolled in the analysis, 438 patients (42.8%) were diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma histologically. When serum PSA levels were divided into five subgroups (less than 4.0, 4.0 to 10.0, 10.0 to 20.0, 20.0 to 100.0, and ≥ 100.0 ng/ml), the detection rates of prostate cancer were 12.4, 15.9, 34.1, 66.2, and 93.8%, respectively. With serum PSA levels of 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml, the cancer detection rates for a normal DRE and a suspect DRE finding were 13.5 and 58.2%, respectively. Accordingly, the cancer detection rates for a normal imaging and a suspect imaging finding were 13.5 and 58.2%, respectively. Besides, a large proportion of the patients were in the clinically advanced stage.ConclusionsThe present study data reported a relatively higher prostate cancer detection rate of 42.8% and that the majority of the patients presented with clinically advanced prostate cancers within a local clinical urologic practice. An early detection and screening program for prostate cancer is of great need to reduce the burden from this disease among the northern Han Chinese population.

Prostate-specific Antigen Parameters and Prostate Health Index Enhance Prostate Cancer Prediction With the In-bore 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy After Negative 12-Core Biopsy

To assess prostate cancer (PCa) detection and prediction by combining the in-bore magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal targeted prostate biopsy (MRGB) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) parameters and the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in case of negative 12-core standard biopsy. A total of 112 men (2014-2016) underwent 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent MRGB of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesions 3-5. Ancillary PSA parameters (PSA ratio [%fPSA] and PSA density [PSAD]) and the PHI and PHI density (PHID) were recorded. With these parameters in combination with MRGB, PCa prediction was calculated. The most common lesions biopsied were PI-RADS 4 (66%), located in the peripheral zone (64%), in the middle (58%) and anterior (65%) sections of the prostate, and 13 mm (IQR 10-15) in size. PCa was found in 62 (55%) patients (28% Gleason score ≥7). PSAD (0.15 vs 0.21; P = .0051), %fPSA (16 vs 13; P = .0191), PHI (45 vs 69; P < .0001), PHID (0.7 vs 1.5; P < .0001), and prostate volume (56 mL vs 45 mL; P = .0073) were significantly different in patients with PCa and those without PCa. PHI and PHID were the strongest predictors of PCa with areas under the curve of 0.79 and 0.77, respectively. Using optimal thresholds of 59 and 0.79, PHI and PHID were 69% and 84% sensitive and 82% and62% specific for PCa, respectively. Following negative standard biopsy of the prostate, the MRGB achieved an overall PCa detection rate of 55% in patients with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions. By considering PHI and PHID, 82% and 62% of unnecessary biopsies could have been avoided, failing to detect 31% and 16% of cancers.

Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature.

Only a few papers in the literature aimed to evaluate biopsy core lengths. Additionally, studies evaluated the core length with different approaches. We aimed to determine whether prostate cancer (PCa) detection is affected from core lengths according to three different approaches in a large standard cohort and compare our cut-off values with the published cut-offs. We retrospectively analyzed 1,523 initial consecutive transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsies. Biopsies were evaluated with respect to total core length (total length of each patients' core) average core length (total core length divided by total number of cores in each patient), and mean core length (mean length of all cores pooled), and compared our cut-off values with the published cut-offs. The prostate volumes were categorized into four groups (<30, 30-59.99, 60-119.99, ≥120 cm3) and PCa detection rates in these categories were examined. PCa was found in 41.5% patients. There was no difference between benign and malignant mean core lengths of the pooled cores (p>0.05). Total core length and average core length were not significantly associated with PCa in multivariate logistic regression analyses (p>0.05). The core lengths (mean, average and total core lengths) increased (p<0.001) and PCa rates decreased (p<0.001) steadily with increasing prostate volume categories. PCa percentages decreased in all categories above the utilized cut-offs for mean (p>0.05), average (p<0.05), and total core lengths (p>0.05). There was no difference between mean core lengths of benign and malignant cores. Total core length and average core length were not significantly associated with PCa. Contrary to the cut-offs used for mean and average core lengths in the published studies, PCa rates decrease as these core lengths increase. Larger studies are necessary for the determination and acceptance of accurate cut-offs.

