Prospective Controlled Trials Research Articles

Current state and perspectives of CAR T cell therapy in central nervous system diseases.

B cell-directed CAR T cell therapy has fundamentally changed the treatment of hematological malignancies and its scope of application is rapidly expanding to include other diseases such as solid tumors or autoimmune disorders. Therapy-refractoriness remains an important challenge in various inflammatory and non-inflammatory disorders of the CNS. The reasons for therapy failure are diverse and include limited access of current therapies to the CNS, as well as enormous inter- and intraindividual disease heterogeneity. The tissue-penetrating properties of CAR T cells make them a promising option to overcome this problem and to tackle pathologies directly within the CNS. First application of B cell-directed CAR T cells in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis patients has lately revealed promising outcomes, expanding the potential of CAR T cell therapy to encompass CNS diseases. Additionally, the optimization of CAR T cells for the therapy of gliomas is a growing field. As a further perspective, pre-clinical data reveal potential benefits of CAR T cell therapy also in the treatment of primary neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. Considering the biotechnological optimizations in the field of T cell engineering, such as the extension to target different antigens or the variation of the modified T cell subtype, new and promising fields of application for CAR T cells are rapidly opening up. These innovations offer the potencial to address the complex pathophysiological properties of CNS diseases. To optimally utilize CAR T cell therapy for CNS diseases in the future while minimizing therapy risks, there is a need for further mechanistic research as well as prospective controlled trials to seriously assess the disease and patient-specific risk-benefit ratio.

Real-World and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Dupilumab and Other Biological Drugs for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-A Systematic Review.

Over the last few decades, the efficacy of biological therapies for COPD has been evaluated by different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Still, the evaluation of real-world data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been performed in this field before. In the current work, we present a systematic literature review of the real-world data and PROMs of biological treatments for COPD. Three large databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) were utilized for the systematic literature review. Clinical studies (RCT, cohorts, case series/reports) assessing patients with COPD treated by any biological therapy were included. The review resulted in twelve eligible studies (nine randomized controlled trials and three "real-world" case series/reports). The evaluation of PROMs in the included studies was mainly limited to the severity and burden of respiratory symptoms. Most biological therapies were associated with improved PROMs compared to the baseline, although not for the placebo. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy with proven efficacy in RCT for both objective and subjective measures. One prior study reported patients' self-perceived drug effects, and none evaluated patients' perceived disease status. Only 25 patients were assessed in a real-world setting for all biologic therapies combined. Real-world data were retrospective in the form of case reports or series. There are limited data on patients' experience with biological therapies for COPD. While real-world data and PROMs are missing, biases such as a placebo effect must be considered, requiring their incorporation with objective outcomes from prospective controlled trials.

Orthodontic bracket failure rate after bonding with and without primer – A systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare the difference in failure rates between orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured primer and those bonded without primer. An electronic search of five databases and additional manual searches were performed until January 2024. Randomized and prospective non-randomized controlled trials directly comparing the bracket failure rate with and without primer. Two authors independently collected study characteristics by extracting outcome data from pre-defined sheets. After evaluating the risk of bias, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models. Four studies were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative analysis. The analysis included data from 199 patients (1691 brackets with primer and 1646 brackets without primer). Random effects of pooled meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in the bracket failure rates (odds ratio=1.50, p=0.010, [95% CI 1.10 to 2.05]). The risk of failure was 1.5 times greater when brackets were bonded without primer. The results should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size, even though there was a substantial difference in the failure rates of brackets with and without a primer, favouring the use of a primer. Furthermore, the validity of the finding may be limited by potential variables such as patient factors, clinician expertise, and isolation. More extensive research is required to validate these findings (PROSPERO CRD42024593134).

