Proactive Interference Effects Research Articles

Anterior frontal cortex and the effect of proactive interference in word pair learning —results of brain-spect

Technetium-99m-HMPAO-Brain-SPECT was performed twice in each of 12 right-handed students. The control condition was a standard word pair learning task. In the experimental condition, subjects had to overcome the detrimental effect that older memories exerted on the acquisition of new information (controlling proactive inhibition): they were presented with taxonomically similar words, which could easily be mixed up, and which reappeared in each list, but in different pairings. Results revealed an increase in right anterior frontal flow indices with the experimental condition. These results parallel the observed increase in negative event-related DC potential shifts. U HL et al. [ J. cognit. Neurosci. 2, 373, 1990] recorded at frontopolar (Fp3,Fp4) scalp projections, although the extent of modulation was much higher for DC potentials (100%) than it was for SPECT (3%) thus suggesting different sensitivity.

Forgetting in rats following medial septum or mammillary body damage.

This study examined the effects of medial septal (MS) and mammillary body (MB) radio-frequency lesions in an automated delayed-matching-to-sample (DMTS) procedure using lever-position stimuli and rats. Memory performance pre- and postsurgery was assessed with a negative exponential decay function fitted to bias-free measures of recognition. Part 1 showed that MS, but not MB or sham-control surgery, impaired DMTS performance. This impairment in the MS group was best characterized as an increase in the rate of forgetting. Part 2 examined the interaction between MS and MB lesion effects and proactive interference arising from responses made on the previous DMTS trial. The results indicated that proactive interference effects were similar for all groups. These results provide further support for the critical role of the MS region in memory function but indicate that damage to this brain region does not disrupt memory function through a heightened sensitivity to proactive interference.

Regency Judgements in Wernicke-Korsakoff and Post-Encephalitic Amnesia: Influences of Proactive Interference and Retention Interval

This study further examines the performance of diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesics on the recency judgement task (Parkin, Leng and Hunkin, 1990). The two patient groups were represented by patients with Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS) and post-Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). Experiment 1 demonstrated that poorer recency judgements by WKS patients were not due to a general proactive interference effect, but from an inability to remember which items had been designated targets on a given trial. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the superior performance of the HSE group was not attributable to a putative faster forgetting rate. In addition, the study found no relationship between recency judgements and degree of frontal lobe impairment. It is concluded that diencephalic damage has a particular effect on the ability to make recency judgements and that this represents a fundamental difference between diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesia. Theoretical interpretations of this difference are discussed.

Examining a processing tradeoff explanation of proactive interference.

Burns (1989) claims that proactive interference effects occur in paired-associate learning because of tradeoffs in relational and response-specific processing. Consistent with this claim, Burns demonstrated that free recall of critical-list responses is better in the interference condition than in the control condition. Burns's processing tradeoff explanation predicts that the occurrence of this reverse-interference effect should be positively correlated with the occurrence of traditional interference effects. We present several experiments whose results are inconsistent with this prediction. We hypothesize that the reverse-interference effect is a list-length effect. The results of a final experiment, contrasting the predictions of the list-length and processing tradeoff explanations, support the list-length explanation.

Spontaneous recovery in cross-motivational transfer (counterconditioning)

In two experiments with rat subjects, we examined the effects of a retention interval on performance in two conditioning paradigms in which a conditioned stimulus (CS) was associated with different unconditioned stimuli (USs) in successive phases of the experiment- Experiment 1 was designed to examine aversive-appetitive transfer, in which the CS is associated with shock and then food; Experiment 2 was designed to examine appetitive-aversive transfer, in which the CS is associated with food and then shock. Aversive and appetitive conditioned responses (freezing and head-jerk responding, respectively) were scored from videotape. In both experiments, a 28-day retention interval following the end of Phase 2 caused a recovery of the Phase 1 response and a resuppression of the Phase 2 response. The results suggest that the original association is not destroyed when the CS is associated with a new US in Phase 2. They also suggest that both retroactive and proactive interference effects may result-from interference with performance output rather than a disruption or loss of what is learned during or stored from the target phase.