Impact of transrectal real-time tissue elastography guiding biopsy combined with peak strain index for diagnosing prostate cancer

Objective To evaluate the value of transrectal real-time tissue elastography (RTE) targeted prostate biopsy in the peripheral zone combined with peak strain index. Methods One hundred and forty-one patients with suspicious prostate lesions in the peripheral zone were evaluated from February 2011 to February 2014. All the patients underwent RTE with a mean age of 71.6 years, PSA of 30 ng/ml, prostate volume of 50.3 ml and measured peak strain index (PSI) . The diagnostic value of PSI was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Two-core RTE combined with PSI targeted prostate biopsy was taken and subsequently a 10-core systematic biopsy was taken. The value of RTE was evaluated. The data of targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy in prostate were both reviewed and statistically compared. Results Cancer was detected in 72 of 141 patients (PSI, mean 24.79), and 69 patients had benign prostate disease (PSI, mean 3.02). PSI value of prostate cancer was significantly higher than that of the benign lesions (P 0.05). Conclusions RTE combined PSI can improve the detection rate of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone and likewise guide targeted biopsy combined with systematic biopsy to detect more moderate or high risk prostate cancer. Key words: Prostatic neoplasms; Transrectal real-time tissue elastography; Strain index; Biopsy

Impact of Prostatic-specific Antigen Threshold and Screening Interval in Prostate Cancer Screening Outcomes: Comparing the Swedish and Finnish European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Centres

BackgroundThe European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer trial has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening. Sweden used a 2-yr screening interval and showed a larger mortality reduction than Finland with a 4-yr interval and higher PSA cut-off. ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of screening interval and PSA cut-off on PC detection and mortality. Design, setting, and participantsWe analysed the core age groups (55–69 yr at entry) of the Finnish (N=31 866) and Swedish (N=5901) screening arms at 13 yr and 16 yr of follow-up. Sweden used a screening interval of 2 yr and a PSA cut-off of 3.0ng/ml, while in Finland the screening interval was 4 yr and the PSA cut-off 4.0ng/ml (or PSA 3.0–3.9ng/ml with free PSA<16%). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisWe compared PC detection rate and PC mortality between the Finnish and Swedish centres and estimated the impact of different screening protocols. Results and limitationsIf the Swedish screening protocol had been followed in Finland, 122 additional PC cases would have been diagnosed at screening, 84% of which would have been low-risk cancers, and four leading to PC death. In contrast, if a lower PSA threshold had been applied in Finland, at least 127 additional PC would have been found, with 19 PC deaths. ConclusionsThe small number of deaths among cases that would have been potentially detectable in Finland with the Swedish protocol (or those that would have been missed in Sweden with the Finnish approach) is unlikely to explain the differences in mortality in this long of a follow-up. Patient summaryA prostate-specific antigen threshold of 3ng/ml versus 4ng/ml or a screening interval of 2 yr instead of 4 yr is unlikely to explain the larger mortality reduction achieved in Sweden compared with Finland.

High cancer detection rate using cognitive fusion - targeted transperineal prostate biopsies.

ABSTRACT Objective MRI of the prostate improves diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer. Different fusion approaches with transrectal ultrasound images are employed.Objective To determine detection rate of prostate cancer in men undergoing transperineal MRI-based cognitive fusion biopsy.Materials and Methods One hundred and sixty-four consecutive men underwent a multiple-core prostate transperineal biopsy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to address the relationship between clinical parameters and prostate cancer detection rate.Results One hundred and fourteen patients underwent mpMRI prior to the transperineal biopsy, 52 (45%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer, of them, 36 had Gleason score ≥7 (69%). Among these 114 patients, 82 had suspicious lesions on MRI, and 43 of them were diagnosed with cancer (52%). On multivariate analysis, the most significant independent predictive factors were PSA density (P<0.001) and suspicious MRI lesion (P=0.006). Men with a PSA density of more than 0.22 and a suspicious lesion on MRI had a detection rate of 78%. Detection rate among 50 patients with no MRI study prior to this biopsy was 26%.Conclusions This study showed that among a group of mostly multi-biopsied patients, the presence of mpMRI lesions and high PSA density values helped to detect clinically significant prostate cancer using cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies.

Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.