Secondary anti-viral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients for the prevention of cytomegalovirus relapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Secondary prophylaxis (SP) is not routinely recommended by guidelines on the management of CMV in SOTR but may be considered in certain higher-risk situations. A comprehensive search of English language publications up to September 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was CMV relapse, defined as the recurrence of DNAemia or disease. Secondary outcomes included graft loss, mortality, and hematological toxicity. Meta-analysis used the random-effects model. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022357028). Six retrospective comparative studies were included. A total of 520/727 (72%) of SOTR received SP with valganciclovir. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in CMV relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.63). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (I2 = 0%, p = 0.57). SP was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.54) but not graft loss (OR 0.67, 0.17-2.63). There was no significant difference in CMV relapse among kidney-specific SOTR (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.65-2.96). Evidence from six nonrandomized studies is limited and cannot support a recommendation for or against routine SP in SOTR treated for CMV infection. Awaiting prospective-controlled trials, the decision about SP should depend on individualized risk-profile assessments by experienced clinicians.

High-dose chemotherapy as initial salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors has not been established in prospective studies. Our aim was to estimate the benefits and harm of this treatment in men with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors. Electronic databases, conference proceedings, and trial registers until April 30, 2023, were searched. Randomized and non-randomized prospective controlled trials were included. Risk of bias assessments were performed using either RoB2 or ROBINS-I tools. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Time-to-event data were analyzed using the hazard ratio. The primary outcome was overall survival, and a meta-analysis was not conducted to assess it because non-randomized trials were judged to have a critical risk of bias. Categorical data were analyzed using a risk ratio. All results are presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Four out of 3,824 records met the inclusion criteria, and three out of four were used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Based on the IT94 study (N = 263 participants), single high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation may have little to no effect on overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.42; p = 0.916]. Non-randomized trials (N = 43 participants) showed contrasting results, which may be explained by the number of cycles of high-dose chemotherapy administered in each study. Regarding secondary outcomes, information was only provided for event-free survival, response rate, and acute toxicities. Based on prospective data, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the proposal that high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation improves survival in men with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors. If this treatment is considered essential, the choice should be made by experienced clinicians at high-volume cancer centers.

Safety and effectiveness of intraosseous regional prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) as a widely applicable and clinically valuable route of administration has gained significant attention in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the prophylactic administration of antibiotics. However, there is still controversy regarding its effectiveness and safety. The latest meta-analysis reports that the use of IORA for antibiotics in TKA is as safe and effective as IV administration in preventing prosthetic joint infection (PJI), but they did not separate the statistics for primary TKA and revision TKA, which may be inappropriate. There is currently a lack of evidence specifically comparing the outcomes of prophylactic antibiotic administration via IORA or IV route in primary/revision TKA, respectively, and new research evidence has emerged. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the primary objective of comparing the local drug tissue concentration and the incidence of PJI between preoperative IORA and intravenous (IV) administration of prophylactic antibiotics in TKA. Additionally, the occurrence of complications between the two administration routes was also compared. This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement (PRISMA) guidelines. Retrospective cohort studies and prospective randomized controlled trials that utilized intraosseous local drug delivery for prophylactic antibiotics in knee arthroplasty were included. English literature from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of each database until December 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed the quality, and extracted data according to the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were local antibiotic tissue concentration and postoperative PJI incidence, while the secondary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. This study included 7 prospective randomized controlled trials and 5 retrospective cohort studies. A total of 4091 patients participated in the 12 included studies, with 1,801 cases receiving IORA and 2,290 cases in the control group. In terms of local drug tissue concentration, intraosseous infusion (IO) 500mg vancomycin significantly increased the drug concentration in the periarticular adipose tissue (SMD: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.87-1.84; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and bone tissue (SMD: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.49-1.40; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) compared to IV 1g vancomycin. Regarding the incidence of postoperative PJI after primary TKA, IO 500mg vancomycin was more effective in reducing the occurrence of PJI compared to IV 1g vancomycin (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.59; P < 0.001; I2 = 36%). Finally, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 0.22-13.69; P = 0.59; I2 = 0%) and vancomycin-related complications (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.25-1.19; P = 0.44; I2 = 0%). Preoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration via IORA in TKA significantly increases local drug tissue concentration without significantly increasing systemic drug-related complications compared to traditional IV administration. In primary TKA, low-dose vancomycin via IORA is more effective in reducing the incidence of PJI compared to traditional IV regimens. However, its effectiveness remains controversial in high-risk populations for PJI, such as obese, diabetic, and renal insufficiency patients, as well as in revision TKA.

