Background: Endoscopic Retrograde Choloangio Pancreatography (ERCP) poses significant radiation risk to patients and health professionals. Radiation exposure depends mainly on fluoroscopy time which theoretically may be decreased by using pulsed fluoroscopy instead of traditional method of continuous x-ray screening. Aim: To study the fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure to patients undergoing ERCP using pulsed fluoroscopy. Methods: Three hundred consecutive ERCPs performed from January to November 2003 at a single centre in UK were retrospectively studied. Siemens Siremobil Compact mobile intensifier system was used on the endoscopy unit. A Dose Area product (DAP) meter was fitted to the Xray tube and DAP reading and fluoroscopy time was recorded for each patient. Results: A total of 300 ERCPs on 225 consecutive patients were studied during 11 month period. 278 procedures were performed and ERCP was abandoned in 22 (7.3%) cases mainly because of poor access to papillary area. The biliary ducts were adequately visualized in 262 (94.2%) cases. Out of 278 ERCPs that were performed, thirty one (11.2%) ERCPs were diagnostic and 247 (88.8%) were therapeutic. Therapeutic procedures performed were mainly sphincterotomy in 159 (64.4%), duct clearance in 163 (66%) and stent insertion or exchange in 89 (36%) cases. There were in all 13 (4.3%) complications recorded. Of which 4 (1.3%) were mild and 9 (3%) were of moderate severity. The mean fluoroscopic time was 60.19 seconds (95% C.I 46.6-73.7 sec) for diagnostic and 97.09 seconds (95% C.I 88.4-105.8 sec) for the therapeutic ERCP (p < 0.001). Average DAP was 471.3 cGray-cm2 (95% C.I 358.3-584.3) for diagnostic and 808.9 cGray-cm2 (95% C.I 730.4-887. 3) for the therapeutic ERCP (p < 0.0001). DAP showed a linear correlation with fluoroscopy time (pearson correlation 0.947). Conclusion: Use of pulsed radiation in this study resulted in smaller fluoroscopy time and radiation dose compared to published data using traditional non pulsed fluoroscopy 1. Our success rates in therapeutic procedures as well as complication rates compare favourably to most published series2. We conclude that pulse fluoroscopy can considerably reduce the screening time and radiation dose without loss of efficacy or additional risk to patients.
Read full abstract