To determine the effect of urologist and radiologist learning curves and changes in MRI-TRUS fusion platform during 9 years of NCI's experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/TRUS fusion biopsy. A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing mpMRI followed by fusion biopsy (Fbx) and systematic biopsy (Sbx) from 2007 to 2016 was reviewed. The patients were stratified based on the timing of first biopsy. Cohort 1 (7/2007-12/2010) accounted for learning curve. Cohort 2 (1/2011-5/2013) and cohort 3 (5/2013-4/2016) included patients biopsied prior to and after debut of a new software platform, respectively. Clinically significant (CS) disease was defined as Gleason 7 (3+4) or higher. McNemar's test compared cancer detection rates (CDRs) of Sbx and Fbx between time periods. 1528 patients were included in the study with 230, 537 and 761 patients included in three respective cohorts. Median age (interquartile range) was 61.0 (±9.0), 62.0 (±7.3), and 64.0 (±11.0) years in three cohorts, respectively (P<0.001). Fbx and Sbx had comparable CS CDR in cohort 1 (24.8 vs 22.2%, P=0.377). Fbx detected significantly more CS disease compared to Sbx in the following two periods (cohort 2: 31.5 vs 25.0%, P=0.001; cohort 3: 36.4 vs 30.3%, P<0.001) and detected significantly less low risk disease in the same period (cohort 2: 14.5 vs 19.6%, P<0.001; cohort 3: 12.6 vs 16.7%, P<0.001). Even after multivariate adjustment with age, PSA, race, clinical stage and MRI suspicion score, Fbx CS cancer detection increased in successive cohorts (cohort 2: OR 2.23, P=0.043; cohort 3: OR 2.92, P=0.007). In the past 9 years, there has been significant improvement in the accuracy of Fbx. Our results show that after an early learning period, Fbx detected higher rates of CS cancer and lower rates of clinically insignificant cancer than Sbx. Software advances allowed for even greater detection of CS disease.

Evaluation of MR imaging-targeted biopsies of the prostate in biopsy-naïve patients. A single centre study.

To evaluate the differences in prostate cancer detection rate and biopsy effectiveness between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) target biopsy (TB) and transperineal standard biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naïve patients. Between October 2014 and April 2016, 60 men with a mean age of 64.1±6.7 (SD) years (range: 53-82 years) were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent a prostate MRI study, evaluated by two radiologists, before undergoing the biopsy. A transperineal 12-core SB was carried out before TB, without the information from the MRI. The detection rate for all tumors and for clinically significant tumors (CS) was recorded. Sampling variables such as the proportion of cores positive for CS cancer (PCP-CS) and the maximum cancer core length (MCCL) were also calculated. The ability of MRI to predict the presence of a CS tumor at biopsy was studied using a sector analysis. Patients with negative biopsies were followed during a minimum of 12 months. The detection rate for SB and TB was 53.3% (32/60) and 46.7% (28/60) respectively for all tumors (P=0.289) and 45% (27/60) in both techniques for CS tumors. TB obtained a larger PCP-CS (P<0.001) and MCCL (P=0.018). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and cancer prevalence was 83.3%, 92.9%, 83.3%, 92.9% and 30% for peripheral zone sectors and 43.8%, 97.1%, 70.0%, 91.8% and 13,3% for transitional zone sectors. The proportion of patients that showed an increase of PSA faster than 0.75ng/mL/year after a negative biopsy was 26.1%. Detection rate of prostate cancer did not show significant differences between a TB and a SB technique in biopsy-naïve patients. However, targeted prostate biopsies demonstrated a better sampling effectiveness thus reducing the cores needed to diagnose clinically significant tumors.