Long-term impact of scheduled regular endoscopic interventions for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with biliary obstructions that can require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). While the beneficial effects of ERCP are well documented, follow-up interventional strategies are less defined, and their long-term impact is debated. We evaluated the outcome of a scheduled program of ERCP-guided interventions that have been developed and implemented at our tertiary liver center for more than 20 years. Within our center, follow-up ERCPs were performed at regular intervals to treat previously detected morphological stenosis independent of clinical symptoms. We calculated the transplant-free survival (TFS) of patients who were enrolled in the scheduled ERCP program and compared it to patients who received follow-up ERCPs only on clinical demand. Moreover, we documented the occurrence of hepatic decompensation, recurrent cholangitis episodes, hepatobiliary malignancies, and endoscopy-related adverse events. In our retrospective study, we included 201 patients with PSC who all received an ERCP. In all, 133 patients received scheduled follow-up ERCPs and 68 received follow-up ERCPs only on demand. The rates of TFS since initial diagnosis (median TFS: 17 vs. 27 y; P = 0.020) and initial presentation (median TFS: 16 vs. 11 y; P = 0.002) were higher in patients receiving scheduled versus on-demand ERCP. Subgroup analysis revealed that progression in cholangiographic findings between the first and second ERCP was associated with a poorer outcome compared to patients without progression (17 y vs. undefined; P = 0.021). In conclusion, we report the outcome data of a scheduled follow-up ERCP program for patients with PSC in an experienced high-volume endoscopy center. Our data suggest the initiation of multicenter randomized controlled prospective trials to explore the full potential of regular endoscopic follow-up treatment as a strategy to prevent disease progression in patients with PSC.

Effectiveness of traditional herbal Kampo medicine Goreisan on chronic subdural hematoma recurrence: a meta-analysis.

Objectives: Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of Traditional Chinese herbal Kampo medicine Goreisan in improving recurrence in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials prospective trials, and retrospective cohort studies were systematically identified through searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to March 2024. Following the application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen the available studies, main outcome measures were rigorously extracted. RevMan v5.4 software was utilized to evaluate the overall recurrence rate, employing a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios with the Mantel-Haenszel estimation method. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q (Chi-square) test and I2 statistics. Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. Results: Among the 48 articles initially screened for citation, eight were ultimately selected for inclusion in the study. The results of our network meta-analysis indicate that patients with newly diagnosed Chronic subdural hematoma experienced a significantly reduced recurrence rate when treated with Goreisan compared to standard neurosurgical treatment (OR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.86; p = 0.00003). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of complications, including general fatigue, allergic reactions, hepatic dysfunction, and interstitial pneumonia (OR: 7.21; 95% CI 0.37-141.29; p = 0.19). Conclusion: Traditional medicine Goreisan was effective in reducing CDSH recurrence rates. For clinical treatment, it provides a high level of evidence-based medicine. It is also necessary to conduct multicenter randomized controlled trials with dose adjustments to determine whether Goreisan interventions improve neurological function or prognosis.

Extracorporeal removal of pathogens using abiomimetic adsorber-Anew treatment strategy for the intensive care unit : Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter and its fields of application

In 2019 the World Health Organization (WHO) listed antimicrobial resistance among the top 10threats to global health. The Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity blood filter (Seraph® 100) has been in use since 2019 to eliminate pathogens from the bloodstream in addition to anti-infective pharmacotherapy. It is the first device used to rapidly and efficiently reduce the number of circulating bacteria and viruses. After abackground on the concept of extracorporeal pathogen removal in general, this review summarizes the preclinical and clinical data on the Seraph® 100 Affinity Blood Filter. The clinical effect of this treatment and potential therapeutic options are described. Structured PubMed review including references published up to February 2024. Case reports, uncontrolled observational studies and data from registries show widespread clinical use of the Seraph® 100 ranging from difficult to treat bacterial (super) infections to viral infections. The treatment can be done as stand-alone hemoperfusion or in combination with all forms of kidney replacement therapy as well as in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The use of the Seraph® 100 varies in terms of duration, concomitant therapy and clinical settings. Due to the absence of prospective controlled trials the clinical effect cannot be properly evaluated.

