Programmed Death-1 Therapy Research Articles

Relationship between lymphopenia and objective response rate with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy: A single-center retrospective analysis.

e14512 Background: Lymphopenia is frequent in advanced cancers, but the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on clinical responses with PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult solid tumor patients treated with a PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at Johns Hopkins from 2015-2016. Patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors concurrently with investigational immunotherapies, on unreported clinical trials or for cancers in which the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear, or for whom response information is not available, were excluded. Data were collected on patient treatment history, objective response to PD-1 therapy by RECIST 1.1, and ALC at treatment initiation and one and three months after treatment initiation. Results: 172 patients met the inclusion criteria (lung n = 54; melanoma n = 61; kidney n = 25; other tumors n = 32). Lymphopenia (ALC < 1000) was present in 30.2%, 26.7%, and 34.3%, at 0, 1, and 3 months after treatment initiation. In a multiple regression analysis that adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, tumor type, number of prior therapies, and concurrent ipilimumab usage, lymphopenia at baseline was not predictive of response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor. However, in this same model, lymphopenia at 1 and 3 months after treatment initiation was inversely related to response rate (p < 0.01). Of patients with lymphopenia at baseline, 37 patients (71.2%) had persistent lymphopenia (ALC < 1000 at baseline persisting to month 3) whereas 15 patients (28.8%) had normalized lymphocyte counts by month 3. In a univariate analysis, patients with persistent lymphopenia had decreased response rates as compared to patients who were not lymphopenic at baseline (21.6% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.01). However, patients with lymphopenia at baseline who had normalized lymphocyte counts at month 3 responded similarly as patients who were not lymphopenic at baseline (46.7% vs. 47.5%). Conclusions: Patients on anti–PD-1 therapy with persistent lymphopenia may have a reduced likelihood of responding to these agents. This association requires further validation in additional patient cohorts.

Nuclear IRF-1 expression as a mechanism to assess \u201cCapability\u201d to express PD-L1 and response to PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma

BackgroundPredictive biomarkers for antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) remain a major unmet need in metastatic melanoma. Specifically, response is seen in tumors that do not express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), highlighting the need for a more sensitive biomarker. We hypothesize that capacity to express PD-L1, as assessed by an assay for a PD-L1 transcription factor, interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1), may better distinguish patients likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.MethodsSamples from 47 melanoma patients that received nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination ipilimumab/nivolumab at Yale New Haven Hospital from May 2013 to March 2016 were collected. Expression of IRF-1 and PD-L1 in archival pre-treatment formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples were assessed by the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence. Objective radiographic response (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using modified RECIST v1.1 criteria.ResultsNuclear IRF-1 expression was higher in patients with partial or complete response (PR/CR) than in patients with stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) (p = 0.044). There was an insignificant trend toward higher PD-L1 expression in patients with PR/CR (p = 0.085). PFS was higher in the IRF-1-high group than the IRF-1-low group (p = 0.017), while PD-L1 expression had no effect on PFS (p = 0.83). In a subset analysis, a strong association with PFS is seen in patients treated with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab (p = 0.0051).ConclusionsAs a measure of PD-L1 expression capability, IRF-1 expression may be a more valuable predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy than PD-L1 itself.

Mutations Associated with Acquired Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Melanoma

BackgroundApproximately 75% of objective responses to anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients with melanoma are durable, lasting for years, but delayed relapses have been noted long after initial objective tumor regression despite continuous therapy. Mechanisms of immune escape in this context are unknown.MethodsWe analyzed biopsy samples from paired baseline and relapsing lesions in four patients with metastatic melanoma who had had an initial objective tumor regression in response to anti–PD-1 therapy (pembrolizumab) followed by disease progression months to years later.ResultsWhole-exome sequencing detected clonal selection and outgrowth of the acquired resistant tumors and, in two of the four patients, revealed resistance-associated loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding interferon-receptor–associated Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) or Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), concurrent with deletion of the wild-type allele. A truncating mutation in the gene encoding the antigen-presenting protein beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) was identified in a third patient. JAK1 and JAK2 truncating mutations resulted in a lack of response to interferon gamma, including insensitivity to its antiproliferative effects on cancer cells. The B2M truncating mutation led to loss of surface expression of major histocompatibility complex class I.ConclusionsIn this study, acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in patients with melanoma was associated with defects in the pathways involved in interferon-receptor signaling and in antigen presentation. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.)

Possible Interaction of Anti–PD-1 Therapy with the Effects of Radiosurgery on Brain Metastases

Delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy related to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases has been reported to manifest clinically 9 to 18 months after treatment. Immune-modulating therapies have been introduced to treatment regimens for malignancies with metastatic predilection to the brain. The interaction of these systemic therapies with other modalities of treatment for brain metastases, namely, SRS, has not been fully characterized. We report two patients with metastatic malignancies to the brain who received SRS followed by immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to programmed death 1 (PD-1). Both patients appeared to have early clinical and radiologic progression of their treated lesions, which was highly suspicious for tumor progression. Both patients underwent surgical resection of their lesions and the material was submitted for histopathologic examination. Pathologic examination in both cases showed predominantly radiation-induced changes characterized by reactive astrocytosis and vascular wall infiltration by T lymphocytes. The accelerated response to SRS in these two patients was temporally related to the initiation of immunotherapy. We propose a possible biologic interaction between SRS and the PD-1 mAbs. Additionally, awareness of this potential occurrence is critical for accurate interpretation and proper management of clinical and radiologic findings in these patients. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(6); 481-7. ©2016 AACR.

