Additional work of breathing and breathing patterns in spontaneously breathing patients during pressure support ventilation, automatic tube compensation and amplified spontaneous pattern breathing

Background and objective: Automatic tube compensation has been designed as a new ventilatory mode to compensate for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube. The study investigated the effects of automatic tube compensation compared with breathing through a T-piece or pressure support during a trial of spontaneous breathing used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation of the lungs. Methods: Twelve patients were studied who were ready for weaning after prolonged mechanical ventilation (10.2 ± 8.4 days) due to acute respiratory failure. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Thirty minutes of automatic tube compensation were compared with 30 min periods of 7 cmH2O pressure support and T-piece breathing. Breathing patterns and workload indices were measured at the end of each study period. Results: During T-piece breathing, the peak inspiratory flow rate (0.65 ± 0.20 L s−1) and minute ventilation (8.9 ± 2.7 L min−1) were lower than during either pressure support (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.81 ± 0.25 L s−1; minute ventilation 10.2 ± 2.3 L min−1, respectively) or automatic tube compensation (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.75 ± 0.26 L s−1; minute ventilation 10.8 ± 2.7 L min−1). The pressure-time product as well as patients' work of breathing were comparable during automatic tube compensation (pressure-time product 214.5 ± 104.6 cmH2O s−1 min−1, patient work of breathing 1.1 ± 0.4 J L−1) and T-piece breathing (pressure-time product 208.3 ± 121.6 cmH2O s−1 min−1, patient work of breathing 1.1 ± 0.4 J L−1), whereas pressure support resulted in a significant decrease in workload indices (pressure-time product 121.2 ± 64.1 cmH2O s−1 min−1, patient work of breathing 0.7 ± 0.4 J L−1). Conclusions: In weaning from mechanical lung ventilation, patients' work of breathing during spontaneous breathing trials is clearly reduced by the application of pressure support 7 cmH2O, whereas the workload during automatic tube compensation corresponded closely to the values during trials of breathing through a T-piece.

Automatic tube compensation has been designed as a new ventilatory mode to compensate for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube. The study investigated the effects of automatic tube compensation compared with breathing through a T-piece or pressure support during a trial of spontaneous breathing used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation of the lungs. Twelve patients were studied who were ready for weaning after prolonged mechanical ventilation (10.2 +/- 8.4 days) due to acute respiratory failure. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Thirty minutes of automatic tube compensation were compared with 30 min periods of 7 cmH2O pressure support and T-piece breathing. Breathing patterns and workload indices were measured at the end of each study period. During T-piece breathing, the peak inspiratory flow rate (0.65 +/- 0.20 L s(-1)) and minute ventilation (8.9 +/- 2.7L min(-1)) were lower than during either pressure support (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.81 +/- 0.25 L s(-1) minute ventilation 10.2 +/- 2.3 L min(-1), respectively) or automatic tube compensation (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.75 +/- 0.26L s(-1); minute ventilation 10.8 +/- 2.7 L min(-1)). The pressure-time product as well as patients' work of breathing were comparable during automatic tube compensation (pressure-time product 214.5 +/- 104.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)) and T-piece breathing (pressure-time product 208.3 +/- 121.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)), whereas pressure support resulted in a significant decrease in workload indices (pressure-time product 121.2 +/- 64.1 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 0.7 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)). In weaning from mechanical lung ventilation, patients' work of breathing during spontaneous breathing trials is clearly reduced by the application of pressure support 7 cmH2O, whereas the workload during automatic tube compensation corresponded closely to the values during trials of breathing through a T-piece.