Role of Adjuvant Mitomycin C in The Endoscopic Treatment of Laryngotracheal Stenosis (Meta-Analytic Study)

Abstract Background Laryngotracheal stenosis is a life-threatening restriction in pulmonary ventilation. It is an umbrella term, including luminal compromise at the level of the larynx, subglottis, or trachea. Etiology of laryngotracheal stenosis is multifactorial. In adults and adolescents it is mostly acquired, where in children it may be acquired or congenital. Acquired laryngotracheal stenosis can result from previous intubation or tracheostomy, systemic disease, trauma, infection, or idiopathic causes. Historically, infectious etiology was common. Currently, laryngotracheal stenosis most frequently results from prolonged intubation or trauma from intubation itself. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of topical Mitomycin C as an adjuvant treatment with the endoscopic management of laryngotreacheal stenosis. Patients and Methods The total number of patients in all the included studies was 454, 379 patients in MMC group and 75 patients in non-MMC group. Results This meta-analysis study showed that resolution (success) rate in MMC group was (68.7%) and there was a significant increase in resolution (success) rate in MMC compared to non- MMC group (p = 0.011) with the odds of being 5 times higher in MMC group (OR = 5.04). The Complications rate in MMC using patients was (4%). The result of this meta-analysis study showed that Mitomycin C is an effective and safe adjuvant in the endoscopic treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis. However, this study included limitations. We recommend the need of more high quality prospective randomized controlled trials, two armed studies and further studies in the future to achieve stronger results. Conclusion We suggest that that Mitomycin C is an effective and safe adjuvant in the endoscopic treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis. However, this study included limitations. We recommend the need of more high quality prospective randomized controlled trials, two armed studies and further studies in the future to achieve stronger results.

Copenhagen Mesenteric stent study (COMESS)—a randomized trial of stent versus covered stent treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia

BackgroundCurrent management of mesenteric ischemia is primarily endovascular stent treatment. Typical CMI symptoms are postprandial abdominal pain, food fear, weight loss, and diarrhea. Revascularization is often necessary, as mesenteric ischemia may progress to bowel necrosis and death if left untreated. This study aims to compare the outcome using bare metal stent (BMS) or covered stent (CS) in the endovascular treatment of chronic and acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia.MethodsThis is an investigator-driven, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and single-center, national cohort study at the Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. A total of 98 patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) and acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia (AoCMI) will be randomized to treatment with either BeSmooth BMS (Bentley Innomed GmbH) or BeGraft CS (Bentley Innomed GmbH). Randomization occurs intraoperatively after lesion crossing.DiscussionThere is currently no published data from prospective controlled trials regarding the preferred type of stent used for the treatment of chronic and acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. This trial will evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of BMS versus CS when treating CMI and AoCMI, as well as the benefit of a more intense postoperative surveillance program.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05244629. Registered on February 8, 2022.

Does Long-term Surveillance Imaging Improve Survival in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence.