Signaling pathway and dysregulation of PD1 and its ligands in lymphoid malignancies

Tumor cells evade immune destruction, at least partially, by upregulating inhibitory signals to limit effector T cell activation. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is one of the most critical co-inhibitory molecules limiting the T-cell antitumor response. PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, are overexpressed by various types of tumors as well as reactive cells in the tumor microenvironment. A growing body of evidence has shown the clinical efficiency and minimal toxicity of PD-1 pathway inhibitors in patients with solid tumors, but the role of these inhibitors in lymphoid malignancies is much less well studied. In this review, we analyze the pathologic role of the PD-1 pathway in most common lymphoid malignancies and we organize the clinical data from clinical trials of PD-1 pathway inhibitors. Several anti–PD-1 regimens have shown encouraging therapeutic effects in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Additional progress is needed to foster an improved understanding of the role of anti–PD-1 therapy in reconstituting antitumor immunity in patients with lymphoid malignancies. Upcoming trials will explore the clinical efficiency of combining PD-1 pathway inhibitors and various agents with diverse mechanisms of action and create more therapeutic possibilities for afflicted patients.

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade together with vaccine therapy facilitates effector T-cell infiltration into pancreatic tumors.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has a poor prognosis due to late detection and resistance to conventional therapies. Published studies show that the PDA tumor microenvironment is predominantly infiltrated with immune suppressive cells and signals that if altered, would allow effective immunotherapy. However, single-agent checkpoint inhibitors including agents that alter immune suppressive signals in other human cancers such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1), and its ligand PD-L1, have failed to demonstrate objective responses when given as single agents to PDA patients. We recently reported that inhibition of the CTLA-4 pathway when given together with a T cell inducing vaccine gives objective responses in metastatic PDA patients. In this study, we evaluated blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. We found that PD-L1 is weakly expressed at a low frequency in untreated human and murine PDAs but treatment with a granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor secreting PDA vaccine (GVAX) significantly upregulates PD-L1 membranous expression after treatment of tumor-bearing mice. In addition, combination therapy with vaccine and PD-1 antibody blockade improved murine survival compared with PD-1 antibody monotherapy or GVAX therapy alone. Furthermore, PD-1 blockade increased effector CD8 T lymphocytes and tumor-specific interferon-γ production of CD8 T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunosuppressive pathways, including regulatory T cells and CTLA-4 expression on T cells were overcome by the addition of vaccine and low-dose cyclophosphamide to PD-1 blockade. Collectively, our study supports combining PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody therapy with a T cell inducing agent for PDA treatment.

Lichenoid dermatitis in three patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.

Therapies that activate the immune system through blocking the binding of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) present on tumors and PD-1 (programmed death 1) present on activated immune cells are revolutionizing the care for patients with cancer. These therapies work by inhibiting negative regulators of the immune system, thereby decreasing a tumor's ability to evade the immune system. The side effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are generally mild and as expected are related to autoimmune reactions. Two of the most common side effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are rash and pruritus occurring in approximately 20% of patients. Although the rash is generally recognized to be immune mediated, the exact mechanisms of the rash remain unclear. Herein, we report three cases of lichenoid dermatitis in three patients treated with MK-3475 (anti-PD-1) that were characterized with marked T-cell infiltrates with few PD-1-positive cells. The rashes in all three patients were relatively mild, allowing treatment to continue despite the rashes.

Anti–ErbB-2 mAb therapy requires type I and II interferons and synergizes with anti–PD-1 or anti-CD137 mAb therapy

Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/ErbB-2), has become the mainstay of treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. Nevertheless, its exact mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated. Although several studies suggest that Fc receptor-expressing immune cells are involved in trastuzumab therapy, the relative contribution of lymphocyte-mediated cellular cytotoxicity and antitumor cytokines remains unknown. We report here that anti-ErbB-2 mAb therapy is dependent on the release of type I and type II IFNs but is independent of perforin or FasL. Our study thus challenges the notion that classical antibody-dependent, lymphocyte-mediated cellular cytotoxicity is important for trastuzumab. We demonstrate that anti-ErbB-2 mAb therapy of experimental tumors derived from MMTV-ErbB-2 transgenic mice triggers MyD88-dependent signaling and primes IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells. Adoptive cell transfer of purified T cell subsets confirmed the essential role of IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells. Notably, anti-ErbB-2 mAb therapy was independent of IL-1R or IL-17Ra signaling. Finally, we investigated whether immunostimulatory approaches with antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) or 41BB (CD137) could be used to capitalize on the immune-mediated effects of trastuzumab. We demonstrate that anti-PD-1 or anti-CD137 mAb can significantly improve the therapeutic activity of anti-ErbB-2 mAb in immunocompetent mice.