To evaluate patients without prior pulmonary disease after cardiac surgery and to determine whether resistive unloading by automatic tube compensation, pressure support ventilation, and continuous positive airway pressure has different effects on oxygen consumption, breathing pattern, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. Prospective, randomized, controlled study. Tertiary care, postoperative intensive care unit. Twenty-one patients scheduled for open heart coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Each patient was ventilated with all three modes in random order. Patients were ventilated in three modes, each applied for 30 mins according to computer-generated randomization: pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O, continuous positive airway pressure, and automatic tube compensation. Oxygen consumption was calculated by means of indirect calorimetry. The hypnotic state of the patients was monitored by Bispectral Index. For hemodynamic measurements, a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. The main finding of our study was that oxygen consumption and breathing pattern (tidal volume and respiratory rate) did not differ significantly during automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure (oxygen consumption, 170 +/- 29 vs. 170 +/- 26 vs. 174 +/- 29 mL.min.m, respectively; tidal volume, 466 +/- 132 vs. 484 +/- 125 vs. 470 +/- 119 mL, respectively; respiratory rate, 16 +/- 4 vs. 15 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 4 breaths/min, respectively). Automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation had no clinical effects on gas exchange and hemodynamic variables compared with continuous positive airway pressure. None of the variables differed significantly during the three ventilatory settings. In postoperative tracheally intubated patients with normal ventilatory demand, automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O lead to identical oxygen consumption, breathing patterns, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. We, therefore, suggest that this group of patients does not need any additional positive pressure support from the ventilator to overcome the additional work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube during the weaning phase from mechanical ventilation.

Automatic tube compensation (ATC) is one of the newer weaning modes that seem promising to improve the weaning process. To evaluate the benefit of ATC in hastening and improving the weaning process. In a prospective randomized-controlled trial, all eligible patients of Assiut Chest Department who were mechanically ventilated were included during the period from April 2010 to March 2012. They were divided into two groups, 88 patients weaned by pressure support ventilation (PSV) and 78 patients weaned by ATC. The primary outcomes measure was the ability to maintain spontaneous breathing for more than 48 h after extubation and weaning duration. A total of 166 patients were included; the mean age was 58.6 ± 12.3 years; males represented 70%. The weaning duration was shorter in ATC than in PSV (19.7 vs. 29.9 h, respectively). Also, ATC had a higher trend toward successful extubation than PSV (88.5 vs. 78.4%). Patients who underwent weaning by ATC had a nonsignificant trend toward simple weaning. Moreover, hospital mortality was less in ATC (ATC 15.4% vs. PSV 22.7%). However, the difference did not reach significance in all primary and secondary outcomes. In respiratory ICU patients, the weaning process can be usefully performed by ATC (at least as effective as PSV) but without significant hastening of the weaning process. All primary and secondary outcomes were potentially improved (weaning duration, extubation outcome, predictive value of ATC-assisted ratio of respiratory rate and tidal volume, number of spontaneous breathing trials, weaning category, reintubation rate, complications, and hospital mortality). Egypt J Broncho 2015 9:253–260 © 2015 Egyptian Journal of Bronchology

To investigate whether automatic tube compensation (ATC) or conventional pressure support (PS) is suitable to compensate for the work of breathing imposed by the breathing circuit without altering the breathing pattern. Breathing pattern and work of breathing were measured in healthy volunteers. After a 20 min period of quiet breathing through a mouth piece (control) the volunteers were breathing through a 8.0 mm ID endotracheal tube (ETT) with four different settings: CPAP at 0 mbar, ATC, PS 5 mbar, PS 10 mbar. Each mode was applied for a 20 min period. At the end of each period data from 10 consecutive breaths were analyzed and averaged. Tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency (f), and minute ventilation (Ve) were determined from the stored gas flow tracings. Work of breathing was assessed as the pressure time product (PTP) calculated from the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) using a combined esophageal and gastric balloon catheter. During the control period the breathing pattern was as follows: VT = 882 +/- 277 ml, f = 13.7 +/- 5/min, Ve = 11.5 +/- 4.2 L/min. Maximal Pdi was 9.2 +/- 5.4 mbar and PTP was 11.3 +/- 7.1 mbar x s. Breathing CPAP through the ETT resulted in a slight increase in Pdi (10.8 +/- 5.4 mbar) and PTP (14.8 +/- 10.4 mbar x s) with an unchanged breathing pattern. However, for the same amount of unloading from respiratory workload ATC did not alter the breathing pattern, whereas PS 5 mbar and PS 10 mbar resulted in a clear increase in VT (1014 +/- 202 ml, 1336 +/- 305 ml, respectively). From the presented data in healthy volunteers it might be concluded that ATC and PS 5 mbar and 10 mbar are suitable modes for unloading the respiratory system from work imposed by the breathing circuit. ATC does not alter the breathing pattern in contrast to PS which results in an increased tidal volume. Therefore, the exact compensation of the work imposed by the ETT during ATC seems to be advantageous over ATC to assess the actual breathing pattern.

