IntroductionInternational organizations, led by the World Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank, are pursuing an international political agenda in the areas of migration and development. Its guiding principle is that they consider that remittances, sent home by migrants, can promote the local, regional and national of the countries of origin. In addition, remittances are recognized an indispensable source of foreign exchange for providing macroeconomic stability, and alleviating the ravages caused by such insidious phenomena as poverty. At the same time, the Mexican government is pursuing an erratic policy of migration and implemented by a handful of programs that are unconnected and de-contextualized vis-a-vis the complexity of problems (Delgado Wise and Marquez, 2005).For Mexico, as for other countries that export large numbers of migrants, the great paradox of international migration and policy is that it provides no substantial change in the principles that underpin neoliberal globalization or the specific way in which neoliberal policies are applied in the countries of origin. At most, they offer superficial strategies related to the migration phenomenon but not to development. Neither, do they address the need to lower the cost of transferring remittances or the promotion of financial support instruments to enable the use of remittances for microprojects, with very limited impact in terms of development. In the specific case of Mexico, it is clear that the country is not attempting to design coherent or properly contextualized policies for migration and development. There are no guiding strategies that could serve as part of an alternative model or as a new form of regional economic integration to reduce the socioeconomic asymmetries between Mexico and the United States. It is apparent that there are no efforts made to contain -or at least reduce- the burgeoning the current migratory dynamic.Our argument is that the remittance-based model is not the only one at work in the world, but it is certainly the most regressive (Delgado Wise and Marquez, 2006b). The peculiarity of this model is that it is not intended to foster substantial socioeconomic change in the communities and regions of migrant origin or to set roots in the sending country. In the specific case of Mexican migration to the United States, its aims are threefold: (1) Deepen the process of asymmetric regional economic integration based on exports of Mexican labor (Delgado Wise and Marquez, 2006a.) (2) Encourage the neoliberal export-led development mode of the country by the remittances contribution to macroeconomic stability. (3) Assure a level of governance, by presenting a human face to negate the climate of social unsustainability, labor precarization, and productive disarticulation that prevails.The theoretical perspective, used in this paper, emphasizes the political economy of development. It centers its attention on the role of migrant labor within the North American regional economic bloc. The analytical approach assesses remittances as a component, largely equivalent to wages, used for the workers subsistence. According to these forethoughts, workers are part of a relative surplus population forced to enter the crossborder job market under conditions of labor precarization and social exclusion. This outlook adopts contributions made by several theoretical approaches that shed light on the relationship between migration and in its efforts to construct a comprehensive, multidimensional view.1This document is divided into five sections: The first offers a brief overview of current migration and models found in different socioeconomic and geographical contexts around the world. The second describes the labor export-led model, applied in Mexico, under the neoliberal aegis and NAFTA context. Section three, examines how this model leads to the remittance-based model, which serves as the framework for most public policies in that area. …
Read full abstract