Evaluation of Prostate HistoScanning as a Method for Targeted Biopsy in Routine Practice

BackgroundProstate HistoScanning (PHS) is a tissue characterization system used to enhance prostate cancer (PCa) detection via transrectal ultrasound imaging. ObjectiveTo assess the impact of supplementing systematic transrectal biopsy with up to three PHS true targeting (TT) guided biopsies on the PCa detection rate and preclinical patient assessment. Design, setting, and participantsThis was a prospective study involving a cohort of 611 consecutive patients referred for transrectal prostate biopsy following suspicion of PCa. PHS-TT guided cores were obtained from up to three PHS lesions of ≥0.5cm3 per prostate and only one core per single PHS lesion. Histological outcomes from a systematic extended 12-core biopsy (Bx) scheme and additional PHS-TT guided cores were compared. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisComparison of PHS results and histopathology was performed per sextant. The χ2 and Mann-Whitney test were used to assess differences. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results and limitationsPHS showed lesions of ≥0.5cm3 in 312 out of the 611 patients recruited. In this group, Bx detected PCa in 59% (185/312) and PHS-TT in 87% (270/312; p<0.001). The detection rate was 25% (944/3744 cores) for Bx and 68% (387/573 cores) for PHS-TT (p<0.001). Preclinical assessment was significantly better when using PHS-TT: Bx found 18.6% (58/312) and 8.3% (26/312), while PHS-TT found 42.3% (132/312) and 20.8% (65/312) of Gleason 7 and 8 cases, respectively (p<0.001). PHS-TT attributed Gleason score 6 to fewer patients (23.4%, 73/312) than Bx did (32.4%, 101/312; p=0.0021). ConclusionsPatients with a suspicion of PCa may benefit from addition of a few PHS-TT cores to the standard Bx workflow. Patient summaryTargeted biopsies of the prostate are proving to be equivalent to or better than standard systematic random sampling in many studies. Our study results support supplementing the standard schematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with a few guided cores harvested using the ultrasound-based prostate HistoScanning true targeting approach in cases for which multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is not available.

Reclassification of prostate cancer risk using sequentially identified SNPs: Results from the REDUCE trial.

Although the clinical validity of risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for assessment of disease susceptibility has been consistently established, risk reclassification from increasing numbers of implicated risk-associated SNPs raises concern that it is premature for clinical use. Our objective is to assess the degree and impact of risk reclassification with the increasing number of SNPs. A total of 3239 patients from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial were included. Four genetic risk scores (GRSs) were calculated based on sets of sequentially discovered prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated SNPs (17, 34, 51, and 68 SNPs). Pair-wise correlation coefficients between sets of GRSs increased as more SNPs were included in the GRS: 0.80, 0.86, and 0.95 for 17 versus 34 SNPs, 34 versus 51 SNPs, and 51 versus 68 SNPs, respectively. Using a GRS of 1.5 as a cutoff for higher versus lower risk, reclassification rates of PCa risk decreased: 14.11%, 12.04%, and 8.15% for 17 versus 34 SNPs, 34 versus 51 SNPs, and 51 versus 68 SNPs, respectively. Evolving GRSs, nevertheless, provide a tool for further refining risk assessment. When all four sequential GRSs were considered, the detection rates of PCa for men whose GRSs were consistently <1.5, reclassified, and consistently ≥1.5 were 20.8%, 29.67%, and 39.26%, respectively (Ptrend = 1.12 × 10-8 ). In comparison, the detection rates of PCa in men with negative or positive family history were 23.75% and 31.78%, respectively. Risk assessment using currently available SNPs is justified. Multiple GRS values from evolving sets of SNPs provide a valuable tool for better refining risk.

Abstract SY04-03: Three components of inherited cancer risk and their implications in personalized cancer screening