Automatic tube compensation (ATC) is a new option to support spontaneously breathing tracheally intubated patients. We have previously demonstrated an increased respiratory comfort compared to pressure support ventilation (PSV) in volunteers. Here we characterized the breathing pattern during ATC associated with respiratory comfort in comparison to PSV. Furthermore, we studied whether ATC can be substituted by a simple modification of PSV. We exposed 10 volunteers breathing through a 7.5 mm endotracheal tube via mouthpiece to PSV with 1) immediate and 2) delayed pressure rise and to 3) ATC. Immediate changes of the respiratory pattern after mode shifts were analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the volunteers were instructed to indicate changes in comfort after transitions between these modes as increased, unchanged, or decreased. Decreased comfort was associated with a substantial increase of tidal volume, minute ventilation, gas flow, and pressure. No differences in respiratory comfort were perceived between immediate and delayed pressure rise during PSV. PSV resulted in excessive tidal volumes and airflow, which was perceived as discomfort. This cannot be avoided by a delayed pressure rise but can be by the more comfortable ATC. ATC seems to adapt better to the ventilatory demand than PSV.

We designed a new ventilatory mode to support spontaneously breathing, intubated patients and to improve weaning from mechanical ventilation. This mode, named Automatic Tube Compensation (ATC), compensates for the flow-dependent pressure drop across the endotracheal tube (ETT) and controls tracheal pressure to a constant value. In this study, we compared ATC with conventional patient-triggered inspiratory pressure support (IPS). A prospective, interventional study. A medical intensive care unit (ICU) and an ICU for heart and thoracic surgery in a university hospital. We investigated two groups of intubated, spontaneously breathing patients: ten postoperative patients without lung injury, who had a normal minute ventilation (VE) of 7.6 +/- 1.7 l/min, and six critically ill patients who showed increased ventilatory demand (VE = 16.8 +/- 3.0 l/ min). We measured the breathing pattern [VE, tidal volume (VT), and respiratory rate (RR)] and additional work of breathing (WOBadd) due to ETT resistance and demand valve resistance. Measurements were performed under IPS of 5, 10, and 15 mbar and under ATC. The response of VT, RR, and WOBadd to different ventilatory modes was different in both patient groups, whereas VE remained unchanged. In postoperative patients, ATC, IPS of 10 mbar, and IPS of 15 mbar were sufficient to compensate for WOBadd. In contrast, WOBadd under IPS was greatly increased in patients with increased ventilatory demand, and only ATC was able to compensate for WOBadd. The breathing pattern response to IPS and ATC is different in patients with differing ventilatory demand. ATC, in contrast to IPS, is a suitable mode to compensate for WOBadd in patients with increased ventilatory demand. When WOBadd was avoided using ATC, the patients did not need additional pressure support.

Background Weaning covers the entire process of liberating the patient from mechanical support and from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) is a challenge. Its prolongation is related to increased mortality. Aim of the Work is to assess the value of ATC in predicting successful weaning and hastening the weaning process. This study will compare the benefits and effects of ATC versus PSV as weaning modes on spontaneous breathing trials and work of breathing. Patients and Mehtods This prospective non randomized was done on 50 adult patients admitted to the Critical Care Medicine Department in Ain shams University Hospital presenting with ARF and mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. They were divided into two groups: Group I “ATC group” Each underwent a 1-hour spontaneous breathing trial, using ATC mode and Group II “PSV group” PSV mode was used. Results In the present study we have found that the use of ATC during a spontaneous breathing trial was as effective as PSV in predicting the ability of patients to maintain spontaneous, unassisted breathing for more than 48 hours after removal of the endotracheal tube. In our study, there was no significant difference in the number of patients who tolerated the spontaneous breathing trial and then extubated between ATC and PSV groups (60 % vs. 56% respectively, p > 0.05). Both modes had comparable sensitivity, and +ve predictive value. Sensitivity was 80.0% versus 75.0% and the positive predictive value was 88.0%, versus 87.0% for ATC versus PSV respectively. The specificity was comparable (76.8% versus 80.0 % in ATC versus PSV respectively). ATC group had higher negative predictive than PSV group (82.0% versus 70.1%, respectively). In our study, criteria for successful extubation were met in 56.0%. In ATC group 60.0% met the criteria for successful extubation vs. 60% in PSV group. In the present study it was found that male patients were the most predominant in both groups (72.0% in ATC group and 68% in PSV group). This is expected as cigarette smoking is prevalent among males and is the single most important and most prevalent risk factor for the development of COPD. In our study, about one third of patients had COPD exacerbation as a cause for ARF. Conclusion In ICU population, ATC was safe, reliable, and can be reasonably used for weaning trials. ATC confers a potential benefit in weaning duration, weaning category, number of Ss, failure of first SBT extubation outcome, ICU length of stay, complication, and mortality rate. In addition, ATC improves the predictive value of RR/TV and IWI in predicting weaning success.

