BioTechniquesVol. 58, No. 1 BioSpotlight / CitationsOpen AccessBioSpotlight / CitationsNathan S. Blow & Nijsje DormanNathan S. BlowSearch for more papers by this author & Nijsje DormanSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Apr 2018https://doi.org/10.2144/000114243AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail “Hi-gher”-plexIn 2013, researchers from the University of Melbourne led by Daniel J. Park reported the development of Hi-Plex, a PCR-based approach for targeted massively parallel sequencing. The authors demonstrated that Hi-Plex worked with both difficult sample types and low starting amounts of input DNA, generating up to 60 amplicons simultaneously. With the proof-of-concept done, they next tried to expand the number of amplicons possible with Hi-Plex but found that the technique did not scale as anticipated. In this issue of BioTechniques, Park and his colleagues are back again, describing a refinement in the Hi-Plex methodology that enables the generation of up to 1003 amplicons. The group found that the use of abridged adapter oligonucleotides as universal primers during the initial reaction, followed by full length adapter primers during later amplification, actually enhanced the number of possible amplicons while at the same time preserving the low input requirements and maintaining the uniform amplification previously seen with smaller amplicon numbers. With this improvement to the technique, Hi-Plex is now well-positioned as an efficient and robust method for targeted next-generation sequencing.See “Abridged adapter primers increase the target scope of Hi-Plex”Mixing it upThe use of cell-free protein expression systems is on the rise, with several kits now commercially available. Although it is possible to make the necessary components from scratch in your own lab, there are a number of barriers to entry, one being the challenge of mixing amino acid solutions in sufficiently high concentrations to permit the translation reaction to work. But that barrier might now be coming down as Filippo Caschera and Vincent Noireaux at the University of Minnesota present a series of “recipes” for creating amino acid stock solutions for protein expression. In the current issue of BioTechniques, the authors provide detailed descriptions of the chemicals and conditions required to create amino acid mixtures with desired compositions at physiological pHs. With these solutions in hand, the researchers were able to synthesize up to 2.1 mg/ml of active protein using an E. coli cell-free expression system. This new report should further expand the use of cell-free protein expression systems by lowering the barrier to entry for interested researchers.See “Preparation of amino acid mixtures for cell-free expression systems”Protein interference using darpinsDARPins (designed ankyrin repeat protein-based binders) are antibody alternatives that can function within cells. Surface-randomized libraries of these scaffold proteins can be used to select high-affinity binders by ribosome display. With the aim of manipulating the function of fluorescent tag–containing proteins, Brauchle et al. identified DARPins to GFP and mCherry. They found that DARPins with the highest affinity in vitro could colocalize with their targets when transiently cotransfected, upon co-injection into zebrafish embryos, and in transgenic Drosophila. Because of their stability, DARPins can be fused to functional domains without compromising their binding. For instance, a DARPin fused to a degradation-triggering domain was able to knock out a histone–fluorescent protein fusion, and a membrane-anchored DARPin could redirect a fluorescently tagged endosomal protein to the plasma membrane. These DARPins should be able to target GFP/YFP and mCherry fusions in any animal model, providing a new means to make inferences about protein function.M. Brauchle et al. 2014. Protein interference applications in cellular and developmental biology using DARPins that recognize GFP and mCherry. Biol Open. [Epub ahead of print, Nov 21, 2014 ; doi:10.1242/bio.201410041].Minicircles for more efficient genome engineeringZinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) are often introduced into target cells via plasmid vectors, but the efficiency of gene modification is generally low. Dad et al. advocate instead for the use of minicircle vectors, which lack bacterial backbone sequences irrelevant for transgene expression. Historically, minicircle vectors have been inconvenient to prepare, but recently optimized methods have considerably simplified the process, and these vectors are also available commercially. The authors found that minicircle-delivered ZFNs and TALENs roughly doubled the frequency of gene mutations relative to plasmid-borne programmable nucleases, an effect that was due to improved transfection efficiency and enhanced transcription. Cell viability was also significantly greater in the cells transfected with the smaller vector, and there was no sign of minicircle integration into the genome. This simple change should speed targeted genetic modification procedures.A.B. Dad et al. 2014. Enhanced gene disruption by programmable nucleases delivered by a minicircle vector. Gene Ther. 21(11):921-30.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 58, No. 1 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics History Published online 3 April 2018 Published in print January 2015 Information© 2015 Author(s)PDF download
Read full abstract