Abstract Inherited risk for cancer has been well established from twin studies and family studies. For example, a large, population-based study in Scandinavian countries of more than 200,000 same-sex twin pairs found that heritability was 33% for overall cancer and 57% for prostate cancer (1). At present, family history is the most commonly used method for evaluating an individual’s inherited risk for cancer. For those individuals with a strong family history, typically defined as multiple affected relatives or relatives who died of cancer at an early age, genetic testing of specific genes may also be recommended. However, recent data suggest that this standard of care is insufficient and inadequate for identifying individuals with higher inherited risk. Several recent studies suggest that inherited mutations in a number of high-penetrance genes (HPGs) are more common in cancer patients than previously estimated. In one study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, 4-19% of cancer patients harbored an HPG mutation, with 8% of prostate cancer patients found to be HPG mutation carriers (2). Furthermore, many mutation carriers do not have a positive family history. In our recent study of patients with prostate cancer, 60% of pathogenic mutation carriers of BRCA1/2 and ATM had a negative family history of prostate cancer (3).Therefore, it is necessary and relevant to include HPGs in cancer risk assessment among all subjects, regardless of family history. Another major component of inherited risk is cancer risk–associated SNPs. Many cancer risk–associated SNPs have been identified through genome-wide association studies. The validity of these SNPs has been well established, as they are statistically significant (P&amp;lt;5E-08) and have been replicated among independent study populations. Although each SNP has a small individual effect on cancer risk, they have a strong cumulative effect. The cumulative effect of these SNPs can be measured using several methods, including genetic risk score (GRS) (4). Because GRS is based on individuals’ genotypes and is a continuous variable, it is objective and informative in stratifying inherited risk of developing specific cancers. More importantly, GRS can identify considerably more high-risk subjects in the general population than family history. For example, in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), 24% of men in the study population had a GRS &amp;gt;1.4 and the prostate cancer detection rate during the 7 years of the study in these men was 33% (5). In contrast, 17% of men in the cohort had a positive family history and the prostate cancer detection rate in these men was 29%. Taken together, the latest data suggest that a comprehensive assessment of inherited cancer risk should include family history, HPGs, and GRS. These measures are complementary and, used together, can better identify subjects in the general population at elevated inherited risk for cancer. Using prostate cancer as an example, approximately 7-17% of men in the U.S. population have a positive family history of the disease and are therefore considered to have elevated inherited risk for prostate cancer (6,7). In addition, approximately 2% of men in the general population have a considerably higher inherited risk for prostate cancer due to harboring at least one pathogenic mutation in an HPG for prostate cancer (8). Many of these men do not have a positive family history. Finally, approximately 24% of men in the general population have higher GRSs (&amp;gt;1.4) and have an estimated prostate cancer risk equivalent to or even higher than a positive family history (5). Considering all three risk factors, approximately 36% of men in the general population are estimated to be at higher inherited risk for prostate cancer using this comprehensive risk assessment strategy, more than twice that of the current standard of care risk assessment. The more comprehensive assessment of inherited cancer risk has important clinical implications, both for asymptomatic subjects in the general population as well as for cancer patients. The most notable clinical utility is for developing individualized cancer screening strategies. A personalized cancer screening approach can maximize benefits and minimize harms associated with cancer screening. For example, offering PSA screening among men with higher inherited risk based on family history, HPGs, and GRS is a rational approach to address the current debate on prostate cancer screening. It is important to note that individualizing cancer screening is the most impactful component of precision medicine, as it can effectively reduce cancer-related mortality and improve quality of life.

A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (TRUS-bx) and multiparametric-MRI targeted biopsies (mp-MRI-bx) in a repeat biopsy setting and evaluate the clinical significance following an “MRI-targeted-only” approach. Materials and Methods: Patients with prior negative biopsies underwent prostatic multiparametric-MRI that was scored using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification. All underwent both repeated TRUS-bx and mp-MRI-bx using image fusion of any PI-RADS ≥3 lesion. Biopsy results from TRUS-bx, mp-MRI-bx, and the combination were compared. Results: PCa was detected in 89 out of 206 (43%) patients. Of these, 64 (31%) and 74 (36%) patients were detected using mp-MRI-bx and TRUS-bx, respectively. Overall, mp-MRI-bx detected fewer patients with low-grade (Gleason score [GS] 3 + 3) cancers (14/64 vs. 41/74) and more patients with intermediate/high-grade cancers (GS ≥3 + 4) (50/64 vs. 33/74) using fewer biopsy cores compared with TRUS-bx (p < 0.001). Using an “MRI-targeted-only” approach in men with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions reduced the number of men requiring repeated biopsies by 50%, decreased low-grade cancer diagnoses by 66%, and increased intermediate/high-grade cancer diagnoses by 52%. Conclusions: MRI-targeted biopsies have a high detection rate for significant PCa in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and preferentially detect intermediate/high-grade compared with low-grade tumors.