We measured the ventilatory pattern and additional work of breathing (WOBadd) at three different levels of inspiratory pressure support [IPS 5, 10, 15 mbar above positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)] and in a new ventilatory mode, automatic tube compensation (ATC), in nine operative patients without lung injury nine patients ventilated for several following acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI). In ATC, endotracheal tube resistance is compensated automatically by means of closed-loop control of the calculated tracheal pressure. Pressure support in this mode, i.e. airway pressure above PEEP, is equal to the actual flow-dependent pressure drop across the endotracheal tube (ETT). Airway pressure rises at the beginning of inspiration and falls towards the end. As the tube resistance of ETT seriously hinders expiration and can cause desynchronization between ventilator and patient, airway pressure is reduced below PEEP during expiration in the same way as it is increased during inspiration. The result is a near-constant tracheal pressure at PEEP both during inspiration and during expiration. This mode could be best termed as "electronic extubation". The most striking difference between the postoperative patients and the ARI patients was their minute ventilation (17.8 +/- 1.85 l/min in ARI patients vs 7.3 +/- 3.1 l/min in the postoperative patients). In the postoperative patients augmentation of IPS from 5 to 15 mbar induced a steady increase in tidal volume (VT) and a consecutive decrease in respiratory rate (rr) compared with ATC (VTATC,postop = 463 +/- 78 ml; rrATC,postop = 16 +/- 4 min-1; VTIPS5.postop = 505 +/- 79 ml; rrIPS5,postop = 15 +/- 4 min-1; VTIPS10,postop = 562 +/- 86 ml; rrIPS15,postop = 14 +/- 4 min-1; VTIPS15.postop = 660 +/- 151 ml; rrTPS15,postop = 12 +/- 4 min-1), whereas the augmentation of IPS of 5 and 10 mbar in the ARI patients could not compensate for the increase in rr and the decrease in VT, after switching from ATC to IPS (VTATC,ARI 724 +/- 308 ml, rrATC,ARI = 24 +/- 6 min-1; VTIPS5,ARI = 649 +/- 315 ml; rrIPS5,ARI = 27 +/- 8 min-1; VTIPS10,ARI = 653 +/- 353 ml; rrIPS10,ARI = 25 +/- 8 min-1: Even IPS 15 was not able to reestablish VT at the values observed during ATC (VTIPS15,ARI = 680 +/- 312 ml). During ATC WOBadd was small in both postoperative and ARI patients (WOBadd,ATC,postop = 93 +/- 36 mJ/l, WOBadd,ATC,ARI = 116 +/- 72 mJ/l). In the postoperative patients, an inspiratory pressure support of 5 mbar was not sufficient to compensate WOBadd compared with ATC. However, IPS 10 and 15 mbar were able to compensate for WOBadd (WOBadd,ATC5.postop WOBadd,IPS5,postop = 189 +/- 77 mJ/l; WOBadd,IPS10,postop = 55 +/- 30 mJ/l; WOBadd,IPS15,postop = 21 +/- 11 mJ/l). In the ARI patients an IPS 5, 10 or 15 mbar was not sufficient to compensate for WOBadd (WOBadd,IPS 5,ARI = 1126 +/- 262 mJ/l; WOBadd,IPS 10,ARI 863 +/- 253 mJ/l; WOBadd,IPS15,ARI 763 +/- 298 mJ/l). Under ATC, WOBadd was only 15% of WOBadd under IPS of 15 mbar. All but two patients were successfully extubated after the investigation. These two patients were not extubated because they were dependent on an FIO2 > 0.5. Our results strongly indicate that ventilatory dependence in ARI patients may be caused by the ETT rather than by mechanical dysfunction of the lung. ATC is a very helpful mode to use in distinguishing between ventilatory failure caused by ETT and real ventilatory dependence.