Long-term post-treatment surveillance imaging algorithms for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are not standardized due to debates over optimal surveillance strategy and efficacy. Consequently, current guidelines do not provide long-term surveillance imaging recommendations beyond 6 months. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of long-term imaging surveillance (i.e., imaging beyond 6 months following treatment completion) on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for English literature published between 2003 and 2024 evaluating the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. 718 abstracts were screened and 95 underwent full-text review, with 2 articles meeting inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tool was used. A qualitative assessment without a pooled analysis was performed for the two studies meeting inclusion criteria. No randomized prospective controlled trials were identified. Two retrospective two-arm studies were included comparing long-term surveillance imaging with clinical surveillance and were each rated as having moderate risk of bias. Each study included heterogeneous populations with variable risk profiles and imaging surveillance protocols. Both studies investigated the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on overall survival and came to a different conclusion with one study reporting a survival benefit for long-term surveillance imaging with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage III or IV disease or an oropharyngeal primary tumor and the other study demonstrating no survival benefit. Limited heterogeneous retrospective data available precludes definitive conclusions on the impact of long-term surveillance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. There is insufficient quality evidence regarding the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. There is a lack of standardized definition of long-term surveillance, variable surveillance protocols, and inconsistencies in results reporting, underscoring the need for a prospective multi-center registry assessing outcomes. HNSCC = Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma; RT= radiotherapy; NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network; MPC = metachronous primary cancer; CR = complete response; OS = overall survival; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; HPV = human papillomavirus; PFS = progression-free survival; CFU = clinical follow up; NI-RADS = Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients who responded to venetoclax and azacitidine and stopped treatment.

Venetoclax-azacitidine is the standard of treatment for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients. In the VIALE-A study, treatment was given until progression but there are no data on its optimal duration for responding patients who do not tolerate indefinite therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients who discontinued venetoclax or venetoclax-azacitidine due to poor tolerance. Sixty-two newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients and 22 patients with morphological relapse or refractory AML were included. In the ND cohort (n = 62), 28 patients stopped venetoclax and azacitidine and 34 patients continued azacitidine monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 20-32), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 44 (IQR, 16-NR) and 16 (IQR, 8-27) months, respectively. Patients who stopped both treatments and those who continued azacitidine monotherapy had the same outcomes. Negative minimal residual disease was associated with a 2-year treatment-free survival of 80%. In the RR cohort (n = 22), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 19 (IQR, 17-31) and 10 (IQR, 5-NR) months, respectively. Prior number of venetoclax-azacitidine cycles and IDH mutations were associated with increased overall survival. The only factor significantly impacting treatment-free survival was the number of prior cycles. This study suggests that patients who discontinued treatment in remission have favorable outcomes supporting the rationale for prospective controlled trials.

A Test Method for Identifying Selection Bias Risk in Prospective Controlled Clinical Therapy Trials Using the I2 Point Estimate.

A test method is proposed for identifying potential selection bias risk in single prospective controlled clinical therapy trials that can be applied by trial reviewers. The method is described in detail and was tested on eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with reported negative Berger-Exner test results as negative and on eight prospective, controlled cohort studies as positive controls. All 16 studies were identified by systematic literature search. The test method yielded negative results for all RCTs and positive results for six out of the eight cohortstudies. All test results remained within the expected limits for both study types, suggesting a reasonably high accuracy for correctly identifying selection bias risk. However, the method does not provide the possibility to establish whether such bias risk has actually altered trial outcomes. Instead, a positive test result may provide an empirical basis for rating a trial as of high selection bias risk during trial appraisal.

Clinical Implications of Remote Dielectric Sensing-Guided Management.

Background: Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) systems can quantify the degree of pulmonary congestion rapidly and non-invasively. However, the clinical implications of ReDS-guided medication adjustment remain uncertain. Methods: Patients hospitalized to treat cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, valvular disease, and coronary artery disease, and underwent ReDS measurement before index discharge between 2021 and 2022 were included. According to our institutional protocol, ReDS values were blinded to the attending clinicians until February 2022 (blind period). After the period, ReDS values were timely opened to the attending clinicians, and medications such as diuretics were adjusted according to the ReDS values (target value between 20% and 35%) before index discharge (open period). A composite primary outcome of all-cause death and heart failure readmissions was compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 183 patients were included (median 79 years old, 101 men), consisting of 138 patients in the blind period and 45 patients in the open period. During a median of 646 (401, 818) days after the index discharge, 33 patients experienced the primary outcome of interest. Management during the open period, where medications were adjusted according to ReDS values, was independently associated with a lower incidence of the primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.94, p = 0.041), as compared with those of the blind period. Conclusions: According to the findings of the present retrospective study, ReDS-guided management may have the potential to reduce the risk of mortality and heart failure admission in individuals hospitalized for cardiovascular diagnoses. Further prospective randomized control trials involving those with a variety of background etiologies and clinical scenarios are warranted to validate our findings and establish optimal ReDS-guided management.

