Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2020, 14, 2000206 DOI: 10.1002/pssr.202000206 In the published article, it was reported that 2D FeCl can realize the valley Hall effect, and that the valley polarization comes from the opposite signs of the Berry curvatures around the two valleys (B and B′) on the high-symmetry lines Γ–X and Γ–X′. However, it is now realized that the distribution of the Berry curvatures of FeCl should match with its crystal symmetry. The distribution of the Berry curvatures reported violates this rule because FeCl has C4 symmetry, which requires the same signs for the Berry curvatures around the valleys B and B′. After analyzing all calculation processes in detail, an error is found in the step of calculating the maximal localized Wannier functions (MLWFs). Although the energy bands from the MLWFs match with the results of first-principles calculations, the C4 symmetry is broken for low-energy electronic states and the Berry curvatures. After analyzing the influence of C4 rotation symmetry to the distributions of the Berry curvatures, it is found that the Chern number must be 2 or −2 for FeCl. To obtain the correct results of the Berry curvatures, a tight-binding model is built with the basis of the five d orbitals of the Fe atom, and this model matches with the crystal symmetry of FeCl. According to the orbital projected band structures without spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in the published article, the main contribution to the spin-polarized bands around the Fermi level is from the five d orbitals of the Fe atoms. Thus, we constructed a five-band tight-binding Hamiltonian with the basis set of the five spin-down d orbitals. Figure 1a herein shows the band structure from the tight-binding model and first-principles calculation, and they match with each other. To consider the effect of SOC, we add an intrinsic SOC term into this Hamiltonian. The hopping strength of SOC is set to 0.05 eV to match the bandgap (20 meV) of the first-principles result (see Figure 1b). The broken time-reversal symmetry generally results in the nonvanishing Berry curvatures for the electronic states below the Fermi level. With the help of the above tight-binding model, we calculated the Berry curvatures in the first Brillouin zone (see Figure 1c) and the anomalous Hall conductivity (see Figure 1d). It is shown that the Berry curvatures have the same signs around B and B′. By integrating the Berry curvatures near the valleys B and B′, we obtain Chern numbers of CB and CB′, and they are approximately equal to −1/2, which indicates VHE cannot happen if only a proper electronic field is applied.[1] To induce valley polarization from FeCl, we apply uniaxial strain to break the energy degeneracy of the valleys B and B’. The energy splittings of the different valleys are very important for the applications of FeCl in valleytronics. For 2D FeCl (see Figure 2c herein), the bands of the different valleys (B and B′) have the same energies for unstrained FeCl and the energy degeneracy is protected by the C4 rotation symmetry and Mx(y) mirror symmetries of the point group D4h.[2, 3] Valleys B and B′ are related by C4 symmetry, which leads to similar Berry curvature distributions around B and B′. Meanwhile, due to the existence of C 4 2 or Mx(y), the Berry curvatures of the four valleys have same signs in the first Brillouin zone, as shown in Figure 1c. If symmetries are broken by uniaxial strains, the point group becomes D2h, which only has C2 symmetry and Mx(y) mirror symmetry. Therefore, the Berry curvatures around valleys B and B′ can be different. It is worth mentioning that the Berry curvature distribution of the two valleys in kx = 0 or ky = 0 should remain the same and it is protected by C2 and Mx(y). We find the size of movement for the energies of valley B and B′ almost linearly dependent on the strain. When −5% strain is applied (see Figure 2b), the energy of valley B′ moves to above the Fermi level (+0.04 eV); at the same time, the energy of B moves to −0.11 eV. If the Fermi level is tuned to these two energies, a valley polarized current would be produced. Moreover, as shown in Figure 2d, the tensile strain can induce the opposite movement on the energies of B and B′. Our results revealed that uniaxial strain can effectively adjust the energies of different valleys and induce valley polarization in 2D FeCl.