Over the last decade, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia and also in pediatric intensive care. However, the smaller inner diameter of cuffed endotracheal tubes and, implicitly, the increased endotracheal tube resistance is still a matter of debate. This invitro study investigated work of breathing and inspiratory airway pressures in cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes and the impact of pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation. In 5 simulated neonatal and pediatric lung models, the Active Servo Lung 5000 and an intensive care ventilator were used to quantify the differences in work of breathing under spontaneous breathing (with and without pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation) between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Additionally, differences in inspiratory airway pressures, measured either proximal or distal of the endotracheal tube, between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes under mechanical ventilation were investigated. Work of breathing was overall 10.27% [95% confidence interval 9.01-11.94] higher with cuffed than with uncuffed endotracheal tubes and was dramatically reduced by 34.19% [95% confidence interval 31.61-35.25] with the application of pressure support. Automatic tube compensation almost diminished work of breathing differences between the 2 endotracheal tube types in nearly all pediatric lung models. Peak inspiratory and mean airway pressures measured at the proximal endotracheal tube end revealed significantly higher values in cuffed than in uncuffed endotracheal tubes. However, these differences measured at the distal end of the endotracheal tube became minimal. This invitro study confirmed significant differences in work of breathing and inspiratory pressures between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Work of breathing, however, is almost neutralized by pressure support ventilation with automatic tube compensation and distal inspiratory airway pressures that, from a clinical perspective, are not significantly increased.

BackgroundDuring spontaneous breathing trial, low-pressure support is thought to compensate for endotracheal tube resistance, but it actually should provide overassistance. Automatic tube compensation is an option available in the ventilator to compensate for flow-resistance of endotracheal tube. Its effects on patient effort have been poorly investigated. We aimed to compare the effects of low-pressure support and automatic tube compensation during spontaneous breathing trial on breathing power and lung ventilation distribution.ResultsWe performed a randomized crossover study in 20 patients ready to wean. Each patient received both methods for 30 min separated by baseline ventilation: pressure support 0 cmH2O and automatic tube compensation 100% in one period and pressure support 7 cmH2O without automatic tube compensation in the other period, a 4 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure being applied in each. Same ventilator brand (Evita XL, Draeger, Germany) was used. Breathing power was assessed from Campbell diagram with esophageal pressure, airway pressure, flow and volume recorded by a data logger. Lung ventilation distribution was assessed by using electrical impedance tomography (Pulmovista, Draeger, Germany). During the last 2 min of low-pressure support and automatic compensation period breathing power and lung ventilation distribution were measured on each breath. Breathing power generated by the patient’s respiratory muscles was 7.2 (4.4–9.6) and 9.7 (5.7–21.9) J/min in low-pressure support and automatic tube compensation periods, respectively (P = 0.011). Lung ventilation distribution was not different between the two methods.ConclusionsWe found that ATC was associated with higher breathing power than low PS during SBT without altering the distribution of lung ventilation.

Background. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) has been developed to overcome the imposed work of breathing due to artificial airways during spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Objectives. This study aimed to assess extubation outcome after an SBT (spontaneous breathing trial) with ATC compared with pressure support ventilation (PSV) and to determine the risk factors for extubation failure. Methods. Patients ready for extubation were randomly assigned to two-hour spontaneous breathing trial with either ATC or pressure support ventilation. Results. In the ATC group (n = 17), 11 (65%) patients passed the SBT with subsequent extubation failure (9%). While in PSV group (n = 19), 10 (53%) patients passed the SBT with subsequent extubation failure (10%). This represented a positive predictive value for ATC of 91% and PSV of 90% (P = 0.52). Five (83%) of the patients who failed the SBT in ATC group were reintubated. This represented a higher negative predictive value for ATC of 83% than for PSV which was 56%. None of the assessed risk factors were independently associated with extubation failure including failed trial. Conclusion. ATC was equivalent to PSV in predicting patients with successful extubation. A trial failure in ATC group is associated with but does not definitely predict extubation failure.