Delayed matching-to-sample performance by rats in a new avoidance-motivated maze: Response to scopolamine and fimbria-fornix lesions

A new avoidance-motivated detour-maze in which memory for an immediately preceding sample event could be assessed was evaluated by testing seven 6-month-old male F-344 rats with a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) paradigm. Rats first received extensive pretraining with this paradigm over several months and after a minimum of 1,390 choice-trials demonstrated great proficiency in this maze. Studies were then conducted to establish cholinergic and hippocampal involvement in the DMTS task by using drug manipulations (scopolamine and physostigmine), and after lesions to the fimbria-fornix (FF) pathway. A high dose (1.0 mg/kg) of scopolamine but not a low dose (0.3 mg/kg) significantly interfered with choice accuracy as measured by errors and trials to criterion; physostigmine (0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg) had no significant effect; and fimbria lesions significantly disrupted both choice accuracy and runtime performance. Disruption was most pronounced on difficult problems (different paths to the goal). After lesions only, considerable within-trial perseverative errors occurred during the early postlesion weeks on four difficult problems from among the 18 tested. Results were discussed in terms of (a) specificity of this disruption, (b) indications of proactive interference effects, and (c) the movement-related excitation component of maze learning. The present results accord with earlier findings of disruption by scopolamine and FF lesions in a 14-unit T-maze, both mazes having similar performance requirements of shock avoidance and multiple 90-degree turns along the paths to the goal. The present results affirm that this new detour maze provides a viable approach for assessing cognitive performance in a within-subjects design and thereby offers new possibilities for testing various aspects of cognitive processing, particularly for aged rodent models, in a complex aversive situation.

NMDA receptor channel antagonism by dizocilpine (MK-801) impairs performance of rats in aversively motivated complex maze tasks.

To determine the involvement of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in shock-motivated complex maze performance, the drug dizocilpine (DIZO; a.k.a. MK-801) was administered a) to naive, 3-month-old male F-344 rats prior to acquisition (AQ) in the 14-unit T-maze (Experiment 1), and b) to well-trained 11-month-old male F-344 rats prior to testing in a delayed-matching-to-sample (DMTS) task in the detour maze (Experiment 2). For Experiment 1, rats first were pretrained in a straight runway on one-way active avoidance (13/15 correct avoidances) for a maximum of 30 trials. On the following day, either DIZO 0.025 (n = 8), 0.05 (n = 8), 0.1 (n = 8), mg/kg, or saline (SAL; n = 15) was administered subcutaneously (SC) 20 min prior to 15 AQ trials in the shock-motivated 14-unit T-maze. The highest dose disrupted all measures of maze performance including errors, alternation errors, runtime, shock duration and frequency, but also produced marked motor ataxia. The 0.05-mg/kg group displayed significant impairment in AQ of this task but only on the cognitive measures, errors and alternation errors, and the 0.025-mg/kg group was impaired on the alternation measure only. One week later, the 15 SAL rats were divided into 2 groups and tested on retention with either SAL or 0.05 mg/kg DIZO. No effects on maze performance were observed. For Experiment 2, after receiving extensive pretraining in the shock-motivated detour maze, 7 rats were exposed to a novel sequence of 4 problems (P) during each of 7 daily sessions. Performance was evaluated 20 min after SC injection of either DIZO--0.025, 0.05, 0.125 mg/kg, or SAL. The 0.125-mg/kg dose caused extreme motor ataxia which precluded testing during that session. The 0.05-mg/kg but not the 0.025-mg/kg dose significantly disrupted performance on both error and trials to criterion measures. Both problem and interaction effects were significant. Disruption was most evident on two specific problems, those involving a side change from the first to second detour. Also, rats had more difficulty switching sides from problem to problem (few errors on P-1 and most on P-4), suggesting proactive interference effects. In sum, DIZO was observed to significantly disrupt performance in both mazes in a dose-related manner similar to effects observed in previous studies following administration of the anticholinergic drug scopolamine. For the 14-unit T-maze, the present results simulate age-related deficits previously found in acquisition of that task.