A Systematic Review of Loco-Sedative Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of the characteristics and outcomes of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for various urologic procedures. Urologic care has much to gain from the routine integration of ambulatory surgery via loco-sedative anesthetic techniques for both surgeon and patient. MethodsA comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Scopus databases following PRISMA criteria from June to August 2021. Articles were included if they were English, prospective, randomized, or non-randomized controlled trials that used local anesthetic or conscious sedation for urologic interventions in adult patients. Additionally, included studies provided primary data on the use loco-sedative anesthesia and the efficacy and complications. All studies included were further reviewed to assess the biases and conflicts of interests. Results32 studies with 6897 patients were included in the review. Mean patient age was 46.4 years. The most common anesthetic and analgesic relief was the use of local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. The majority used lidocaine as an injection, whereas the second most common route of administration was a topical cream. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the type of local or conscious sedation method and whether a combination was used. 44.4% of the studies used the visual analog scale as their primary endpoint. All the studies reported an 83% to 100% successful procedure rate without note of significant sedation-related complications. ConclusionsGiven the high efficacy rates, loco-sedative anesthesia is a promising technique for urologic interventions and should be further investigated to determine whether it may become be the standard of care.

Pain catastrophizing in rheumatic diseases: prevalence, origin, and implications.

Pain is a crucial factor in rheumatic disorders, and reducing it is a primary goal of successful treatment. Adaptive pain-coping strategies can enhance this improvement, but maladaptive approaches such as pain catastrophizing may worsen overall patient well-being. This narrative review aims to provide a concise overview of the existing knowledge on pain catastrophizing in the most prevalent specific rheumatic disorders. The objective of this study was to improve understanding of this phenomenon and its implications, as well as to pinpoint potential directions for future research. We conducted searches in the MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, and DOAJ bibliography databases to identify articles related to pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and osteoarthritis (non-surgical treatment). Data extraction was performed on November 1, 2023. The investigators screened the identified articles to determine their relevance and whether they met the inclusion criteria. Following a bibliography search, which was further expanded by screening of citations and references, we included 156 records in the current review. The full-text analysis centred on pain catastrophizing, encompassing its prevalence, pathogenesis, and impact. The review established the role of catastrophizing in amplifying pain and diminishing various aspects of general well-being. Also, potential treatment approaches were discussed and summarised across the examined disorders. Pain catastrophizing is as a significant factor in rheumatic disorders. Its impact warrants further exploration through prospective controlled trials to enhance global patient outcomes.

Dietary Supplementation of Myo-Inositol, Cocoa Polyphenols, and Soy Isoflavones Improves Vasomotor Symptoms and Metabolic Profile in Menopausal Women with Metabolic Syndrome: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Background and Objectives: Hormonal changes physiologically occurring in menopausal women may increase the risk of developing metabolic and vasomotor disturbances, which contribute to increase the risk of developing other concomitant pathologies, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from 200 menopausal women with MetS and vasomotor symptoms taking one sachet per day of the dietary supplement INOFOLIC® NRT (Farmares srl, Rome, Italy) were collected. Each sachet consisted of myo-Inositol (2000 mg), cocoa polyphenols (30 mg), and soy isoflavones (80 mg, of which 50 mg is genistin). Patients recorded their symptoms through a medical questionnaire at the beginning of the administration (T0) and after 6 months (T1). Results: We observed an improvement in both the frequency and the severity of hot flushes: increased percentage of 2-3 hot flushes (28 at T0 vs. 65% at T1, p value < 0.001) and decreased percentage of 4-9 hot flushes (54% at T0 vs. 18% at T1, p value < 0.001). Moreover, symptoms of depression improved after supplementation (87% at T0 vs. 56% at T1 of patients reported moderate depression symptoms, p value < 0.001). Regarding metabolic profile, women improved body mass index and waist circumference with a reduction in the percentage of overweight and obesity women (88% at T0 vs. 51% at T1, p value = 0.01; 14% at T0 vs. 9% at T1, p value = 0.04). In addition, the number of women suffering from non-insulin dependent diabetes reduced (26% at T0 vs. 16% at T1, p value = 0.04). Conclusions: These data corroborate previously observed beneficial effects of the oral administration of myo-Inositol, cocoa polyphenols, and soy isoflavones against menopausal symptoms in the study population. Considering the promising results of the present study, further prospective controlled clinical trials are needed to deeply understand and support the efficacy of these natural compounds for the management of menopausal symptoms.