Automatic tube compensation (ATC) is a new option to compensate for the pressure drop across the endotracheal or tracheostomy tube (ETT), especially during ventilator-assisted spontaneous breathing. While several benefits of this mode have so far been documented, ATC has not yet been used to predict whether the ETT could be safely removed at the end of weaning, from mechanical ventilation. We undertook a systematic trial using a randomized block design. During a 2-year period, all eligible patients of a medical intensive care unit were treated with ATC, conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV, 5 cmH2O), or T-tube for 2-h. Tolerance of the breathing trial served as a basis for the decision to remove the endotracheal tube. Extubation failure was considered if reintubation was necessary or if the patient required non-invasive ventilatory assistance (both within 48 h). After the inclusion of 90 patients (30 per group) we did not observe significant differences between the modes. Twelve patients failed the initial weaning trial. However, half of the patients who appeared to fail the spontaneous breathing trial on the T-tube, PSV, or both, were successfully extubated after a succeeding trial with ATC. Extubation was thus withheld from four and three of these patients while breathing with PSV or the T-tube, respectively, but to any patient breathing with ATC. It seems that ATC can be used as an alternative mode during the final phase of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, this study may promote a larger multicenter trial on weaning with ATC compared with standard modes.

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) modes increase mean airway pressure and functional residual capacity by increasing inspiratory time, and allow spontaneous breathing without limitation during high and low airway pressure periods. Many studies confirmed that these two modes can effectively improve ventilation/perfusion and oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, APRV/BIPAP modes are not widely used clinically. Several questions have been raised, i.e., why frequent asynchrony occurs between patients and ventilator? Whether augmented spontaneous breathing (ASB) should be used during spontaneous breathing or not? Which kind of ASB is the most effective to decrease the patient’s work of breathing? How do the changes of inspiration/expiration ratio affect the patient-ventilator synchrony and the work of breathing? The APRV/BIPAP mode with inspiratory pressure high/expiratory pressure low settings were 20/8 cmH2O in PB840, G5 and Servo-i. Three different ASB: non, pressure support 16 cmH2O and 100% automatic tube compensation (ATC), combined with five different inspiration/expiration time: 1:5, 2:4, 3:3, 4:2 and 5:1 to formulate 15 test conditions were set on each ventilator. The ASL5000 was used to simulate the lungs of ARDS patients. The computer was connected to the ASL 5000 to collect and analyzed data gained after 10 minutes run of each test conditions according to the settings mentioned above. The purpose of the study was to find the most suitable settings for the three different ventilators, PB840, G5 and Servo-i, with APRV/BIPAP mode and which ventilator has good performance. The results showed that in G5 and Servo-i APRV/BIPAP modes with different ASB, the best patient-ventilator interaction was with pressure support, represented as smallest values of inspiratory time delay (TI delay) and inspiratory trigger pressure (Ptrig). Work of breathing was the least with pressure support, represented as trigger work (WOBtrig) and pressure time product (PTP). In the contrast, the worst and highest of each respectively was with non. However in PB840, we found the highest Ptrig and largest PTP with ATC but the lowest with pressure support. In different inspiration/expiration settings, we found increased WOBtrig, PTP, Ptrig and TI delay with increased inspiration time, possibly due to the spontaneous breathing occurred at high pressure period. The respiratory waveform analysis of 3 ventilators demonstrated that there is no expiratory asynchrony in PB840, probably due to it could automatically shorten its inspiration/expiration time to cooperate the patients breathing cycle. Therefore, PB840 has the best interaction with the simulated lung. Waveform of Servo-i showed irregularity, frequent asynchrony and it could not automatically adjust its inspiration/expiration time to cooperate with the simulated lung. Servo-i has the worst interaction with the simulated lung. In conclusion, expiratory asynchrony occurred in Servo-i and G5. PB840 has longer synchronized interval and it is able to adjust inspiration/expiration time, resulting in better interaction. In the same ventilator we found that without ASB and increased inspiration time would cause poorer patient-ventilator interaction, and increased trigger work. Using pressure support as ASB provides the best interaction and cause the least trigger work.

Differences in end-tidal carbon dioxide and breathing patterns in ventilator-dependent patients using pressure support ventilation