Hi, I am Peter Gloviczki from Mayo Clinic, Editor in Chief of the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. We are pleased to introduce to you the latest issue of our journal with several excellent papers on venous and lymphatic diseases. The Editors’ Choice article in May is on the “First 10-month results of the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry,” a multicenter study written by Andrea Obi, Thomas Wakefield, and colleagues. The study is important, since this is the first report of early data gathered through the new VQI Varicose Vein Registry, cosponsored by the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery. A total of 1803 limbs from 1406 patients were studied. Most patients had C2 or C3 chronic venous disease, and 130 limbs had healed or active venous ulcers. The procedure was an outpatient procedure in 99.9%; most frequently, in 54.4%, it was performed in the office, and in 37%, it was performed in a hospital setting. Seventy-four percent of the procedures were done under tumescent anesthesia, and 18% were done under general anesthesia. The most frequent vein treated was the great saphenous vein in the thigh (in 55.8%), followed by the small saphenous vein of the calf (in 17%). Most patients (55.2%) underwent radiofrequency ablation, 33.9% had laser surgery, and open surgery was done in 8.7%. There were three hospital admissions and only a few mild complications. Follow-up was short (mean, 45 days), but both Venous Disease Severity Scores and patient-reported outcomes improved after interventions. Based on these early results, the authors concluded that modern-day varicose vein surgery is characterized by predominantly endovenous treatment of axial vein reflux, phlebectomy of clusters, and substantial early improvements in both physician- and patient-reported outcomes. As you probably know, in 2017, you can earn your CME credit by reading one of the papers in our venous journal, which you can also download this month free of charge. Our CME paper is entitled “Predictors of failure and complications of catheter-directed interventions for pulmonary embolism,” written by Dr Avgerinos and colleagues from the University of Pittsburgh. In this single-center retrospective study, 102 patients were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis, 14 for massive, and 88 for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-directed thrombolysis failure occurred in 14.7%; in 50% with massive PE, 9.1% with submassive PE, major bleeding occurred in 6.9%, in 21.4% with massive and in 4.5% with submassive PE. Mortality of patients with massive PE was high (21.4%). Failure of catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat PE was associated with massive PE, prior pulmonary disease, and contraindication to lysis. Bleeding was associated with age >70 years and with contraindications. Based on their results, the authors suggest avoiding catheter-directed thrombolysis for PE in patients with a contraindication to lysis, in patients with massive PE, in those with prior pulmonary disease, and in patients over 70 years of age. The next article is entitled “VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins” by Nick Morrison and colleagues. This is a prospective randomized multicenter trial that compared results of two interventions in 222 patients with symptomatic varicose veins and saphenous incompetence. In this multicenter prospective randomized study, early complications were mild and similar in both groups, days to complete occlusions were significantly less in the cyanoacrylate groups, while days to recanalization were not significantly different. At 1 year, physician- and patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. The authors concluded that cyanoacrylate-based chemical ablation had similar efficacy compared to radiofrequency ablation thermal ablation in terms of occlusion, durability, relief from symptoms, and quality of life at 1 year after the interventions. The final paper we would like to introduce you is entitled “Outcomes of iliac vein stents after pregnancy,” authored by Dr Dasari and colleagues from Pittsburgh and Bradford in Pennsylvania and Jackson, Mississippi. In this retrospective study, 12 of 310 women of reproductive age had at least one pregnancy after iliac vein stenting. One patient had asymptomatic stent compression after two deliveries, which was treated successfully with balloon angioplasty. At a mean follow-up of 61 months, all stents were patent without structural damage or thrombosis. The authors suggest that iliocaval stenting is not contraindicated in women of reproductive age, although close follow-up of this subset of patients, especially during and after pregnancy, is warranted. These were just a few of the many excellent articles from our May issue. To access these articles free this month, please download them on www.jvsvenous.org. Enjoy reading all JVS journals, let us know if you have a good idea how to improve our publications, and see you next time for the Highlights of the July issue of the JVS Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. https://www.jvsvenous.org/cms/asset/df554123-1e72-4bd5-8a21-77ede2a6bf30/mmc1.mp4Loading ... Download .mp4 (115.68 MB) Help with .mp4 files Video