The value of transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men

Objective To estimate the value of transrectal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging(TRUS/MR) fusion targeted prostate biopsy(targeted biopsy, TB) in the biopsy naive patients. Methods Between September 2015 and September 2016, 91 patients with PI-RADS ≥3 suspicious regions on the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were retrospectively evaluated. The age of patients was 46-83 years (median 68). Serum PSA level before biopsy was 1.2-85 ng/ml (median 11.2 ng/ml), in which 36 cases with PSA 20 ng/ml. Two-core TB using real-time virtual sonography (RVS) platform for mpMRI-suspicious lesions was followed by 12-core systematic biopsy (SB). The detection rates for any cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa) were compared between TB and SB. Results The total detection rate for PCa was 57.1%, with a comparable positive rate between TB (44.0%) and SB (51.7%) groups which did not significantly differ (P=0.14). The proportion of CsPCa in TB group was higher than that in SB group (80.0% vs. 68.1%, P=0.21). In TB group, detection of PCa for grade 5 lesions was significantly higher than that for grade 3 lesions (77.1% vs. 10.3%, P 20ng/ml (27.8% vs. 36.1%, 50% vs. 56.7%, 60% vs. 68%, respectively). Conclusions This study revealed a similar rate of prostate cancer detection between 2-core targeted biopsy guided by TRUS/MR fusion and 12-core random biopsy in different PSA regions for no prior biopsy men. TB maybe tend to detect high proportion of CsPCa. PI-RADS is instructive to select appropriate patients for TB. Key words: Prostate biopsy; Prostatic neoplasms; Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging fusion(TRUS/MR)

The comparation of fusion targeting biopsy and systematic biopsy in the clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective: To systematically compare the differences in the detection rate of prostate cancer with fusion targeting biopsy and systemic biopsy. Methods: A computer-based search of PubMed, Medline, China Biomedical Literature Database and Wanfang database (from the beginning of establishment of library to October 2016) on the detection rate of prostate cancer by fusion targeting biopsy and systemic biopsy was performed manually.The inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated by 2 reviewers, and the data were extracted and evaluated respectively. RevMan5.3 software was used to analyze the detection rate of prostate cancer by two biopsy methods. Results: A total of 15 related clinical studies were included, 5 337 cases were enrolled in the study, including 2 667 cases of targeted fusion biopsy and 2 670 cases of routine systemic biopsy. The results showed that the overall detection rate of prostate cancer in targeting fusion biopsy was significantly higher than that of conventional systemic biopsy (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30, P=0.007). The detection rates of prostate cancer with different risk grades by two biopsy methods were conducted. We found that targeted fusion biopsy had a significant advantage compared with conventional system biopsy (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58, P<0.05) in middle and high risk prostate cancer with Gleason ≥ 7 points. In low-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason score <7, the detection rate of prostate cancer by targeted fusion biopsy was lower (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89, P<0.05) than that of conventional systemic biopsy. Conclusions: Targeted fusion biopsy was significantly better than systemic biopsy in the overall detection rate of prostate cancer and the detection rate of the middle and high risk prostate cancer with Gleason ≥7 points. However, systemic biopsy performed better in patients with Gleason<7 points of low-risk prostate cancer.

Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting.

Prostate biopsy is typically performed via either the transrectal or transperineal approach. MRI-targeted biopsy, whether using any of the three options of cognitive fusion, MRI-ultrasound fusion software, or in-bore MRI-guided biopsy, can also be performed via either transrectal or transperineal approaches. As an extension of traditional random prostate biopsy, the transrectal approach is far more commonly used for MRI-targeted biopsy due to its convenience. However, in the context of today’s increasing multi-drug resistance of rectal flora, the transperineal approach is being used more often due to its lack of septic complications. In addition, only a first-generation cephalosporin, not a fluoroquinolone, is required as antibiotic prophylaxis. Evidence shows excellent detection rates of significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and/or systematic transperineal biopsy (TPB). However, there are no head-to-head studies comparing the different MRI-targeted methods within TPB. To provide truly patient-centred care, the biopsy technique using the safest method with the highest detection rate of significant cancer should be used. Depending on healthcare context and hospital resource utilization, MRI-targeted TPB is an excellent option and should be performed wherever available and feasible. Whilst building capacity for TPB in one’s practice, the routine use of rectal culture swabs prior to any transrectal biopsies is strongly encouraged. Independent of biopsy route, the addition of systematic cores needs to be discussed with the patient weighing maximal detection of significant cancer against increased detection of insignificant lesions.