A Systematic Review of Loco-Sedative Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery

Abstract

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of the characteristics and outcomes of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for various urologic procedures. Urologic care has much to gain from the routine integration of ambulatory surgery via loco-sedative anesthetic techniques for both surgeon and patient. MethodsA comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Scopus databases following PRISMA criteria from June to August 2021. Articles were included if they were English, prospective, randomized, or non-randomized controlled trials that used local anesthetic or conscious sedation for urologic interventions in adult patients. Additionally, included studies provided primary data on the use loco-sedative anesthesia and the efficacy and complications. All studies included were further reviewed to assess the biases and conflicts of interests. Results32 studies with 6897 patients were included in the review. Mean patient age was 46.4 years. The most common anesthetic and analgesic relief was the use of local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. The majority used lidocaine as an injection, whereas the second most common route of administration was a topical cream. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the type of local or conscious sedation method and whether a combination was used. 44.4% of the studies used the visual analog scale as their primary endpoint. All the studies reported an 83% to 100% successful procedure rate without note of significant sedation-related complications. ConclusionsGiven the high efficacy rates, loco-sedative anesthesia is a promising technique for urologic interventions and should be further investigated to determine whether it may become be the standard of care.