Anterior Frontal Cortex and the Effect of Proactive Interference in Paired Associate Learning: A DC Potential Study

This contribution focuses on neurophysiological correlates of the cerebral processes subserving the control of proactive interference. Event-related negative shifts of the scalp-recorded cortical steady potential (negative DC shifts) were measured in 17 right-handed normals during two tasks of paired associate learning. The control condition was a standard word pair learning task in which unrelated word pairs were presented. In the experimental condition, proactive interference was maximized by presenting very similar words and by requiring negative transfer, i.e., by having them reappear, but in different pairings. Proactive interference leads to increased anterior frontal negative DC shifts. Furthermore, centrotemporal negative DC shifts predicted subsequent cued recall performance. In spite of elaborative strategies, an effect of subsequent mnestic performance on the P300 was observed.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: I. Basic parameters and drug effects.

An operant delayed-matching task was used to assess the role of proactive interference (PI) effects on short-term memory capacity of rats. Task performance was analyzed in terms of the influence of the sample positions and response choices on previous trials. PI was predominantly attributable to the influence of the immediately previous trial but not preceding trials and was abolished by increasing the intertrial intervals from 5 to 15 s. Nicotine induced a decline in choice accuracy only on trials in which the previous response had been to the side opposite the current sample and correct response, suggesting an increased susceptibility to PI. Physostigmine induced a mild, relatively nonspecific decline in response accuracy. Clonidine induced delay-dependent impairments irrespective of responses on previous trials. None of these drugs enhanced choice accuracy at any dose tested.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: I. Basic parameters and drug effects.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: I. Basic parameters and drug effects.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: II. Effects in young and aged rats.

Whether the short-term memory impairments of aged rats in an operant delayed-matching task is attributable to increased susceptibility to proactive interference (PI) was tested. Groups of young and aged rats were trained on the task, and the previously reported delay-dependent deficit of aged rats was replicated. The aged rats showed a significantly greater decline in performance on previous-response-opposite trials compared with previous-response-same trials than did young rats, when tested over the same range of delay intervals, suggesting a higher sensitivity to PI. However, this effect was established against a higher overall baseline performance of the young animals on both types of trial. When the young and aged animals were equated for performance on previous-response-same trials (by increasing the range of delay intervals used for testing the young animals), the interaction effect was abolished. Thus, the delay-dependent deficits of aged rats are independent of their sensitivity to PI.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: II. Effects in young and aged rats.

Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: II. Effects in young and aged rats.

Retrieval plus scanning: does it occur?

In the two experiments reported here, we tested the retrieval-plus-scan model of delayed probe recognition by adding a second probe 2 sec after subjects had responded to the first probe. According to this model, the list items should still be in consciousness from the first probe at the time of the second probe. Consequently, on tests in which the first probe had been tested immediately, we expected to find the same pattern of performance on both first and second probes. On tests in which the first probe came after a filled delay, we expected the first-probe data to show the effects of retrieval and proactive interference. These effects should not be present on the second probe. The results of the first-probe data in both experiments were consistent with the retrieval-plus-scan model. The second-probe data did not fit the model, however. In the first experiment, the second probe on what had been delayed first-probe trials still produced intercept differences, indicating the presence of retrieval. In the second experiment, the effects of proactive interference were still present on the second probe. It is suggested that these results not only invalidate the retrieval-plus-scan model for delayed probe recognition but that they, along with other results, cast doubt on a scanning operation in immediate probe recognition.

Effects of Proactive Interference on Learning the Tennis Backhand Stroke

Proactive interference in motor skill acquisition occurs when a desired response is adversely affected by a previously learned skill. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of learning a forehand tennis groundstroke on the subsequent learning of a backhand. 96 subjects equally representing seventh and eighth grade boys and girls who had never played tennis were randomly assigned to two methods of instruction. This resulted in four groups of 24. The experimental groups received instruction and practice in a forehand skill. The experimental and control groups received backhand instruction and practice and both groups were tested on backhand. Results of a 2 × 2 multivariate analysis of variance indicated significant between-subjects main effects for sex and groups. There were significant within-subjects effects for days and group × days. These results suggest that learning the forehand independent of the backhand may interfere with learning the backhand.

