Time-Dependent Aftershock Probabilistic Forecasting and Ensemble Model Implementation: Insights from the 2021 Ms 7.4 Maduo Earthquake

Abstract

Abstract On 22 May 2021, an Ms 7.4 earthquake with a focal depth of 17 km struck the Maduo region of Qinghai province, breaking a 3.8-year quiescence of strong earthquakes (magnitude >7.0) in mainland China. This event has increased stress on the Maqin–Maqu segment of the Kunlunshan fault, heightening the potential for a large earthquake in the region. In this study, we employed the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model and Reasenberg–Jones (R–J) model to fit the aftershock sequence following the mainshock, analyzing the temporal response and its ability to influence future generations. Concurrently, ensemble models were explored to leverage the strengths of both the ETAS and R–J models. Short-term forecasts of the probability and occurrence rate of aftershock events with varying magnitudes were conducted for the next three days. Then statistical methods, that is, receiver-operating characteristic diagrams and information gain, were used to evaluate the unconditional and relative performance. Our findings include that the ETAS model indicates a high decay rate with many aftershocks triggered by previous events, whereas the R–J model shows a normal decay rate with a higher proportion of strong aftershocks. The ETAS and R–J models perform better than random guesses for different aftershock magnitudes, but the ETAS model is somewhat affected by the problem of missing small earthquakes for a short period of time after the mainshock. The ensemble model that chooses the minimum strategy shows promise, especially in the early period, suggesting a reasonable and cautious decision approach should be chosen during the unstable stage. This study highlights the importance of short-term aftershock probability estimation for seismic research and decision-making. In the absence of more accurate models, current analytical approaches within the operational earthquake forecasting framework remain valuable. Continuous testing, feedback, and refinement of forecasting models, along with the development of ensemble models, are essential for enhancing seismic risk assessment and mitigation strategies.