Purpose: This scoping review aimed to identify application methods, effectiveness, facilitating factors, and obstacles to clinical supervision for nurses in maternal and child health and to understand its discriminatory characteristics compared to mentoring.Methods: This study was based on the scoping review methodology and consisted of six stages: (1) identifying research questions; (2) identifying relevant studies (search strategy); (3) study selection; (4) charting of the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consultation. From April to July 2022, 1,323 studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Open Gray, and finally eleven studies were selected through the literature selection process.Results: Because clinical supervision aimed to strengthen the professional capabilities of nurses, reflective practice was applied. However, mentoring was designed to acquire knowledge or skills that can be applied directly in practice. Therefore, indicators to measure the effects of clinical supervision consisted of psychosocial factors, such as job satisfaction and exhaustion, but the effects of mentoring were evaluated primarily using knowledge levels and skills. The model, which is applied mainly in clinical supervision, reflects the restorative function. When applying clinical supervision and mentoring, listening, supportive environment, and accessibility were identified as facilitating factors, while criticism, lack of time and space, and excessive workload were identified as obstacles.Conclusions: Time and space must be secured to provide effective clinical supervision. The confidentiality of the supervisee must be guaranteed, and sufficient information must be provided in advance so that nurses can accurately recognize the clinical supervision process. Finally, a policy for institutionalizing clinical supervision should be supported to ensure its applicability and sustainability.
Read full abstract