Cued recall and release from proactive interference in Alzheimer's disease.

Two tasks were administered to 13 mildly to moderately impaired subjects who met clinical research criteria for AD, and 17 controls matched for age and education. In the first task, subjects were administered a cued recall test (Buschke, 1984). AD subjects were found to be variably impaired in their ability to perform the initial stimulus-processing procedure, which involved matching cues with referents. The subsequent cued recall test did not typically facilitate performance. In the second task, subjects were administered a release from proactive interference (PI) paradigm consisting of semantically related and unrelated word lists. AD subjects did not develop the expected proactive interference effect for the semantically related words or show a resulting "release from PI" on related word list recall compared to normal controls. Results are discussed in terms of the role of semantic processing in episodic memory tasks.

Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising

This article reports the results of three experiments that examine memory interference in an advertising context. In Experiment 1, consumer memory for a brand's advertising was inhibited as a result of subsequent exposure to ads for other products in that manufacturer's product line and ads for competing brands in the product class. Experiment 2 demonstrates analogous proactive interference effects. The results of Experiment 3 indicate that the presence of advertising for competitive brands changes the relationship between ad repetition and consumer memory. Repetition had a positive effect on recall only when there was little or no advertising for similar products.

Long-term proactive interference and novelty enhancement effects in monkey list memory.

Serial-probe-recognition (SPR) performance by 2 monkeys deteriorated over several months of training. Three hundred and twenty different items were presented without repetition within a session (trial unique) but were repeated between sessions. The cause of the deterioration was identified as proactive interference (PI) due to repetitive use of items from day to day. Introduction of novel stimuli across days improved performance from 63% to 82% correct (Experiment 1). Tests with only probe items and no list items (Experiment 2) revealed that the monkeys were using a familiar/novel response strategy in combination with a relational strategy (relating the probe item to the list items) to further improve their SPR performance. Intermixing familiar baseline trials and novel transfer trials within a session (Experiment 3) encouraged the subjects to use a relational strategy, and it improved performance on baseline trials as well as on transfer trials. Possible qualitative similarity between the relational strategy and the familiar/novel response strategy is discussed along with theoretical implications of these findings for experiments which have used small number of repeating stimuli within a session.

Long-term proactive interference and novelty enhancement effects in monkey list memory.

Serial-probe-recognition (SPR) performance by 2 monkeys deteriorated over several months of training. Three hundred and twenty different items were presented without repetition within a session (trial unique) but were repeated between sessions. The cause of the deterioration was identified as proactive interference (PI) due to repetitive use of items from day to day. Introduction of novel stimuli across days improved performance from 63% to 82% correct (Experiment 1). Tests with only probe items and no list items (Experiment 2) revealed that the monkeys were using a familiar/novel response strategy in combination with a relational strategy (relating the probe item to the list items) to further improve their SPR performance. Intermixing familiar baseline trials and novel transfer trials within a session (Experiment 3) encouraged the subjects to use a relational strategy, and it improved performance on baseline trials as well as on transfer trials. Possible qualitative similarity between the relational strategy and the familiar/novel response strategy is discussed along with theoretical implications of these findings for experiments which have used small number of repeating stimuli within a session.

Levels of Processing: Effects of Interference in Word Learning over Time

Although much research has addressed the “levels-of-processing” perspective, critics continue to attack this formulation. The lack of an operational definition is frequently cited as a shortcoming of the perspective. Utilizing resistance to interference as a perspective from which to investigate “deep” and shallow” processing, an experiment was conducted with two follow-up tests to ascertain the effects of proactive and retroactive interference in immediate, intermediate, and long-term recall.

Trace susceptibility theory.

A new theory for the dynamics of trace susceptibility to storage loss is developed and tested. According to the trace susceptibility theory, storage loss occurs when a critical feature for the support of recall is no longer bound to the other features of the trace. The storage loss occurs because of the retroactive influence of other traces, and the storage retention function is precisely characterized by an underlying Weibull distribution. Predictions of the trace susceptibility theory were tested against predictions of a multistore model. The results support the trace susceptibility theory. Finally, the relation between the trace susceptibility theory and proactive interference effects was developed.