Abstract The predictability of precipitation is hindered by finer-scale processes not captured explicitly in global numerical models, such as convective interactions, cloud microphysics, and boundary layer dynamics. However, there is growing demand across various sectors for medium- (3–10-day) and extended-range (10–30-day) quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) and probabilistic QPFs (PQPFs). This study uses a novel statistical postprocessing technique, APPM, that combines analog postprocessing (AP) with probability matching (PM) to produce week-1 and week-2 accumulated precipitation forecasts over Taiwan. AP searches for historical predictions that closely resemble the current forecast and create an AP ensemble using the observed high-resolution precipitation patterns corresponding to these forecast analogs. Frequency counting and PM are then separately applied to the AP ensemble to produce calibrated and downscaled PQPFs and bias-reduced QPFs, respectively. Evaluation over a 22-yr (1999–2020) period shows that raw ensemble forecasts from the GEFS of NOAA/NWS/Environmental Modeling Center, collected for the subseasonal experiment, are underdispersive with a wet bias. In contrast, the AP ensemble spread well represents forecast uncertainty, leading to substantially more reliable and skillful probabilistic forecasts. Furthermore, the AP-based PQPF demonstrates superior discrimination ability and yields notably greater economic benefits for a wider range of users, with the maximum economic value increasing by 30%–50% for the week-2 forecast. Compared to the raw ensemble mean forecast, the calibrated QPF exhibits lower mean absolute error and explains 3–8 times more variance in observations. Overall, the APPM technique significantly improves week-1 and week-2 QPFs and PQPFs over Taiwan. Significance Statement There are two significant challenges in improving precipitation forecasts beyond a few days in Taiwan. First, large-scale numerical models often struggle with accurately predicting precipitation locations, magnitudes, and providing sufficient detail. Second, probabilistic precipitation forecasts have been unreliable, failing to convey accurate uncertainty information to users. In response to these challenges, this study has developed a relatively simple yet effective technique that corrects the spatiotemporal distribution of predicted precipitation and downscales the forecasts from a 1° to 1-km spatial resolution. Our results demonstrate that this technique significantly alleviates these two issues, resulting in more accurate precipitation forecasts and more reliable probabilistic precipitation forecasts within a 2-week timeframe.