Periarticular Injections with Liposomal Bupivacaine in Comparison with Traditional (Bupivacaine/Ropivacaine) Periarticular Injections in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Objectives This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the current literature to determine whether local infiltration liposomal bupivacaine (LB) used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) results in reduced pain scores and opioid consumption compared to traditional local anesthetics. Methods A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. Articles were screened independently by two investigators based on inclusion criteria of 1) prospective randomized control trials or retrospective cohort studies, 2) conducted after the 2015 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expansion of LB indication to local surgical infiltration, 3) compared LB as a periarticular injection to other local anesthetics used as a periarticular injection, and 4) available in English. Primary outcomes of pain scores and opioid consumption were reported. Secondary outcomes of interest included mobility, length of stay, costs, incidence of adverse events, and readmission rates. Bupivacaine costs $3 per dose, while LB costs $334 per dose. Results A total of seven articles were identified with the inclusion criteria. Four studies concluded that LB improves patient outcomes of pain scores and opioid consumption in patients receiving THA. Three studies found no benefit to using LB compared to their controls. Four studies found no significant reduction in the length of stay between the groups. There were no reported differences in the incidence of adverse events or total costs between the two groups. Conclusion There are minimal benefits of reduced pain scores or opioid consumption when using LB opioid-sparing protocols compared to current protocols for patients undergoing THA. Level of Evidence III

Monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index: Potential parameters for the evaluation of disease activity and severity in Graves' ophthalmopathy?

To assess changes in monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (MHR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) and their possible relation with GO disease activity and severity. A total of 20 patients with GO and 24 healthy controls were involved in the study. The thyroid status, MHR (monocyte count/HDL cholesterol level), NLR (neutrophil count/lymphocyte count) and SII [(neutrophil count × platelet count)/lymphocyte count] were compared between the groups. The relation of systemic inflammation parameters with disease activity and severity was evaluated. The mean Clinical Activity Score (CAS) was 0.75 ± 0.78 in the GO group. None of the patients were active. The severity was mild for 14 (70.0%) patients and moderate-to-severe for 6 (30.0%) patients. MHR (17.28 ± 5.56 vs. 13.28 ± 5.08), NLR (2.51 ± 1.09 vs. 1.69 ± 0.53) and SII [600.42 (391.79-837.16) vs. 413.69 (344.26-603.82)] values were significantly increased in GO patients than in the controls (p = 0.017, p = 0.005 and p = 0.036, respectively). CAS was significantly correlated with MHR (r = 0.815, p < 0.001), NLR (r = 0.768, p = 0.017) and SII (r = 0.837, p < 0.001). The severity of GO was associated with increased MHR, NLR and SII (p = 0.019, p = 0.036 and p = 0.008, respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated that MHR, NLR and SII have a good ability to differentiate GO patients from healthy individuals. GO patients have higher MHR and SII levels than healthy controls. Higher MHR, NLR and SII values were associated with increasing disease severity and activity, supporting the efficacy of these non-invasive, low-cost markers in determining the course of GO. Future prospective controlled trials are needed to elucidate the relation between inflammatory markers and GO.